
Where Oregon Football rank in ESPN's post-spring SP+ rankings
Where Oregon Football rank in ESPN's post-spring SP+ rankings
After a successful 2024 season in which they won the Big Ten Conference Championship, finished the regular season as the only undefeated team in the nation, and went into the College Football Playoff as the No. 1 overall seed, the Oregon Ducks are ready for more going into the new year.
And with a revamped roster featuring new starters at several key positions on the depth chart, they're expected to be just as good again.
With one of the highest win-total over-under in the nation, expectations are high for Dan Lanning as he brings a young but incredibly talented group of players into the new year. The schedule is favorable, with the biggest tests of the season coming on the road at Penn State and at home against the USC Trojans. Every offseason, we look at various rankings to get a sense of where the Ducks rank going into the new year, and one of the most valuable rankings to look at is ESPN's SP+.
Throughout the offseason, ESPN staff writer Bill Connelly updates his SP+ list for each college football team, and he recently released his post-spring rankings.
According to Connelly, the SP+ rankings are based on three factors: "returning production, recent recruiting, and recent history." The rankings are predictive, and they aren't meant to be a Top-25 list based solely on performance. The SP+ rankings are based less on the eye test, and are more focused on the most recent data, to predict the most likely outcomes.
Below are the top 25 teams in Connelly's most recent SP+ list.
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 11.8
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 15
For more Tigers news and information, check out Auburn Wire!
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 12.1
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 43
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 12.2
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 31
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 12.2
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 61
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 12.5
Strength of Schedule Rank: No.
20. SMU Mustangs
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 13.1
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 45
19. Illinois Fighting Illini
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 14.3
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 40
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 15.6
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 57
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 16.1
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 7
16. Oklahoma Sooners
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 16.5
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 1
For more Sooners news and information, check out Sooners Wire!
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 17.2
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 10
For more Aggies news and information, check out Aggies Wire!
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 17.3
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 2
For more Gators news and information, check out Gators Wire!
13. Tennessee Volunteers
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 18.4
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 24
For more Tennessee news and information, check out Vols Wire!
12. Miami Hurricanes
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 18.3
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 36
11. Ole Miss Rebels
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 19.8
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 23
10. Michigan Wolverines
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 21.5
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 38
For more Michigan news and information, check out Wolverines Wire!
9. LSU Tigers
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 22.1
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 9
For more LSU news and information, check out LSU Tigers Wire!
8. Clemson Tigers
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 23.3
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 34
For more Tigers news and information, check out Clemson Wire!
7. Oregon Ducks
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 24.7
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 32
For more Ducks news and information, check out Ducks Wire!
6. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 24.9
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 44
For more Notre Dame news and information, check out Fighting Irish Wire!
5. Texas Longhorns
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 26.3
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 12
For more Texas news and information, check out Longhorns Wire!
4. Georgia Bulldogs
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 26.9
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 13
For more Georgia news and information, check out UGA Wire!
3. Pen State Nittany Lions
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 27.7
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 29
For more Penn State news and information, check out Nittany Lions Wire!
2. Alabama Crimson Tide
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 27.9
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 11
For more Alabama news and information, check out Roll Tide Wire!
1. Ohio State Buckeyes
ESPN SP+ Ranking: 29.5
Strength of Schedule Rank: No. 21
For more Buckeyes news and information, check out Buckeyes Wire!
Contact/Follow @Ducks_Wire on X (formerly Twitter) and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Oregon Ducks news, notes, and opinions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Federal judge approves $2.8B settlement, paving way for US colleges to pay athletes millions
A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. The road to a settlement Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL) — a term that is now as common in college sports as 'March Madness' or 'Roll Tide.' It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are. Roster limits held things up The deal looked ready to go since last fall, but Wilken put a halt to it after listening to a number of players who had lost their spots because of newly imposed roster limits being placed on teams. The limits were part of a trade-off that allowed the schools to offer scholarships to everyone on the roster, instead of only a fraction, as has been the case for decades. Schools started cutting walk-ons in anticipation of the deal being approved. Wilken asked for a solution and, after weeks, the parties decided to let anyone cut from a roster — now termed a 'Designated Student-Athlete' — return to their old school or play for a new one without counting against the new limit. Wilken ultimately agreed, going point-by-point through the objectors' arguments to explain why they didn't hold up. 'The modifications provide Designated Student-Athletes with what they had prior to the roster limits provisions being implemented, which was the opportunity to be on a roster at the discretion of a Division I school,' Wilken wrote. Winners and losers The list of winners and losers is long and, in some cases, hard to tease out. A rough guide of winners would include football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, which will devote much of their bankroll to signing and retaining them. For instance, Michigan quarterback Bryce Underwood's NIL deal is reportedly worth between $10.5 million and $12 million. Losers, despite Wilken's ruling, figure to be at least some of the walk-ons and partial scholarship athletes whose spots are gone. Also in limbo are Olympic sports many of those athletes play and that serve as the main pipeline for a U.S. team that has won the most medals at every Olympics since the downfall of the Soviet Union. All this is a price worth paying, according to the attorneys who crafted the settlement and argue they delivered exactly what they were asked for: an attempt to put more money in the pockets of the players whose sweat and toil keep people watching from the start of football season through March Madness and the College World Series in June. What the settlement does not solve is the threat of further litigation. Though this deal brings some uniformity to the rules, states still have separate laws regarding how NIL can be doled out, which could lead to legal challenges. NCAA President Charlie Baker has been consistent in pushing for federal legislation that would put college sports under one rulebook and, if he has his way, provide some form of antitrust protection to prevent the new model from being disrupted again.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ESPN's Adam Schefter had a very interesting take regarding new Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Aaron Rodgers.
ESPN's Adam Schefter had a very interesting take regarding new Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback Aaron Rodgers. originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Veteran quarterback Aaron Rodgers finally made a decision on where he will be playing in 2025, as he informed the Pittsburgh Steelers that he intends to sign with them. Advertisement But not everyone was all positive about the move. In a recent post on X, ESPN's Adam Schefter had a very interesting take about the Steelers signing the 41-year-old QB. "Steelers and Aaron Rodgers need each other," Schefter wrote. "The Steelers have lost six straight playoff games, their longest postseason losing streak in team history. Rodgers hasn't won a playoff game since the 2020 Divisional Playoff, a 32-18 win against the Rams on Jan. 16, 2021 — 1,601 days ago." It may be true that the Steelers have lost six straight playoff games because of the fact that they have not found a consistent starting QB since Ben Roethlisberger retired. But that does not exactly mean that they absolutely needed Rodgers to be their field general. Advertisement As for Rodgers not winning a playoff game since 2020, he has not played with a player who was named to the Pro Bowl since that season. While that does not mean that he has had no help, it does play a factor in him not winning a postseason game since 2020. But think about it: The Steelers don't win playoff games and either does Rodgers. How in Schefter's wacky mind do those two wrongs add up to being a right? Rodgers will be looking to prove this season that signing with the Steelers was the right move, as he ideally helps lead the team back to the playoffs to redeem themselves after their early exit this past season. Advertisement Related: Aaron Rodgers Signing Incredibly Cheap Contract With Steelers Rumored Related: Steelers Rumored to Be Targeting Trade for Aaron Rodgers Buddy This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 6, 2025, where it first appeared.


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Aljamain Sterling doesn't get Sean O'Malley's stardom: 'His personality is a little dry'
Aljamain Sterling doesn't get Sean O'Malley's stardom: 'His personality is a little dry' Aljamain Sterling is confused by UFC 316 headliner Sean O'Malley's star power. O'Malley (18-2 MMA, 10-2 UFC) runs things back with Merab Dvalishvili (19-4 MMA, 12-2 UFC) in Saturday's main event (pay-per-view, ESPN, ESPN+) at Prudential Center in Newark, N.J. Sterling lost his bantamweight title to O'Malley at UFC 292, before his teammate Dvalishvili dethroned O'Malley to become champion at UFC 306. "The Funkmaster" previously said his fight with O'Malley didn't deliver the pay-per-view buys he expected, and that the idea of him being a big star may be a myth. "I don't really know his personality outside of when he's asking me constantly about my weight, or asking other fighters how much they weigh in person," Sterling told Home of Fight. "That's always been my interaction with him: 'How much do you weigh right now?' So I don't really have much to go of off. "I've always said his personality was a little dry, in my opinion, and I didn't really understand the stardom other than his fight skills. He's a very good fighter. He had a lot of good knockouts and highlights. That's usually good when you're fighting not-so-good people." O'Malley revealed that he went into his first fight with Dvalishvili with a torn labrum in his hip, which he underwent surgery for after the fight. When Sterling fought O'Malley, it was just three months after he had retained his belt against Henry Cejudo in a five-round battle at UFC 288. "Isn't that funny? Isn't that funny that he's all of a sudden healthy, but for some reason I was making excuses when we fought, had to turn around (fast) after just going 25 minutes with a former two-division champion?" Sterling said. "You could say whatever you want. I had to take a whole month off just to let my legs heal, and somehow that had no bearing on the fight in his fanbase's mind. "But anyone, as a combat sports athlete, understands the game. You have to be mentally ready and physically prepared in order to step in there, so I think it's perfect timing with the irony. Karma has a way of playing funny games, and now he sees how it feels. Even if he had two good hips, I really don't think on that day he was beating Merab."