logo
Letters to the Editor: U.S.' history of injustice against Indigenous people has lasting consequences

Letters to the Editor: U.S.' history of injustice against Indigenous people has lasting consequences

To the editor: As an Indigenous citizen, I commend guest contributor Tony Platt's excellent article about UC's role in shaping a distorted and incomplete history of the Indigenous inhabitants in and around its Berkeley campus ('The California story we keep erasing,' June 29). Sadly, UC's history is a microcosm of the national history of untold native tribal injustices inflicted by the U.S. government.
I was roused by Yurok Tribal Court Chief Judge Abby Abinanti's admonition: 'The hardest mistakes to correct are those that are ingrained.'
What mistakes are ingrained and how did it occur? In the 15th century, Pope Nicholas V gave European explorers the legal and moral right to possess Indigenous lands, to 'invade, search out, capture and subdue all … pagans' in the name of religion. That dubious right became known as the Doctrine of Discovery. It was based on the principle that presumed the superiority of European Christians. This doctrine empowered the settling and colonizing of this continent. The Doctrine of Discovery's dehumanizing principles were ingrained in our foundational documents. The language of the Declaration of Independence excludes Indigenous people ('merciless Indian savages'), and African Americans were deemed three-fifths of a person in the electoral college.
The Doctrine of Discovery was referenced as legal precedent by the Supreme Court as recently as 2005 in the City of Sherrill vs. Oneida Indian Nation case. This ingrained supremacy principle is all too evident in the appalling events happening now. Woefully, the Yurok Tribal Court judge was spot-on.
Harold Printup, Mar Vista
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch live: Trump lands in Alaska ahead of high-stakes Putin summit
Watch live: Trump lands in Alaska ahead of high-stakes Putin summit

The Hill

time24 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Watch live: Trump lands in Alaska ahead of high-stakes Putin summit

President Trump landed in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday afternoon ahead of his highly anticipated meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin — their first face-to-face interaction since Trump's first term. Trump said earlier Friday that he would not use the meeting as a platform to negotiate for Ukraine and threatened to 'walk away' from the conversation if Putin is not willing to make a peace deal that the U.S. finds acceptable. 'I think it's going to work out very well — and if it doesn't, I'm going to head back home real fast,' he told Fox News's Bret Baier aboard Air Force One. The comments come days after the president sought to reassure European allies that he would not advocate for a land swap between Russia and Ukraine. The meeting is expected to begin around 3 p.m. EDT and the two leaders are expected to give remarks following the summit. Watch the live video above.

Will Trump and Putin's meeting be successful? Here are 6 things to look out for.
Will Trump and Putin's meeting be successful? Here are 6 things to look out for.

Politico

time25 minutes ago

  • Politico

Will Trump and Putin's meeting be successful? Here are 6 things to look out for.

'The time [of the meeting] will depend on how the discussion goes. There are, of course, time parameters, but I told you when the negotiations will begin … when they will end — this will depend, first of all, on the presidents,' Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said on Thursday. Does Zelenskyy get a call? Trump has outlined his order of operations for Friday's meeting, telling reporters at a Kennedy Center event on Wednesday 'I'm going to call President Zelenskyy,' and then ring up other European allies to debrief them on the talks. But that's only if the meeting goes well. If it goes poorly, 'I'm not calling anybody,' Trump told Fox News' Brian Kilmeade on Thursday. Whether Trump follows through on his promise to immediately get his Ukrainian counterpart on the line could also indicate whether or not Zelenskyy is being sidelined in the negotiations process. Both Zelenskyy and his European allies have argued that no decision about Ukraine's future should be made without Ukraine at the table. When, or if, Trump makes those calls in the hours after his one-on-one with Putin — and what world leaders discuss — will determine if Zelenskyy and the U.S.'s European partners feel like they've been pushed out of the critical talks. Trump's eventual conversation with Zelenskyy could also determine the possibility of a Putin-Trump-Zelenskyy trilateral, which Trump has said would be the ideal outcome of Friday's meeting. Is the Trump-Putin bromance back on? The tone Trump takes in his conversations with — and about — Putin are likely to be an early tell of his interest in forcing Russia to get serious about a deal. While he was laudatory of the Russian leader during the first few months of his term, Trump has soured on his former pal more recently. The U.S. president has taken a markedly harsher approach toward Putin in the past few weeks, expressing frustration in the Russian president's stalling tactics and threatening sanctions if the Kremlin fails to come to a ceasefire agreement. On Wednesday, Trump once again assured reporters that there would be 'severe consequences' if Putin isn't willing to strike a deal, though he declined to go into detail on what those repercussions would look like. Speaking with reporters aboard Air Force One on the way to Anchorage Friday, Trump said Ukraine will be the ultimate decision-maker on any territory swaps. 'They'll be discussed, but I've got to let Ukraine make that decision,' Trump said. 'I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine. I'm here to get them at a table.' Any sign that Trump's stance toward Putin is softening could frustrate his European allies' and their hopes of coming down hard on Putin. Will Trump bring up security guarantees for Ukraine?

Verdict for Brazil's Bolsonaro set for early September
Verdict for Brazil's Bolsonaro set for early September

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Verdict for Brazil's Bolsonaro set for early September

A verdict and sentence in the coup trial against former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro will be delivered early next month, the country's Supreme Court announced. The court said the five-justice panel that heard the right-wing leader's case will deliver verdicts and sentences on the five counts against him from September 2 to 12. Bolsonaro, who has drawn the strong support of US President Donald Trump and who remains under house arrest, is accused of leading a conspiracy to stay in office after his narrow election defeat in 2022 to current President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Bolsonaro denies wrongdoing. Prosecutors say Bolsonaro and several of his allies headed a criminal organisation that plotted to overturn the election, including plans to kill Mr Lula and Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing the criminal case. Prosecutors have presented message exchanges, handwritten notes and other evidence allegedly detailing the plot. Defence lawyers have argued that no coup went forward and that Bolsonaro allowed the presidential transition to Mr Lula to take place, undermining any allegations that he tried to thwart that process. There are two five-justice panels at Brazil's top court, and Justice de Moraes brought the case to the one he sits on. Bolsonaro, who governed from 2019 to 2022, appointed two members of the court, but both sit on the other panel. There are five counts against Bolsonaro issued by the country's prosecutor-general: attempting to stage a coup, involvement in an armed criminal organisation, attempted violent abolition of the democratic rule of law and two counts involving destruction of state property. The prosecution finished presenting its case in July and the defence wrapped up its arguments this week. Bolsonaro's trial has gripped a sharply divided Brazilian public. It received even more attention after Mr Trump directly tied a 50% tariff on imported Brazilian goods to his ally's judicial situation. The US president has called the proceedings a 'witch hunt' against a political opponent, triggering nationalist reactions from many Brazilian politicians.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store