Revealed: The unhealthiest sandwiches on the high street that are packed with more calories than TWO McDonald's Cheeseburgers
Sandwiches sold on the British high street and in supermarket meal deals can be more calorific than burgers and sweeter than chocolate bars, analysis reveals.
MailOnline found a host of the nation's lunchtime favourites had more calories, saturated fat, sugar and salt than fast food and desserts.
Pret 's Posh Cheddar & Pickle Baguette sandwich contained 643 calories, more than two McDonald's cheeseburgers (295 calories each) or a Big Mac (494 calories).
Many sandwiches offered by British supermarkets also had fast food burgers beat when it came to saturated fat content.
Waitrose 's No.1 The Perfect Ploughman's Cornish Cheddar Sandwich was one of those with the most saturated fat content at 13.1g per pack.
This is more fat than two McDonald's Cheeseburgers, which have 5.4g of saturated fat a piece.
M&S's Farmhouse Cheddar Cheese Ploughman's was another high fat offering, and with 11.3g of saturated fat, had more than a Big Mac (8.8g).
Both sandwiches contained over half the NHS's daily statured fat limits for women (20g) and nearly half that for men (30g) in just a single pack.
Sainsbury's Brie Bacon & Chili Chutney Sandwich topped the charts when it came to sugar content with 19.7g of the sweet stuff.
This is almost the equivalent of having two Kit Kat chocolate bars (10.3g each).
Another surprisingly sugary offering was M&S's All Day Breakfast Sandwich.
This sandwich contained 10.1g of sugar, only slightly less than a Krispy Kreme Original Glazed Donut (12g).
For context, the NHS recommends adults only consume a maximum of 30g of sugar per day.
Multiple British sandwiches for sale on the high street were also found to be far saltier than fast food items.
Pret's Ham & Grevé Baguette contained 3.85g of salt, making it saltier than four large portions of McDonald's fries (0.82g of salt each).
But even some vegetarian options were surprisingly high in salt.
M&S's Farmhouse Cheddar Cheese Ploughman contained 1.78g, slightly more than two large McDonald's fries.
Adults are recommended to only have no more than 6g of salt per day, and children are advised to have even less.
Having excess salt in your system leads to water retention in the blood raising your blood pressure.
This can, subsequently, raise the risk of a potentially fatal heart attack or stroke.
Heart disease and strokes are one of Britain's biggest killers, killing about 160,000 a year, with the American death toll about five times higher.
The NHS also warns that too much fat in your diet, especially saturated fats, can raise your cholesterol, which in turn increases the risk of heart disease.
Eating too much sugar, which is packed with energy, can contribute to potentially harmful weight gain increasing the risk of serious issues like heart disease, some cancers as well as type 2 diabetes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The NHS truths the Left don't want you to hear
Until very recently, Health Secretary Wes Streeting tried to market himself as a radical health reformer, who is not afraid to poke sacred cows. While his reform-minded rhetoric always remained at a highly-abstract and general level, Streeting deserved some credit for it, because he did not have to do this. He had the courage to say things which he knew would rub some people up the wrong way, not least the Corbynite wing of his own party. Sadly, that brief period of NHS candour is now officially over. Streeting, the self-styled reformer, is no more. He and his colleagues have fully retreated into their comfort zone. During the recent local election campaign, Labour distributed a leaflet that showed a mock medical bill, and a doctor holding up a credit card reader. The message was clear: vote for us, because this is what the other lot want to do to you. On Twitter/X, Labour are now frequently posting dire warnings about the alleged evils of insurance-based healthcare systems. This is exactly that old-school NHS cultism which Streeting used to disavow until five minutes ago. It may work for him. The NHS may be falling apart, but the cult around is still going strong. In the eyes of its keenest defenders, the NHS can do no wrong. They have quietly dropped the old cliché about the NHS being 'the envy of the word', and replaced it with a slightly more subtle version, which goes something like this: Once upon a time, the NHS used to be the best healthcare system in the world. But then, from 2010 on, it was systematically defunded. It was deliberately run into the ground, so that it can be privatised more easily. A privatised system would mean luxury healthcare for the rich, and Wild West medicine for the poor. None of these claims are true. Let's have a look at each of them in turn. 'The NHS used to be the best healthcare system in the world' The NHS was never the best healthcare system in the world. The idea that it ever was can be traced back to a ranking compiled by the Commonwealth Fund, an American healthcare think tank, which relies on a very unusual methodology, in which medical outcomes only account for a fifth of the total score. This matters, because on medical outcomes, the NHS has always been one of the worst-performing healthcare systems in the developed world – as even the Commonwealth Fund study shows. There is no turning point after which the NHS's performance suddenly deteriorated. It was just never good in the first place. '…it was systematically defunded' At the end of the 2010s, age-adjusted real NHS spending per capita was only marginally higher than it had been in the beginning of the decade. Put differently, the NHS budget only just about kept pace with population growth, population ageing, and inflation. This clearly constituted a slowdown in spending increases compared to the previous decade. But it does not constitute a 'defunding'. In any case: that period of relative spending restraint is already over again. The NHS budget was given a massive boost during the pandemic, which has only been partially reversed. Public healthcare spending in the UK stands at just under 9% of GDP: one of the highest levels in the world. '…so that it can be privatised…' Conspiracy theories about secret plans to privatise the NHS have been around for decades. I wrote a report on this three years ago, for which I went through the news archives, and I found warnings about the NHS's imminent demise from every year since 1980. But somehow, it never happens. The NHS remains an unusually state-centred system. Most healthcare systems, including tax-funded ones, use a mix of public, private for-profit and private non-profit providers. 'A privatised system would mean luxury healthcare for the rich, and Wild West medicine for the poor' There are no plans – secret or otherwise – to privatise the NHS. More's the pity. Because there is nothing wrong with private healthcare systems. There are good examples of private, insurance-based healthcare systems, most notably in the Netherlands and Switzerland, which are nothing like the dreaded system of the US. These systems cover everybody: poor people are exempt from health insurance premiums and co-payments. Under these systems, rich and poor alike get faster access to medical treatment, and better medical outcomes, than they would on the NHS. The only thing these people don't get is a naff feel-good mythology around their health systems.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cancer patients 'priced out' of holidays, charity warns
Cancer patients are being "priced out" of holidays due to "extremely unfair" travel insurance costs, a charity has cancer support charity said patients and those with a history of the disease were "frequently" being quoted premiums of thousands of pounds, while some were being refused cover chief executive, Dame Laura Lee, said: "We know how stressful a cancer diagnosis can be, and the last thing people should have to think about is inflated insurance costs."The Association of British Insurers (ABI) said the "significant costs" associated with emergency treatment abroad for pre-existing medical conditions were taken into account when offering cover. In a statement, Dame Lee emphasised the "emotional distress" caused by "barriers" to obtaining travel insurance for people with said: "Travelling and taking holidays can be so important for someone's wellbeing and recovery, and it is extremely unfair that people with cancer are being priced out of the opportunity to visit family and friends abroad or simply explore the world."Maggie's has called on the Treasury, Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and insurers to jointly develop recommendations to ensure cancer patients are "treated more fairly" by providers. 'Completely unaffordable' Josh Cull, 28, told BBC Breakfast he went through "a year of hell" in 2021 after being treated for a brain tumour which affected his eyesight and ability to walk. "I then decided, you know what, I'm going to live some life now," he while searching for insurance for a trip to South East Asia with his fiancée and brother, Mr Cull said the lowest quote he could find was £3,000, which he described as "completely unaffordable"."[That was] despite being two-and-a-half years clean, no recurring conditions. I was completely healthy," he Cull said he decided to travel without insurance, having had most of his savings "wiped out" by his time off work for treatment."I [didn't] want it to stop me living my life," he said, adding that he instead took other more "affordable" precautions ahead of the trip, such as getting "extra vaccines".A spokesperson for the ABI said in a statement that it "remained committed" to supporting customers who have or have had cancer. "As part of a signposting agreement introduced by the FCA, if an insurer is unable to offer you cover because of a pre-existing medical condition, they will point you to specialist providers who can help you find an appropriate policy."A 2018 report by the FCA warned that cancer patients were struggling to find affordable travel insurance, even long after their treatment had BBC has approached the Treasury for comment.
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Dr James: Why ‘scanxiety' around cancer is common
Cancer being a most serious business inevitably evokes alarm and despondency. This might be mitigated, at least in part, by awareness of its favourable prognosis, particularly for those where it is diagnosed early. The combination of surgery to remove the tumour plus appropriate 'adjuvant' therapy should hopefully result in a complete cure in excess of 90 per cent of those with, for example, the common cancers of the bowel, prostate and breast. These excellent outcomes from 'treatment with curative intent' (as it is known) necessarily poses the question 'What next?'. Specifically, how frequently and thoroughly should doctors seek out with tests and scans the possibility it may have recurred in the small minority in whom it does? Patients' attitudes to this continuing ' routine surveillance ' are mixed. They certainly welcome the reassurance from those follow-up appointments – initially every few months and then at yearly intervals – that all is well, and the opportunity to discuss any concerns they may have. That reassurance may, however, be offset by trepidation in the weeks leading up to the appointment and particularly 'scanxiety', the apprehension that the findings of those scans might be inauspicious. 'It is all quite nerve-racking', comments a participant in a study of the phenomenon. 'Even if you are feeling fine, the fear of what might be revealed is most distressing'. While the rationale for 'routine surveillance' is entirely plausible – cancer recurrence detected before causing symptoms is likely to respond more readily to further treatment – the value of those repeat scans has recently been questioned. 'The empirical case is weak', notes Dr Gilbert Welch, commenting on the absence of the measurable benefit from the full canopy of investigations (ultrasound, bone scans, CT and MRI scans), which does not preclude the possibility they might be advantageous for some. The equivocal merits of such investigations is a common conundrum of modern medicine, but perhaps further encouragement to those 'treated with curative intent' to put their cancer diagnosis behind them and look optimistically towards the future. Coffins that inspire Many will have noted the diverting correspondence in this paper on embellishing funerals with idiosyncratic (and witty) allusions to the enthusiasms of the deceased. What more fitting tribute for a man who loved working his allotment than to bury him in his gardening clothes: or to place a jar of honey amongst the flowers on a beekeeper's coffin: or, for an adventurous climber, a compass 'to navigate his way to eternity'? Those seeking further inspiration might consider visiting the British Museum's enthralling Living and Dying gallery. Perhaps the most striking of the many exhibits are replicas of the tall, thin, elaborately decorated upright coffins of the North Australian Aborigines. The bones of the deceased painted in red ochre are broken up and placed in a tree trunk – hollowed out by termites – in which the spirit will travel to the Land of the Dead. Carvings on the exterior illustrating local landmarks ensure it will not get lost on the way, while family and friends dance around acting out the hazards that might be encountered. Following the ceremony, the coffin is left standing upright to be gradually eroded away by the elements. It is difficult to imagine a more uplifting – or ecological – send-off. A clever solution to athlete's foot Finally, my thanks to a couple of readers for passing on their experience of simple remedies for the intense itchiness of athlete's foot, where the standard antifungal creams, as a university lecturer comments, 'never work for very long'. Following his customary evening bath, he now rubs a tuft of cotton wool soaked in surgical spirit under and between his toes that keeps the skin 'a lovely healthy pink colour'. The next is an exercise in lateral thinking, the principal being that both athlete's foot and dandruff are primarily caused by a fungal infection. 'After soaking my feet in anti-dandruff shampoo for a few minutes, massaging it between the toes, the macerated skin floats away and the itching resolves', writes a Bath reader. 'Occasional supplement applications keep it in check'.
