logo
Greens go it alone with early policy promises

Greens go it alone with early policy promises

Newsrooma day ago
Analysis: On one level, the new Green Party initiative to protect children could be seen as business as usual – a political play to pressure an opposing government into action.
Certainly, launching the party's new 'seven promises to tamariki' by way of an open letter to Children's Minister Karen Chhour of Act and urging the public to sign on to its message online meets that tactic. The petition preamble talks of Chhour 'taking some personal responsibility' for the safety of vulnerable tamariki.
And timing it for the anniversary of when a range of community care providers lost state contracts under this Government carries its own message.
But the 'For our Children' policy also represents another move by the Greens to set out political priorities and new thinking, out of government, well ahead of next year's election; to get out in front.
The party had tried to arrange meetings with Chhour to lobby her directly for attention to its seven goals for child care and protection, but her schedule did not allow it.
So, 14 months out from a likely election date, it made its goals into public promises and committed at a launch by co-leader Marama Davidson and children's spokesperson Kahurangi Carter that voters 'can hold us to this'.
The Greens did not seek agreement or endorsement from Labour or Te Pāti Māori, its likely governing partners in any future administration, ahead of Friday's launch after months of consulting those in the child welfare sector.
Instead, the party has struck out on its own to put the issue of care of tamariki to the front, and near the top, of its policy package for 2026.
The seven promises are that:
every child's whānau and whakapapa must be centred
must be free from poverty
must be supported every step of their journey
must be heard, respected and placed at the heart of decision making
must be protected
must have a stable, nurturing home
is cared for by a well-supported workforce
Few would find much in those commitments to argue with. Who would oppose those standards or sentiments?
But on the flip side these are pretty broad and challenging measures to say any politicians or government agency can guarantee to achieve. Promising that children 'must be free from poverty' and 'supported every step of their journey' goes beyond the aspirational.
Each of the seven promises is expanded on in the policy package – for example, the first, on centring whānau and whakapapa would be achieved by two changes to the Oranga Tamariki Act and creation of a Māori Transition Authority as recommended in the past by the Waitangi Tribunal.
Other specific changes would be to make early intervention and prevention core principles of the OT law, new top-up payments and increased Best Start funding for households, guaranteed and ring-fenced funding and enacting changes recommended by the Royal Commission into abuse in state care.
The party's letter to Chhour is blunt. 'Right now, far too many tamariki are being failed by a care system that is under-resourced, disconnected from whakapapa, and lacking a focus on preventing harm before it happens.
'Social workers are overwhelmed, facing dangerously high caseloads. Community providers are dealing with funding cuts and funding uncertainty every year. Independent oversight recommendations are constantly ignored. Far too many children in our care system are not having their fundamental rights met.
'As Minister for Children, you hold responsibility to ensure this system upholds the rights and dignity of every child in Aotearoa.
'That is why we are asking you to commit to a 'Duty of Care'. A set of seven core promises that speak to the fundamental system change required to protect tamariki, put them at the heart of government decision making and deliver a system that truly serves children.'
Carter told Newsroom the Greens would make themselves accountable for those seven promises when in government. Better still, it wanted Chhour to recognise their value and adopt them now, ahead of any change of administration.
But she wouldn't be holding her breath. 'This Government has put a real focus on punishment rather than prevention, slashing of safety and care organisations' funding and a move away from prevention. We've got to get back to getting support for children, parents and communities.'
Carter said the coalition Government had failed to take up numerous recommendations from the commission, and in her view had taken actions against the spirit of the commission report by introducing and continuing boot camps and allowing third parties to use force on young people.
Making a big commitment on child protection and poverty is not new in NZ politics. Labour's Jacinda Ardern put these issues at the centre of her government from 2017, taking the child portfolio, setting up the Royal Commission and with Grant Robertson putting child poverty reports into the suite of wellbeing measures in Budgets.
Carter says things have gone backwards under this Government and, while it might be debatable if prioritising child protection automatically wins votes for a party at an election, it's important the Greens did the work now.
'What's important is that we're ready to go into our first 100 days with policies that will protect children and keep families together.
'For me, it's about having a mandate from the community and people we are serving to go through and do this work. Polls and votes are important but doing the work and having the foundations is what's behind this campaign.'
She acknowledged the seven promises would come with possibly substantial costs – in reducing social worker caseloads, as one example – but said the funding would largely come from re-prioritising other spending, away from this coalition's centralised systems and 'back into the community'.
As just one MP, Carter couldn't say if the Greens would make the seven promises a bottom line in governing talks with Labour or Te Pāti Māori. 'But we are going hard on ensuring our kids are safe.'
A good response from Chhour to the letter would be to say 'this is awesome, let's see how we can implement the seven promises' and adopt them as their own.
On the other hand, if the minister remained silent and ignored the Greens' proposals, that would reject the work of people in the sector who had contributed. 'It's the mandate of the people out there doing the mahi and the kids who have been through the system. They want to see action.
'I think New Zealanders want politicians to work together to put New Zealand first and our children first.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Future of Right to Repair Bill uncertain as NZ First pulls support
Future of Right to Repair Bill uncertain as NZ First pulls support

Scoop

time4 hours ago

  • Scoop

Future of Right to Repair Bill uncertain as NZ First pulls support

Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson says she's not giving up on her bill that would give consumers the right to get goods repaired. The Consumer Guarantees (Right to Repair) Amendment Bill would compel manufacturers to make repair parts available locally to consumers to extend the lifetime of products and reduce waste. The legislation was sent to Select Committee after passing its first reading in February with support from Labour, the Greens, Te Pāti Maori and New Zealand First. It appeared to have enough support to progress into law, but the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee has now recommended, by majority, that the bill not be passed. What the Consumer Guarantees (Right to Repair) Amendment Bill proposes: Retain requirements for manufacturers to make repair facilities, parts, software, tools, and information available to consumers. Allow consumers to request that goods be repaired, rather than replaced. Prevent the use of unauthorised repairers and parts from voiding manufacturers' guarantees. Davidson told RNZ New Zealand First appeared to have pulled its support for the legislation. "The reason we got it through first reading is because we had [support from] all of the opposition parties, plus New Zealand First, so we were able to get it to Select Committee, which was fantastic. "We heard from submitters, oral submissions, written submissions, overwhelming support for the bill. At the end of the select committee process, the bill was reported back, and, at least at this stage, the New Zealand First members have voted against progressing the bill." She said she would not give up on the bill, especially when she had adopted changes, like narrowing the goods covered to above $100 in value, at the suggestion of government members. "It's a little rough to have done all that deep work to make the bill better but the positive is we have now got incredible improvements that we know government members were in support of because they helped us make them. "So there is massive mandate there for the public to have what they've asked for, which is the right to repair their own goods. " New Zealand First leader Winston Peters said his party had changed its mind because of the bill's "unworkability and cost". "We said we'd vote it to Select Committee. We get to the Select Committee, we find it's unworkable. Now that's a sound way of proceeding with politics and with policies." Peters was asked about the concessionary changes Davidson had made to the bill at the request of government ministers. "Marama Davidson wouldn't know how to build a dog house. Excuse me, I've been a lawyer and acted for thousands of house buyers. I know their costs." 'Serious concerns' about process raised in Select Committee report The committee's report on the Right To Repair Bill notes opposition parties had "serious concerns" about the way the committee had conducted its work on the bill. "Opposition members participated in this work in the reasonable expectation that such engagement was aimed at building genuine cross-party agreement," the report said. "The result was otherwise. The committee spent significant time, and drew on the resources of Parliamentary Counsel and departmental advisors, to explore and draft changes to resolve the concerns of government members that they then ultimately chose not to support," the report states. "That decision is of course within their rights. But when extensive collaborative work is undertaken with the tacit implication that it might secure support, only for that support to be withheld, the effect is to undermine trust between members. "It also risks the perception that the process was used to keep the committee occupied rather than to improve the bill, at a cost to the public purse." The decision comes as the government rolls back a series of waste-reduction measures. The container-return scheme has been scrapped, plastic bans pared back, and product stewardship rules delayed. In December 2024, the government quietly cancelled several waste minimisation initiatives focused on recycling and kerbside food scraps composting. Four out of five planned policies will no longer go ahead, including mandatory kerbside composting and recycling for all urban areas. A planned national Circular Economy & Bioeconomy Strategy was also put on hold. Professor at the University of Auckland and a member of the Right to Repair Coalition Alex Sims told Checkpoint there would be no difference to everyday consumers because nothing had changed. "It was a bit of a long shot that it would actually get through. "It just means New Zealand is increasing out of step with the rest of the world because right to repair is, you know, in Europe, the UK and a lot of states in America as well." She said the bill needed to be narrowed down to have worked. "The bill was going to protect everything, so just anything that you normally buy for your house, even things that just couldn't be repaired, and that was just seen as being to wide." Sims said we were not the first country to create a bill like this and that these situations had played out overseas. "It's not a case that the consumers want it and the manufactures don't, sure it may require a bit of a change in business model but... [at the moment] it's an incredible waste of resources." She hoped the country could look into what had already been done to make a change.

OCR Cut Welcome For Some While Govt Leaves Many Behind
OCR Cut Welcome For Some While Govt Leaves Many Behind

Scoop

time9 hours ago

  • Scoop

OCR Cut Welcome For Some While Govt Leaves Many Behind

Poverty and homelessness continue to grow because of this Government's decisions, despite the Reserve Bank's move to lower the Official Cash Rate (OCR). 'The Reserve Bank's decision to lower interest rates today will be welcome news for some but won't help the thousands this Government has pushed into homelessness and poverty,' says Green Party co-leader and spokesperson for Finance Chlöe Swarbrick. 'Monetary policy is a blunt instrument. It is fiscal policy - that is, the Government's choices on tax and spend - which dictates who wins and who loses in our economy. 'While the OCR cut will provide some relief for those with a mortgage, the number of New Zealanders left out in the cold continues to grow under Luxon's decisions. Reports out today show families being forced to choose between unsafe boarding houses, or living on the street. 'Cuts to the OCR do not end poverty or homelessness, nor arrest growing inequality. The Government knows it can take action to address these problems, but is instead choosing to make them worse. 'While this Government tells people they're making the 'hard choices' to push more kids into poverty and increase emissions, the Greens will continue to fight for an Aotearoa where everyone thrives and nobody is left behind,' says Chlöe Swarbrick.

The Wednesday Politics Panel for 20 August 2025
The Wednesday Politics Panel for 20 August 2025

RNZ News

time11 hours ago

  • RNZ News

The Wednesday Politics Panel for 20 August 2025

It's another hit of the most insightful and sharp 30 minutes in political analysis. Today Wallace is joined by journalist Annabelle Lee-Mather, former Greens MP Sue Kedgley and Maddison Burgess-Smith, commentator and Senior Consultant at Iron Duke Partners. Topics discussed on the show tonight include: Former Prime Minister Helen Clark has lamented the "boys club" environment of golbal politcs. The backlash over Labour ministers refusing to front up publicly for the Covid Royal Commission of Inquiry. Finance Minister Nicola Willis caused quite the stir this week by nabbing the Prime Minister's interview spot on the caucus run. Should we take note of the whispers of a roll? The Government's decision to remove te reo Maori from new early-reading books is, according to critics, just the latest in a run of policies seemingly targeting Maori. is it an assualt on Te Ao Maori? To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store