logo
House security breach: HC questions choice of venue, reserves bail order

House security breach: HC questions choice of venue, reserves bail order

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Tuesday reserved its decision on the bail pleas of Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat, accused in the December 13, 2023, Parliament security breach, questioning why the accused chose the Parliament on that particular day for their protest when there are designated places for demonstrations in the capital.
A division bench comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad and Justice Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar heard arguments from the accused's lawyers and Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, representing Delhi Police, before reserving the order.
During the hearing, the bench asked, 'Why pick that date and that place, knowing it is the Parliament? Does holding a protest there not intimidate the nation?'
The accused's counsel replied that these matters should be settled during trial and argued that their actions do not amount to a terrorist act as defined under Section 15 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).
The court said it must decide whether the choice of place, date, and manner of the protest collectively qualifies as an offence under the UAPA.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No compromise on women's dignity: SC tells lawyer who abused judge
No compromise on women's dignity: SC tells lawyer who abused judge

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

No compromise on women's dignity: SC tells lawyer who abused judge

The judiciary cannot compromise when it comes to the safety and dignity of women judges, the Supreme Court said on Tuesday, refusing to interfere with the conviction and 18-month jail sentence of a Delhi-based lawyer who verbally abused and threatened a woman judicial officer in court. 'There can be no leniency in ensuring a safe workplace for women judges…Most of the judicial officers in Delhi today are women. They must feel safe at their place of work,' a bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan emphasised. Rejecting an appeal by advocate Sanjay Rathore, the bench added: 'They (women judges) won't be able to function if someone like him gets High Court is right.' The top court's decision comes weeks after the Delhi High Court delivered a scathing verdict, describing Rathore's conduct as 'an assault on justice itself' . The trial court had originally sentenced Rathore to a total of two years' imprisonment for using gendered abuse against a woman magistrate in 2015, but the high court reduced the term to 18 months. Rathore had already undergone six months in jail by the time his appeal was heard in the Supreme Court. His lawyer argued that the incident was a 'spur-of-the-moment' outburst and that further incarceration would be harsh. But the top court remained unmoved. 'Your sentence has already been reduced to 18 months. We can't bring it down. Your matter was duly dealt with by the high court and a strong judgment was issued. We have to ensure the safety of women judicial officers,' the bench said during the hearing. The court also took note of the testimony given under oath by the woman magistrate, who corroborated the charges. 'Look at the kind of language you have used. How will judges work if we entertain your petition?' the bench asked. In its brief order, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and granted Rathore two weeks to surrender. The case dates back to October 2015, when Rathore, aggrieved by an adjournment in his case that was passed in his absence, verbally abused a woman magistrate in Karkardooma court, including using gender-specific slurs. The incident prompted the judicial officer to lodge an FIR at Farsh Bazar police station. In 2023, a trial court found Rathore guilty under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code -- 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman), 189 (threat of injury to a public servant), and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of duty) -- and sentenced him to two years in jail. The high court, while upholding the conviction in May 2025, modified the sentence to 18 months. In her May 26 judgment, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of the high court minced no words in rejecting Rathore's plea for leniency. She observed that 'the act of outraging the modesty of a judicial officer while she was presiding over court proceedings… attacks the very foundation of judicial decorum and institutional integrity.' Justice Sharma emphasised that Rathore, being an officer of the court, was expected to uphold its dignity, not undermine it. 'This is not merely a case of individual misbehaviour, but a case where injustice was done to justice itself where a judge… became the target of personal attack while discharging her official duties.' The judgment went on to highlight the larger systemic issue: 'Any act that seeks to threaten or intimidate a judge, especially through gender-specific abuse, is an assault on justice itself and must be met with firm accountability. To trivialise such conduct under the garb of emotional outburst or momentary lapse is to reflect a patriarchal mindset — one that struggles to respect women in authority and seeks to normalise the unacceptable. This cannot be permitted. Not in law. Not in court.' Calling the woman magistrate's experience a reflection of 'a mindset where even women in empowered roles are not seen as immune from humiliation or indignity,' the high court warned that no judicial officer, especially women at the district level who form the 'backbone of our justice delivery system,' should ever feel unsupported or unsafe. 'If a woman holding judicial office is made to feel that her authority is conditional on the civility or restraint of others, the very foundation of judicial independence would get shaken,' Justice Sharma wrote.

Man accused of rape and murder tries to escape custody, held
Man accused of rape and murder tries to escape custody, held

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Man accused of rape and murder tries to escape custody, held

New Delhi: A 28-year-old man, accused of raping and murdering a nine-year-old girl in north-east Delhi's Dayalpur, was shot in the leg during a police encounter in Welcome, also in north-east Delhi, while attempting to escape. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Police reported that he injured a policeman with a blade while trying to escape. The rape and murder was reported on Saturday. Police got a PCR call at 8.41 pm regarding the sexual assault on the girl, whose family had found her stuffed in a suitcase. Upon reaching the scene, officers learned that the girl was taken to a hospital but was declared dead on arrival. A senior police officer said that doctors observed that there were visible injuries to her face and suspected sexual assault. A case under sections 103 (murder), 66 (punishment for causing death or resulting in persistent vegetative state of victim), and 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act was registered. In a press statement, Delhi Police said that, given the gravity of the crime, multiple police teams were deployed to trace and arrest the accused. "Through analysis of CCTV footage and technical surveillance, the accused was traced and arrested on Tuesday from the Hapur-Bulandshahr Road area in Hapur, Uttar Pradesh," police said. While being escorted back to Delhi in a police vehicle, the accused asked for permission to relieve himself. As the escorting team approached the Jheel Park area of Welcome, he again said he wanted to relieve himself. While being taken for the natural call by a team led by sub-inspector Kaushik Ghosh, the accused suddenly took out a blade hidden in his clothes. He then attacked a member of the escorting party twice, slashing him with the blade, and freeing himself from the cops. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Noticing the assault on the police team and the man's attempt to escape, Ghosh issued a verbal warning and fired a shot in the air, instructing the accused to stop and surrender. However, the man ignored the warning and continued to run. "To prevent his escape, Ghosh fired another carefully aimed round, which struck the accused in the leg. Subsequently, the accused was overpowered and taken into custody," police said. In the attack by the accused, constable Amit Mann suffered blade injuries to his chest. Both were taken to a hospital for treatment. For the assault, another case is being registered against the accused at Welcome police station. "The accused lived in the same neighbourhood as the girl," police said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store