logo
‘These murders still live with me': the show that goes inside Fred and Rose West's ‘house of horrors'

‘These murders still live with me': the show that goes inside Fred and Rose West's ‘house of horrors'

The Guardian13-05-2025

Dez Chambers waited 15 years to get the news she didn't want. All that time, she thought her missing little sister, Alison, might still be out there. Dez would watch documentaries about homelessness to see if perhaps she'd recognise a face, and even attempted the Salvation Army's family tracing service. 'It was hope,' she says from her home in the Netherlands.
Hope faded one day in 1994. Calling her from the UK, Dez's mother-in-law cried down the phone. There was panic, there was confusion, 'so I had to ask her. And then she said it was in the papers that the remains had been identified as Alison.'
Back in England, one story was gripping the nation: Fred and Rose West. With every detail plastered on news channels and filling newspapers, the country was obsessed with the serial killers who for nearly three decades had been on an undetected murder spree, abducting young women, torturing them, mutilating them, and burying the bodies in the garden of their Gloucester home. Some of those bodies were the West's own children.
Alison had gone missing in the late 1970s. A rough relationship with authority meant she ended up in care as a teenager, then ran away, social services told her family. She was taken in by a couple in Gloucester, looking after their children and doing housework in return. 'They know that I was in care, and are more than willing to help me on my feet,' Alison wrote in a letter to her mother in the early 80s. 'I have accepted them as a second family.'
It was the worst second family she could have had: the Wests, whose gruesome crimes – and the people who were left to pick up the pieces – are the subject of Netflix's new three-part documentary series, Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story.
It's a documentary which, using unseen police video and unheard interview recordings with Fred West, brings new insight to some of the worst serial killers Britain has ever seen. The show reveals how the pair abused and murdered 12 young women, how the police carried out their investigation, and how the families coped, featuring interviews with relatives of the deceased – some of whom have never spoken in public before.
Those interviews were the stories director Dan Dewsbury wanted front and centre. 'I really wanted to make sure that people understood this was a real thing that still affects these people today,' he says. 'It's one of the world's most known crimes. The hope is that [viewers] will come out of it thinking a lot of different things beyond just the crime that was committed.'
It's a new approach for the now omnipresent true-crime format. While most focus on the twists and turns, the mystery and bloodshed, Dewsbury's version of this well-known case tries to put empathy for those affected at the heart of the storytelling. 'They wanted to bring the victims to life, and I wanted to do that too,' says Chambers, who has turned down other interviews in the past for fear of objectifying her little sister and reopening traumatic wounds. 'That's why I agreed to do this one, to bring Alison to life, but also for myself – for the closure.'
Despite Dewsbury's victim-first approach, the series does still hit notes required for any Netflix true-crime series. There's creepy music with reversed vocals, glossy talking heads mixed with grainy archive footage, and ghostly Polaroids frequently popping up on screen. Dewsbury says he had to pick his battles regarding how far he could shake up the format. 'The advantage is you've got a readymade audience,' he says of the genre. 'The disadvantage is they may have a predisposition of what they want that series to be. It's up to me to push against some of that.'
This is a story that has been told many times, and it required input from the lawyers, police and forensic experts involved in the case. How hard was it to keep these interviewees fresh? 'They become desensitised to it,' Dewsbury says. He kept notes of what the contributors had said in previous interviews, and alerted them when they were repeating themselves. 'I want people to give an authentic interview, really connect into what I'm trying to do – not resort to media-speak or what worked last time.'
The previously unseen footage is bone-chilling. Viewers see tapes of West family home videos, police digging up bodies in the garden, shots from inside the 'House of Horrors' punctuated by archive material of the media frenzy around the case. But perhaps most shocking is the police footage of Fred at his home, handcuffed to detectives, being forced to locate his victims buried in the foundations. 'There was a bone in there last time,' West grunts in his thick Gloucester accent, pointing at a corner of his excavated garden and referencing a previous visit.
In one scene, we're carried via police camcorder through the house, into the bespoke voids where carpenter West filmed his crimes. 'It was clear that Fred had been able to adapt the building to his sexual pleasure,' forensic psychologist Paul Britton says to the cameras.
During the research period, Dewsbury digested hundreds of hours of grisly archive material, which included footage of locals expressing their disbelief that a friendly couple from the community was committing these atrocities under everyone's noses. 'I think about the reconciliation those people must have gone through, because it genuinely felt like a shock, to that road, to that street, to that town, to that country,' he says. 'It made me come face to face with this idea of the mask that people can put on.'
Those involved in the case make for compelling viewing. Some are cartoonish and others understated – it's remarkable to think this motley crew were at the heart of the biggest murder story in the world at the time. There's Howard Sounes, the caricature Fleet Street hack who pays sources for exclusive stories. There's Howard Ogden, the small-time local lawyer brought in to represent Fred in a case that may have been above his pay grade. There's even an appearance from Brian Leveson, at the time a rising star in the legal world and the prosecuting lawyer in the West's trial. 'I have prosecuted all sorts of crime,' he says. 'But if I had to identify one case that lives with me the most, this is the case.'
But this is not just a documentary about two of the worst killers in British history. It's a story of miscarriages of justice, incompetent authorities who didn't join the dots, and vulnerable young women – some runaways, some leaving care – who became easy to hide when the state wasn't looking for them. The Wests had been in contact with social services since the 60s, and a string of sexual assaults had gone unpunished. Dewsbury believes the lessons of the case apply to 2025. 'I think the process by which Fred and Rose got away with what they did might be slightly unique to that period of time, but the undercurrent of what was going on is really relevant to now,' he says.
One truly staggering missed opportunity is the case of Caroline Owens, one of the Wests' nannies who was abducted, raped and abused by the pair in 1973. She escaped and bravely reported the crimes to the police, but the Wests inexplicably got off with a £50 fine. 'It was a missed opportunity to raise the profile of Fred and Rose and identify them as possible sex offenders who could carry out abductions, kidnapping and imprisonment,' says detective constable Russ Williams in the documentary. 'They did get off lightly with it.'
Chambers wouldn't usually watch a documentary with 'Fred and Rose West' in the title, but she plans on tuning in to this one. 'It'll be tough, because there's things I likely didn't know, and things I might have forgotten,' she says. 'But I stand behind it, because it's about the victims. I'll have to watch it all in one go, because I won't be able to sleep in between.'
Fred and Rose West: A British Horror Story is on Netflix on 14 May.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Silence on bullying at universities ‘like Post Office scandal', says Cambridge chancellor hopeful
Silence on bullying at universities ‘like Post Office scandal', says Cambridge chancellor hopeful

Telegraph

time42 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Silence on bullying at universities ‘like Post Office scandal', says Cambridge chancellor hopeful

The culture of silence on bullying at universities is like the Post Office scandal, a candidate in the running to be the next Cambridge University chancellor has claimed. Prof Wyn Evans, one of 10 hopefuls who could become Cambridge University's next figurehead, said academics were routinely made to feel as if their allegations about bullying and harassment were isolated cases. In an interview with The Telegraph, the astrophysics professor at Cambridge's Institute of Astronomy claimed he was subject to 'prolonged retaliation' after he tried to blow the whistle over mistreatment of a colleague. Prof Evans raised concerns with the university in July 2021 that a female member of staff in his department in the 'throes of extreme mental distress' was being bullied by a more senior employee, adding that he was worried about her welfare as a result. Cambridge University appointed an independent barrister to investigate the claims, but also tasked them with probing separate allegations made about Prof Evans's own behaviour. It took more than a year and a half before the investigation was completed. The barrister concluded that Prof Evans's intervention met the legal threshold for whistleblowing, but that the behaviour reported by him did not constitute bullying. The lawyer dismissed the personal allegations made against Prof Evans and said the claimant provided no evidence to substantiate them. Prof Evans told The Telegraph that the drawn-out process had an enormous impact on his mental health, and that at his lowest ebb during the investigation, he had thoughts of ending his own life. 'Not even a droplet of compassion' 'My problems all started when I intervened on [my colleague's] behalf. I contacted a prominent figure in the university for help in dealing with the victim… No help was offered. There was not even a droplet of compassion for the victim,' he said. 'As is very common in whistleblowing cases, there was then prolonged retaliation against me. The retaliation caused significant disruption to my work and my mental health. I went on sick leave. Sleep was an elusive luxury [and] I was plagued with recurrent nightmares.' The astrophysics professor has promised to introduce an ombudsman at Cambridge University to investigate 'serious abuses or mismanagement' if elected chancellor. The scientist, whose research is around the formation of the Milky Way, launched a blog about his ordeal in 2023 calling for other academics to come forward with their own experiences. The 21 Group, named after the percentage of Cambridge University employees who reported being subjected to bullying or harassment in an internal staff survey, has seen almost 300 academics from around the world share their stories about bullying and harassment to date. Prof Evans described their revelations as similar to the Post Office scandal, in which victims were repeatedly told they were the only ones struggling with the company's faulty Horizon software despite more than 900 of them later being wrongly prosecuted for theft. 'If you remember in the sub-postmaster scandal, the Post Office was telling each individual sub-postmaster that, you know, 'it's just you were having problems with Horizon'. And it was only when they got together and they found that it was actually very common and almost ubiquitous, and the Post Office had been telling untruths,' he said. 'So it's something similar to that, that by helping all these people come together, we're much more powerful at fighting back against the universities. The knowledge that what has happened to you has happened to many other people is powerful because you realise that it isn't an individual personal experience.' The 21 Group has seen more than 8,000 visitors to its website in the past week alone, according to Prof Evans, with most academics active on the platform claiming to be from research-intensive universities across the UK. Some allege they have been stripped of research funding as part of power struggles with more senior colleagues. Free speech 'There are many young researchers who find their grants blocked because of sort of academic jealousy or of the feeling of being threatened. I think that's actually very common,' said Prof Evans. He claimed the issue was at the heart of broader free speech problems at universities, with institutions failing to properly address bullying and harassment allegations for fear of reputational damage. In his independent report into Prof Evans's whistleblowing claims, the external barrister appointed by Cambridge University said he regretted the length of time that the investigation took and 'the effect this will undoubtedly have had on all those involved'. The barrister also raised concerns that several staff members pulled out of providing testimony over fears they would face retaliation. Prof Evans, a don at the university for more than 20 years, claimed it was 'all quite unlike the Cambridge University as it really could be'. 'The magnificent role the university could play in encouraging greater empathy, diversity, kindness and inclusion as well as public interest in scholarship and learning, is undermined by its poor culture,' he said. 'Culture is set by the people at the top. This is one of things I would change as chancellor.' Cambridge University said it strongly refuted Prof Evans's claims. The astrophysics professor will run against rival candidates including Sandi Toksvig, the comedian and ex-presenter of the Great British Bake Off, and Gina Miller, the anti-Brexit campaigner, in the race to become the next Cambridge chancellor. The successful candidate will replace Lord Sainsbury of Turville, who was elected to the role in 2011 and stepped down last year. He had succeeded Prince Philip, the late Duke of Edinburgh, who held the position for 35 years. Voting is set to take place both online and in-person for the first time next month, with a winner set to be announced in the week beginning July 21, 2025. A spokesperson for Cambridge University said: 'We strongly dispute claims made in this version of events but cannot comment further on ongoing cases. The university takes allegations of bullying and harassment extremely seriously.'

Trans police officers blocked from strip-searching biological women
Trans police officers blocked from strip-searching biological women

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Trans police officers blocked from strip-searching biological women

Transgender police officers will no longer be able to strip-search people of a different biological sex to them. Six forces across England had previously been accused of a lack of urgency in changing policies to ensure detainees should only be searched by an officer of the same sex in the wake of the landmark legal ruling on the definition of sex in April. The constabularies of Merseyside, Sussex, Surrey and Northumbria, as well as the Metropolitan Police and the British Transport Police, previously allowed trans officers to search people if their gender matched the sex of the detainee. This allowed biological male officers who identified as female and had a gender recognition certificate to strip-search women. However, recent interim guidance issued by the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) has now been sent to all police forces stating that strip searches 'must be conducted with officers of the same biological sex as the person being searched'. This was based on legal advice following the Supreme Court ruling that found that sex is biological under the Equality Act. Now, it has emerged that the six police forces have reversed their stance and are adopting the NPCC guidance. The reversal has been hailed as a victory by women's rights campaigners who launched a legal challenge on this point. 'Forces have finally about-turned' Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'The British Transport Police, the Met Police and several other forces have finally about-turned on strip-searching policies based on gender recognition certificates. 'They should never have considered a man with a £5 certificate based on a change of pronouns and a medical diagnosis of 'dysphoria' as suitable to strip-search women and girls.' The NPCC guidance offers detainees who are transgender the ability to request to be searched by an officer who is of their gender, and not their biological sex. A biological man who identifies as a female, for example, could request the strip-search to be performed by a female officer. The NPCC guidance says that 'as far as operationally viable' this option will be provided to people whose 'lived-in gender is not the same as their biological sex'. For these individuals who are being strip-searched by police, the guidance indicates that written consent from the detainee, the searching officer and the authorising officer will be needed. In these instances, which the NPCC identifies as a rare occurrence, the officer will not be of the same sex as the detainee. 'Dangerous loophole' Ms Forstater called the NPCC guidance, which allows opposite-sex strip-searching by 'consent', a 'dangerous loophole'. 'It leaves female officers exposed to pressure and coercion within the custody suite and when out on the beat. 'This is particularly concerning given the years in which trans lobby groups have trained forces across the UK to centre the demands of trans-identifying men and disregard women's rights and needs. 'The question remains: how has the ethical and legal position of police forces across the UK deteriorated to such a point that they are putting such immense effort into enabling something as sordid as opposite-sex strip-searching?' Campaigners are now investigating if this is a breach of the law under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). This ensured intimate searches would not be done by a person of the opposite sex. Sex Matters believes this loophole for transgender detainees may be in breach of the law following the ruling of the Supreme Court case that defined sex under the Equality Act 2010. Some female officers have anonymously raised concerns that if they were asked to strip-search a trans woman who has male genitalia they may feel unable to refuse the request for fear of being branded 'transphobic' or unprofessional. 'Nonsensical jumble' The Police Federation called the suggested consensual regime for transgender detainees a 'wholly unworkable idea' and called the guidance a 'nonsensical jumble'. 'We believe that the only lawful option following the Supreme Court decision is to exempt transsexual officers from searching either biological sex and this should be the default situation for all transsexual officers,' it added. All police forces have been approached for comment. A National Police Chiefs' Council spokesman said: 'Those in policing and our communities would benefit from a clear and consistent position across the country in this complex and sensitive area. 'The guidance is explicit that officers will face no career detriment from declining to carry out searches, and any search not conducted in line with biological sex must have the written consent of the detainee, the officer carrying out the search as well as the authorising officer. 'The interim guidance is based on legal advice and has been developed after seeking views across policing as well as those of partners. It reflects working practice that already happens every day across policing, where officers and detainees make requests about searches for a multitude of reasons. 'We understand the depth of feeling there is on these issues, both among transgender communities, as well as those who hold gender-critical views. Policing remains committed to treating everyone with fairness, dignity and respect.'

Thames Water must be held to account
Thames Water must be held to account

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Thames Water must be held to account

So creditors wishing to take over Thames Water want the company and its senior management to be granted clemency from rules on sewage spills and environmental protection (Bidders demand Thames Water granted immunity over environmental crimes, 7 June). The rights of investors, it would seem, should prevail over the rights of communities to a clean environment. It is the failure of rigorously enforced regulation that led to the mismanagement of Thames Water, with loans being used to increase shareholder dividends and bloated bonuses for incompetent managers. In many countries the law can now be used to confiscate private assets gained from immoral activities, such as drug-running and prostitution. There is no reason why those who accrue wealth through the degradation of the natural environment should be treated any differently. Far from granting immunity from prosecution, the government should tighten the law to enable the criminal prosecution of the managers responsible and the repayment of shareholder dividends awarded by an underperforming business. Such a move would enable financial markets to promote good corporate governance and environmental sustainability. After all, financial investors and shareholders want profitable businesses that provide them with financial returns. If investors knew that they could lose their investment and dividends by investing in a company such as Thames Water, they would soon look to invest in more ethically run businesses. The government should now initiate legal proceedings to seize the assets of those managers who enriched themselves by creating a debt-laden, high-polluting water company. The proceeds should be invested in water infrastructure and environmental clean-ups. And Thames Water should be taken into public ownership and its assets auctioned off. Only socially responsible investors need HumphreysEmeritus professor of environmental policy, Open University Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store