Polls show support for Ishiba recovering ahead of election
Public support for Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is holding up after the government moved to address high rice prices, according to new opinion polls, a positive sign for Ishiba as he heads into an election and tries to reach a trade agreement with the United States.
A survey conducted over the weekend by Kyodo News showed the approval rating for Ishiba's Cabinet at 37.0%, up from 31.7% in a survey in May. A separate poll by the Asahi newspaper showed support at 32%, little changed from 33% in a May survey.
High rice prices are one of the biggest concerns for voters going into an Upper House election in July. Ishiba's administration has released some government stockpiles of rice and set up a minister-level meeting to address the supply of the staple.
While the government's efforts on rice appears to have helped Ishiba, last week's moves to address the rising cost of living with cash handouts were less well received. The same Kyodo survey showed 54.9% were against the ruling party's promise to hand out ¥20,000 ($138) per person, while 67% of respondents to the Asahi poll said they didn't approve of the move.
Ishiba is also looking to show progress in talks with the U.S. over tariffs, particularly on Japanese auto exports, a critical engine for the economy. So far, repeated conversations between officials on both sides have shown little tangible progress.
Ishiba should have a chance to talk to U.S. President Donald Trump at this week's Group of Seven summit meeting in Canada. The two leaders held a phone call on Friday, after which Ishiba said they agreed to accelerate talks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
20 minutes ago
- Japan Times
Agriculture ministry aims to stop publishing rice index amid accuracy concerns
The agriculture ministry plans to cease publishing its rice crop situation index, which has been used for almost seven decades, after farmers and retailers voiced concerns that government data is overstated, the farm ministry said Monday. The rice crop situation index –– or the ratio of rice yield per 10 ares (1,000 sq. meters) to the average yield per 10 ares –– shows the condition of the crop. For rice produced in 2024, the crop situation index was in the same range as previous years at 101, or 1% more rice crops than the average year, according to the agriculture ministry. 'Amid speculation from the public and farmers about the various data and statistics on rice, our ministry debated over what is really the best way to make revisions,' farm minister Shinjiro Koizumi told reporters, adding, 'We've decided that to release the index will mean doing nothing about this inaccuracy.' The gap between the crop situation index and farmers' testimonies occurred because the ministry was using outdated sampling numbers –– trends from the past three decades, during which cold weather resulted in smaller yields, making it inappropriate to compare with current crops. 'From now on, we want to use satellites, artificial intelligence and other cutting-edge technology to improve our accuracy, establishing a new foundation for agriculture policies,' Koizumi said. The Minister of Internal Affairs and Communications will make the final decision regarding whether to stop publishing the crop situation index. Koizumi's remarks came after he visited Fukushima Prefecture on Sunday to meet with officials from the Japan Agricultural Cooperatives (JA) and rice farmers, who said that the agriculture ministry's rice crop situation index does not reflect reality. 'So you're saying that you're not producing, not harvesting as much as the agriculture ministry is saying? Well, we've been hearing the same thing in other regions,' Koizumi told the farmers, adding, 'I will make sure that you feel like (the ministry's data) is getting closer to what you're sensing on-site.' Since replacing his predecessor, who stepped down over a gaffe about rice four weeks ago, Koizumi has repeatedly said rice prices had surged since last summer due to a sharp drop in shipments made to JA and other distributors despite higher production. Farmers produced 6.79 million tons of rice last year, up 180,000 tons from the previous year, according to the farm ministry. In 2025, they are projected to yield 7.19 million tons of rice, which would take the harvest 400,000 tons higher compared with last year's and make it the largest in five years, the ministry said –– data which is now being refuted by farmers, themselves. 'I really want you to figure out the root cause of this rice shortage,' JA Fukushima Chuou-kai president Keiji Kano told Koizumi on Sunday. Other factors, including a rising number of foreign visitors consuming more of the staple grain and speculative buyers entering the market, are also said to have contributed to price hikes. Some critics blamed farmers for not producing enough rice to meet demand. The farm ministry released an additional 200,000 metric tons of stockpiled rice harvested in 2021 and 2020 through no-bid contracts last Wednesday. The retail price for the 2021 rice is expected to be around ¥1,800 ($12.43) per 5-kilogram bag while the 2020 rice is expected to cost ¥1,700. 'We need to prevent consumers from buying less rice, which we are (preventing) with farmers' interests in mind. I ask for your understanding. I don't think that (rice) will be ¥2,000 forever,' Koizumi said.
Asahi Shimbun
an hour ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: A plea to stop Washington sticking its nose in U.S. Steel
Nippon Steel Corp.'s move to acquire U.S. Steel finally got the seal of approval from the U.S. government after it intervened and set conditions. We give high marks to the partnership agreed to by private-sector companies of Japan and the United States. The U.S. government needs to respect Nippon Steel's autonomous management and not meddle in it. Prior to winning the presidential election last November, Donald Trump vowed to block the acquisition. But he has since toned down his attitude and said he would allow 'investment' by Nippon Steel. Still, he expressed qualms about the Japanese company's goal of making U.S. Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. Nippon Steel made its intentions known about 18 months ago. The plan to make U.S. Steel a subsidiary was approved with the signing of a presidential order just before the deadline that revised one signed by Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, to stop the acquisition. U.S. Steel is a noted corporation that at one time boasted the world's largest share of crude steel production. But it has fallen on hard times. Even if the U.S. government was trying to protect this symbol of U.S. industrialization from being controlled by foreign capital, the argument that an acquisition by a company from Japan, a U.S. ally, would create a risk in U.S. national security and in an important supply chain lacked logic. It was a mistake to try to push through protectionist policy. It is only right that the U.S. government did an about-face and allowed U.S. Steel to become a wholly owned subsidiary. As a condition for having its acquisition approved, Nippon Steel agreed to sign a national security agreement with the U.S. government. The U.S. side will have some influence over company management through the issuance of 'golden shares' to the U.S. government that grant it veto power over important management decisions. In addition to the 2 trillion yen ($13.8 billion) for the acquisition, Nippon Steel will also invest about 1.6 trillion yen on production facilities by 2028. The agreement appears to include wording on the composition of the U.S. Steel corporate board as well as production capacity in the United States. But using that agreement to flex its muscle will limit Nippon Steel's management freedom and perhaps thwart the rebuilding of U.S. Steel on the path to sustained growth. Concerns about the investment environment in the United States could lead other Japanese companies to take a more cautious stance about investing there. The interests of both Japan and the United States will not be served by such a development. Prior to approving the acquisition, Trump doubled the tariff rate on steel and aluminum to 50 percent. Trump seems to be trying to take credit for increased investment in the United States through his high tariff policy. But the acquisition plan was well under way before the increased tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. Trying to claim that Nippon Steel's investment was the result of the tariff policy is a wishful boast. Trump also suddenly indicated that the 25-percent additional tariff on imported autos would be raised. That was a high-handed move that could deal a crippling blow to the Japanese economy. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Trump will soon meet for talks on the tariffs. Tokyo should not simply compromise just because the acquisition was approved but continue to seek a retraction of all the tariff measures. --The Asahi Shimbun, June 15
Japan Times
an hour ago
- Japan Times
U.S. pushes Vietnam to decouple from Chinese tech, sources say
The United States is pushing Vietnam in tariff talks to reduce the use of Chinese tech in devices that are assembled in the country before being exported to America, three people briefed on the matter said. Vietnam is home to large manufacturing operations of tech firms such as Apple and Samsung, which often rely on components made in China. Meta and Google also have contractors in Vietnam that produce goods such as virtual reality headsets and smartphones. The Southeast Asian nation has been organizing meetings with local businesses to boost the supply of Vietnamese parts, with firms showing willingness to cooperate but also warning they would need time and technology to do so, according to one person with knowledge of the discussions. The Trump administration has threatened Vietnam with crippling tariffs of 46%, which could significantly limit access for Vietnam-made goods to their main market and upend the Communist-run country's export-oriented growth model. Vietnam has been asked "to reduce its dependency on Chinese high-tech," said one person familiar with the discussions. "That is part of the restructuring of supply chains and would in turn reduce U.S. dependency on Chinese components," the person added. The ultimate objective is to speed up U.S. decoupling from Chinese high-tech while increasing Vietnam's industrial capacity, a second person said, citing virtual reality devices as an example of Vietnam-assembled products that are too dependent on Chinese technology. All sources declined to be identified as the discussions were confidential. It could not be determined if the U.S. has proposed numerical targets such as caps on Chinese content for "Made in Vietnam" goods or different tariff rates based on the amount of Chinese content. Apple, Samsung, Meta and Google did not reply to requests for comment. As the U.S.-imposed deadline of July 8 nears before the tariffs take effect, the timing and scope of a possible deal remain unclear. All sources stressed that while the U.S. has made broader requests for Vietnam to reduce its reliance on China, tackling the issue of Chinese high-tech content in exports was a key priority. Last year, China exported around $44 billion of tech such as electronics components, computers and phones to Vietnam, about 30% of its total exports to the country. Vietnam shipped $33 billion of tech goods to the United States, or 28% of the U.S.-bound exports. Both flows are on the rise this year, according to Vietnam's customs data. Vietnam's trade ministry did not reply to requests for comment. Separate sources have previously said that U.S. demands were seen as "tough" and "difficult" by Vietnamese negotiators. The U.S. also wants Vietnam to crack down on the practice of shipping Chinese goods to America with misleading "Made in Vietnam" labels that draw lower duties — which Vietnam is also trying to heed. The ministry said on Sunday that a third round of talks last week in Washington ended with progress, but critical issues remain unresolved. Vietnam's ruling Communist Party chief, To Lam, intends to meet U.S. President Donald Trump in the United States, possibly in late June, officials with knowledge of the matter said. No date has been announced for the trip. The White House and Vietnam's foreign ministry did not respond to requests for comment on the possible visit. Local firms attending meetings organized by the trade ministry in recent weeks expressed a general willingness to adapt, but many warned that instant changes "would destroy business," according to one of the sources. Vietnam has been slowly developing an industrial ecosystem with local suppliers but it has a long way to go before it can match China's advanced supply chains and cheaper pricing, industry executives say. "Vietnam is about 15-20 years behind China in somewhat fully replicating its supply chain scale and sophistication, but it's catching up fast, especially in key sectors like textiles and electronics," said Carlo Chiandone, a Vietnam-based supply chain expert. Abrupt changes to existing practices may hurt Vietnam's delicate relationship with China, which is both a major investor in its Southeast Asian neighbor and a source of security concerns.
