
What it was like to live as a diplomat in North Korea
Always under the watchful eye of their Korean minders, opportunities for genuine interaction with locals were scarce.
But one group of foreigners is allowed to roam Pyongyang, the capital, more or less as they wish: the diplomats.
Speaking to The Telegraph, they described how it was to live a life of relative freedom in one of the strangest and most repressive corners of the world.
Firstly, the fact that North Korea is under heavy sanctions poses serious logistical challenges.
For one, it is impossible to withdraw or send money to the country, which means embassy staff have to fly to China and bring back bags stuffed with cash to fund their missions.
'Every month, I or one of my staff would take the plane to Beijing, pick up 30 or 40,000 euros in cash, and bring it back,' said Mike Gifford, who served as the British ambassador to North Korea from 2012 to 2015.
'It was slightly surreal – you'll be at the airport and you'll see the German third secretary and he's got a trolley case with a little tag saying German government, but this is what we all did because there was no other way.'
Finding staple products on the shopping run was also not a simple undertaking.
'We spent a lot of our spare time shopping, not because there is a vibrant shopping scene, but because you had to,' said Mr Gifford.
There were only a few supermarkets that catered to foreigners, but 'the range of goods was not fantastic', he said.
'They would occasionally have whole chiller cabinets full of Perrier water and that's great, but I don't always want Perrier water,' Mr Gifford added.
Pyongyang has a decent amount of bars, cafés and restaurants – including an Italian pizza place and a Viennese coffee shop – but making friends with locals was not easy.
Lindsey Miller, who spent two years in Pyongyang as the spouse of a British diplomat, said they would always be seated away from Koreans at the bars.
She managed to strike up a friendship with a young woman who ran a bar not far from the embassy compound, but it wasn't easy.
'It's something I wrestled with the whole time I was there. How can you really get to know people? How can you really get to know what they think when you can't really ask them?' asked Ms Miller.
The woman she befriended had spent time outside the country and could speak English, but the extent to which she could share details about her life was limited.
Keeping in touch with friends back home in Britain and Europe was also challenging. While the Munsu-dong diplomatic compound in the east of the capital – where most of them were based – was one of the few places in the entire country to have WiFi, it was very slow.
'You could answer emails and you could send Facebook messages to people, but you'd have to wait for a video to load for ages on YouTube,' said Ms Miller.
Ms Miller used to spend her days walking around the city, taking Taekwondo lessons and going to a traditional Korean spa.
She would also explore what was behind the doors of Pyongyang's nondescript shopfront doors.
'You'll go into a building that will have a shop that sells lawn mowers and cheese. Then, across from that will be a little cafe that's tucked away that you would never know was in there. Then you walk through the back and there's a gym and it's an amazingly equipped gym,' said Ms Miller.
'They're in these faceless buildings so you have to go in to see what's inside.'
Regular trips to China to stock up on supplies became part of the diplomats' routine.
'When we crossed the bridge from North Korea to China, it sounds ridiculous, but we felt like finally we were in a country of freedom,' said Thomas Schaefer, who served two non-consecutive terms as Germany's ambassador to North Korea.
'It's funny but that is how you feel when you come out of North Korea.'
Mr Gifford said his China excursions would usually be train rides to Dandong, a city right on the North Korean border, or flights to Beijing.
'We would come back with boxes full of stuff, which in the UK would be staples, like cheese, butter and bacon,' he said.
Healthcare was also a reason to head over the border. While there was a doctor who worked out of the United Nations offices in Pyongyang who could treat diplomats for minor ailments, for anything more serious, foreigners were advised to go to China.
Alastair Morgan, who served as the British ambassador to North Korea from 2015 to 2018, remembered that a diplomatic spouse fell ill and was taken to Pyongyang General Hospital.
However, the treatment he was administered only made his condition worse and it was eventually decided that he needed to be treated outside of North Korea.
'He was driven up to the Chinese border and the first hospital in China that looked at him wouldn't take him, then the second took him and ended up treating him for acute appendicitis,' said Mr Morgan.
The lack of safety is one of the reasons that some missions have yet to reopen their embassies after the Covid-19 pandemic forced them all out, several of the former diplomats told The Telegraph.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which laid the groundwork for a new and stronger partnership between Moscow and Pyongyang, also contributed to the reluctance to reopen the missions.
North Korea allowed foreign missions to return late last year and some, including the Swedish and Polish embassies, have reopened. However, others, including the UK and Germany, have held off.
Mr Schaefer said that Pyongyang had invited Germany to reopen its embassy but the government was still considering the logistical concerns.
Despite the clash of values and the numerous challenges of hosting Westerners, the former diplomats believed that there were – and are – benefits to having a presence inside the country.
'We could give messages into the regime that we could not be confident would be fed in by their diplomats overseas,' explained Mr Morgan.
He also added that having a presence on the ground allowed for diplomats to collect information about life in North Korea that could be sent back to headquarters in Europe.
The North Korean side also saw benefits to having the diplomats there.
Having Western envoys inside the country gave North Korea a certain degree of recognition as well as access to alternative views, Mr Gifford explained.
'They wanted to be able to put their case across to as many people as they could,' he said.
The Western embassies would also run humanitarian operations and language programmes for local communities, which were welcomed by the regime.
However, while helpful, these were relatively small programmes bogged down by lots of bureaucracy and red tape and in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, the country needed a bigger partner that could offer support without asking any questions.
'Coming out of a three-and-a-half-year Covid lockdown, they needed a lot of help. They had no food, they had no medicine, they had no energy, they had nothing,' said Victor Cha, the Korea chair at the US-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
'They had this opportunity with Russia to get food, fuel and hard currency, and so they made that choice, and the sacrifice would be their relations with European countries.'
North Korea's relationship with other Western countries, namely the US, had also taken a turn for the worse.
During Donald Trump's first term as president, engagement with North Korea and Kim Jong-un was a priority for the administration.
The two men met three times at summits in Singapore, Hanoi and in the demilitarised zone between the two Koreas.
However, the meetings were largely unsuccessful and ended up damaging relations between the two countries even more, said Dr Cha.
'The North Koreans and the leader specifically suffered the biggest embarrassment ever in the history of the leadership of the country when they engaged in these summits with Donald Trump and then Donald Trump walked out of the summit in Hanoi,' he said.
'He walked out saying there's no deal here and he literally left Kim Jong-un within the first day, before lunchtime.'
Since Mr Trump was sworn in for his second term earlier this year, he has not made the same grand statements about meeting with Kim, although he reportedly tried to pass a letter to the regime's representative at the United Nations in New York.
These efforts have reportedly been shunned – a clear sign of how much has changed in the last 10 years.
'Whatever Kim does, he won't go through the cycle that he went through before, which finished with the failure in Hanoi,' said Mr Morgan.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Food businesses offset commodity price hits at Japanese trading houses
TOKYO, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Higher profits at the diversified food businesses run by Japanese trading houses offset weaker performances at their commodities units, disclosures by Mitsui, Marubeni and Itochu showed on Friday. This diversification from the traditional commodity trading businesses at Itochu (8001.T), opens new tab, Marubeni (8002.T), opens new tab, Mitsui (8031.T), opens new tab is part of what drew Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRKa.N), opens new tab to take minority stakes in the companies. Profits at Mitsui (8031.T), opens new tab for the three months ended on June 30 fell 31% from a year earlier partly because of weaker iron ore prices but income at its lifestyle unit, including overseas shrimp and broiler processing as well as domestic foods, grew by around 1 billion yen, accounting for 8% of the total 191.6 billion yen ($1.3 billion) the company earned. Marubeni's food and agriculture business saw a profit increase of 4 billion yen for the same period to 35.5 billion yen, or 23% of its 154.4 billion yen total. Income at the company's metals and mineral resources unit fell by 6 billion yen to 28.7 billion yen. Itochu's profits from its food business rose by nearly 10 billion yen to a record 28.8 billion yen while profits at its FamilyMart convenience store chain rose by 4.5 billion yen to 15.4 billion yen. Combined, they made 16% of Itochu's 284 billion yen quarterly net profit, highest so far. Mitsui, Marubeni and Itochu kept their full fiscal year profit forecasts unchanged on Friday at 770 billion yen, 510 billion yen and 900 billion yen, respectively. ($1 = 150.4600 yen)


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
BOJ gears up to hike rates again but leaves free hand on timing
TOKYO, Aug 1 (Reuters) - The Bank of Japan laid the groundwork this week for resuming interest rate hikes by spelling out explicitly for the first time the risks that persistent food price rises fan broad-based inflation. While markets took a dovish reading of BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda's commentary after Thursday's policy meeting, much of his guidance suggests the bank is inching back towards action after a period of waiting and watching, analysts say. A shift in the board's inflation bias and its less gloomy view on the impact of U.S. tariffs also underscore the BOJ's resolve to pull the trigger once it is convinced the damage from higher levies will be within its expectations. Such hawkish signals in the BOJ's quarterly report, which represents the board's consensus view on the policy outlook, were qualified by Ueda's comments suggesting he was in no rush to raise interest rates. Still, Ueda said Japan was making some progress towards durably hitting the BOJ's 2% inflation target and stressed that its policy rate - at 0.5% - remains very low. "It's not as if we will wait until underlying inflation is firmly at 2%. Our decision is dependent on how likely underlying inflation will reach that level," Ueda told a news conference on Thursday when asked about the next rate-hike timing. All in all, the signals show the BOJ is preparing for another rate hike, while leaving all options open on the exact timing, analysts say. "The outlook report clearly shows the BOJ is starting to lay the groundwork for a rate hike," said Naomi Muguruma, chief bond strategist at Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities. "The BOJ seems confident about prospects for durably hitting its inflation target," she said. "It may not be in a rush, but signaling that every policy meeting from now will be live." The BOJ holds its next policy meeting in September and another in October, when the board conducts a quarterly review of growth and price forecasts. It holds its final meeting for this year in December. A Reuters poll last month showed a majority of economists expect another rate hike by year-end. Swap rates indicate a 54% chance the BOJ will raise rates to 0.75% in October and a 71% chance in December. When the BOJ compiled its previous outlook report on May 1, Ueda signalled a pause in its rate-hike cycle as President Donald Trump's April announcement of sweeping "reciprocal" tariffs jolted markets and stoked fears of global recession. Thursday's report showed signs the BOJ has ended that pause, as markets restored some calm and Japan's trade agreement with the U.S. in July reduced some uncertainty. For one, the BOJ removed the word "extremely" in describing uncertainty over U.S. trade policy. While Ueda stressed the need to await more data on the impact from U.S. tariffs, he said the risk of the economy "falling off the cliff" has diminished. The board also revised up its inflation forecast and said risks to the price outlook were balanced - a more neutral stance from that of May 1 describing risks as skewed to the downside. Furthermore, the BOJ report for the first time included a detailed assessment of how rising food costs - once seen as transitory - may lead to broad-based price rises. "It is possible that price rises will persist for longer than expected" as companies are passing on not just raw material but labour and distribution costs, the report said. A steady rise in the price of items like food, which consumers buy frequently, may induce "second-round effects" on underlying inflation, the BOJ said in the strongest warning to date on mounting price pressure. To be sure, food prices are among several factors the BOJ looks at in judging whether underlying inflation - or price rises driven by domestic demand - will durably hit its 2% target and justify raising rates. Other measures show underlying inflation remains short of 2%, Ueda said, brushing aside the view the BOJ may be behind the curve in addressing the risk of too-high inflation. But he said the BOJ must keep an eye out on how food prices and headline consumer inflation, which has remained above its target for well over three years, could affect inflation expectations. In exiting a decade-long stimulus last year and raising rates to 0.5% in January, the BOJ pointed to growing signs companies were shedding their long-held aversion to price hikes. Such change in corporate behaviour may be accelerating. A total of 1,010 food and beverage items saw prices rise in August with more than 3,000 items likely to see higher prices in October, think tank Teikoku Databank said on Thursday. "Food inflation will undoubtedly persist, which is probably why the BOJ highlighted the risk so clearly in the report," said veteran BOJ watcher Mari Iwashita. "Once there's more clarity that wage hikes will continue, the BOJ might go ahead and raise rates."


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Jane Street not co-operating in ongoing probe, says India government source
NEW DELHI, Aug 1 (Reuters) - U.S. trading firm Jane Street is not co-operating with the income tax department in the ongoing investigation against the firm, a government source who has been briefed on the matter told Reuters on Friday. India's income tax authorities are reviewing documents across the local offices of Jane Street and its trading partner Nuvama Wealth ( opens new tab, two sources aware of the matter had said on Thursday. "Their servers are located outside India and access is being blocked. The books of accounts are also maintained outside the country, despite the requirement under Indian company law to maintain them in India," the source said on condition of anonymity as the proceedings are confidential. "They have only a skeletal staff present here, who are also not co-operating," the source added. India's tax authorities did not immediately respond to queries sent on email. An e-mail sent to Jane Street's headquarters in the U.S. outside office hours also did not get an immediate response. India's markets regulator SEBI temporarily banned Jane Street from trading in Indian markets on July 4, alleging the firm manipulated stock indexes through its derivatives positions. According to the regulator's order, the Jane Street group made a profit of $4.23 billion from trading in India between January 2023 to May 2025. The U.S. brokerage has deposited $567 million in an escrow account, representing what the regulator said are "unlawful gains," in a bid to resume trading while reserving its legal rights. SEBI has since lifted restrictions placed on the firm but the company has continued to stay away from trading in India.