logo
I scammed my bank

I scammed my bank

I may be a tech reporter, but I am not tech savvy. Something breaks, I turn it off and back on, and then I give up. But even I was able to deepfake my own bank with relative ease.
Generative AI has made it way easier to impersonate people's voices. For years, there have been deepfakes of politicians, celebrities, and the late pope made to sow disinformation on social media. Lately, hackers have been able to deepfake people like you and me. All they need is a few seconds of your voice, which they might find in video posts on Instagram or TikTok, and maybe some information like your phone or debit card number, which they might be able to find in data leaks on the dark web.
In my case — for the purposes of this story — I downloaded the audio of a radio interview I sat for a few weeks ago, trained a voice generator on it after subscribing to a service for a few dollars, and then used a text-to-voice function to chat with my bank in a voice that sounded a bit robotic but eerily similar to my own. Over the course of a five-minute call, first with the automated system and then a human representative, my deepfake seemingly triggered little to no suspicion.
It's a tactic scammers are increasingly adopting. They take advantage of cheap, widely available generative-AI tools to deepfake people and gain access to their bank accounts, or even open accounts in someone else's name. These deepfakes are not only getting easier to make but also getting harder to detect. Last year, a financial worker in Hong Kong mistakenly paid out $25 million to scammers after they deepfaked the company's chief financial officer and other staff members in a video call.
That's one major oopsie, but huge paydays aren't necessarily the goal. The tech allows criminal organizations to imitate people at scale, automating deepfake voice calls they use to scam smaller amounts from tons of people. A report from Deloitte predicts that fraud losses in the US could reach $40 billion by 2027 as generative AI bolsters fraudsters, which would be a jump from $12.3 billion in 2023. In a recent Accenture survey of 600 cybersecurity executives at banks, 80% of respondents said they believed gen AI was ramping up hackers' abilities faster than banks could respond.
These scammers can take gen-AI tools and target accounts at a massive scale. "They're the best engineers, the best product managers, the best researchers," says Ben Colman, the CEO of Reality Defender, a company that makes software for governments, financial institutions, and other businesses to detect the likelihood that content was generated by AI in real time. "If they can automate fraud, they will use every single tool." In addition to stealing your voice or image, they can use gen AI to falsify documents, either to steal an identity or make an entirely new, fake one to open accounts for funneling money.
In a recent Accenture survey of 600 cybersecurity executives at banks, 80% of respondents said they believed gen AI was ramping up hackers' abilities faster than banks could respond.
The scammers are playing a numbers game. Even when a financial institution blocks them, they can try another account or another service. By automating the attempts, "the attackers don't have to be right very often to do well," Colman says. And they don't care about going after only the richest people; scamming lots of people out of small amounts of money can be even more lucrative over time. According to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center, the average online scam in 2024 came out to just under $20,000 across more than 250,000 complaints the FBI received from people of all ages (those over 60 filed the most complaints and saw the biggest losses, but even people under 20 lost a combined $22.5 million). "Everybody is equally a target," he says.
Colman says some banks have tried to get ahead of the deepfake problem in the past few years, while others didn't see it as a pressing issue. Now, more and more are using software to protect their clients. A 2024 survey of business executives (who worked across industries, not just in banking) found that more than 10% had faced an attempted or successful deepfake fraud. More than half said that their employees had not been trained to identify or address such attacks.
I reached out to several of the largest banks in the US, asking them what they're doing to detect and shut down deepfake fraud. Several did not respond. Citi declined to share any details of its fraud detection methods and technology. Darius Kingsley, the head of consumer banking practices at JPMorgan Chase, told me the bank sees "the challenges posed by rapidly evolving technologies that can be exploited by bad actors" and is "committed to staying ahead by continuously advancing our security protocols and investing in cutting-edge solutions to protect our customers."
Spotting deepfakes is tricky work. Even OpenAI discontinued its AI-writing detector shortly after launching it in 2023, reasoning that its accuracy was too low to even reliably detect whether something was generated by its own ChatGPT. Image, video, and audio generation have all been rapidly improving over the past two years as tools become more sophisticated: If you remember how horrifying and unrealistic AI Will Smith eating spaghetti looked just two years ago, you'll be shocked to see what OpenAI's text-to-video generator, Sora, can do now. Generative AI has gotten leaps and bounds better at covering its tracks, which is great news for scammers.
On my deepfake's call with my bank, I had fake me read off information like my debit card number and the last four digits of my Social Security number. Obviously, this was info I had on hand, but it's disturbingly easy these days for criminals to buy this kind of personal data on the dark web, as it may have been involved in a data leak. I generated friendly phrases that asked my bank to update my email address, please, or change my PIN. Fake me repeatedly begged the automated system to connect me to a representative, and then gave a cheery, "I'm doing well today, how are you?" greeting to the person on the other line. I had deepfake me ask for more time to dig up confirmation codes sent to my phone and then thank the representative for their help.
Authorities are starting to sound the alarm on how easy and widespread deepfakes are becoming. In November, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network put out an alert to financial institutions about gen AI, deepfakes, and the risk of identity fraud. Speaking at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in April, Michael Barr, a governor of the Federal Reserve, said that the tech "has the potential to supercharge identity fraud" and that deepfake attacks had increased twentyfold in the past three years. Barr said that we'll need new policies that raise the cost for the attacker and lower the burden on banks. Right now, it's relatively low risk and low cost for scammer organizations to carry out a massive number of attacks, and impossible for banks to catch each and every one.
It's not just banks getting odd calls; scammers will also use deepfakes to call up people and impersonate someone they know or a service they use. There are steps we can take if suspicious requests come our way. "These scams are a new flavor of an old-school method that relies on unexpected contact and a false sense of urgency to trick people into parting with their money," Ashwin Raghu, the head of scam policy and innovation at Citi, tells me in an email. Raghu says people should be suspicious of urgent requests and unexpected calls — even if they're coming from someone who sounds like a friend or family member. Try to take time to verify the caller or contact the person in a different way. If the call seems to be from your bank, you may want to hang up and call the bank back using the phone number on your card to confirm it.
For all the data on you that scammers can dig up using AI, there will be things that only two people can ever know. This past summer, an executive at Ferrari was able to catch a scammer deepfaking the company CEO's voice when he asked the caller what book he had recommended just days earlier. Limiting what you share on social media and to whom is one way to crack down on the likelihood you'll become a target, as are tools like two-factor authentication and password managers that store complex and varied passwords. But there's no foolproof way to avoid becoming a target of the scams.
Barr's policy ideas included creating more consistency in cybercrime laws internationally and more coordination among law enforcement agencies, which would make it more difficult for criminal rings to operate undetected. He also called for increasing penalties on those who attempt to use generative AI for fraud. But those won't be the quickest of fixes to keep up with how rapidly the tech has changed.
Even though this tech is readily available, sometimes in free apps and sometimes for purchases of just a few dollars, the problem is less a proliferation of lone wolf hackers, says Jason Ioannides, the vice president of global fintech and sponsor banking at Alloy, a fraud prevention platform. These are often carried out by big, organized crime rings that are able to move in large numbers and are bolstered by automation to carry out thousands of attacks. If they try 1,000 times to get through and make it once, they'll then focus their efforts on chipping away at that same institution, until the bank notices a trend and comes up with fixes to stop it. "They look for a weakness, and then they attack it," Ioannides says. He says banks should "stay nimble" and have "layered approaches" to detect quickly evolving fraud. "You're never going to stop 100% of fraud," he says. And banks generally won't be perfect, but their defense lies in making themselves "less attractive to a bad actor" than other institutions.
Ultimately, I wasn't able to totally hack my bank. I tried to change my debit card PIN and my email address during the phone calls, but I was told I had to do the first at an ATM and the second online. I was able to hear my account balance, and with a bit more prep and expertise, I may have been able to move some money. Each bank has different systems and rules in place, and some might allow people to change personal information, like emails, over the phone, which could give a scammer much easier access to the account. Whether my bank caught on to my use of a generated voice, I'm not sure, but I do sleep a little bit better knowing there are some protections in place.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

German town offers free 2-week stay to lure people to relocate there
German town offers free 2-week stay to lure people to relocate there

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

German town offers free 2-week stay to lure people to relocate there

A German town trying to beef up its population is luring in new residents by offering them a two-week trial accommodation — on the house. Eisenhüttenstadt, around 60 miles from Berlin, was built in 1950. dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images Eisenhüttenstadt, around 60 miles from Berlin, is accepting applications for the program — which will run from Sept. 6 to 20 — until the beginning of July. Advertisement 'The project is aimed at anyone interested in moving to Eisenhüttenstadt—such as commuters, those interested in returning to the town, skilled workers, or self-employed individuals seeking a change of scenery,' the local council said in a statement, according to CNN Travel. The initiative in the city, which now has a population of around 24,000, is part of an 'innovative immigration project' named 'Make Plans Now,' the council continued. Local businesses will offer internships and job shadowing. dpa/picture alliance via Getty Images Advertisement Those enrolled in the program will also participate in activities designed just for them, including a tour of Eisenhüttenstadt, home to historical buildings from the Soviet era. One man was so captivated by its architecture that he had already moved there. 'We were traveling to Ratzdorf with friends and drove through Karl-Marx-Straße. And I saw these houses, this architecture that completely blew me away, and I said to my wife, 'I'm going to move here,'' he wrote on the town hall's Instagram account. Eisenhüttenstadt, which means Steel Mill Town, was built around a steel mill. Guests will get the chance to explore its factories as well. Advertisement The town also houses the largest integrated steelworks facility in eastern Germany, which employs 2,500 people and acts as a metals processing hub. Local businesses will also offer internships, job shadowing and conduct interviews with tourists, who can move there and join their labor force. Founded in 1950, Eisenhüttenstadt was the first town built from scratch under then East Germany's socialist government. At its peak, it boasted a population of 50,000. Advertisement It was originally named Stalinstadt, or Stalin Town, after the late Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin, but was renamed after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the German reunification.

New council homes approved on former sea cadet site
New council homes approved on former sea cadet site

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New council homes approved on former sea cadet site

New council homes have been approved at a former Surrey sea cadet site. A planning application to demolish the existing buildings and replace them with 16 houses, each with a back garden, was approved by Tandridge District Council. The planned development at The Grove and Hawarden Road in Caterham, which currently includes a former barracks, will have 35 car parking spaces. Plans were green-lit on Thursday, with proposals for more social housing supported, but both councillors and residents were frustrated with the design. Marilyn Payne MBE argued at the meeting that plans were "akin to inner city development rather than on the edge of the green belt". She said the homes were too cramped together in the plot, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. The small, north-facing gardens would not be big enough for children to play in and would not get any sunshine, she added. Councillor Jeremy Pursehouse said there were 44 families living in B&Bs on the council's urgent need list. He said they wouldn't "care about the size of the back garden, they want to be out of there". The council bought the land from the Ministry of Defence in 2023. Planning documents said the proposed new builds would look "contemporary and minimal" to reflect the residential area and the previous army barracks. All the homes will be kept by the council and rented to families on its housing list. The development includes 10 three-bedroom homes, five two-bedroom houses, and a wheelchair accessible one-bedroom home. Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@ or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250. Plans submitted for homes on former sea cadet site Plans for council homes on former sea cadets site Local Democracy Reporting Service Tandridge District Council

Working hard or hardly working? Gen Z's brutally honest backlash over ‘out of touch' work-life balance ignites TikTok
Working hard or hardly working? Gen Z's brutally honest backlash over ‘out of touch' work-life balance ignites TikTok

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Working hard or hardly working? Gen Z's brutally honest backlash over ‘out of touch' work-life balance ignites TikTok

A millennial CEO called out Gen Z's work ethic — and got flamed for it. Lindsey Carter, founder of activewear company Set Active, said she wasn't prepared for the backlash she faced after critiquing Gen Z's take on work-life balance in a now-deleted TikTok video. 'Now all I see are people sprinting out of their offices at 5pm like it's a fire drill and then wondering why they feel so unfulfilled in their careers,' Carter posted last week. 'Balance is important, but balance without ambition. That's just coasting,' Carter continued. 'You don't build something great by just doing the bare minimum.' The backlash was fast — and furious. Critics slammed Carter, suggesting she was promoting unpaid work and ignoring burnout. 'Staying past 5pm working for a company I have no equity in doesn't sound like the path to fulfillment, ' one TikToker responded. 'How can I be active if I have to be strapped to my desk after 5pm?' another wrote. Carter quickly deleted the post — then blasted her critics on her Instagram story and claimed she'd been cancelled. 'What followed wasn't dialogue. It was a pile-on,' Carter wrote. 'It doesn't leave room for the thing we all say we believe in . . . growth.' She didn't stop there. 'I'm a millennial. I grew up in a culture where 'hard work pays off' wasn't just a phrase . . . it was a promise,' Carter said in a May 30 Substack essay defending her position. 'Two truths can coexist . . . we can honor ambition and protect our peace.' But for many online, that didn't cut it. Haters noted Set Active's negative Glassdoor reviews and Carter's 2023 decision to restructure her social media team, which some interpreted as layoffs. 'She just had a bad take and is out of touch,' one Reddit user wrote. 'That's consequences, not cancellation.' The controversy has since evolved into a larger debate over what ambition should look like in today's workforce and whether Gen Z is lazy — or simply redefining success on their own terms. Younger workers are no longer buying into the hustle mindset pushed by older generations, said Gabrielle Judge, an influencer known as the 'anti work girlboss.' 'Gen Z isn't unambitious,' Judge told The Post. 'We're just done sacrificing our mental health for companies that reward burnout with pizza parties. 'Logging off at 5 isn't laziness. It's a boundary.' Career strategist J.T. O'Donnell, founder of Work It Daily, said she understands both sides. Rather than trading hours for pay, younger workers are more focused on leveraging skills and knowledge in a changing economy. 'Working long hours is less productive,' said Celeste Headlee, author of 'Do Nothing: How to Break Away from Overworking, Overdoing, and Underliving.' 'I'm not irritated that Lindsey used the word 'coasting,' I have great empathy for her. She is still gripped by the delusion that work is what gives her life purpose and value.' Studies show Gen Z is noticeably less focused on work than young people were just five years ago, said psychologist Jean Twenge, author of 'Generations: The Real Differences between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, Boomers and Silents — and What They Mean for America's Future.' 'It's a rejection of the idea that work is the most important thing in life,' Twenge said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store