Europe's first 'boil in the bag' funerals happened in Meath and are set for UK
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
'Boil in a bag' funerals could soon be made available across the UK after Europe's first facility opened in Meath.
This unusual method, officially known as water cremation or alkaline hydrolysis, offers an environmentally friendly, yet controversial, way to say your final goodbyes to a loved one. It is currently effectively banned in the UK, but could well get the legal go-ahead following the independent Law Commission's new consultation into funerary methods.
And Ireland has paved the way. Already available across 30 US states, as well as Canada and South Africa, the first European water cremation facility, or resomation, opened its doors in early 2023 in Navan, Co Meath, Ireland.
Traditional burials can lead to embalming fluid seeping into the grave soil, while each gas-powered fire cremation releases around 245kg of CO2 into the atmosphere, according to UK-based cemetery and crematorium development the CDS Group. By comparison, figures from Resomation Ltd, the founding body for alkaline hydrolysis, show just 28kg of CO2 is released into the atmosphere per water cremation. Unlike conventional cremations, these eco-friendly farewells, which take between three to four hours, also don't release harmful mercury emissions into the atmosphere.
A body is loaded into the alkaline hydrolysis machine, which calculates the amount of water and potassium hydroxide required. The machine locks, and an alkaline solution then fills the pressurised tank, which is gently heated to 152°C (305°F).
The remains are broken into their chemical components - amino acids, peptides, sugars and salt - leaving behind a liquid that is then cooled in another tank until sterile and free from any remaining tissue or DNA. Around 330 gallons of brown-coloured liquid will be washed down the drain, while the softened bones are ground to powder in a reducer, and presented in an urn to the grieving family.
Back in 2017, Wired journalist Hayley Campbell described the process in colourful detail after seeing a resomator in action at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Hayley wrote: "Over the course of up to four hours, the strong alkaline base causes everything but the skeleton to break down to the original components that built it: sugar, salt, peptides and amino acids; DNA unzips into its nucleobases, cytosine, guanine, adenine, thymine.
"The body becomes fertiliser and soap, a sterile watery liquid that looks like weak tea. The liquid shoots through a pipe into a holding tank in the opposite corner of the room, where it will cool down, be brought down to an acceptable pH for the water treatment plant, and be released down the drain."
Noting that "it's not actually that terrible", Hayley revealed: "The human body, liquefied, smells like steamed clams." Although many scientists view alkaline hydrolysis as the future of the death industry, it's something many still feel squeamish about, while others object on religious or cultural grounds.
Highlighting why this process is still a bit of a taboo in an interview with The Telegraph, Dr Lian Lundy, a wastewater specialist from Middlesex University, explained: "Some people view it as basically mixing up my loved one with poo in the sewer and they don't like that. But there's a lot that goes into the sewer that we don't really think about – waste from mortuaries and hospitals and all sorts of things that we don't know about – so from that perspective, it's not really any different."
Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.
For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dublin Live
a day ago
- Dublin Live
Europe's first 'boil in the bag' funerals happened in Meath and are set for UK
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info 'Boil in a bag' funerals could soon be made available across the UK after Europe's first facility opened in Meath. This unusual method, officially known as water cremation or alkaline hydrolysis, offers an environmentally friendly, yet controversial, way to say your final goodbyes to a loved one. It is currently effectively banned in the UK, but could well get the legal go-ahead following the independent Law Commission's new consultation into funerary methods. And Ireland has paved the way. Already available across 30 US states, as well as Canada and South Africa, the first European water cremation facility, or resomation, opened its doors in early 2023 in Navan, Co Meath, Ireland. Traditional burials can lead to embalming fluid seeping into the grave soil, while each gas-powered fire cremation releases around 245kg of CO2 into the atmosphere, according to UK-based cemetery and crematorium development the CDS Group. By comparison, figures from Resomation Ltd, the founding body for alkaline hydrolysis, show just 28kg of CO2 is released into the atmosphere per water cremation. Unlike conventional cremations, these eco-friendly farewells, which take between three to four hours, also don't release harmful mercury emissions into the atmosphere. A body is loaded into the alkaline hydrolysis machine, which calculates the amount of water and potassium hydroxide required. The machine locks, and an alkaline solution then fills the pressurised tank, which is gently heated to 152°C (305°F). The remains are broken into their chemical components - amino acids, peptides, sugars and salt - leaving behind a liquid that is then cooled in another tank until sterile and free from any remaining tissue or DNA. Around 330 gallons of brown-coloured liquid will be washed down the drain, while the softened bones are ground to powder in a reducer, and presented in an urn to the grieving family. Back in 2017, Wired journalist Hayley Campbell described the process in colourful detail after seeing a resomator in action at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Hayley wrote: "Over the course of up to four hours, the strong alkaline base causes everything but the skeleton to break down to the original components that built it: sugar, salt, peptides and amino acids; DNA unzips into its nucleobases, cytosine, guanine, adenine, thymine. "The body becomes fertiliser and soap, a sterile watery liquid that looks like weak tea. The liquid shoots through a pipe into a holding tank in the opposite corner of the room, where it will cool down, be brought down to an acceptable pH for the water treatment plant, and be released down the drain." Noting that "it's not actually that terrible", Hayley revealed: "The human body, liquefied, smells like steamed clams." Although many scientists view alkaline hydrolysis as the future of the death industry, it's something many still feel squeamish about, while others object on religious or cultural grounds. Highlighting why this process is still a bit of a taboo in an interview with The Telegraph, Dr Lian Lundy, a wastewater specialist from Middlesex University, explained: "Some people view it as basically mixing up my loved one with poo in the sewer and they don't like that. But there's a lot that goes into the sewer that we don't really think about – waste from mortuaries and hospitals and all sorts of things that we don't know about – so from that perspective, it's not really any different." Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Why is Irish media so reticent about covering gender issues?
The phrase 'third rail' was originally coined to describe the electrified line that runs alongside train tracks, deadly to the touch. In politics and public discourse, it has come to signify any subject deemed too dangerous, too radioactive, too fraught to approach. And while journalism in a liberal democracy is, in theory, about touching all the rails – especially the live ones – theory and practice often diverge. Last week, the New York Times published all six episodes of The Protocol , a podcast series that represents a significant moment in the polarised US debate around youth transgender healthcare. The series explores how the standardised medical approach to gender transition in minors was developed in the Netherlands in the 1990s. Known as the 'Dutch protocol', the model recommends the use of puberty blockers and hormone therapy for carefully assessed adolescents experiencing gender dysphoria. That protocol was later exported, adapted – and contested – elsewhere, including in the United Kingdom and United States, where culture war battle lines have long since been drawn. The New York Times podcast tells a story of shifting medical consensus, political pressure, and institutional confusion. But it also carries a subtext about journalism itself – how hard it can be for newsrooms to report accurately and fairly on an issue that cuts so close to the cultural bone. READ MORE It's worth noting that the New York Times has not emerged from this process unscathed. Over the past few years, its coverage of trans issues has prompted significant internal dissent. A 2022 feature by journalist Emily Bazelon questioning aspects of the prevailing medical model and an article by Katie Baker in 2023 titled, When Students Change Gender Identity and Parents Don't Know sparked public protests, petitions signed by some of the paper's reporters, and an open letter from celebrities and activists accusing the newspaper of platforming 'anti-trans bigotry'. Senior editors responded with unusually sharp criticism of their staff, insisting that journalism 'cannot exist in service of any cause'. The Protocol feels, in part, like an attempt to reset. Bazelon is credited as an adviser on the podcast. The editorial tone is serious, sober, and almost anxious in its caution. There are no polemics. But the very act of producing it – at scale, with resources and rigour – feels like a line being drawn: a claim that this subject, however charged, can and should be reported on without fear or favour. How to manage your pension in these volatile times Listen | 37:00 Which brings us to this side of the Atlantic. In the same week The Protocol dropped, Irish psychotherapist Stella O'Malley published a blog post recounting her own experience with Irish media. O'Malley, a founder of the organisation Genspect, is sharply critical in the post and in an interview on the State of Us podcast , of what she describes as the effective blacklisting of dissenting voices on the issue of youth transition by Irish media, including The Irish Times. 'In Ireland,' she writes, 'cancel culture doesn't burn you at the stake – it quietly leaves you out in the cold'. O'Malley is particularly scathing about RTÉ, where, until 2021, she had been a regular contributor to national discussions on youth mental health. Since then, she says, her media invitations have dried up. She cites the Irish media's lack of coverage on key developments abroad, such as the closure of the Tavistock gender clinic in London following the Cass Review, or the recent UK Supreme Court ruling that sex, not gender identity, should be the basis of protections under equality law, as evidence of what she characterises as a systemic avoidance of uncomfortable facts. Of course, O'Malley is now an activist with a clear ideological stance, and reasonable people can disagree with her conclusions or question her affiliations. But if activism were a barrier to participation in Irish current affairs programmes, there would be an awful lot of silence on our airwaves. What seems harder to deny is that, in her case and others, views that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy on gender identity are seen as beyond the pale. This may explain a striking media gap. The Cass Review in the UK, a years-long, evidence-based review of youth gender services led by a respected paediatrician, concluded that the medical model developed in the Netherlands and exported widely was, in many cases, being applied without sufficient clinical oversight. It led directly to the suspension of all routine prescription of puberty blockers to under-18s in the National Health Service. The Irish media coverage of this was scant, scattered and mostly relegated to the opinion pages, even though it had a direct impact on the treatment of Irish children, or that the largest political party on the island, Sinn Féin, was forced into policy contortions on either side of the Border as a result. Why the reticence? There is a commonly heard view that to even enter this debate is to engage in a 'toxic' discourse imported from Britain and the US – best avoided in a mature, progressive society. But this is an odd position, especially in a media culture that otherwise shows little hesitation in following every twist and turn of UK and US affairs, from the post-Brexit travails of the Conservative party to the power struggles within the Trump White House. The truth may be simpler and more uncomfortable. Irish journalism, like Irish society, is small. The circles are tight. The cost of stepping on the wrong third rail – socially, professionally, reputationally – is high. Better, perhaps, to look away. And yet the issues are not going away. Ireland, like every other country, is grappling with questions of medical ethics, consent, identity, and law. Young people experiencing gender distress deserve compassionate, evidence-based care. But they also deserve a society willing to discuss that care honestly. And journalists, if they are doing their jobs, have to be part of that conversation, even when it's difficult.
Irish Examiner
2 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: We need to eradicate TB for good
Tuberculosis in Ireland has had a tragic and unforgettable human cost, having taken as many as 10,000 lives a year in Dublin alone at one point, in between its epidemic years of 1880 to 1950. Poor housing, overcrowding, and starvation were the main reasons TB struck terror throughout the country, from the tenements of the capital city to the smallest rural communities. Up until the mid-1940s, when a vaccine capable of treating it finally emerged, it was a silent and deadly killer. While we eventually managed to contain the disease in humans, bovine TB later emerged and it has been claimed that the State has spent the equivalent of the cost of building the new National Children's Hospital — well over €2bn at the last count — to try to eradicate the disease. It has not worked yet — but it must. With efforts to stamp out bovine TB regarded as essential to securing Ireland's access to European and world markets for our beef products — and, by extension, also protecting farm incomes — the failure to eradicate it is as embarrassing as it is pressing. We know the recorded number of infected cattle hit a historic low in 2016 but has been rising steadily since. As well as animal health, the focus of the eradication plan is largely concerned with ensuring farmers have the requisite herd health status for access to export markets for both beef and milk. The Government has already acknowledged that disease levels are continuing to deteriorate and has admitted that compensation levels to farmers had reached €20m for the first four months of this year, the same outlay as was the case for the entirety of 2020. But the incidence rates are growing and not diminishing, despite tremendous efforts to try to quell the bovine TB tide. In the current programme for government, 2030 is set as the aspirational date for the final eradication of the disease from the national herd but, even working in collaboration with farmers and the agri-sector, that appears optimistic at this moment. As was pointed out to the Government recently by the chairman of Lakeland Dairies, Niall Matthews, this 'national scourge' shows no sign of abating. He said that some 3,200 farmers supply his company and every one of them faced a deteriorating scenario. He also asserted that Ireland appears to be 'further away' than ever from achieving the much-desired 'TB-free' status. With small rural communities and individual farmers across the country currently at their wits' end, the need to finally crack this problem has become imperative. Vatican warning on US populism As Donald Trump enthusiastically sent in the national guard to counter protests against his signature immigration policy, giving us some idea of his vision for a police state in America, a timely warning about the dangers of nationalist political movements came from the Vatican. In what was perhaps the first indication that Pope Leo XIV is intent on addressing the dangers of far-right populism during his papacy, the new pontiff criticised the 'exclusionary mindset' of many modern politicians, without directly pointing the finger at any individual. His timing — as Trump set his armed forces to work across Los Angeles — was pertinent and the fact he is American was perhaps not as coincidental as might be thought. But Pope Leo's request in Rome last Sunday that God 'open borders, break down walls, [and] dispel hatred' certainly hit the right chord in addressing populists. Before becoming Pope last month, Cardinal Robert Prevost was not shy about criticising Trump and shared several disapproving posts on X, admonishing the president and his running mate JD Vance. Back in January, he said Trump's plan to deport millions of migrants from the US was 'a disgrace' and he had previously said that Trump was not a Christian because of his view on immigration. 'A person who thinks only about building walls, wherever they may be, and not building bridges is not a Christian,' he said of Trump in 2016. While Pope Leo did not directly address the situation in LA, where Trump is ignoring the wishes of Democratic governor Gavin Newsome with the undoubted hope of provoking havoc in the deeply Democratic state, expressing his thoughts on nationalist politics is undoubtedly opportune. Bad publicity If Israel was hoping its grievous behaviour in Gaza could be sandblasted off the world's front pages or global news websites, its hijacking of the pro-Palestine Freedom Flotilla Coalition ship could not have had a worse outcome. Israeli forces stopped the Gaza-bound aid vessel Madleen and detained those on-board, including climate campaigner Greta Thunberg and Rima Hassan, a French member of the European Parliament, yesterday morning. In doing so, Amnesty International said, it flouted international law and gave the flotilla's inhabitants the publicity they had sought in the first place. Voyage organisers had hoped to further highlight Israel's ongoing military campaign in Gaza and its restriction of humanitarian aid into the region where 2m people are facing famine conditions. They certainly achieved that aim. Ironically, they may also have achieved their aim of getting humanitarian aid to the stricken Palestinian people, as the Israelis said that while those arrested on what it described as 'the selfie boat' would be sent to their home countries, the aid supplies aboard the Madleen would be delivered to Gaza. Israel might have lost this PR battle, but it is telling that such a realisation pressured the authorities there to publicly state that the aid would be forwarded to those who need it. Perhaps it's not too much to hope that Israel now commits to enabling all such aid to through to Gaza to feed its starving inhabitants. Read More Irish Examiner view: Listening is an important precursor to change
