
Pets don't necessarily improve their owners' well-being
But even though the belief that pets bring many benefits to their owners is widespread, research shows that having a pet is not a panacea for bolstering human psychological well-being.
Despite this, pets are often portrayed in the news and on social media as effective solutions to reduce stress and loneliness, reflecting a popular belief in their health benefits. This can lead people to adopt pets without fully considering the responsibilities and demands involved, which can have negative consequences for both themselves and their pets.
As social psychologists studying human-pet relationships, we take a more nuanced approach, examining when, how and for whom pets can — or cannot — enhance well-being.
What the research says
Many studies have found that pet owners are less anxious, lonely and stressed out compared to people who don't have pets. Pet owners also report being more satisfied with their life.
These studies often catch our attention because they tap into something many of us believe: that our pets are good for us. This type of research offers reassurance and validates the deep bond we may feel with our animal companions. But they only tell one side of the story.
Other studies have found no significant link between pet ownership and human well-being. In other words, people with pets don't necessarily report higher well-being, nor do they have better mental health than those without pets.
Read more:
Our research into pet ownership in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic was surprising: it found that owning a pet was generally associated with lower well-being and mental health.
The study included both pet owners and those without pets, aiming to compare the two groups on various well-being indicators during the pandemic. Pet owners reported lower well-being than non-pet owners during that time, including higher levels of loneliness.
These inconsistencies across different studies show that the connection between having a pet and feeling good isn't so straightforward. Our study indicated some of these complexities. For example, compared to owners of other pets, dog owners reported higher well-being.
To make sense of these mixed findings, researchers have started to look more closely at the nature of the relationship between owners and their pets. This approach may help us better understand the factors that influence whether pet ownership is beneficial for our well-being.
The quality of the connection
Just like our relationships with people, our bond with pets is complex. Many aspects of this connection can influence how much we benefit from it. It's not just having a pet that counts, but how we bond and interact with them.
For example, owners who experience anxiety about being away from their pets or question their pet's affection — reflecting an insecure attachment to a pet — also report feeling more depressed. Perceiving our pets as less understanding or more insensitive to our needs is also associated with higher levels of depression, anxiety and loneliness.
In contrast, the more people feel that they share characteristics with their pets (for example, loyalty, a mutual love of sleeping), the more likely they are to report higher well-being. Pets are also perceived as living in the present, not dwelling on the past or worrying about the future. Interacting with our animal companions mindfully can help us focus on the present moment as well, which also promotes greater well-being.
Read more:
By nurturing the positive aspects of our relationships with pets and working through the more difficult ones, we may ease the stress associated with some of the challenges of caring for them, including the financial resources required or the anxiety we feel when they get sick.
Some challenges of pet ownership
In fact, pet ownership comes with responsibilities and challenges that don't seem to be discussed as often as the benefits. These more difficult aspects of caring for a pet can sometimes be emotionally distressing and negatively impact a pet owner's psychological well-being.
Having pets, no matter how much we love them, requires time, energy and financial resources. For some, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, this responsibility may represent an additional source of stress. In our study, pet ownership was linked to lower well-being among women and among those with two or more children at home — groups already facing increased child-care and household demands.
Similarly, pet ownership was associated with lower well-being for people who were unemployed or in less stable forms of employment (for example, students, homemakers). Limited financial resources may have made pet care more challenging.
Likewise, having to care for a sick animal can be emotionally distressing for the owners. Caregivers of chronically sick dogs report feeling hopeless and powerless, especially when they cannot help to alleviate their dogs' suffering.
Other factors, such as the pet's behavioural problems and the grief experienced after losing a pet, can also be difficult for owners. For those contemplating adoption, it's important to take these realities into account to make an informed decision.
Meeting our pet's needs
There are many important factors to consider when welcoming a new animal companion into our homes. Above all, we need to ensure we have the time, energy and resources to meet their needs.
Choosing a pet carefully, based on what we realistically can offer and on reliable information about their characteristics and needs, gives us the best chance of having a positive and successful relationship.
Read more:
Supporting our pets' needs can also improve our own well-being as owners, showing the potential for mutually beneficial interspecies relationships. But when those needs are not met, both pets and their owners can end up feeling stressed and unwell.
When considering adopting a pet, it's important to ask: why do we want a pet? If the idea is to improve psychological well-being, our research suggests we might need to think again.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organisation bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Christophe Gagné, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM) and Catherine Amiot, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM)
Read more:
The 3 worst things you can say after a pet dies, and what to say instead
Dogs are helping people regulate stress even more than expected, research shows
Pandemic pet boom has increased the demand for pet-friendly workplaces
Catherine Amiot is a member of the emerging Board of Directors of the PHAIR Society, an academic society that seeks to promote research on human-animal intergroup relations. She has received funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) and from the Fond de recherche du Québec - Santé (FRQS) for the research conducted in her laboratory which is presented in this article.
Christophe Gagné does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New COVID variant 'Stratus' is spreading in the U.S. and worldwide: What are the symptoms?
A new COVID variant is climbing the ranks in the U.S., becoming the third-most common strain of the summer. Variant XFG, colloquially known as "Stratus," was first detected in Southeast Asia in January but accounted for less than about 0% of cases in the United States until May. By late June, it was estimated to account for up to 14%, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The World Health Organization (WHO) added XFG to its watchlist but evaluated the additional public health risk posed by the variant as "low" at the global level in a late June report, in which it also advised that currently approved COVID-19 vaccines are "expected to remain effective to this variant against symptomatic and severe disease." Here's what we know about XFG. What is COVID variant XFG? XFG is a combination of COVID-19 variants F.7 and LP.8.1.2, the latter of which is currently the second most prominent strain in the U.S. The variant's mutations may enhance XFG's ability to evade immune responses, but its binding behavior shows that it is less likely to be highly contagious than other dominant variants, Subhash Verma, microbiology and immunology professor at the University of Nevada, Reno, told USA TODAY. "There is currently no clear evidence that XFG causes more severe disease or significantly different symptoms than earlier Omicron variants," said Verma. "Importantly, there are no immediate public health concerns associated with this variant." How common is XFG? While XFG has been growing and spreading worldwide, it has yet to become the predominant source of infection in the United States. The CDC has moved to using longer timeframes for COVID tracking due to low reporting from states. According to the latest data for the two-week period ending June 21, XFG accounted for 14% of U.S. cases, making it the third most-prevalent strain after NB.1.8.1 (43%) and LP.8.1 (31%). The prominence of XFG in the United States significantly increased in the weeks leading up to the last report, accounting for 0% of cases through March before reaching 2% in April, 6% in late May, 11% in early June and 14% in late June. WHO tracked an uptick in XFG worldwide in June as well, with the June report including data from 38 countries showing that XFG accounted for only 7.4% of positive tests in the first week of May but 22.7% by the last. USA TODAY has reached out to the CDC for more information about the spread of COVID variants in July and August. What are the symptoms of XFG? There is no evidence that XFG causes any distinct symptoms from other variants, said Verma. However, hoarseness has been anecdotally associated with the strain, according to social media posts and news reports. The CDC outlines the following as common COVID-19 symptoms: Fever or chills Cough Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing Sore throat Congestion or a runny nose New loss of taste or smell Fatigue Muscle or body aches Headache Nausea or vomiting The CDC advises seeking medical care if you experience any of the following symptoms: Trouble breathing Persistent pain or pressure in the chest New confusion Inability to wake or stay awake Depending on skin tone, lips, nail beds and skin may appear pale, gray, or blue This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: New COVID variant 'Stratus' spreading in US: symptoms, what to know Solve the daily Crossword


Washington Post
5 minutes ago
- Washington Post
How much sugar is in orange juice? Here's what to know.
The Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday proposed a tweak to reduce the amount of sugar required in pasteurized orange juice. But the news from the Trump administration isn't a proposal to lower the amount of sugar in the American diet; it's intended to help Florida's citrus industry because the sugar content of Florida oranges has been steadily dropping due to a bacterial disease afflicting the crop.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NFL bans smelling salts for 2025, and George Kittle is 'distraught'
The NFL has banned the use of smelling salts and ammonia packets ahead of the 2025 NFL season. For George Kittle, this is very disappointing news. The San Francisco 49ers tight end broke the news on NFL Network Tuesday. He then shared that the ban has left him "distraught." Kittle did so while crashing the set of an NFL Network hit at 49ers training camp during an interview with his teammate Fred Warner. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] "I honestly just came up here to air a grievance," Kittle said after being handed a microphone. "Our team got a memo today that smelling salts and ammonia packets were made illegal in the NFL, and I've been distraught all day." Kittle then joked that he was contemplating extreme measures in response to the rule change. "I considered retirement," he said, with a smile. "We've got to come up with a middle ground here guys. Somebody help me out. Somebody come up with a good idea." So why is Kittle so "distraught?" "I'm an every drive guy," Kittle said regarding his smelling salts use. "I'm an every drive guy." Kittle drew the line on using smelling salts for each play, declaring that's "too much." So why the ban? NFL Network's Mike Garafolo later shared the memo that got Kittle so worked up. It appears that Kittle's use of smelling salts on "every drive" might not be a good idea. Citing a 2024 memo from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the NFL explained its reasoning for banning ammonia inhalants (AIs), an umbrella term that includes smelling salts. From the memo: "The FDA noted potential negative effects from AI use," the memo states. "AIs also have the potential to mask certain neurologic signs and symptoms, including some potential signs of concussion. "As a result, the NFL head, neck and spine committee recommended prohibiting the use of AIs for any purpose during play in the NFL." The memo clarified that the AI category encompasses 'any form of 'smelling salts'' and prohibits any member of a team from administering or providing AIs to players at any point during a game. The FDA memo that the NFL referenced detailed reported adverse effects of using unapproved AIs that include "shortness of breath, seizures, migraines, vomiting, diarrhea, and fainting from consumers after using these types of products, possibly purchased through various websites." Smelling salts are traditionally used to treat fainting victims, but have apparently become popular among athletes — particularly football and hockey players — as a perceived energy boost. This appears to be Kittle's preferred use. The NFL isn't the first sports organization to ban the use of smelling salts. Hockey Quebec, a branch of Hockey Canada that oversees amateur hockey in the province, banned smelling salts in February, citing concern over their use by youth players.