Planned Rakiura 1080 drop slammed
Last year, the Department of Conservation (Doc) announced plans to drop 1080 cereal bait to reduce the feral cat population endangering the southern New Zealand dotterel. The bird population has declined in the past four years, despite trapping and other efforts to reduce cat numbers.
Now there are about 105 birds left.
The bait will kill rats and possums which the cats will feed on. The first phase is a trial to gain understanding for Predator Free Rakiura, and will take place in 7000ha area inside the 43,000ha area where the second phase of the bait drop will happen.
About 108 tonnes of cereal bait containing 162kg of 1080 will be dropped.
The bait pellets contain cereal, cinnamon or orange lure, sugar, green dye and small amounts of 1080 (0.15% per pellet). It will be spread at a rate equivalent to about four to eight pellets in a tennis-court-sized area.
Ruggedy Range Wilderness Experience owner Furnah Ahmad has been a tour operator on Stewart Island for the past 25 years.
Ms Ahmad said 1080 was "harmful to everything that breathes air", and would adversely affect the island.
"It is harmful to our wildlife and environment, it's harmful to human beings and it will have an impact on the livelihood and wellbeing of people in our community."
New Zealand was known for its clean green image and attracted many visitors who did not want to walk "through a national park full of dead carcasses", unable to drink the groundwater and seeing animals sick or dying because of "horrendous poison", she said.
Paterson Inlet was part marine reserve, a food gathering source and contained salmon and mussel farms that could be poisoned with 1080 that flowed down the waterways to it, Ms Ahmad said.
The manufacturers of the poison recommended that all animals poisoned with 1080 should be buried, but this would not happen on the island.
Doc director national programmes Ben Reddiex said Stewart Island was the last breeding site for pukunui, and the bird could be lost without urgent intervention.
Aerial 1080 was the most effective tool to control predators including rats, possums and feral cats over large areas and in rugged terrain, Mr Reddiex said.
Research showed biodegradable 1080 was safe and the Environmental Protection Agency approved the use of 1080.
In 2011, the independent Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment conducted a review of the use of 1080 and recommended it should be used more.
Studies showed that 1080 has no detectable impact on invertebrate populations and did not affect native fish, including eels/tuna, or introduced trout, and freshwater crayfish/kōura.
The poison broke down more slowly in dry and cold environments, but conditions on Stewart Island were like Fiordland where aerial 1080 was successfully used, he said.
Doc staff would monitor the results of the bait drop to determine when no residue remained in carcasses and it was safe to resume activities in the area.
Rakiura National Park, including bookable hunting blocks, will remain open during the operation. Doc would ensure people were well-informed about how to keep safe.
In March, a trial was held to test bait laced with deer repellent, and bait with deer repellent will be used within bookable hunting blocks only.
New Zealand Deerstalkers Association president Callum Sheridan said the group opposed the aerial dropping of 1080 as it indiscriminately killed not just game animals and impacted the environment.
Even though 1080 was said to break down fast, recently he had seen undissolved pellets in snow grass near Murchison that had been dropped more than three months ago.
The dosage in the pellets was not enough to kill a deer immediately.
"It takes days for them to die and they are basically exploding from the inside out — it's quite a horrible way to go."
He would not be keen to eat meat shot in an area where 1080 had been dropped, he said.
He estimated the Stewart Island bait drop would cost about $80 million.
The money might be better spent employing people to monitor bait stations and trap pests, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
15 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Letters to Editor: inquiry, 1080, airport
Today's letters to the Editor include discussion about the inquiry into the government response to the Covid-19 pandemic, 1080 drops by DOC, and an airport in Central Otago. It is reported that former ministers have refused to attend a Royal Commission of Inquiry hearing. (ODT 14.8.25) That is probably well advised, as we have seen the venom expressed by a few members of our society who sometimes have anonymously created a web of hatred and misleading theory over the actions of the Labour government trying to protect us from the effects of this new and unknown pandemic. Yes there were mistakes made, and some suffered the emotional loss of not being with their dearest as they died. Some found the mandates offensive, and some were concerned about loss of personal freedom. The hearing will give some more insight into the causes and effects of a worldwide pandemic such as this. The steps taken were, I believe, in good faith and given that this pandemic was a new and unknown viral variation, the government under advice, took the only steps it could. It is worthwhile reading the article "Analysing past pandemics to inform future responses" (ODT 13.8.25). This outlined just how quickly the Spanish Flu of 1918 spread; and remember, no commercial airlines. It was estimated that worldwide 50 million people died. New Zealand lost 9000 in six weeks. That is equivalent to 40,000 today. Preparedness and survival during the next pandemic will depend on readiness and mandates such as vaccines and movement control, so we should be grateful for the work that our epidemiologists are doing. You may be alive and angry, but please consider those who survived because of strong mitigation by our leaders who tried to do the right thing. David Blair Port Chalmers [Abridged — length. Editor.] Take care I have observed that for some time there has been a crashed car down the bank on one of the corners of Three Mile Hill. There is a temporary speed limit of 30kmh on a section of the corners which has now become semi-permanent, with the recommended speed signs being replaced by circular 30 signs. The question arises as to why the crashed car has not been removed? On the subject of the temporary speed restriction, I have endeavoured to reduce my normal speed and stick to the limit. This has inevitably caused some impatient motorists to tailgate and on one occasion, the person passed me on a blind corner with another car coming the other way. My message is to drive with care over Three Mile Hill, especially in winter. John Batt Wakari Surcharge woes This government is not spending wisely, as they claim. Telling thousands of retailers that they are not allowed to add a surcharge for credit and contactless etc payments will result in employing lots of people to administer/prosecute those that don't comply which is wasteful. By telling banks that they can't charge retailers extra for that service when there are very few of them to check up on is much better. Banks make huge profits: they can carry that extra cost. Retailers that are struggling won't have to increase their costs to cover what the banks are charging for that service, thus not increasing the pressure on the cost of living. What is the government afraid of? Robert Morey Dunedin Centenary North Otago Rural Women New Zealand will be celebrating the centenary of the founding of the organisation with a luncheon at the Brydone Hotel on August 29. Guest speaker will be ODT business and rural editor Sally Rae. Registration of interest from current and former members: Judy Kingan jaydeekgn@ The reason why use of 'super toxin' opposed RE the ODT article "Doc claims predators bigger threat than 1080" (9.8.25). Having monitored several 1080 poison drops, one in particular defies all the robust science I have read and what I have witnessed. In 2002 Ecological Networks carried out, at the request of Doc, a study on the effects of 1080 poison on tomtits in the Waianakarua Scenic Reserve. Three days after the drop I and a few others had a casual walk through the poisoned area and picked up 16 dead tomtits along with dead brown creeper, a grey warbler and blackbirds. More decomposed bird carcasses were found in later months. The only dead predators found were half a dozen possums: no rats, cats, mice, ferrets, stoats, hedgehogs or weasels but plenty of dead deer and birds. All tomtits were offered to the Doc for autopsy: they declined saying 'we only have funding for one autopsy a year'. Sometime later I was invited along with other interested parties to a Maf biosecurity meeting in Christchurch to discuss a pest management strategy in Christchurch at which Doc didn't turn up. I took to the meeting a map of all the grid-referenced dead birds found in the Waianakarua Scenic Reserve to show a senior Landcare scientist in attendance and asked him to extrapolate the total bird deaths in the 4000ha reserve. He said he had heard of that operation; he came up with a figure that astounded me — 10,000. Is it any wonder I and many others continually oppose the use of this poison known as a super toxin? Lewis Hore Oamaru Plot loss It seems Dunedin City Council has more interest in creating playgrounds in George St than in creating essential parking or drop-off areas for hospital staff. Have we not lost the plot here? Graham Kitchin Oamaru Common sense hoped for in airport debate There has been quite a lot of plotting to build a new international airport somewhere in Central Otago. Christchurch City Holdings seem hell-bent on a new airport at Tarras. But when you land there you would require a bus to Queenstown which would take 90 minutes or more. Not acceptable. It is my contention that these plans are seriously flawed. Firstly the government, I'm sure, would possibly like fewer airports in the South Island not more. I doubt if it would support this pie-in-the-sky plan. Secondly it would seem to me to be far more practical to expand the Dunedin airport, particularly internationally, and then arrange domestic flights to Wanaka, Queenstown or anywhere. If you fly into San Francisco and want to go inland this is achieved with a domestic service rather than building a new international airport inland. I hope common sense prevails. Andrew Burton Lowburn Letters changes The Otago Daily Times welcomes letters. They are a vital part of the newspaper, and an important forum for readers to express their views. To make it easier for us to receive your letters we have created a new email address — letters@ — for you to write to us at. The old system, whereby letters were sent to an "editor" address, meant that letters were being missed due to the sheer volume of emails received. Letters will receive an automatic reply to say that the ODT has received your submission and that it is under consideration. Letters longer than 250 words may require abridgement; in some cases they will be rejected because they are too long. Our letters rules are at the bottom of the page. Rest assured, all letters sent to the ODT are read. However, we will seldom enter into discussion about selection or editing. We look forward to receiving your letters at letters@ — Editor
Otago Daily Times
4 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Controversial West Coast mine has fast track-bid declined
By Kate Green of RNZ Te Kuha Mine on the West Coast has had its application for fast-track approval declined, after failing to meet seven of the application criteria. The project has raised concerns over its impact on the environment and had already been rejected multiple times by the courts. Now, a letter sent to the company behind the plan, Stevenson Mining, in March but only recently published, showed the application never got as far as the minister for final approval, with the Ministry for the Environment finding it did not comply with seven requirements in the Act. Notably, it lacked an explanation of why the fast-track approvals process would enable it to be processed in a more timely and cost-effective way than under normal processes. It did not consult with local authorities like Buller District Council, the Ministry for the Environment, Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment and the Department of Conservation. It did not address other approvals which would be needed for the project to go ahead, like access to land owned or administered by other parties, including KiwiRail, which runs the Stillwater to Ngākawau line near the proposed mine site. Stevenson Mining has been approached for comment. Te Kuha Coal Project would have created an opencut mine, with a footprint of 144 hectares, near Westport. It would have extracted some 4 million tonnes of coking coal - the kind used for making steel - over 16 years. It would have necessitated a land swap with the Department of Conservation, as it overlapped with stewardship land. The project had already been rejected by the Supreme Court in 2020 and the Environment Court in 2023. Adam Currie, campaigner for 350 Aotearoa, said it was welcome news. "MfE declining it for now is a win for the environment," he said. "It's the process in this instance working as it's supposed to." He said it showed the lack of regard for detail and process which mining companies often demonstrated. "It's pretty incredible that companies are making these massive applications that have ginormous impacts on all these things, and they're just not thinking through these basic things." But Patrick Phelps, manager of Minerals West Coast, said it was a new piece of legislation, and companies were "getting to grips with how it actually works". "It's a novel process - any applicant, they don't fully know what the expectations are. They'll get the best advice, hydrology experts, and they'll put forward the best information that they can. "While I'm disappointed that they haven't got over the line, I would simply say that that should be an indication to people that the fast-track process is not just a rubber stamp." A spokesperson from the Ministry for the Environment said it generally did not comment on individual fast-track referral applications, but explained that it checked referral applications against the requirements of the Acts. "Incomplete or non-compliant applications are returned to applicants, along with reasons for them being returned." Applications which met the requirements would then be sent on to the Infrastructure Minister (currently Chris Bishop), who gathered advice and reports on the project's impact and, if they saw fit, would refer it on to the final step, the expert panel. The ministry said applicants were allowed to reapply if their initial application was found to be incomplete, but it would be treated as a new application, with a fresh application fee - which, according to the MfE website, would cost $12,000.
Scoop
04-08-2025
- Scoop
FMC Responds To The Government's Proposed Overhaul Of Conservation Law And Access Charging
The purpose of our public conservation land is conservation 'The purpose of the conservation estate and the Department of Conservation is in its name: Conservation,' says FMC President Megan Dimozantos, responding to the government's proposed changes to conservation law, including the introduction of access charges. 'We don't yet know enough detail behind these announcements to signal support or otherwise. We have significant concerns about the rhetoric of uninhibited economic growth on the conservation land— that could undermine conservation values, restrict public access, and see parts of our conservation estate up for land disposals.' On Saturday, the government announced conservation reform proposals, building on a public consultation held by DOC earlier this year. FMC supports a streamlined legislative framework in principle, but strongly opposes removing the New Zealand Conservation Authority (NZCA) from the approval process for key planning documents. The NZCA is vital in ensuring decisions about public conservation land are transparent, robust, and reflect a broad range of perspectives. We do not support a system that concentrates decision-making solely in the hands of the Minister. FMC is deeply concerned about proposals that could enable the disposal or development of public conservation land—including conservation parks and stewardship land—without adequate safeguards. With only 40% of the estate fully protected, vast areas such as Forest Parks and Conservation Parks could be opened up to inappropriate development. FMC supports efficient concession processes, but not at the expense of properly assessing impacts on conservation and recreation. We welcome the government's commitment that Kiwis won't be charged to access their backyard—but questions remain about how access charging will work in practice. How visitors will be identified, compliance enforced, and whether revenue will exceed costs remain unclear. Freedom of access for Kiwis should be protected in legislation, and any revenue raised must be legally ringfenced for reinvestment in the places it comes from. FMC submitted on both the modernisation and access charging proposals earlier this year and looks forward to engaging further. 'While we support some elements in principle, we remain concerned about the broader direction signaled by this announcement,' says Dimozantos. 'Public conservation law exists first and foremost to protect the land—not to serve as a platform for economic growth.'
