On US Army's 250th birthday, Trump calls LA protesters 'animals'
FORT BRAGG, United States: President Donald Trump turned a trip marking the US army's 250th birthday into a political-style rally Tuesday, wrapping himself in martial symbolism as he defended his decision to send soldiers to protest-hit Los Angeles.
The US commander-in-chief goaded troops to boo political opponents and the media and called protesters "animals" in what was meant to be a non-partisan event at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, the country's biggest military installation.
The Republican president meanwhile reinforced his strongman image as he watched spectacular rocket fire, special forces training and parachute displays, standing behind sandbags while surrounded by military officers in camouflage.
The event came days before tanks are set to rumble through Washington in a huge and highly unusual military parade on Saturday, which coincides with Trump's own 79th birthday.
Trump has long shown a fascination for the military – and envy for the military parades that his foreign counterparts preside over.
But on Tuesday he spent much of his speech talking about anything but the army, preferring instead to go on a diatribe on the Los Angeles protests.
"They're incompetent," Trump said of California Governor Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass, as some troops in the audience booed.
Newsom has attacked Trump as "dictatorial" after the president deployed thousands of troops including 700 active duty US Marines to Los Angeles following clashes sparked by US government immigration raids.
Pointing at the "fake news," Trump said "look what I have to put up with" as troops booed again.
Democratic former president Joe Biden also earned a few boos when Trump mentioned him.
Trump then ramped up the military language as he promised to "liberate" Los Angeles, saying he would "not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy."
The Republican also announced that he would be restoring the names of other US Army bases that, like Fort Bragg, honoured military figures of the pro-slavery Confederacy from the US Civil War.
He was accompanied by Pentagon chief and former Fox News contributor Pete Hegseth, who hailed the end of what he called "woke" in the US military.
In scenes that resembled one of his election rallies last year, Trump finally left the stage to cheers as he did his trademark dance to the Village People song "Y.M.C.A."
The event comes in a week loaded with military symbolism for Trump.
He made it clear earlier that he would not tolerate anyone spoiling the parade on Saturday – which marks the 250th anniversary of the army but falls on his birthday too.
"If there's any protest that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force," Trump said earlier at the White House.
For Trump, "what matters is the spectacle. And the military is a heck of a spectacle," said Peter Loge, director of George Washington University's School of Media.
"The military parade, the military in Los Angeles is theater of leadership, theater of governing, without paying attention to the real-world consequences," Loge told AFP.
Trump was sent to a military academy as a child by his property tycoon father, and seems to have loved military pomp ever since – even if repeated educational and medical deferments meant he could avoid the draft to fight in Vietnam.
He first had the idea for a grand military parade after attending France's annual Bastille Day parade in Paris at the invitation of his friend, President Emmanuel Macron, but is only getting around to it in his second term.
World War II meanwhile appears to have been increasingly on Trump's mind since returning to office.
He recently designated May 8 "Victory Day," noting that unlike much of Europe, the United States had no day to mark the defeat of Nazi Germany – and he has repeatedly downplayed the role of US allies in the war.
"Without us, you'd all be speaking German right now, maybe a little Japanese thrown in," Trump said at Fort Bragg.
Critics say that Trump's military fascination underscores an authoritarian streak.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
30 minutes ago
- Barnama
Trump Says US Is Evacuating Personnel From Middle East As 'It Could Be A Dangerous Place'
ISTANBUL, June 12 (Bernama-Anadolu) -- United States (US) President Donald Trump said Wednesday that American personnel are being evacuated from locations in the Middle East amid escalating tensions with Iran because "it could be a dangerous place, Anadolu Ajansi (AA) reported. Speaking to reporters before attending the opening night of the award-winning musical Les Misérables at the Kennedy Centre, Trump acknowledged the withdrawal while maintaining his firm stance on Iran's nuclear ambitions. "Well, they are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place. We'll see what happens. We've given notice to move out," he said when asked about reports of personnel relocations.
The Star
43 minutes ago
- The Star
Democratic governors embrace border security, reject Trump immigrant 'abuses'
FILE PHOTO: Women dressed in traditional Mexican attire take part in a protest against federal immigration sweeps, in downtown Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 11, 2025. REUTERS/David Swanson/File Photo WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Three prominent Democratic U.S. governors face a grilling on Thursday from a Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives panel over immigration policy, as President Donald Trump steps up a crackdown on people living in the country illegally. The governors of New York, Illinois and Minnesota are due to testify to the House Oversight Committee following days of protests in downtown Los Angeles over the Trump administration's aggressive ramping up of arrests of migrants. Tensions escalated as Trump ordered the National Guard and Marines into California to provide additional security. Trump's immigration crackdown has become a major political flashpoint between the White House and national Democrats. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, seen as a contender for the party's presidential nomination in 2028, in a Tuesday night video speech accused Trump of choosing "theatrics over public safety." Minnesota's Tim Walz, who ran unsuccessfully for vice president last year; Illinois' JB Pritzker, also seen a 2028 hopeful, and New York's Kathy Hochul, walked a careful line in their prepared testimony for Thursday's hearing, voicing support for immigration enforcement, if not Trump's tactics. "If they are undocumented, we want them out of Illinois and out of our country," Pritzker said. At the same time, Pritzker lashed out against "any violations of the law or abuses of power" and said, "Law-abiding, hardworking, tax-paying people who have been in this country for years should have a path to citizenship." Reuters/Ipsos polls show Trump getting more support for his handling of immigration than any other policy area. "Minnesota is not a sanctuary state," Walz proclaimed, adding that state officials cooperate with federal immigration authorities, while noting that it offers "respect" to cities and counties that choose to give no more than the legal minimum support to the Department of Homeland Security. (Reporting by Richard Cowan; editing by Scott Malone and Sandra Maler)
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Donald Trump and the 'rhetoric of emergency'
TARIFFS, immigration, energy: In all these areas, Donald Trump has granted himself exceptional and broad presidential powers by declaring "emergency" situations that his critics insist do not exist. "In the United States, there is no tradition of emergency powers (granted to the president) under the Constitution," New York University professor Noah Rosenblum told AFP. But various laws allow the commander-in-chief's powers to be expanded on an exceptional – and usually temporary – basis. Historically such emergency powers have been invoked to deal with natural disasters, to deploy responders or troops, and to unlock critical funding. "But that, of course, is not how Donald Trump is using it," Rosenblum said. Since returning to the White House on January 20, the Republican president has repeatedly invoked states of emergency in a variety of areas – eight times in all, according to National Public Radio – thus green-lighting swift and forceful intervention on his administration's part. They have had little to do with hurricanes, floods or earthquakes. On his first day in office, Trump declared a "national energy emergency" in the United States – the world's leading oil producer. By early April, frustrated by the trade deficits the United States had with many countries, including some imbalances going back decades, Trump declared a national emergency, among other reasons, "to increase our competitive edge," the White House said. The result? Tariffs slapped on adversaries and allies alike. The flow of migrants arriving from Mexico has prompted Trump to declare a state of emergency at the US southern border, and he apparently feels empowered to respond with massive import duties, or forced deportations of undocumented migrants. Now, Trump has sent the US military into Los Angeles to quell protests, invoking a seldom-used law that allows the president to deploy National Guard units if there is a "rebellion or danger of rebellion." The move countered the wishes of local authorities and California Governor Gavin Newsom, who accused Trump of a "dictatorial" drift. "The president is simply announcing emergencies when there aren't any," said Frank Bowman, a law professor at the University of Missouri, noting how local police have said they are capable of handling clashes with protesters opposed to raids by immigration agents. "All of these grants of potential emergency powers really don't account for the election of a president like Mr. Trump, who is not entirely rational, who is not dedicated to the rule of law, who is, in fact, an aspiring autocrat who is looking... to exercise extraordinary power," Bowman told AFP. Trump is not the first US leader to invoke exceptional circumstances to justify such moves, even if he does so in a way without precedent. His Democratic predecessor Joe Biden, for example, decided to forgive student debt given the "emergency" created by the Covid pandemic. The conservative-leaning Supreme Court was not convinced, however, and blocked the plan. In Trump's case, will the courts, which have been flooded by lawsuits, affirm the legality of actions taken in the name of imminent peril? The tendency of judges "in these kinds of things is to defer pretty heavily to the president," Bowman said. On Thursday, a California court will consider a request by Governor Newsom to suspend Trump's troop deployment. In a filing to the court, the administration said Trump's judgment has historical precedent. Courts did not interfere when President Dwight Eisenhower sent troops to protect school desegregation or when Richard Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail during a postal workers' strike, "and courts should not interfere here either," it said. Beyond the legal tussles, the relentless use of the language of urgency, of imminent threat or national peril, is part of a broader strategy, professor Rosenblum stressed. Trump, he said, "is using the perpetual rhetoric of emergency to keep us perpetually riled up and either on the defensive and so increasingly exhausted or scared and aggressive – and so demanding government intervention."
