logo
Bluff Gorse Stoush: Ex-Councillor Hasn't Paid Council Bill

Bluff Gorse Stoush: Ex-Councillor Hasn't Paid Council Bill

Scoop13-05-2025

Article – Matthew Rosenberg – Local Democracy Reporter
Karen Arnold has been embroiled in a battle with the organisation since 2022 when her section at Theodore St, Bluff, began failing inspections due to overgrowth.
A former Invercargill councillor says she has not cleared her bill with the council after they removed gorse from her land more than two years ago.
Karen Arnold has been embroiled in a battle with the organisation since 2022 when her section at Theodore St, Bluff, began failing inspections due to overgrowth.
A report prepared for a March hearing showed it had drawn three 'request for service' complaints and failed eight of 10 inspections.
But Arnold disputes the issue, saying compliance notices from council were unlawful and breached the New Zealand Bill of Rights.
Arnold said she won't pay her share of a $5320 bill for council contractors clearing the section following an October 2022 bylaw notice, despite receiving monthly reminders.
'They keep sending it out, I've ignored it.'
Invercargill City Council group manager consenting and environment Jonathan Shaw said a decision was made to split the cost 50/50 with Arnold when she met with council in January 2024.
The section was also the subject of a council hearing in March where Arnold unsuccessfully appealed a bylaw notice from December 2024.
Although the panel accepted it was unhelpful that gorse existed on co-owned council land at the boundary of the property, removal still rested with the owner.
'They say that it's got to be cleared again, and I'm not going to do it and so it's going to be the same thing,' Arnold said.
'They'll go and clear it and then they'll charge me.'
The section backs onto Bluff Hill/Motupōhue, which is co-owned by the council and Department of Conservation.
Arnold claims the council conceded it had failed on a range of issues at a January 2024 meeting where the council's chief executive and lawyer were present.
That included that two compliance notices in 2022 and one from 2023 were unlawful and breached the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, that the council did not manage its gorse under the regional pest management plan until prompted, and that they had a conflict of interest in dealing with her concerns.
In response to questions, Shaw said the council did not accept that gorse wasn't being managed on its land at Bluff Hill prior to Arnold's complaint.
The cancellation of a December 2023 notice for procedural reasons did not mean the compliance problems raised in the original notice were invalid, Shaw said.
Two councillors on the hearing panel declared conflicts of interest but felt it did not warrant them stepping aside, he added.
'The council staff involved in the decision considered the issues raised by Ms Arnold on each occasion in a fair and balanced manner.
'This included preparing for and attending the hearing, which Arnold chose to leave partway through.'
Arnold was elected to council in 2013 and 2016, but stood down near the end of her second term.
She was declared bankrupt in 2018 after losing a defamation suit against Stuff and then-mayor Sir Tim Shadbolt, RNZ reported.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Farmers Risk Being Cut Off As Bridge Funding Dries Up
Farmers Risk Being Cut Off As Bridge Funding Dries Up

Scoop

time3 hours ago

  • Scoop

Farmers Risk Being Cut Off As Bridge Funding Dries Up

Article – David Hill – Local Democracy Reporter Waka Kotahi has announced it will not extend a 30 June sunset clause or offer additional funding for a replacement for a quake damaged bridge at the Waiau Toa Clarence River. Clarence Valley farmers have been left high and dry following a decision not to extend a funding deadline for replacing a quake-damaged bridge north of Kaikōura. Waka Kotahi – the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) – has informed the Kaikōura District Council it will not extend the 30 June sunset clause or offering additional funding for a replacement for the Glen Alton Bridge on Waiau Toa Clarence River, which was destroyed in the 7.8 magnitude earthquake in 2016. Property owners now face an uncertain future, without year-round, all weather access to the valley. Steve and Shirley Millard have been farming in the valley for 13 years, with Mrs Millard commuting to work in Kaikōura. 'It should have been done way before now,' Steve said. 'They said they are looking at other options, but I can't see many.' The Clarence Valley is home to several properties, including forestry blocks, large hill country properties and Department of Conservation land. For now access in and out is via Waipapa Road, Wharekiri Stream and a paper road through several properties. But the Wharekiri Stream is prone to flooding in heavy rain events and can be impassable for up to two weeks. Access is by four-wheel-drive only. Kaikōura District Council chief executive Will Doughty said NZTA's decision is a major setback and left the council with few options. 'The project has had a number of complex issues and stakeholder challenges that, despite best efforts, council has not been able to fully overcome.' The NZTA board approved emergency works funding of $12.6 million from the National Land Transport Programme in 2019 to replace bridge – a 95 percent subsidy, but the project has been beset by challenges. The council initially applied to Environment Canterbury (ECan) for a resource consent to build a $13.5m bridge, 500 metres upstream from the previous bridge. But this was opposed by Te Rūnanga o Kaikōura on cultural grounds. Last year, the council asked its contractor, Contract Structures Ltd, to provide a cost estimate for building a bridge at the original site. Going to the original site will require the council to acquire land for an access road to the new bridge, a process expected to take up to 18 month. The council will leave the local share funding of around $500,000 in the 2025/26 annual plan budget while the next steps are considered, Doughty said. NZTA regional manager central and lower South Island Peter Brown said the agency advised the council in December its application for an extension would likely be declined unless it could provide evidence by 28 February the challenges it faced could be overcome. 'Despite some progress being made on key issues, there remained significant ongoing risks and a lack of a clear path forward.' The NZTA board met last month and declined an extension and a funding increase to $16.5m. 'We understand there will be disappointment over this decision for Clarence Valley residents,' Brown said. 'The prolonged delays and unresolved issues make continued investment in this project untenable.' Brown said NZTA will continue to work with the council to explore what options are available.

Predator Free 2050 committed to 'professional' transition as it hands over years of work to DOC
Predator Free 2050 committed to 'professional' transition as it hands over years of work to DOC

RNZ News

time2 days ago

  • RNZ News

Predator Free 2050 committed to 'professional' transition as it hands over years of work to DOC

A stoat caught on a monitoring camera in Miramar Peninsula. Photo: Supplied / Predator Free Wellington Predator Free 2050 says it's committed to a "professional and smooth transition", as it hands over its responsibilities to the Department of Conservation following news of its disestablishment. A Crown-owned company, Predator Free 2050 Limited was set up in 2016 after the government set the ambitious goal of removing mustelids, rats and possums nationwide by the year 2050. For nearly a decade it co-funded large-scale predator elimination projects and supported science to achieve this goal by providing funding, resources and expertise to predator removal projects around New Zealand. But its disestablishment was announced on Budget Day last month, and science director Dan Tompkins said the company would be handing over its 18 active contracts by mid-August. "We'll take our time, we want to make sure that nothing is lost, we're ensuring all our learnings and understanding and insights into the way we have been running to achieve the advances that we've made to date [are passed on]." It was yet to be decided whether jobs at Predator Free 2050 Limited would go, or be amalgamated into DOC. He said the company's disestablishment had "not really" come as a surprise. "We've been working for seven to eight years now, and what we've been doing is we've been building a national mission. "I think our work, alongside that of DOC and the PFNZ Trust, has been really successful. We've shown it can be done, we've developed lots of new tools available for the job, we've got some good research coming along in the background for future tools to make it even more achievable." Did Tompkins have faith that the predator-free-by-2050 goal was achievable? "Completely," he said. "Already I think it's totally achievable - it's just whether we can afford it ." Chief executive Rob Forlong said many projects had proven eradication was achievable, and lately it had been focussing on how to make them cheaper, through new tools and solutions that could be scaled up. "We're committed to delivering a professional and smooth transition of contractual responsibilities to the Department of Conservation. This includes sharing proven strategies, roadmaps and insights." Predator Free 2050 chief executive Rob Forlong. Photo: Susan Botting / LDR DOC's deputy director-general for public affairs, Sia Aston, said the agency was committed to honouring all existing contracts. It already had a large existing programme of predator-free work and would "absorb the cost of managing the company's projects and contracts within its baseline". The remaining Crown funds of $2.3 million that PF2050 Ltd was allocated would be transferred to DOC and continue to be invested in predator free projects and contracts to avoid disruption. DOC is currently consulting with the public on its predator free strategy, with submissions closing on 30 June. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Planned Rakiura 1080 drop slammed
Planned Rakiura 1080 drop slammed

Otago Daily Times

time3 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Planned Rakiura 1080 drop slammed

The planned 1080 poison drop over Stewart Island is an "ecological disaster that's waiting to happen", a tour operator says. Last year, the Department of Conservation (Doc) announced plans to drop 1080 cereal bait to reduce the feral cat population endangering the southern New Zealand dotterel. The bird population has declined in the past four years, despite trapping and other efforts to reduce cat numbers. Now there are about 105 birds left. The bait will kill rats and possums which the cats will feed on. The first phase is a trial to gain understanding for Predator Free Rakiura, and will take place in 7000ha area inside the 43,000ha area where the second phase of the bait drop will happen. About 108 tonnes of cereal bait containing 162kg of 1080 will be dropped. The bait pellets contain cereal, cinnamon or orange lure, sugar, green dye and small amounts of 1080 (0.15% per pellet). It will be spread at a rate equivalent to about four to eight pellets in a tennis-court-sized area. Ruggedy Range Wilderness Experience owner Furnah Ahmad has been a tour operator on Stewart Island for the past 25 years. Ms Ahmad said 1080 was "harmful to everything that breathes air", and would adversely affect the island. "It is harmful to our wildlife and environment, it's harmful to human beings and it will have an impact on the livelihood and wellbeing of people in our community." New Zealand was known for its clean green image and attracted many visitors who did not want to walk "through a national park full of dead carcasses", unable to drink the groundwater and seeing animals sick or dying because of "horrendous poison", she said. Paterson Inlet was part marine reserve, a food gathering source and contained salmon and mussel farms that could be poisoned with 1080 that flowed down the waterways to it, Ms Ahmad said. The manufacturers of the poison recommended that all animals poisoned with 1080 should be buried, but this would not happen on the island. Doc director national programmes Ben Reddiex said Stewart Island was the last breeding site for pukunui, and the bird could be lost without urgent intervention. Aerial 1080 was the most effective tool to control predators including rats, possums and feral cats over large areas and in rugged terrain, Mr Reddiex said. Research showed biodegradable 1080 was safe and the Environmental Protection Agency approved the use of 1080. In 2011, the independent Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment conducted a review of the use of 1080 and recommended it should be used more. Studies showed that 1080 has no detectable impact on invertebrate populations and did not affect native fish, including eels/tuna, or introduced trout, and freshwater crayfish/kōura. The poison broke down more slowly in dry and cold environments, but conditions on Stewart Island were like Fiordland where aerial 1080 was successfully used, he said. Doc staff would monitor the results of the bait drop to determine when no residue remained in carcasses and it was safe to resume activities in the area. Rakiura National Park, including bookable hunting blocks, will remain open during the operation. Doc would ensure people were well-informed about how to keep safe. In March, a trial was held to test bait laced with deer repellent, and bait with deer repellent will be used within bookable hunting blocks only. New Zealand Deerstalkers Association president Callum Sheridan said the group opposed the aerial dropping of 1080 as it indiscriminately killed not just game animals and impacted the environment. Even though 1080 was said to break down fast, recently he had seen undissolved pellets in snow grass near Murchison that had been dropped more than three months ago. The dosage in the pellets was not enough to kill a deer immediately. "It takes days for them to die and they are basically exploding from the inside out — it's quite a horrible way to go." He would not be keen to eat meat shot in an area where 1080 had been dropped, he said. He estimated the Stewart Island bait drop would cost about $80 million. The money might be better spent employing people to monitor bait stations and trap pests, he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store