Tips for supporting Child Protection Week 2025
Child Protection Week is an annual campaign in South Africa aimed at raising awareness about the rights of children and the importance of protecting them from abuse, neglect, violence, and exploitation.
It is a time to promote collective responsibility for the safety and well-being of every child.
In 2025, Child Protection Week will be observed from May 29 to June 5.
While the week helps focus national attention, child protection must be a daily commitment.
Children face risks throughout the year, and safeguarding their rights requires ongoing vigilance, education, and action from individuals, families, communities, and institutions.
Ongoing efforts are essential to break cycles of abuse and create a safer, more supportive society for future generations.
Here is how you can get it:
Know the law and your duty
South Africa's Constitution and the Children's Act (Act No. 38 of 2005) place a legal and moral obligation on every adult to protect children. Understanding Article 28 of the Constitution, which guarantees every child the right to protection from maltreatment, neglect, abuse or degradation, is the first step towards meaningful action.
Be the eyes and ears
If you witness or suspect abuse, don't stay silent. Reporting abuse can save lives. Know the signs of physical, emotional and sexual abuse, as well as neglect. Children may not always speak out, but their behaviour often does.
Empower children with knowledge
Teach children about their rights in age-appropriate ways. Equip them with the tools to speak up and seek help if they feel unsafe at home, at school, or online. Trusted adults, teachers and caregivers must create safe spaces for these conversations.
Support child-focused organisations
Donate, volunteer, or partner with NGOs and community organisations working in child protection. Their work is vital and often under-resourced. Use your skills, time or platforms to make a difference.
Keep an eye on digital dangers
Online grooming, bullying, and exploitation are increasing threats. Monitor children's online activities, activate parental controls, and have open conversations about internet safety.
Make child safety everyone's business
Encourage schools, religious institutions, sports clubs, and community groups to observe Child Protection Week. Hosting workshops, poster drives, or awareness talks can amplify the message that every child matters.
Break the silence on abuse
Stigma and silence perpetuate abuse. Survivors and allies must be supported to speak out. Share real stories (with consent) during Child Protection Week to shine a light on both the pain and the hope of recovery.
Challenge harmful norms
Cultural practices or social beliefs should never justify child abuse. Take a stand against harmful traditions, bullying, and gender-based violence in all its forms.
Lead by example
Children watch what we do more than what we say. Show respect, kindness and non-violence in your own actions, whether as a parent, neighbour or community leader.
Save these vital numbers:
Keep these helplines easily accessible and share them in your networks:
• Department of Social Development (24/7 GBV Command Centre): 0800 428 428 (Toll-free)
• Dial *120*7867# (free from any mobile phone) to request a call-back
• Childline South Africa: 116
• Child Welfare South Africa: 0861 4 CHILD (24453) / 011 452-4110
• Email: info@childwelfaresa.org.za
This year's theme echoes a vital truth: 'It's in our hands to stop the cycle'.
Let's build a society where children are protected, nurtured, and given the chance to thrive, not just during Child Protection Week, but every day.
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
Teacher dismissed for sexual harassment against Grade 8 pupils
The arbitrator noted that students initially delayed reporting the harassment incidents 'because Siwela threatened them'. A Gauteng high school teacher has been found guilty of sexual assault and harassment of multiple Grade 8 students and dismissed from his position following a lengthy arbitration process that concluded in May 2025. Lindokuhle Siwela, a natural science teacher at Kensington High School, was found guilty on multiple charges of sexual misconduct involving several schoolgirls in 2023. Education Labour Relations Council arbitrator Themba Manganyi ruled that Siwela was unsuitable to work with children and ordered his dismissal as the mandatory sanction. The arbitrator also declared that Siwela be registered as unsuitable to work with children in terms of the Children's Act, effectively barring him from any future employment involving minors. Pattern of misconduct targeting Grade 8 students The charges against Siwela involved a disturbing pattern of behaviour targeting Grade 8D students throughout 2023. The allegations included multiple instances of sexual assault through inappropriate touching, sexual harassment through inappropriate comments and questions, and intimidation of victims who threatened to report him. According to testimony by pupils, Siwela's misconduct extended beyond physical assault to include a system of awarding academic marks based on students' physical appearance rather than their academic performance. Learner ZY testified that during a periodic table project, Siwela 'would allocate them marks based on their body shape'. She recounted how when asked how many marks she deserved, she said 15 out of 20, 'but he said she deserved 18 out of 20 because she was beautiful'. ALSO READ: Police rope in specialised team to probe murder of 14-year-old Lukhona Fose Students testify about harassment Multiple students provided testimony detailing Siwela's inappropriate behavior during the 2023 academic year. The students, whose identities were protected during proceedings, described a pattern of unwanted physical contact, inappropriate sexual comments and threats when they attempted to seek help. Learner AM testified about an incident in which she and another student called Siwela for help with a project. 'Mr Siwela approached them from behind and put his hands around their necks and he held their breasts,' the arbitrator's report said. When questioned about his actions, Siwela allegedly responded that 'he would make them fail'. The same student testified that Siwela told her 'she must date him and that he would take good care of her and that she should stop sleeping with young boys.' Learner SK, who served as a representative council member, testified about particularly disturbing incidents including Siwela's refusal to allow her to use the toilet during menstruation unless she proved her condition to him. 'Mr Siwela refused and said that she must undress so that he could see for himself,' according to her testimony. ALSO READ: Police launch search for teen kidnapped by fake cops in Vereeniging Threats and intimidation tactics Central to the case was evidence that Siwela used his position of authority to intimidate students who might report his behaviour. Multiple witnesses testified that he threatened academic retaliation against students who spoke out. SK testified that Siwela 'threatened her that if she reported him for sexual harassment, he would make sure that she did not write matric'. Similarly, testimony revealed that Siwela told another student 'he would make her life miserable and that he would make her fail' when she indicated she might report him. The arbitrator noted that students initially delayed reporting the incidents 'because Mr Siwela threatened them'. ALSO READ: Abusive Teachers: How do we deal? Teacher's defence collapses under scrutiny During the proceedings, which spanned multiple hearing dates from August 2024 to March 2025, Siwela pleaded not guilty to all charges but offered what the arbitrator characterised as merely 'bare denial' of the allegations. Siwela's testimony was marked by contradictions and admissions that undermined his defence. He conceded that he 'touched learners when he was interacting with them during teaching and learning' but denied inappropriate intent. Regarding specific allegations, Siwela's responses were evasive. On one charge of sexual assault, he stated he 'had nothing to say about allegation 1 as he was not sure whether it happened in full view of the class or somewhere else'. The arbitrator noted that Siwela 'conceded that he could have touched her bum when moving in between the rows, but denied that he smacked her' and admitted that 'allegation 12 could be true because he used to compliment learners who wore full uniform'. ALSO READ: Discipline and learning collapse at Wordsworth High School Arbitrator finds evidence overwhelming Manganyi found the students' testimony credible and consistent, noting that 'all the learners that testified in these proceedings gave a first-hand account of what they knew and they were consistent even during cross-examination'. The arbitrator was particularly critical of Siwela's defence strategy, noting that 'there was no version that was put to them during cross-examination' and that key elements of Siwela's own testimony contradicted his defence. Manganyi dismissed Siwela's claims that the students were disruptive and had fabricated the allegations, pointing out that no evidence was presented of any disciplinary action taken against the student witnesses. The arbitrator noted that 'these learners were in their first year in high school and the reception that they got from Mr Siwela is very appalling to say the least'. 'The evidence that the learners gave was corroborative, consistent and not rehearsed, contrary to Mr Siwela's arguments,' the arbitrator concluded. ALSO READ: School in south of Joburg rocked by sexual harassment claims Mandatory dismissal and future restrictions The arbitrator determined that dismissal was the mandatory sanction given the nature of the violations under the Employment of Educators Act. Manganyi found Siwela to be 'an unsuitable candidate for corrective discipline as he never showed any remorse for his actions'. The ruling emphasised the breach of trust inherent in Siwela's position: 'It is common cause that Mr Siwela was entrusted with the care of children and that it was expected of him to act with the utmost good faith in his conduct towards learners as society must be able to trust him as an educator unconditionally with children.' The ruling also requires notification to the South African Council of Educators regarding breaches of professional ethics. NOW READ: KZN Education welcomes arrest of alleged serial school rapist
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
A VIEW OF THE WEEK: We need a ceasefire in the war on children
You were once a child, but must now be a responsible adult. The theme for this year's Child Protection Week is 'working together in ending violence against children', but South Africa only came together in outrage. Child Protection Week started on 29 May and ended on Thursday, but it felt like it never really started. The intended focus on children's rights, safety, and community involvement was all overshadowed by mourning. As soon as the week began, police announced the gruesome discovery of the body of a child suspected to be that of two-year-old Kutlwano Shalaba, who went missing last November. The toddler's mother and a sangoma have both been arrested in connection with the death and face charges of murder and human trafficking. A few days later, 14-year-old Likhona Fose's mutilated body was found in an empty field in Roodeport, Gauteng. Police believe Fose was either targeted for her sexuality, making it a hate crime, or her body parts were mutilated for muthi purposes. Not far from that scene, just two days later, a young boy was shot, allegedly through the head and throat, in Westbury. The community claimed it took several hours for paramedics or police to attend to the incident. Children at risk These were just three incidents that grabbed the headlines in the seven days that Child Protection Week is commemorated. Nevermind other murders that may not have been reported, or the bullying, abuse and neglect that is a daily hell for children. Statistics show that around 1 288 children die in road accidents every year, more than 20 died of food-borne diseases in 2024, and around 140 children are known to be missing. Thousands go to school hungry each day, while thousands more do not even attend school. The problem is not only a rural one, with a recent General Household Survey finding that across SA's major urban metros, 578 000 households with children live on less than R2 500 a month. It also found that around 10% of children with special needs do not attend school, with more than 1 in 3 missing school in Mangaung and eThekwini. The government is assisting, with 54% of children attending school for free and 51% receiving social grants. ALSO READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: What were you doing at 11? Not setting fire to a school, I hope Who will protect our kids? While children's rights are enshrined in the constitution, they are too often ignored. If it takes a village to raise a child, it should be that village's responsibility to hold each other to account. There should never be abuse disguised as discipline or bullying masquerading as jokes. Children should never be neglected for convenience or left behind because they are scared to have a voice. School transport owners should not put profit before lives by cramming children on overcrowded and unroadworthy transport. It should not be that children should walk among crime hotspots to get to school, or find the school itself a hotbed of criminality. Parents, teachers, caregivers, community leaders, and children themselves should be taught the signs of abuse and recognise them when displayed. During Child Protection Week, and beyond, we must remember that we were all once children in need of help. We owe it to the rising generation to keep them safe and give them a chance in life we may have never got. NOW READ: A VIEW OF THE WEEK: It's a warzone and we are not prepared
Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
SA's alarming child violence rates demand collaboration between government and NGOs
The plan is up against dysfunction within social development departments and fraught relations with NGOs that deliver most services. About 1,100 children were murdered in South Africa in the past financial year, according to South African Police Service (SAPS) crime statistics. And estimates prepared by detective services suggest that about 1.181 children were victims of attempted murder and 6,209 were seriously assaulted in just the last three-quarters of the 2024/25 financial year. It is clear that South Africa has a serious problem of violence against children. As the country marks national Child Protection Week, those mandated to care for its children should step up. In November 2024, the first-ever Global Ministerial Conference on Ending Violence Against Children took place in Bogotá, Colombia. South Africa's Social Development Minister, Sisisi Tolashe, joined ministers from 102 other countries in pledging an ambitious plan of action to prevent and respond to violence against children. South Africa committed to several actions by 2027. One was to implement evidence-based parenting programmes in 52 districts to ensure safe home environments for children, and reduce child abuse and the use of corporal punishment by parents and caregivers. Another was to implement the 2024 Basic Education Laws Amendment Act by 2027 to improve safety in the learning environment. The law strengthens the ban on corporal punishment in schools and introduces stronger penalties for those using corporal punishment. South Africa also pledged to ensure that psychosocial services are available 24 hours a day to parents and caregivers in distress, and increase the reach of the 365 Days Child Protection Programme of Action for prevention and management of violence against children to 52 districts. It also committed to strengthening the ability of caregivers and frontline workers to reduce and prevent online violence against children. Targets Achieving these targets would help keep children safe and potentially decrease violence overall in South Africa. This is critical because violence against children carries heavy costs for individuals, families and the state. A 2015 study by Save the Children South Africa and the University of Cape Town found that violence against children cost the country R238.58-billion a year, equivalent to 6% of gross domestic product. These are the most recent figures available — and annual costs will only have increased since then. Investing in preventing and reducing violence against children is urgently needed. This would not only save costs, but help increase South Africa's school completion rate, and reduce unemployment and dependency on social grants. Making this pledge a reality is in the interests of all South Africans. It is strongly supported by the many civil society organisations the Department of Social Development would need to work with to implement the programmes the pledge outlines. And herein lies the most significant challenge. The department at a national level and in several provinces has treated non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the people they serve with a lack of respect and compassion, placing many lives at risk. The relationship between the department and civil society is mistrusting and fraught, and must change. At the same time that Tolashe was presenting her plan in Bogotá, the Gauteng Division of the High Court made a third ruling forcing the province's Social Development Department to pay NGOs that it had contracted to provide services. By that point, these NGOs had not received payment to deliver services on behalf of the state for seven months. This is not due to a lack of finances. In the same financial year (2023/4), the Gauteng provincial department underspent its budget by half a billion rand. Essentials The KwaZulu-Natal provincial department has not yet paid its NGO service providers for work done in the first quarter of 2025, leaving organisations unable to cover staff salaries or the costs of essentials, such as food for children. While departmental social workers might help deliver services promised in the pledge, most are already responding to cases of serious child abuse and neglect, and supporting cases through the courts. Without NGOs, the government probably won't be able to deliver on its pledge to prevent and reduce violence against children. There are many positive steps the department could take, including implementing the Sector Funding Policy (SFP). This outlines why services for children are a priority, and lays the basis for multi-year funding for NGOs that provide these vital services on behalf of the state. Funding certainty would help reduce the sector's insecurity and enable relations between the department and its service providers to be repaired. However, Sector Funding Policy implementation is not included in any planning documents, and there are signs that the national department is woefully under-capacitated. One indication of this is its inability to finalise memoranda of understanding with NGOs that offer the department free technical services. Since 2020/21, the national department has not received a clean audit. These examples go beyond isolated glitches. They show recurrent mismanagement, poor planning and a lack of basic operational competence across national and provincial social development departments. The minister needs to accept that the status quo is not working. Strong, capable leadership must be provided to achieve a turnaround, not least by prioritising delivery. For the state to deliver on its bold and important pledge, the minister must focus on repairing the damage caused to the relationships between her department and NGOs. She must also be held accountable for departmental failures that are being compounded daily. The department must ensure that officials deal with families holistically. Currently, it treats each family member's problem separately instead of approaching the family as a complete system. For South Africa to develop, its children must thrive — and that requires providing families with holistic, integrated services. Civil society organisations are ready to do the work required and take hands with the department to achieve the vision of a country that is safe for children. But they can no longer stand by as services to children and families are undermined by the inefficiency and ineptitude of a department that has lost its way. DM Chandré Gould, Senior Research Fellow, Justice and Violence Prevention, Institute for Security Studies (ISS); Gugu Xaba, Executive Director, Save the Children South Africa; Suzan Eriksson, Independent Consultant, Wilmi Dippenaar, Director, South African Parenting Programme Implementers Network; Monica Woodhouse, South African National Child Rights Coalition and Give a Child a Family Africa.
