
U.S. Court Agrees Trump Administration's ICC Sanctions Likely Violate First Amendment Rights Of Fortify Rights CEO
The preliminary injunction prohibits the administration from punishing the two advocates for their work related to the ICC while the litigation is pending.
'I'm grateful the court recognized the serious threat this executive order against the ICC poses to fundamental freedoms and to our ability to pursue accountability for mass atrocity crimes,' said Matthew Smith. 'This case is not only about our rights — it's about safeguarding the space for all human rights defenders to advocate for justice, speak truth to power, and demand international accountability without fear of reprisal.'
Both Smith and Radhakrishnan are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)—a leading American organization that defends and promotes individual rights and liberties guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. As the lawsuit explains, the sanctions violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by prohibiting Smith, Radhakrishnan, and other Americans like them from speaking with the ICC's Office of the Prosecutor, including by providing legal advice, expert analysis, and evidence.
'Preventing our clients and others like them from doing critical human rights work with the ICC is unconstitutional, and we're heartened that the court saw that as well,' said Charlie Hogle, staff attorney with the ACLU's National Security Project. 'The First Amendment does not allow the government to impose sweeping limits on what Americans can say and who they can say it to.'
Under the executive order, people in the U.S. who have devoted their lives to seeking justice for the victims of atrocities — like the genocide of Myanmar's Rohingya people, or gender-based violence committed against Afghan women under the Taliban — could face stiff penalties simply for exercising their constitutional right to engage and advocate with ICC investigators and prosecutors.
The international community, including the United States, established the ICC in 1998 to help maintain international peace and security. The ICC investigates and prosecutes crimes of the severest magnitude — including genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes — when domestic courts are unwilling or unable to do so. Today, 125 countries have joined the ICC's founding treaty, known as the Rome Statute. As the lawsuit explains, although the United States has not ratified the Rome Statute, it has supported the ICC's critical work on a wide range of matters.
'Fighting this order isn't only a defense of the work I do, or the court itself,' wrote Matthew Smith in an op-ed published June 6 in the New York Times. 'It's also a statement about what kind of country we want to be.'
On Friday last week, the New York Times referred to the court's decision to grant a preliminary injunction 'a striking, if tentative, blow to the president's efforts to penalize and isolate the world's highest criminal court.'
For more information about the lawsuit, please see the ACLU's webpage devoted to Smith v. Trump.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NZ Herald
39 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Ex-Fox News host, prosecutor and judge was nominated after Trump's first choice, podcaster Ed Martin was blocked
Republicans have accused Democrats of obstruction for forcing time-consuming votes to confirm the President's picks, rather than allowing some of them to be confirmed by voice vote or unanimous consent, as was common under previous administrations. Republicans in the majority spent days negotiating with Democrats to allow the Senate to confirm more nominees before senators left town, but no deal came together. 'Do not accept the offer, go home and explain to your constituents what bad people the Democrats are, and what a great job the Republicans are doing, and have done, for our Country,' Trump wrote on social media. 'In a fit of rage, Trump threw in the towel, sent Republicans home and was unable to do the basic work of negotiating,' Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (Democrat-New York) told reporters. Pirro is one of a number of Fox hosts that Trump has recruited for the administration and fits the mould of many of his appointees: combative, camera-ready, and loyal enough to have sought to discredit the results of the 2020 election that he lost, the Washington Post reported previously. In the days leading up to the January 6 insurrection, Pirro had cast doubt on the credibility of Joe Biden's election victory in statements that aired on Fox. After Trump supporters stormed the Capitol, however, she walked back those comments, instead calling the attack 'deplorable, reprehensible, outright criminal'. Pirro's claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election were included in the US$2.1 billion ($3.5b) defamation lawsuit filed by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News, which led the broadcaster to settle the case for US$787.5 million in 2023. She is also a defendant in a similar defamation lawsuit by voting software maker Smartmatic. That case is pending. In a written response to senators' questions ahead of her confirmation that was obtained by the Washington Post, Pirro declined to offer thoughts on whether those convicted in the January 6 riot cases should have been pardoned. She sidestepped several other questions, including whether there would ever be a legal basis for someone from the executive branch of government to defy a federal court order. Pirro's confirmation to one of the nation's highest-profile prosecutor's offices was met with mixed reactions. Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, described her record on issues including the January 6 riot, election denialism, and Trump's immigration policies as 'deeply troubling'. 'President Trump has been using the Justice Department to protect his allies and go after his enemies, and Ms Pirro has proven to be a willing accomplice in weaponizing the justice system,' Durbin said in a statement. 'She is not fit to be the US Attorney for our nation's capital, and I believe it's a grave mistake my Republican colleagues voted to confirm her.' 'She is simply a loyal political acolyte and sycophant of the President,' Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) said in a floor speech ahead of the confirmation vote. Attorney-General Pam Bondi called Pirro 'a warrior for law and order' in a post on X. The DC Police Union congratulated Pirro and said it looked forward to working with her 'to hold criminals accountable and reduce crime'. Pirro thanked the union in response and promised to work with police to 'clean up DC'. Deadlines are looming for dozens of Trump loyalists handpicked as interim US Attorneys, whose 120-day terms are set to expire in the coming months. The Justice Department last month deployed a complex procedural manoeuvre to keep Alina Habba, a former personal lawyer for Trump, as New Jersey's top federal prosecutor, in a playbook it has used to extend the tenures of other polarising prosecutors that bypasses the Senate's role in confirming official nominees for the job. During Pirro's time as interim US Attorney, she instituted a policy of scrutinising the immigration status of all criminal defendants in the district, as part of the Trump Administration's efforts to ramp up deportations. She will also oversee a portfolio of major cases, including the shooting deaths of Yaron Lischinsky, 30, and Sarah Lynn Milgrim, 26, a couple who had just left a reception at the Capital Jewish Museum. Pirro said her office intends to investigate the killings as an act of terrorism and a hate crime. For decades, Trump and Pirro have fraternised in the same Republican circles in New York. On her Saturday Fox News show, Justice With Judge Jeanine, Pirro delivered strident defences of the President during his first term. In 2018, Pirro published a book titled Liars, Leakers and Liberals: The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy. Pirro's former husband, Albert Pirro, served as Trump's real estate lawyers before being convicted of federal tax evasion in 2000 when she was district attorney. He was sentenced to 29 months and was released from federal custody in 2002, court records show. Trump pardoned him in 2021, during his first term. In 2006, Pirro was investigated by federal prosecutors for seeking to bug the family's boat to determine whether her husband was having an affair. Pirro called the investigation a 'political witch hunt and smear campaign', and said her marital discord was not the business of the prosecutors. No charges were filed. In a statement on her confirmation, Pirro said: 'The confidence placed in me by the President and affirmed by the Senate will not be in vain. I am committed to ensuring that the nation's capital once again reflects the quality, safety, and promise of the citizens and our great country.'


NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Trump's tariffs are making money. That may make them hard to quit
Indeed, Trump has routinely cited the tariff revenue as evidence that his trade approach, which has sowed uncertainty and begun to increase prices for consumers, is a win for the US. Members of his Administration have argued that the money from the tariffs would help plug the hole created by the broad tax cuts Congress passed last month, which are expected to cost the Government at least US$3.4 trillion. 'The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labour market. Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than US$2t in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that doesn't happen and the US abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit. 'I think this is addictive,' said Joao Gomes, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. 'I think a source of revenue is very hard to turn away from when the debt and deficit are what they are.' Trump has long fantasised about replacing taxes on income with tariffs. He often refers fondly to American fiscal policy in the late 19th century, when there was no income tax and the government relied on tariffs, citing that as a model for the future. And while income and payroll taxes remain by far the most important sources of government revenue, the combination of Trump's tariffs and the latest Republican tax cut does, on the margin, move the US away from taxing earnings and towards taxing goods. Such a shift is expected to be regressive, meaning that rich Americans will fare better than poorer Americans under the change. That's because cutting taxes on income does, in general, provide the biggest benefit to richer Americans who earn the most income. The recent Republican cut to income taxes and the social safety net is perhaps the most regressive piece of major legislation in decades. Placing new taxes on imported products, however, is expected to raise the cost of everyday goods. Lower-income Americans spend more of their earnings on those more expensive goods, meaning the tariffs amount to a larger tax increase for them compared with richer Americans. US President Donald Trump. Photo / Tierney L. Cross, The New York Times Tariffs have begun to bleed into consumer prices, with many companies saying they will have to start raising prices as a result of added costs. And analysts expect the tariffs to weigh on the performance of the economy overall, which in turn could reduce the amount of traditional income tax revenue the Government collects every year. 'Is there a better way to raise that amount of revenue? The economic answer is: Yes, there is a better way, there are more efficient ways,' said Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and a former Biden Administration official. 'But it's really a political question.' Tedeschi said that future leaders in Washington, whether Republican or Democrat, may be hesitant to roll back the tariffs if that would mean a further addition to the federal debt load, which is already raising alarms on Wall Street. And replacing the tariff revenue with another type of tax increase would require Congress to act, while the tariffs would be a legacy decision made by a previous president. 'Congress may not be excited about taking such a politically risky vote when they didn't have to vote on tariffs in the first place,' Tedeschi said. Some in Washington are already starting to think about how they could spend the tariff revenue. Trump recently floated the possibility of sending Americans a cash rebate for the tariffs, and Senator Josh Hawley, (Republican-Missouri), recently introduced legislation to send US$600 to many Americans. 'We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate, but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt,' Trump said last month of the tariffs. Democrats, once they return to power, may face a similar temptation to use the tariff revenue to fund a new social programme, especially if raising taxes in Congress proves as challenging as it has in the past. As it is, Democrats have been divided over tariffs. Maintaining the status quo may be an easier political option than changing trade policy. 'That's a hefty chunk of change,' Tyson Brody, a Democratic strategist, said of the tariffs. 'The way that Democrats are starting to think about it is not that 'these will be impossible to withdraw.' It's: 'Oh, look, there's now going to be a large pot of money to use and reprogramme.'' Of course, the tariffs could prove unpopular, and future elected officials may want to take steps that could lower consumer prices. At the same time, the amount of revenue the tariffs generate could decline over time if companies do, in fact, end up bringing back more of their operations to the US, reducing the number of goods that face the import tax. 'This is clearly not an efficient way to gather revenue,' said Alex Jacquez, a former Biden official and the chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal group. 'And I don't think it would be a long-term progressive priority as a way to simply collect revenue.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Andrew Duehren Photographs by: Alyssa Schukar, Tierney L. Cross ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES


NZ Herald
6 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Child trafficking ring uncovered in Alabama, 7 arrested
The announcement stunned the communities of Brent and Centreville. The sister cities are on the rural county backroads of central Alabama, a region where churches are almost as prolific as the kudzu vines swallowing much of the summer landscape. For some, the allegations of something so sinister happening in their own backyard has been a test of their deep faith, an acknowledgment of how small towns and rural communities have changed and how systems intended to protect vulnerable children often fail to do so. 'Like everybody, my emotions are all over the place,' said Bobby Terry, a local minister who has been attending the prayer vigils. 'I just don't want the world to think that this is our community. I've been living here my entire life, and there's never been anything of this magnitude. I mean, we have problems, you know, but there's never been anything like this.' To some local residents, sex-abuse scandals are the province of rich elites, like the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who is pictured on a billboard in nearby Birmingham with President Donald Trump, along with the question, 'What's the big secret, fellas?' It is a reference to accusations that Trump's Justice Department is covering up details from Epstein's alleged sex crimes that could also ensnare the current president, his predecessor Bill Clinton or other famous people who spent time with Epstein decades ago. (Trump has denied any knowledge of Epstein's crimes and had claimed that the two had a falling out years before the disgraced billionaire's convictions on sex crimes.) Authorities allege that sex trafficking and child abuse took place in an underground storm shelter located on rural property in Brent. Photo / The Washington Post Now, at prayer meetings and other gatherings, Bibb County residents have grappled with the realisation that even more horrific crimes than those Epstein was accused of may have been happening in their own town. For some, it has shattered a sense that their small community was safer than bigger cities. But experts say rural areas are among the places where people are the most vulnerable to trafficking and abuse – including in Alabama, where local prosecutors say such cases have been on the rise. 'We can't assume that just because we're in small towns that everything operates like it did in the days of The Andy Griffith Show,' Robert Turner Jr., the district attorney for Alabama's fourth judicial circuit, which includes Bibb County, told WAKA-TV. 'A lot of these small towns may appear to be Mayberry, but they are far from it.' Lynn Ellinghaus, a Brent native, shivered thinking about images she had seen of the bunker on local television. It looked like something 'out of horror movie', she said, as she attended a community vigil. The case was all anyone she knew was talking about, from the kids to the suspects and then the biggest mystery of all: 'How did no one know?' she wondered. 'All that time, and no one saw any sign?' An isolated shelter Wade said his office was tipped off about the possible abuse earlier this year by a caseworker with the Alabama Department of Human Resources (DHR), the agency that oversees child welfare. An agency spokesperson declined to comment on any aspect of the case, citing 'confidentiality laws,' and Wade did not respond to requests for comment. But it led investigators to a property along Aaron Drive, 8km from the Centreville town square. The home that investigators visited sits at the end of a long gravel driveway on the edge of thick woods, off a dirt road riddled with potholes. It is surrounded by overgrown grassy lots dotted with wrecked cars and dilapidated mobile homes. Across from the driveway, a faded yellow sign almost entirely concealed by thick green vines reads: 'Watch for children.' The property is linked to a relative of William Chase McElroy, 21, who was initially arrested on February 5 and charged with two counts of sexual abuse for inappropriately touching two young children. According to court records, Andres Trejo-Velazquez, the father of the children, is listed as a witness on the complaint. A judge said McElroy could be released from Bibb County Jail on a $60,000 bond, but it is unclear if he left custody. A week later, he was arrested again and charged with sexually abusing two other children under the age of 7. This time, a judge denied bond. Storm shelter involved in the Bibb County child sex trafficking ring case. Photo / WVTM Inside the storm shelter involved in the Bibb County child sex trafficking ring case. Photo / WVTM Investigators took notice of a structure behind the house that Wade said initially looked like a carport but had a rear door leading to an underground storm shelter. There they found a dirty mattress, a fan, and other furniture. A little over two months later, Dalton Terrell, 21, a high school classmate of McElroy who lived near the bunker, was arrested and charged with multiple counts of rape, sodomy, and human trafficking. According to an April 29 complaint, Terrell admitted to investigators that he had abused six children and that he 'gave money to two adults to use the children'. Wade has said Terrell's co-operation blew open the investigation. The next day, Trejo-Velazquez, 29, was arrested and charged with six counts of human trafficking. Three of the victims were his own children, while a fourth was his partner's daughter, according to court records. On July 15, a Bibb County grand jury indicted McElroy, Terrell and Trejo-Velazquez on additional charges including rape, trafficking, kidnapping and abuse. In late July, four others were arrested and charged in connection to the alleged trafficking and abuse, including Rebecca Brewer, Timothy St. John jnr, Ricky Terrell and Sara Terrell. Brewer, 29, is Trejo-Velazquez's partner and the mother of four victims. She was charged with the trafficking and kidnapping of eight children, including her own, and is also facing multiple counts of sexual torture. Several of the defendants are related. According to public records, Brewer is a cousin of Dalton Terrell and the niece of Sara and Randy Terrell, who are Dalton's parents. Wade has said the victims were children who belonged to the defendants or related to other family members or friends. According to records, St. John, 23, was a high school classmate of several defendants and a neighbour of Brewer and Trejo-Velazquez. Court records made public Friday show that a Bibb County grand jury on Thursday issued fresh indictments against McElroy, Terrell, Trejo-Velazquez and St. John with updated charges including sexual abuse and aggravated child abuse. The indictments allege the men conspired together to abuse and deliberately torture some of the victims. Additional charges against them and the three others are expected in coming weeks. Stuart Albea, a court-appointed attorney for Trejo-Velazquez, said in an email that his client 'denies any involvement in the conduct described in the indictment and looks forward to the opportunity to demonstrate his innocence in court'. Albea said he was 'deeply concerned' by how local law enforcement had made information about the case public even as it has not yet been provided to him or his client. He denied that Trejo-Velazquez was a gang member and said he is a US citizen – two issues that law enforcement officials told reporters they are investigating. 'This conduct appears calculated to poison the jury pool and may make it impossible to seat a fair and impartial jury in rural Bibb County,' Albea said, adding it 'also risks further harm' to the alleged victims 'by placing sensitive allegations in the public eye prematurely'. Attorneys for the other six defendants did not immediately respond to requests for comment. All seven are being held without bond at the Bibb County Jail and have not yet entered pleas. Wade said in a July 28 radio interview that some defendants are co-operating with the investigation. 'I think the longer they have time to sit there and maybe repent … we'll get the answers to all the questions that we have to better serve these children,' the sheriff said. The allegations have left many in the community questioning what might've been missed. Wade said last week that the victims attended school and participated in other routine functions – a comment that has sparked scrutiny over whether teachers or others noticed and reported anything. The superintendent of Bibb County Schools did not respond to a request for comment. A playground sits on the campus of Brent Elementary School. Photo / The Washington Post Months before Wade says their office was tipped off about possible abuse by a DHR caseworker, court records show the agency removed four children from Brewer and Trejo-Velazquez's home and placed them in DHR custody. Though it is unclear when the removal happened, records suggest it took place around the time Brewer filed an August 1, 2024, domestic claim against Trejo-Velazquez. Records about that allegation are not public, but a court docket notation describes the case as 'protection' from abuse. In October, an attorney for DHR filed claims against both Brewer and Trejo-Velazquez seeking to garnish any income or financial assistance to help pay for the children's care. Brewer was unemployed, but that December, a judge approved the state's efforts to garnish Trejo-Velazquez's income from a construction firm. Brewer's complaint against Trejo-Velazquez was ultimately dismissed because neither appeared in court. By February, DHR filed petitions in Bibb County to drop the financial claims, writing to the court that the children were no longer in state custody and were back with their parents. A circuit court judge dismissed the cases on March 18, about a month before Trejo-Velazquez was arrested. It's unclear when the children were placed back into state custody. Speaking to reporters, Wade said that so far he believes only those with direct knowledge of the alleged trafficking operation were aware the children were being abused. But Carolyn Potter, a longtime child advocate who is the chief executive of the WellHouse, an Alabama-based nonprofit that operates one of the largest residential treatment programs for trafficking survivors in the country, is sceptical of claims there were no signs. She said people in rural communities beset by poverty are particularly vulnerable to being trafficked by relatives or others with family connections. That's especially true in areas that are less vigorously patrolled by law enforcement, she said. Forty-seven per cent of Brent lives below the poverty level. Identifying trauma in children can also be difficult, Potter said. Teachers often play a key role in reporting possible abuse, given the close bonds they form with their students, she added. Last week, a former Bibb County teacher told Birmingham's WBMA that she repeatedly reported concerns about one of her students during the 2023-24 academic year to school administrators. The student, believed to be one of the victims, showed signs of neglect, including poor hygiene, had chronic absences and exhibited developmental issues, the former teacher told the station, adding that her complaints went nowhere. Terry, the minister who was also a former Bibb County High School teacher and coach until he retired last year, said that teachers undergo mandatory reporting training with DHR representatives. But he also recalled instances in which teachers reported possible abuse and said sometimes, 'nothing happens'. He feared teachers would face criticism for not spotting the alleged abuse in these cases, which he said would be unfair. 'Teachers have too much to do. … They're already being mom and dad and aunt and uncle. And they're being doctor and they're being counsellor and they are being so many different things that they're already doing,' he said. 'These teachers, they love these kids like they're their own.' 'Absolutely shattered' Residents gathered on the lawn of the Bibb County Courthouse two days after Wade's news conference to pray for the victims, law enforcement, the community and each other. Many were angry. They saw the notes on social media calling for things like vigilante justice for the suspects. 'Why do we even need a trial?' one person posted on Facebook. Mike Oakley, the mayor of Centreville, had leapt into action, organising vigils and other public events because he wanted people here to talk and reflect. 'When this happens, you're literally shocked like a punch in the face, a community punch in a face,' he said. Deep down, Oakley knew the small-town experience wasn't the same for everybody. Many in Brent and Centreville now commute into Birmingham and Tuscaloosa instead of working in town and getting to know their neighbours. 'In the South, we are all about being front porch people, knowing our neighbours, talking to them,' he said. 'We need to be that way again.' Concerned residents gather at the Friendship Lodge near the Bibb County Courthouse in Centreville. Photo / The Washington Post But first, they needed to pray. They prayed outside the courthouse, where the defendants will appear before a judge in coming weeks. Inside the church the following evening, they sat in small groups praying for everybody involved – some grudgingly, including the accused. Ellinghaus, who grew up in Brent, kept thinking about another event in her small city that made national news 52 years ago. In May 1973, the town took a direct hit from one of the most violent tornadoes to ever hit the state. It destroyed 90% of the city, including her childhood home. Many people lost everything. A memorial along Main St marks the date, describing Brent as a city 'proven by tempest'. But Ellinghaus worried the allegations of child sex abuse and trafficking, if proved, could end up being more damaging to the city than the tornado. 'People are just absolutely shattered over this,' she said. ' … No one thought anything like this could happen here.