House security breach: HC questions choice of venue, reserves bail order
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday reserved its decision on the bail pleas of Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat, accused in the December 13, 2023, Parliament security breach, questioning why the accused chose the Parliament on that particular day for their protest when there are designated places for demonstrations in the capital.
A division bench comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar heard arguments from the accused's lawyers and Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, representing Delhi Police, before reserving the order.
During the hearing, the bench asked, 'Why pick that date and that place, knowing it is the Parliament? Does holding a protest there not intimidate the nation?'
The accused's counsel replied that these matters should be settled during trial and argued that their actions do not amount to a terrorist act as defined under Section 15 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
The court said it must decide whether the choice of place, date, and manner of the protest collectively qualifies as an offence under the UAPA.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Rules committee's nod to independent secretariat, fin autonomy for assembly
New Delhi: The Rules Committee, led by speaker Vijender Gupta, has approved a proposal to establish an independent secretariat and grant financial autonomy to the Delhi Assembly. According to sources, the committee is expected to submit its report during the upcoming monsoon session of the assembly for tabling in the house. Officials said the move aims to strengthen the institutional framework of the Delhi Assembly in line with the constitutional principle of separation of powers. Since its reconstitution in 1993, Delhi Assembly has functioned without a dedicated secretarial cadre or financial independence. Unlike Parliament and state legislatures—where the speaker holds authority over appointments and administration—Delhi's legislature depends on officers deputed from various government departments. This reliance, officials argue, has led to operational inefficiencies and curtailed the assembly's functional autonomy. "To address these concerns, the speaker proposed the creation of a separate legislative secretariat and the granting of financial autonomy during a recent meeting of the Rules Committee. This proposal aligns with Articles 98 and 187 of the Constitution, which provide for such arrangements in Parliament and state legislatures respectively," said an official. A senior assembly official noted that the 82nd All India Presiding Officers' Conference, held in Dec 2021 under the chairmanship of the Lok Sabha Speaker, adopted a resolution that all legislatures should get financial autonomy enjoyed by both the houses of Parliament. This resolution was later shared with the Delhi chief secretary, along with a request for prompt action in consultation with the Vidhan Sabha. Among the three Union Territories with elected assemblies — Delhi, Puducherry, and Jammu and Kashmir — Delhi is the only one constituted as a constitutional body, with a specific provision for an independent secretariat. "In view of Article 239AA(b) of the Constitution, which empowers Parliament to regulate matters concerning the Delhi Legislative Assembly, the Rules Committee may recommend an amendment to the GNCTD Act, 1991. This would facilitate the establishment of a separate secretariat and financial autonomy, bringing the Delhi Assembly on par with state legislatures," said an official.
Hindustan Times
42 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab: Bathinda DSP suspended over alleged misconduct
Deputy superintendent of police Harbans Singh Dhaliwal, posted in Bathinda as DSP-1, was suspended on Monday for alleged misconduct in handling organised crime cases. His jurisdiction included the Canal Colony and Kotwali police stations. Bathinda senior superintendent of Police (SSP) Amneet Kondal confirmed the suspension, citing Dhaliwal's ineffective response to certain heinous crimes. 'While no specific complaint was filed against him, the decision was based on his handling of several commercial cases under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and other organised criminal activities,' the SSP added.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
No bail for man who forced wife to agree to partner swapping
New Delhi: Delhi High Court on Monday dismissed the bail plea of a man who was accused of forcing his wife into partner swapping. It stated that the allegations levelled by a woman against her husband were not the "stereotyped matrimonial dispute" ones. The court also took a grim view of the wife's complaint that her husband didn't stop her sexual harassment by the brother-in-law and his friends. It said that the incarcerated didn't deserve to come out of jail as he might threaten his wife. "She alleged in the FIR itself that her brother-in-law used to sexually harass her by touching her in an inappropriate manner and outraged her modesty, but when she complained to her husband, the accused/applicant, he told her to ignore all that humiliation," Justice Girish Kathpalia observed. The woman also alleged that her husband used to hurt her hands with a blade and make her do kitchen work with wounded hands. The court recorded in the order that the husband "started compelling her to agree to wife swapping and for that purpose, he took her to a hotel where his friends molested her, so she ran away; and that the accused/applicant created her fake Insta ID and started sending her pictures on social media, soliciting people to make sexual relations with her for money. " Rejecting relief to the accused, Nikund Kumar, the court said that apart from these serious allegations, there were also allegations of rape and gang rape in the statement under Section 164 CrPC of the survivor. The accused claimed he was innocent and was falsely implicated, arguing that the allegations against him were basically arising out of a matrimonial dispute and he deserved to be released on bail. The high court, however, highlighted that earlier when he was granted anticipatory bail, he contacted his wife and exchanged text chats under a fictitious name through a new SIM card. He also admitted before the court that he tried to contact her anonymously. On the complaint of the wife, police initially booked Kumar for offences under sections relating to dowry harassment. Offences of rape and molestation were added later.
