B.C. court squelches Vancouver bylaw that forced ride-hailing firms to pay fees
Uber Canada took the city to court over the bylaw, claiming it overstepped a municipal government's power to regulate so-called "transportation network services."
The bylaw prevented ride-share vehicles from picking up or dropping off passengers in the "Metro Vancouver core" between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. unless they had a "congestion and curbside management permit."
The provincial government made the Passenger Transportation Board the "centralized authority" to regulate ride-hailing in 2019, but the city later imposed the bylaw, which Uber challenged in B.C. Supreme Court.
The court decision says the province made the changes to eliminate regulatory overlap, which the transportation minister at the time said had 'plagued the passenger directed vehicle industry for years."
The ruling says there is no "rational pathway" for the city to claim it didn't intend to regulate the number of ride sharing vehicles operating in Vancouver with the bylaw because its stated intention was to reduce traffic congestion.
"Given the specifics of this particular bylaw, it is unreasonable for the city to decide it was authorized to invoke its powers to regulate stopping on city streets to defeat the purpose and text of its governing legislation," the ruling says. "Therefore, the bylaw is invalid and the decision to adopt it was unreasonable."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 11, 2025.
Darryl Greer, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Wells Fargo Backs Teck Resources as Top Copper Play Despite Sector Caution
Teck Resources Limited (NYSE: TECK) is one of the best commodity stocks to buy now. On August 8, 2025, Wells Fargo analyst Tiago Fauth reiterated an Overweight rating on the Canadian miner and set a $101 price target, describing it as 'one of the most attractive risk/rewards' in his coverage. Fauth pointed to Teck's strong liquidity, with a current ratio of about 3.47, and argued that market skepticism does not match the company's solid fundamentals and valuable exposure to long-term copper demand. Pixabay/Public Domain The upbeat view from Wells Fargo comes as other firms take a more measured stance. Benchmark maintained a Buy rating on July 28 but lowered its target from $55 to $48. B. Riley and JPMorgan have moved to Neutral, citing operational challenges at the Quebrada Blanca Phase 2 project and softer near-term expectations. Jefferies and Raymond James remain constructive but have also trimmed price targets. Teck Resources is a diversified miner, headquartered in Vancouver, with major operations in copper, zinc, steelmaking coal and energy. Its assets span Canada, Chile and the United States, and it is positioning copper at the center of its growth strategy to capitalize on the global energy transition. While we acknowledge the potential of TECK as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Court Lets Trump Block Billions of Dollars in Foreign Aid
(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration can cut billions of dollars in foreign assistance funds approved by Congress for this year, a US appeals court ruled. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets In a 2-1 decision on Wednesday, the appellate panel reversed a Washington federal judge who found that US officials were violating the Constitution's separation of powers principles by failing to authorize the money to be paid in line with what the legislative branch directed. The ruling is a significant win for President Donald Trump's efforts to dissolve the US Agency for International Development and broadly withhold funding from programs that have fallen out of favor with his administration, regardless of how Congress exercised its authority over spending. Trump's critics have assailed what they've described as a far-reaching power grab by the executive branch. The nonprofits and business that sued could ask all of the active judges on the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit to reconsider the three-member panel's decision. If the panel's decision stands, it wasn't immediately clear how much it would affect other lawsuits contesting a range of Trump administration funding freezes and cuts besides foreign aid. Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson wrote in the majority opinion that the challengers lacked valid legal grounds to sue over the Trump administration's decision to withhold the funds, also known as impoundment. The US Comptroller General — who leads an accountability arm of Congress — could sue under a specific law related to impoundment decisions, Henderson wrote, but the challengers couldn't bring a 'freestanding' constitutional claim or claim violations of a different law related to agency actions. Henderson, appointed by former President George H.W. Bush, was joined by Judge Greg Katsas, a Trump appointee. The court didn't reach the core question of whether the administration's unilateral decision to refuse to spend money appropriated by Congress is constitutional. Judge Florence Pan, nominated by former President Joe Biden, dissented, writing that her colleagues had turned 'a blind eye to the 'serious implications' of this case for the rule of law and the very structure of our government.' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement that the appeals court 'has affirmed what we already knew – President Trump has the executive authority to execute his own foreign policy, which includes ensuring that all foreign assistance aligns with the America First agenda.' A lead attorney for the grant recipients did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The two consolidated cases before the appeals court only deal with money that Congress approved for the 2024 fiscal year, which ends on Sept. 30. Grantees are poised to lose access to funds if they haven't yet been approved to be spent by federal officials — a precursor to actual payouts — or unless a court order is in place. The administration lost one of its few battles before the US Supreme Court earlier this year in the foreign aid fight. In March, a majority of justices refused to immediately stop US District Judge Amir Ali's injunction taking effect while the legal fight went forward. Since then, however, the challengers have filed complaints with Ali that the administration is failing to obligate or pay out the funds. They've rebuffed the government's position that the delay is part of a legitimate effort to 'evaluate the appropriate next steps' and accused officials of angling to use a novel tactic to go around Congress in order to cut appropriated money. The Trump administration has dramatically scaled back the US government's humanitarian work overseas, slashing spending and personnel and merging the USAID into the State Department. The challengers say the foreign aid freeze has created a global crisis, and that the money is critical for malaria prevention, to address child malnutrition and provide postnatal care for newborns. The groups argued that the president and agency leaders couldn't defy Congress' spending mandates and didn't have discretion to decide that only some, let alone none, of the money appropriated by lawmakers should be paid. The president can ask Congress to withdraw appropriations but can't do it on his own, the challengers argued. The Justice Department argued Ali's order was an 'improper judicial intrusion into matters left to the political branches' and that the judge wrongly interfered in the 'particularly sensitive area of foreign relations.' The government also said that the Impoundment Control Act, which restricts the president from overruling Congress' spending decisions, wasn't a law that the nonprofits and business could sue to enforce. The challengers countered that Ali's order blocking the funding freeze was rooted in their constitutional separation-of-powers claim, not the impoundment law. The cases are Global Health Council v. Trump, 25-5097, and AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition v. US Department of State, 25-5098, US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit. (Updated with White House comment.) Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Alamos Gold Files $500 Million Shelf Prospectus to Preserve Financial Flexibility
Alamos Gold Inc. (NYSE:AGI) is one of the best cheap growth stocks to buy according to analysts. On August 8, 2025, Alamos Gold filed a base shelf prospectus enabling the company to issue up to US $500 million in securities, including common shares, debt instruments, warrants, and subscription receipts, over the next 25 months. The filing specifically states that there are no current plans to issue securities, positioning the move purely as a precaution to maintain financial flexibility, and it replaces a previous prospectus that expired in June 2025. Alamos Gold Inc. is a Canadian-based intermediate gold producer. Its operations span the Island Gold District and Young‑Davidson mine in Ontario, as well as the Mulatos District in Mexico. The company emphasizes low-cost, long-life assets, with a development pipeline that includes the Phase 3+ expansion at Island Gold and the Lynn Lake project in Manitoba. While we acknowledge the potential of AGI as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤
