Inflation figures awkward for a government promising to boost household finances
Inflation is the most relatable economic metric.
You might tut at sluggish GDP or sigh at labour market data, presuming you notice them at all, but inflation is the number you feel in your pocket.
This month the link could not be plainer. The headline rate of CPI inflation in April jumped 3.5% on the same time a year ago, up almost a percentage point on March, and driven largely by the timing of changes in household bills.
April is the start of the new financial year, and households do not need the Office for National Statistics (ONS) to tell them that means price rises. Combined gas and electricity prices are up almost 7% and water bills more than 25% on average, and index-linked broadband and mobile phone increases kicked in too.
Add a council tax hike of 5%, not included in the CPI calculation, and Sky News analysis suggests an average annual increase of almost £500 for every household, inescapable for billpayers and awkward for a government that came to power promising to put more money in people's pockets.
That case is harder to make when policy choices are considered inflationary. The ONS pointed to increases in transport costs driven by vehicle excise duty - car tax - for both electric and internal combustion engine vehicles.
April also saw the introduction of increased employer National Insurance payments and a reduced threshold, along with a 6% increase in the minimum wage, welcome for employees but another pressure on business.
1:23
Chancellor Rachel Reeves did not deny that these costs would weigh on employers and could impact prices, but remains steadfast that tax rises were necessary to stabilise the public finances she inherited.
She cited the potential impact of recent deals with the US, India and this week the EU to boost trade.
The good news is that this may be close to the peak of an inflation surge long anticipated by the Bank of England and, while wages continue to rise faster than prices, the rate of increase may be slowing down.
There are also some statistical factors that inflate the April figure a little too, primarily a late Easter (last year it fell in March) which pushed up spending on airfares, recreation and culture.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
Homes at former police station in Cleethorpes approved
Plans to build 21 homes at a former police station in Cleethorpes, despite flood risk concerns, have been Bannister of Land Developers (Lincs) Ltd proposes to convert the former station in Princes Road into 10 flats. Eleven houses would also be built on the former car East Lincolnshire Council officers had recommended refusal after an objection from the Environment Agency on tidal flood risk councillors approved it by 5-2 votes, on the grounds of regeneration of a brownfield site and that sufficient attempts had been made to come to a resolution over flood risk. The Prince's Road site in Cleethorpes was sold off after Humberside Police moved out in 2020 after almost 90 to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, Anglian Water were also concerned about the proposals due to surface water run-off and the levels of some floors being below anticipated flood Hayden Dawkins questioned the major flood risk given the Princes Road side was on a hill."It's a typical situation where the Environment Agency goes against every development in Grimsby and Cleethorpes because we're in a flood zone," he said. Residents also raised concerns, with over a hundred people signing a petition against the Helen Lanfranchi said water "frequently pools" in the former police station's car said in the summer of 2021 most of it was covered by water."It remained for over three months with an infestation of flies with, understandably, a horrendous smell."The police and fire services said the empty site had attracted anti-social behaviour and the building had been broken into Police and Crime Commissioner Jonathan Evison said approval would generate money for the police that would be reinvested back into the Grimsby Evison said: "I really worry that if we don't get this through, what does that say to all the other developers in the area?" Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Why the Israel-Iran war could raise your taxes
If Rachel Reeves is to have any chance of making it to her autumn budget without U-turns or raising taxes, the improved economic forecasts of recent months need to come true. Missiles flying between Israel and Iran may destroy that hope. Things had been getting better for the Chancellor. Look at economic forecasts from the aftermath of Trump's 'liberation day', and there was a common theme when it came to Britain. Because of the nature of our economic relationship with America – as a massive exporter in services (we're their call centre) and with more or less balanced trade in goods – we would be shielded against the worst impacts of a trade slowdown. Global GDP growth would suffer, but the effects would not come to Britain. The real boon, if one was being positive, though was what effect these tariffs might have on inflation. While raising prices in the shops for American consumers, the view of the economic world was that for the UK they may in fact be disinflationary. That's because, as the consultancy firm Oxford Economics explained to their clients last month, dampening demand for commodities such as oil and gas would reduce the cost of products consumed in Britain. But all that was before the first Israeli missiles landed in Iran. A barrel of Brent crude now goes for over $70. On Monday it went for $65 – so there has been a 9 per cent in just five days. On Friday morning, it briefly spiked to nearly $80 in what was the sharpest price spike since Russia invaded Ukraine three years ago. Within hours of Reeves delivering what director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies Paul Johnson yesterday called an 'incomprehensible' spending review speech, economists were warning that tax rises in the autumn were becoming likely. Just a day later, a worse-than-expected GDP contraction turned likely into very likely. If oil prices continue climbing as the war escalates, tax rises could become certain. Some 20 billion barrels of oil pass through the Strait of Hormuz, or about 30 per cent of total global trade. So it's easy to see how if Tehran tried to attempt to close the Strait – as Iranian news reports it is considering – or even attacked a few tankers, the oil price would quickly head northwards again. Indeed the FT reported yesterday that the world's largest oil tanker company has stopped accepting new contracts to sail through the Strait. If oil prices do continue to rise – and some say disruption in the Strait could send the price over $100 a barrel – it would be mere days before Brits start paying the cost at the petrol forecourt. But oil supplies are crucial to much more than petrol and diesel and taken together, it's easy to see how the rate of inflation remains sticky or even begins to rise again. Given that the bond markets are keeping the cost of UK debt far higher than the Treasury has been used to – much more because of inflation worries and the after effects of money printing than is understood in Westminster – any signal that prices were rising again are not going to give them faith in Britain as a debtor. If that were to happen and gilt yields remain high, or even climb further, then Reeves could find herself in heaps of trouble. It surprises many City economists just how unequivocal the government has been about sticking to fiscal rules and indeed keeping Labour's manifesto promise not to 'raise taxes on working people' given how hard that is when Reeves only has £9.9 billion of headroom. Before her Spring Statement the chancellor talked of the economic challenges posed by a 'changing world'. Things in the middle east have a habit of spilling over and the world seems to be changing again. Could this once more be the excuse the chancellor has to reach for?
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
More jets does not mean UK ‘at war' says Reeves, amid Israel-Iran conflict
Sending more jets to the Middle East 'does not mean' that the UK is at war, Rachel Reeves has said, as she warned of rising oil and gas prices amid the conflict between Israel and Iran. The Chancellor also indicated that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel, but declined to comment on 'what might happen in the future'. The two nations continued to exchange fire overnight, as the region braced for a protracted conflict. Sir Keir Starmer confirmed on Saturday that more RAF planes are being deployed, amid the escalating hostilities between Israel and Iran. Additional refuelling aircraft have been deployed from UK bases and more fast Typhoon jets will be sent over, it is understood. Asked whether the announcement from the Prime Minister means the UK is at war, Ms Reeves told Sky News: 'No, it does not mean that we are at war. 'And we have not been involved in these strikes or this conflict, but we do have important assets in the region and it is right that we send jets to protect them and that's what we've done. 'It's a precautionary move.' Oil prices surged surged on Friday after Israel's initial strikes against Iran's nuclear programme, sparking fears of increasing prices in the UK. The Chancellor told the BBC that there is 'no complacency' from the Treasury on the issue and 'we're obviously, monitoring this very closely as a government'. Sir Keir has declined to rule out the possibility of intervening in the conflict entirely, and the Chancellor indicated on Sunday that the UK could 'potentially' support Israel in the future. Britain last announced it had deployed fighter jets in the region in last year, when the Government said British aircraft had played a part in efforts to prevent further escalation. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. 'So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation.' It comes after Iranian state media said Tehran had warned it would target US, UK and French bases in the region if the countries help Israel thwart Iran's strikes, according to reports on Saturday. Conservative shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride has backed the Government's decision to send further RAF jets to the region, telling the BBC it is the 'right thing' to do. He told the BBC: 'We've got assets out there in the UAE, Oman, Cyprus, they need to be protected given that Iran has suggested they may be under threat.'
