Harvard students march after Trump seeks to cut remaining contracts
Yesterday's protest at Harvard unfolded as news helicopters hovered overhead. (EPA Images pic)
CAMBRIDGE : Harvard students protested yesterday after the US government said it intends to cancel all remaining financial contracts with the university, president Donald Trump's latest attempt to force the prestigious institution to submit to unprecedented oversight.
Hundreds of students gathered to oppose Trump's widening offensive, including yesterday's measures estimated to be worth US$100 million, against the university that has drawn his ire for refusing to give up control of curriculum, admissions and research.
'Trump = traitor' read one student placard, while the crowd chanted 'who belongs in class today, let them stay' in reference to Harvard's international students whose status Trump has upended by summarily revoking the university's accreditation to the country's student and exchange visitor programme.
A judge issued a restraining order pending a hearing on the matter scheduled for tomorrow, the same day as the university's commencement graduation ceremony for which thousands of graduating students and their families had gathered in Cambridge, Massachusetts, near Boston.
The White House, meanwhile doubled down in its offensive, saying that instead of Harvard public money should go to vocational schools that train electricians and plumbers.
'The president is more interested in giving that taxpayer money to trade schools and programs and state schools where they are promoting American values, but most importantly, educating the next generation based on skills that we need in our economy and our society,' Karoline Leavitt said on Fox News yesterday evening.
'We need more of those in our country, and less LGBTQ graduate majors from Harvard University.'
Yesterday's protest unfolded as news helicopters hovered overhead and graduating students in academic attire and their guests ate finger food at a reception on the lawns of Harvard Square nearby.
'All my international friends and peers and professors and researchers are at risk and (are) threatened with being deported – or their option is to transfer' to another university, said Alice Goyer, who attended the protest wearing a black academic gown.
'As a US student, it's my responsibility to speak out for them.'
One history of medicine student from Britain graduating this week who gave his name only as Jack said that the policies pursued by Trump would make US universities less attractive to international students, even if the courts overturn the most damaging measures.
'The cloud may pass, but the damage will be done,' said Jack, whose parents had travelled from Britain for the graduation ceremony.
Foreign students 'who are here don't know where they stand, those overseas don't know if they'll be able to get back in… I don't know if I'd pursue a PhD here, six years is a long time', he added.
Harvard itself has filed extensive legal challenges against the Trump measures, which legal experts say are likely to be overturned by the courts.
Separately, alumni plan to file a lawsuit against Trump on June 9, filmmaker Anurima Bhargava told a virtual meeting staged by Crimson Courage, a grassroots alumni group that held a mass webinar to raise awareness and a fighting fund from former students.
'American values'
The cutting of contracts announced yesterday – estimated by US media to be worth US$100 million – would mark the slashing of business ties between the government and a university that is the country's oldest and a research powerhouse.
Amid a broad campaign against seats of learning that Trump accuses of being hotbeds of liberal bias and antisemitism, the president has singled out Harvard for particular punishment.
In the last few weeks, the elite educational powerhouse has seen billions of dollars in federal grants frozen and millions of dollars of federal contracts torn up.
The university has sued both to block the revocation of its right to recruit and sponsor foreign students, 27% of its total roll, as well as to overturn the withdrawal of federal funding.
A legal expert suggested Harvard could file a lawsuit to overturn the latest contract cuts as part of existing legal action.
'The case is so strong that the court system is not going to step to the side and allow this… to go forward,' said Albany Law School professor Ray Brescia.
He said the Trump administration's assault on Harvard was so flawed that a higher court would likely strike down the campaign against the university if the Trump administration were to challenge it on appeal.
On Monday, Trump nonetheless vowed he would prevail in the increasingly public struggle, claiming that foreign students at Harvard included 'radicalised lunatics, troublemakers'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
On US Army's 250th birthday, Trump calls LA protesters 'animals'
FORT BRAGG, United States: President Donald Trump turned a trip marking the US army's 250th birthday into a political-style rally Tuesday, wrapping himself in martial symbolism as he defended his decision to send soldiers to protest-hit Los Angeles. The US commander-in-chief goaded troops to boo political opponents and the media and called protesters "animals" in what was meant to be a non-partisan event at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, the country's biggest military installation. The Republican president meanwhile reinforced his strongman image as he watched spectacular rocket fire, special forces training and parachute displays, standing behind sandbags while surrounded by military officers in camouflage. The event came days before tanks are set to rumble through Washington in a huge and highly unusual military parade on Saturday, which coincides with Trump's own 79th birthday. Trump has long shown a fascination for the military – and envy for the military parades that his foreign counterparts preside over. But on Tuesday he spent much of his speech talking about anything but the army, preferring instead to go on a diatribe on the Los Angeles protests. "They're incompetent," Trump said of California Governor Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass, as some troops in the audience booed. Newsom has attacked Trump as "dictatorial" after the president deployed thousands of troops including 700 active duty US Marines to Los Angeles following clashes sparked by US government immigration raids. Pointing at the "fake news," Trump said "look what I have to put up with" as troops booed again. Democratic former president Joe Biden also earned a few boos when Trump mentioned him. Trump then ramped up the military language as he promised to "liberate" Los Angeles, saying he would "not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy." The Republican also announced that he would be restoring the names of other US Army bases that, like Fort Bragg, honoured military figures of the pro-slavery Confederacy from the US Civil War. He was accompanied by Pentagon chief and former Fox News contributor Pete Hegseth, who hailed the end of what he called "woke" in the US military. In scenes that resembled one of his election rallies last year, Trump finally left the stage to cheers as he did his trademark dance to the Village People song "Y.M.C.A." The event comes in a week loaded with military symbolism for Trump. He made it clear earlier that he would not tolerate anyone spoiling the parade on Saturday – which marks the 250th anniversary of the army but falls on his birthday too. "If there's any protest that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force," Trump said earlier at the White House. For Trump, "what matters is the spectacle. And the military is a heck of a spectacle," said Peter Loge, director of George Washington University's School of Media. "The military parade, the military in Los Angeles is theater of leadership, theater of governing, without paying attention to the real-world consequences," Loge told AFP. Trump was sent to a military academy as a child by his property tycoon father, and seems to have loved military pomp ever since – even if repeated educational and medical deferments meant he could avoid the draft to fight in Vietnam. He first had the idea for a grand military parade after attending France's annual Bastille Day parade in Paris at the invitation of his friend, President Emmanuel Macron, but is only getting around to it in his second term. World War II meanwhile appears to have been increasingly on Trump's mind since returning to office. He recently designated May 8 "Victory Day," noting that unlike much of Europe, the United States had no day to mark the defeat of Nazi Germany – and he has repeatedly downplayed the role of US allies in the war. "Without us, you'd all be speaking German right now, maybe a little Japanese thrown in," Trump said at Fort Bragg. Critics say that Trump's military fascination underscores an authoritarian streak.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
US military bases to restore names changed after racial justice protests, Trump says
U.S. President Donald Trump prepares to deliver remarks during a visit to Fort Bragg to mark the U.S. Army anniversary, in North Carolina, U.S., June 10, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein FORT BRAGG, North Carolina (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Tuesday the military would rename bases which were changed after racial justice protests in 2023, including reverting to Fort Lee originally named after Civil War-era Confederate commander Robert E. Lee. Under the Trump administration, the Pentagon has already renamed Fort Moore back to its original name of Fort Benning and Fort Liberty back to Fort Bragg. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has been able to sidestep a Congressional provision that banned bases having Confederate names by renaming bases after people with the same names as the Confederate officials. "We are also going to be restoring the names to Fort Pickett, Fort Hood, Fort Gordon, Fort Rucker, Fort Polk, Fort AP Hill and Fort Robert E. Lee," Trump said while speaking at Fort Bragg. "We won a lot of battles out of those forts. It's no time to change," Trump said as uniformed service members stood behind him. Fort Lee, located in Petersburg, Virginia, was renamed Fort Gregg-Adams in 2023. After Trump's announcement, the Army said that Fort Lee would be renamed after Private Fitz Lee, a Medal of Honor recipient from the Spanish-American War. During Trump's speech at Fort Bragg, some audience members, including those in uniform, cheered as the president made the announcement. They also jeered at the press as Trump pointed towards reporters and called them "Fake News" and applauded as he took shots at his predecessor, Joe Biden. Uniformed members of the U.S. armed forces are meant to be apolitical, carrying out the policies of Democratic and Republican administrations. The 2023 move to shed Confederate names for military bases came in the wake of nationwide protests after the 2020 death of George Floyd, a Black man killed by police in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Confederate flags and base names can be offensive to many Americans, who see them as reminders of the enslavement of Black Americans and symbols of white supremacy. Congress in 2021 passed legislation forbidding the naming of bases after anyone who voluntarily served or held leadership in the Confederate States of America, the breakaway republic of Southern states that fought against the U.S. in the Civil War in the 19th Century. (Reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt in North Carolina, Idrees Ali and Phil Stewart in Washington D.C.; Editing by Stephen Coates)
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
What is the UN high seas treaty and how could it change global ocean conservation?
UNITED NATIONS (US), June 11 — The high seas treaty could be law by the end of the year, affording protection to marine life in the vast swathes of ocean that belong to no one. The treaty was adopted by UN member states in June 2023. It has been ratified by 49 nations plus the European Union, according to the UN, and comes into force 120 days after its 60th ratification. The US signed the treaty in 2023 under Joe Biden's administration but is not expected to ratify it while Donald Trump is president. Here are the key points of the treaty text: International waters The treaty covers international waters, which fall outside the jurisdiction of any single state, and account for more than 60 per cent of the world's oceans. Specifically, it applies to waters beyond countries' exclusive economic zones, which extend up to 200 nautical miles from the coast. It also covers what is known as 'the Area', shorthand for seabed and subsoil beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. The Area comprises just over half of the planet's seabed. Once enacted, a decision-making body — a Conference of the Parties (COP) — would have to work with regional and global organisations that already oversee different aspects of the oceans. These include regional fisheries bodies and the International Seabed Authority, the arena where nations are hotly contesting a proposed set of rules to govern deep-sea mining. Trump's decision to sidestep the authority — to which the US is not a member — and issue deep-sea mining permits in international waters has raised tricky questions of jurisdiction. Marine protected areas Currently, almost all protected marine areas (MPAs) are within national territorial waters. The treaty, however, allows for these reserves to be created in the open ocean. Most decisions would be taken by a consensus of the COP, but an MPA can be voted into existence with a three-quarters majority, to prevent deadlock caused by a single country. One crucial shortcoming: the text does not say how these conservation measures will be monitored and enforced over remote swathes of the ocean — a task that will fall to the COP. Some experts say satellites could be used to spot infractions. Individual countries are already responsible for certain activities on the high seas that they have jurisdiction over, such as those of ships flying their flags. Sharing the bounty? On the high seas, countries and entities under their jurisdiction will be allowed to collect animal, plant, or microbial matter whose genetic material might prove useful, even commercially. Scientists, for example, have discovered molecules with the potential to treat cancer or other diseases in microbes scooped up in sediment, or produced by sponges or marine mollusks. Benefits-sharing of those resources has been a key point of contention between wealthy and poorer nations. The treaty establishes frameworks for the transfer of marine research technologies to developing countries and a strengthening of their research capacities, as well as open access to data. But it is left to the COP to decide exactly how any monetary benefits will eventually be shared, with options including a system based on specific commercialised products, or more generalised payment systems. Environmental impact studies The treaty requires signatories to assess the environmental impacts of planned activities under their control on the high seas before they are authorised in instances when such activities may have more than a minor or transitory effect. It also calls for countries to assess the potential impact on international waters of activities within national jurisdictions that may cause 'substantial pollution' or harm the high sea marine environment. Ultimately, states are responsible for giving the green light to any potentially harmful activity — a role NGOs hoped would go to the COP, to make controversial approvals more difficult. The treaty also requires states to publish updates on an activity's environmental impacts. Approvals can be called into question if unanticipated impacts arise. Though they are not specifically listed in the treaty, activities that could come under regulation include transport and fishing, as well as more controversial subjects such as deep-sea mining or even geo-engineering initiatives to mitigate global warming. — AFP
