logo
Mejuri unveils surprise summer sale: Get 25% off jewellery

Mejuri unveils surprise summer sale: Get 25% off jewellery

That's right, for a limited time, you can get up to 25 per cent off a range of items from the beloved Canadian jewellery brand that adorns the ears, décolletage, and fingers of the style set. All of the gold and silver pieces, whether they are plated or the real deal, are elegant, effortlessly chic, and are bound to become a staple in your rotation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Travelling through YVR this week? Check if your Air Canada flight is cancelled
Travelling through YVR this week? Check if your Air Canada flight is cancelled

Vancouver Sun

time12 minutes ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Travelling through YVR this week? Check if your Air Canada flight is cancelled

Travellers flying through Vancouver International Airport and other airports across the country on Air Canada should prepare for flight cancellations and delays this week. On Wednesday morning, Air Canada said it plans to begin suspending Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flights over the next 72 hours. Air Canada Express flights are not affected. In a statement, Vancouver International Airport said it is aware that both 72-hour strike notice and 72-hour lockout notice have been served as part of contract negotiations between Air Canada and CUPE representing Air Canada flight attendants across the country. This means that Air Canada service could be disrupted as of 9:58 p.m. PT on Friday. However, Air Canada has said it will begin adjusting its flight schedule as of Thursday so passengers travelling on Air Canada are advised to check the status of their flight at 'Although we continue to urge both parties to reach an agreement at the table, YVR is preparing for potential travel impacts should a work stoppage take place. This includes increasing terminal staffing to best support affected passengers,' YVR said in the statement. To address ongoing labour uncertainty following strike notice by CUPE, Air Canada's flight attendant union, a lock out notice was issued to CUPE today, effective Aug. 16. We will begin implementing our contingency plan to gradually begin an orderly wind down of operations. Air Canada says customers whose flights are cancelled will be notified and they will be eligible for a full refund. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The company also says it has made arrangements with other Canadian and foreign carriers to provide customers alternative travel options to the extent possible. The union representing around 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants issued 72-hour strike notice on Wednesday. In response, the airline issued a lockout notice. On Tuesday, Air Canada said it had reached an impasse with the union as the two sides remained far apart in contract talks. The union has said its main sticking points revolve around what it calls flight attendants' 'poverty wages' and unpaid labour when planes aren't in the air. 'Despite our best efforts, Air Canada refused to address our core issues,' the union said in a bargaining update post online. ticrawford@ With files from The Canadian Press

Travelling through YVR this week? Check if your Air Canada flight is cancelled
Travelling through YVR this week? Check if your Air Canada flight is cancelled

Ottawa Citizen

time12 minutes ago

  • Ottawa Citizen

Travelling through YVR this week? Check if your Air Canada flight is cancelled

Article content Travellers flying through Vancouver International Airport and other airports across the country on Air Canada should prepare for flight cancellations and delays this week. Article content On Wednesday morning, Air Canada said it plans to begin suspending Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flights over the next 72 hours. Article content Article content Air Canada Express flights are not affected. Article content In a statement, Vancouver International Airport said it is aware that both 72-hour strike notice and 72-hour lockout notice have been served as part of contract negotiations between Air Canada and CUPE representing Air Canada flight attendants across the country. Article content This means that Air Canada service could be disrupted as of 9:58 p.m. PT on Friday. However, Air Canada has said it will begin adjusting its flight schedule as of Thursday so passengers travelling on Air Canada are advised to check the status of their flight at Article content 'Although we continue to urge both parties to reach an agreement at the table, YVR is preparing for potential travel impacts should a work stoppage take place. This includes increasing terminal staffing to best support affected passengers,' YVR said in the statement. Article content Article content To address ongoing labour uncertainty following strike notice by CUPE, Air Canada's flight attendant union, a lock out notice was issued to CUPE today, effective Aug. 16. We will begin implementing our contingency plan to gradually begin an orderly wind down of operations. — Air Canada (@AirCanada) August 13, 2025 Article content Article content Air Canada says customers whose flights are cancelled will be notified and they will be eligible for a full refund. Article content Article content The company also says it has made arrangements with other Canadian and foreign carriers to provide customers alternative travel options to the extent possible. Article content The union representing around 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants issued 72-hour strike notice on Wednesday. In response, the airline issued a lockout notice. Article content The union has said its main sticking points revolve around what it calls flight attendants' 'poverty wages' and unpaid labour when planes aren't in the air. Article content

The case for Letby's innocence looks weaker than ever
The case for Letby's innocence looks weaker than ever

Spectator

time12 minutes ago

  • Spectator

The case for Letby's innocence looks weaker than ever

The annual Panorama documentary on Lucy Letby appeared on BBC 1 this week, barely a week after a more one-sided pro-Letby documentary was shown on ITV. Channel 4 has a Letby show in the works and Channel 5 has already broadcast two. Fortunately, there is plenty of material for producers to get their teeth into. Not only did her trial last ten months but there was a retrial after that, plus two appeal attempts, and her supporters have been making new claims on any almost weekly basis ever since. The ITV documentary was Letbyism 1.0, mostly consisting of talking points about shift patterns, Post-it notes, door-swipe data etc. that have either been debunked or which are now understood to be irrelevant. The Panorama documentary – the third in what is sure to be an ongoing series – focused on the second phase of Letbyism that began with two press conferences, the second organised by Letby's PR firm (yes, she has a PR firm working for her), in December 2024 and February 2025. In the first press conference we were told that the insulin tests used to convict her of poisoning Baby F and Baby L were wrong, and that Baby O was accidentally killed by a doctor. In the second press conference we were told that no murders had taken place, that the insulin readings for Babies F and L were perfectly normal, and that Baby O died from a liver injury sustained during childbirth. Confused? So are they. Letby has a number of distinguished medics in her corner but they seem to be finding it difficult to put forward a consistent narrative. A panel of experts convened by the Canadian neonatologist and economist Dr Shoo Lee has offered innocent explanations for all of the 22 collapses and deaths on Letby's indictment (including the ones for which she was not convicted, which seems over-eager). Thanks to the unexpected appearance of credible physicians on Team Letby, her supporters have been playing a game of 'my expert is bigger than your expert' ever since, but the Court of Appeal is not interested in how 'eminent' or 'world leading' a witness is. It only wants to know if they have a point, and it is far from obvious that the 'international panel', which contains no pathologists, radiologists, endocrinologists or haematologists, have cracked the case by looking at some medical records a decade after the events took place. Dr Michael Hall, a neonatologist who was ready to give evidence for the defence in Letby's first trial but was never called, gave short shrift to the panel's theory that Baby A died from thrombosis. He pointed out that this suggestion had been raised in court and said 'I'm not sure that the expert witnesses have added anything to that conversation.' Nor was there any evidence that Baby A's mother had passed a rare blood-clotting disorder onto the child. On the contrary, blood tests had disproved this. Hall was also dismissive of the idea that Baby O suffered a liver injury during childbirth. Baby O's mother had plenty of complaints to air about the Countess of Chester Hospital at the Thirlwall Inquiry, but the standard of her planned Caesarean section was not one of them. In any case, Baby O's haemoglobin readings strongly suggested that he had not suffered a liver injury at birth and even Letby admitted that whatever happened to his liver had happened 'on my watch' the following day. Speaking anonymously – presumably to avoid the wrath of Letby's increasingly militant fanbase – a pathologist told Panorama that the theory about Baby O being killed by a doctor's misplaced needle was poppycock. Indeed, everyone on the show seemed to agree that this never happened, despite Dr Richard Taylor stating it as fact on live television eight months ago. With regards to the insulin poisonings, Shoo Lee relied on the expertise of the mechanical engineer Dr Geoff Chase and the chemical engineer Dr Helen Shannon, possibly because he couldn't get any paediatric endocrinologists to come out to bat for Britain's most prolific child-murderer. In their report, they claimed that the incredibly high insulin readings and extremely low C-peptide readings for Baby F and Baby L were 'within the expected range for preterm infants'. Professor John Gregory, a paediatric endocrinologist, told Panorama that such readings were 'exceedingly unlikely' to be natural; in other words, the babies were almost certainly given exogenous insulin. Interviewed by Panorama, Dr Chase said that 'within the expected range' was a poor choice of words, but insisted that such results were 'not uncommon'. He then downgraded this to 'unusual' and 'possible'. The only British member of Lee's panel is Professor Neena Modi. Asked about the claim that Baby O had suffered a liver injury during childbirth, her response was essentially that although there wasn't any evidence that such an injury had been sustained in this instance, a traumatic childbirth is the kind of thing that could cause a liver injury. It was at this moment that the penny dropped: from the outside, Lee's panel do not seem to have been looking for the theory with the most evidence to support it, nor even for the most likely explanation. They appear to have been looking for anything that sounds vaguely plausible so long as it doesn't involve Lucy Letby inflicting deliberate harm on defenceless infants. Dr Hall, who seems genuinely unsure whether Letby is guilty or innocent, said that he feared that the tenuous opinions of the international panel could 'rebound' on her. As this Panorama showed, many of them can be batted away with ease since they were either raised and rejected in court or have no evidence to support them. Letby can go to the Criminal Cases Review Commission as many times as she likes, and is likely to have plenty of time to do so, but every application takes years and the Court of Appeal does not appreciate having its time wasted with lengthy submissions of little merit. The eminence of the experts and the hard work of the PR company do not come into it. Meanwhile, the public may see distinguished doctors disagreeing and conclude that there must be reasonable doubt by definition, but that is not how it works. Only one side can be right and the medical evidence, though important, was only one part of the case. Hundreds of pieces of evidence could be cited, almost all of it circumstantial but almost all of it pointing an accusing finger at staff nurse Letby. It will take many more documentaries for it all to be broadcast to the viewing public, but at the current rate we should get there by the end of the decade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store