logo
'Very sad' west Londoners oppose Heathrow expansion

'Very sad' west Londoners oppose Heathrow expansion

Yahoo29-01-2025

In the historic west London village of Harmondsworth, Justine Bayley pointed to where Heathrow Airport's new boundary would likely sit once a third runway is built -- just yards from her home.
"I'd need to put my ear defenders on every time I opened the front door," said the 74-year-old, her neat garden dotted with green signs that read "Stop Heathrow Expansion".
Harmondsworth -- about an hour's train ride from central London -- has a quintessential English village feel, with its 12th-century church, grocery store, green and two pubs.
But this 1,500-strong community and the neighbouring hamlet of Longford face an uncertain future after UK finance minister Rachel Reeves announced Wednesday that the government backs a new runway at Heathrow.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer's Labour government hopes extending capacity at Europe's busiest airport will help spur much-needed economic growth for the country.
Previous plans for extending the site have proposed bulldozing several hundred homes across the twin villages, which date back to the Anglo-Saxon period.
"We're quite a close tight-knit community," said Bayley, chair of the Stop Heathrow Expansion group which campaigns against the proposed development.
"A lot of people have been here 50 years plus. Their history, their memories are bound up with the houses they live in.
"You can't reconstruct the community because we would be scattered everywhere," she told AFP, in front of yellow posters in her window that scream "No Third Runway".
While Harmondsworth's streets are quaint and quiet, the same can't always be said for the skies above where planes can regularly be seen and heard descending towards or ascending from Heathrow.
Out walking in the streets was 55-year-old Leon Jennion who has lived in Longford for three decades.
When planes take off and land at Europe's biggest airport by passenger numbers his house shakes and conversations in the garden need to be paused until the aircraft have passed.
- 'Better, not bigger' -
"It's disruptive," said Jennion, who like many people in the area has a job related to the airport.
"You hear plates rattling in your cupboards and various ornaments on shelves, and doors rattling with the vibrations."
He says his home is almost certain to be demolished if the third runway goes ahead and added he would be "very sad" to leave Longford.
But Jennion also hoped Reeves's announcement will finally lead to some certainty after proposals to expand Heathrow have been mooted for the best part of two decades.
"I don't want to be having a threat around me anymore," said the father of a teenage child.
"I just want to be able to go and, not restart my life, but just continue it somewhere decent."
Outside The Five Bells pub, 18-year-old student Fletcher Rodger said he has "mixed feelings" about the plans for runway number three.
"If it provides as much economic growth as the government says it's going to then unfortunately I have to say I don't mind too much.
"There's always winners and there's always losers," he said.
Just steps away, 63-year-old Hylton Garriock wore a red hoodie emblazoned with the words "Stop Heathrow Expansion" as he manned a stand for the eponymous campaign group.
Beside him, draped over a wall, was a cloth mural boasting a giant closeup image of a plane to depict the view that the campaign group says residents will ultimately face.
He stressed that more flights will worsen climate change.
"Keep within the boundaries. Make a better Heathrow, not a bigger Heathrow," Garriock told AFP.
Proposals to expand Heathrow have long been dogged by legal challenges, political opposition and fears over the effect it would have on the environment and noise pollution.
Back at Bayley's house, parts of which date to 16th century, the activist was hopeful the plans will be stopped.
"I don't want to move. I've lived here longer than I've lived anywhere else in my life," she said.
"We haven't lost a campaign yet, and we're not intending to lose this one either."
pdh/jkb/sbk

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion - Nationwide injunctions are un-American — the Supreme Court must halt them now
Opinion - Nationwide injunctions are un-American — the Supreme Court must halt them now

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Nationwide injunctions are un-American — the Supreme Court must halt them now

Seventy-seven million Americans elected Donald Trump last November. They elected him to make us safer, to restore law and order, and to return common sense to our country. Since his inauguration, President Trump has carried out his promises to the American people, issuing executive orders on a range of policy objectives. That's how it should work in our country — the people choose the president and the president directs the executive branch to enact his agenda. In the opening months of the second Trump administration, however, we've seen a new resistance to Trump's policies. This resistance is anti-democratic and contrary to the rule of law. And it's coming from within the federal judiciary. Since Trump took office, federal district court judges have issued more than 40 nationwide injunctions blocking his agenda. That's on top of 64 issued during his first term, representing a majority of all the nationwide injunctions ever issued in American history. Often filed by liberal activists before sympathetic judges in carefully selected jurisdictions, a nationwide injunction enjoins conduct across the entire country. In this way, it departs from the proper role of a court in adjudicating a particularized dispute between clearly identified parties. Nationwide injunctions have no basis in American legal traditions or English common law. They violate principles of judicial restraint. And their increased use has serious consequences for constitutional order. The Constitution limits judicial power to only those 'cases' and 'controversies' before the courts. That makes sense. Judges shouldn't be issuing decisions that constrain people who never even set foot in the courtroom. But with a nationwide injunction, one federal judge can block a policy affecting millions, creating a judicial policy veto that is nowhere to be found in the Constitution. Beyond these clear constitutional problems, nationwide injunctions hurt the uniform and efficient administration of justice. These injunctions, especially when issued as temporary restraining orders, don't allow for thorough fact-finding, meaning appellate courts wind up reviewing an incomplete and inaccurate record. They also unfairly benefit special-interest plaintiffs who file identical suits in multiple jurisdictions, because the plaintiffs need only succeed in convincing one court, while the government must successfully defend every case in every jurisdiction. The rise of nationwide injunctions, and their obvious abuses during the first four months of the Trump administration, demand a response. In the House of Representatives, we've passed a bill drafted by Rep. Issa that would restrict a federal judge's ability to issue a nationwide injunction. It's up to the Senate to send it to the president's desk. The Judiciary Committee and its Courts Subcommittee, which we respectively chair, have held hearings and done oversight about the abuse of nationwide injunctions. We've urged congressional appropriators to use the power of the purse to force the judiciary to make reforms. And our work isn't done. But the institution that's best positioned to stop the abuse of nationwide injunctions sits just across from the Capitol Building. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments last week about nationwide injunctions in an immigration case. That appeal gives the court a chance to rein in the abuse of such injunctions and force lower-court judges to stick to their proper constitutional role. In his confirmation hearing before the Senate, Chief Justice John Roberts famously equated the job of a judge to that of a baseball umpire — calling balls and strikes, and nothing more. Applying his metaphor, a nationwide injunction would mean that an umpire's ball-and-strike call in Cleveland would apply to the game in San Diego, in Houston, and everywhere else. That wouldn't fly in our national past-time and it shouldn't be acceptable in our nation's courtrooms. Our nation is the greatest because 'We the People' have the ultimate authority. We are blessed to live in a democracy where the policy decisions are made by those elected to office — not by unaccountable bureaucrats or unelected judges. The policy agenda of a president elected by 77 million people shouldn't hinge on the separate approvals of 677 unelected district court judges. The Supreme Court must end the abuse of nationwide injunctions. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) oversees the House Judiciary Committee; Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) chairs its Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Pic: Missing American-Israeli couple's bodies recovered from Hamas terrorists
Pic: Missing American-Israeli couple's bodies recovered from Hamas terrorists

American Military News

time2 hours ago

  • American Military News

Pic: Missing American-Israeli couple's bodies recovered from Hamas terrorists

Israel Defense Forces confirmed on Thursday that the bodies of an American-Israeli couple murdered by Hamas during the terrorist organization's attack against Israel on October 7, 2023, were recovered as part of a special military operation in Gaza. In a Thursday post on X, formerly Twitter, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced, 'In a special operation by the Shin Bet and the IDF in the Gaza Strip, the bodies of two of our abductees who were being held by the murderous terrorist organization Hamas were returned to Israel: Judy Weinstein-Hagi and Gadi Hagi from Kibbutz Nir Oz, may their memory be blessed.' The Israeli prime minister explained that the American-Israeli couple had been murdered by the Hamas terrorist organization in October of 2023 and that their bodies had been abducted by the terrorists and held hostage in the Gaza Strip prior to this week's special military operation. 'Judy and Gadi were murdered on October 7th and kidnapped to the Gaza Strip. Together with all citizens of Israel, my wife and I extend our heartfelt condolences to the dear families. The heart grieves for the most terrible loss. May their memory be blessed,' Netanyahu added. 'I would like to thank and honor the fighters and commanders for their determined and successful execution. We will not rest or be silent until we bring all our captives home – the living and the dead alike.' READ MORE: Video/Pic: Last living American hostage released by Hamas According to Fox News, the two American-Israeli citizens were killed while walking on the morning of October 7, 2023, in the Hamas terrorist attack that led to the death of roughly 1,200 people and the abduction of 251 individuals. Israel Defense Forces shared a picture of Judi and Gad Haggai on social media, noting that the two American-Israeli citizens were 'beloved parents, grandparents, and members of Kibbutz Nir Oz.' 'They were held hostage for 608 days by terrorists in Gaza. On October 7, 2023, while taking their daily morning walk around the kibbutz, they were murdered and abducted,' Israel Defense Forces stated. 'Judi, a devoted special education English teacher and caregiver, and Gad, a kibbutz cook, were known for their love for their community.' In Thursday's posts, Israel Defense Forces pledged to continue operations until the remaining 56 Hamas hostages are returned. Judi and Gad Haggai were beloved parents, grandparents, and members of Kibbutz Nir Oz. They were held hostage for 608 days by terrorists in Gaza. On October 7, 2023, while taking their daily morning walk around the kibbutz, they were murdered and abducted. Judi, a devoted… — Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) June 5, 2025

Dozens of MPs back campaign to revive playgrounds
Dozens of MPs back campaign to revive playgrounds

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Dozens of MPs back campaign to revive playgrounds

More than 70 MPs are backing a campaign to revive England's playgrounds as pressure grows on the government to do more to tackle community decline to fight Reform UK. Labour MP Tom Hayes has tabled an amendment to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill that would ensure playgrounds lost to development are replaced. Politics Live: Mr Hayes told Sky News it is a personal subject as he grew up in poverty, caring for two disabled parents, and without his local playground "they wouldn't have been able to afford any sort of leisure activity for me". "Talking to parents these days, with the cost of living crisis going on, they just don't have play areas on their doorstep like they used to. What they have instead is rusting swings or boarded-up playgrounds." The Bournemouth East MP said this speaks to a "wider hopelessness" that people are feeling about "littering in their streets, graffiti on their walls, potholes in their roads". "It just makes people feel like nobody really cares about their area. That's at a time when people are feeling hopeless about the possibility of change and Reform, obviously, are trying to capitalise on that." Under the last Labour government, Ed Balls and Andy Burnham launched England's first and only play strategy, which aimed to create 3,500 new play spaces across every local authority - backed by £235m of funding. It was abandoned by the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition two years later and facilities have been in sharp decline since then, according to Play England which has developed the amendment Mr Hayes is tabling. The amendment would require councils in England to assess play provision and integrate "play sufficiency" into local plans and planning decisions - similar to a law that already exists in Scotland and Wales. It would also require developers to deliver and fund adequate play infrastructure, with a focus on inclusive play equipment for children with special educational needs and disabilities. Mr Hayes said this would not cost the Treasury anything and "is such a simple thing" the government can do quickly for children and young people "who have been shafted for so long". It is backed by 71 MPs from across Labour, the Conservatives, the Lib Dems and the Greens, with many supporters hopeful it could also reduce screen time Pressure on government over left-behind areas Amendments by backbench MPs are not usually agreed to but can be used to put pressure on the government, with the issue to be debated in the House of Commons this week as the planning bills enter the report stage. Mr Hayes said his playground campaign was just the start as he backed the resurrection of Sure Start centres, following calls from Rother Valley MP Jake Richards last week. Read More: There is growing momentum among Labour backbenchers who want to see the government give more of a priority to social infrastructure to deliver tangible change to communities and fend off the threat of Reform UK. MPs and policy insiders have told Sky News they are concerned Downing Street's ambition to grow GDP with long-term transport and infrastructure projects will not make a difference in places that look and feel forgotten, even if achieved. As Sky News has previously reported, several Red Wall MPs have , which has identified 613 "mission-critical" neighbourhoods in need of a cash boost to ensure people in left-behind areas can benefit from growth. The commission, chaired by Labour peer Hilary Armstrong, highlights the need to regenerate neighbourhoods with facilities like libraries, parks and community centres for voters to feel a difference. Any money for such a project will be set out in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's , when she will allocate funds for each department over the coming years. One of ICON's supporters is Blackpool South MP Chris Webb, who has also signed Mr Hayes's amendment. He told Sky News playgrounds "will make a real difference to families in Blackpool, which has the most mission-critical neighbourhoods in the country". "I'm committed to fighting for policies that benefit our community, and I'm thrilled to be working with Tom Hayes MP, the play sector and Play England to make this vision a reality." Sky News has contacted the government for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store