For some Californians, high transportation costs put owning a car out of reach
His 20-mile journey from South Los Angeles to the San Fernando Valley takes about 90 minutes each way.
"Half an hour just to get to downtown, to get to the train station, then another half-an-hour just to get from the train station to get here, and then the bus will take me straight to my job," Andrade told CBS News. "I would do this journey every day just to get my family through."
His journey was easier when he had a car. But following a crash, fixing it just cost too much for Andrade, who is the sole provider for his family.
"It's almost like a struggle, every paycheck," Andrade said.
To cut down on daycare costs, his wife stays at home with their young son. "It's heart wrenching, you know," Andrade said. "Because it makes me feel like I'm not enough, you know, as a human. Like, I'm not really doing much."
Andrade's family's struggles mirror that of millions in California. According to a study released earlier this year from the nonprofit United Way, 35% of California households — or about 3.8 million households — do not make enough to afford basic costs of living, such as rent, groceries and gas.
United Way CEO Pete Manzo says the study is just a snapshot of a national problem.
"It's a crisis we've been living with," Manzo told CBS News. "It's like we're running a high fever. We have too many households where people are working hard and they can't earn a decent standard of living."
One of the biggest challenges is access to transportation. AAA says the cost of owning a new car — including monthly payments, insurance, maintenance and fuel — runs more than $12,000 per year for the average American household.
"You're basically saying to a family, it's going to be a $1,000 a month or more to get to and from work, to get to and from school," Manzo said. "It's not cheap." The costs may not be as high in some other states as in California. But nationwide, taking into account inflation, the financial burden of transportation is steadily rising, along with housing and childcare, United Way analysis has found.
Manzo says that advising families in California to move somewhere more affordable isn't necessarily a practical solution.
"For one family, that might be a decent idea," Manzo said. "But it's pretty disruptive to just pick up and leave all your other family relationships and all your community ties to move somewhere to make it cheaper...Expecting them all to move somewhere cheaper just doesn't make sense."
For now, Andrade is saving up to afford a car for his family. "They tell me, you know, don't give up, you got this."
Teen questioned after family's quadruple murder
Iranians evacuate capital Tehran, some say the regime is frightened
Parents, brother of slain Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman speak about her death
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
28 minutes ago
- CNBC
Lutnick says Intel has to give government equity in return for CHIPS Act funds
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Tuesday that Intel must give the U.S. government an equity stake in the company in return for CHIPS Act funds. "We should get an equity stake for our money," Lutnick said on CNBC's "Squawk on the Street" Tuesday. "So we'll deliver the money, which was already committed under the Biden administration. We'll get equity in return for it." Shares of the struggling chipmaker climbed 7% Tuesday, continuing to rally on recent reports that the Trump administration is weighing different ways to get involved with the company. Bloomberg reported Monday that the White House was discussing a 10% stake in Intel, in a deal that could see the U.S. government become the chipmaker's largest shareholder. Intel and SoftBank announced on Monday that the Japanese conglomerate will make a $2 billion investment in the chipmaker. The investment, equal to about 2% of Intel, makes SoftBank the fifth-biggest shareholder, according to FactSet. Lutnick said any potential arrangement wouldn't provide the government with voting or governance rights in Intel. "It's not governance, we're just converting what was a grant under Biden into equity for the Trump administration, for the American people," Lutnick said. "Non-voting." Intel did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Lutnick also suggested that President Donald Trump could seek out similar deals with other CHIPS recipients. Intel was awarded about $7.9 billion in grants. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. was awarded $6.6 billion under the legislation to boost chip fabrication at its Arizona facilities. "The Biden administration literally was giving Intel for free, and giving TSMC money for free, and all these companies just giving them money for free," Lutnick said. "Donald Trump turns that into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action.' " Trump has called for more reshoring of U.S. manufacturing to reduce the country's reliance on companies like Samsung and TSMC to manufacture chips. Intel has struggled to capitalize on the artificial intelligence boom in advanced semiconductors and has spent heavily to stand up a manufacturing business that's yet to secure a significant customer. Intel tapped Lip-Bu Tan to be its CEO in March after his predecessor, Pat Gelsinger, was ousted in December. Tan met with Trump at the White House last week after the president called for his resignation, alleging he had ties to China.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Trump administration confirms it's seeking a stake in Intel. Why? It depends who you ask
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed on Tuesday that the US government is considering an extraordinary investment in struggling chipmaker Intel. But they gave different answers about what the Trump administration sought to do with that stake. Such a deal, if it were to happen, would mark an unusual arrangement that would see the Trump administration use taxpayer money to take a stake in a private American business. In an interview with CNBC Tuesday morning, Bessent suggested a deal like this would be about boosting an American tech company, rather than making money from Intel. When asked whether taking a stake in Intel would mean convincing US companies to purchase chips from the tech giant, Bessent said any investment in Intel would be intended to 'help stabilize the company for chip production here in the US.' 'The last thing we're going to do is put pressure, is take the stake and then try to drum up business,' he said, adding that it would be a 'conversion of the grant,' likely referencing reports from Bloomberg, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal indicating that the administration could convert grants from the CHIPS and Science Act into an equity stake. The reports indicate that the administration is weighing a 10% stake in Intel. Bloomberg first reported the discussions last week. 'There's no talk of trying to force companies to buy from Intel,' he said, adding that reliance on Taiwan for chips, where the majority of the world's chips are made, is a 'national security concern.' 'For national security, we have to stop that single point of failure,' he said. Lutnick reiterated that stance, telling CNBC later on Tuesday morning that shifting chipmaking to the United States instead of relying on Taiwan is a priority, both for the economy and for security. But he also said Trump believes the government should get a return on its investment, rather than doling out grants to major tech companies. He said that the Biden administration, through the bipartisan CHIPS act, was 'was literally giving Intel [money] – for free.' 'Donald Trump turns that into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money,'' Lutnick said. 'America should get the benefit of the bargain. I mean, that is exactly Donald Trump's perspective, which is: 'Why are we giving a company worth $100 billion this kind of money?'' Intel declined to comment on reports of such a deal when approached by CNN last week, but said it 'is deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership.' 'We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump Administration to advance these shared priorities, but we are not going to comment on rumors or speculation,' the spokesperson said in a statement. 'Discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the Administration,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a statement to CNN last week. The reports and Bessent's comments also come after chipmakers Nvidia and AMD said they would pay 15% from their chip sales in China to the government in exchange for export licenses. If the government does take a stake in Intel, it could also serve as a model for other Trump administration investments, two people familiar with the White House discussions on the matter told CNN last week. President Donald Trump met with Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan last week after calling for the tech executive's resignation over allegations about his links to China. Intel has fallen behind in the chip race after losing to rivals like Qualcomm and Nvidia on the shift to mobile and AI. The chipmaker said last month that it had mostly completed plans to lay off 15% of its staff. Trump has pushed to revive manufacturing in the United States and cement America as a leader in the tech sector, two goals that have been a cornerstone of his presidency thus far. He's touted major investments from companies like Apple, TSMC and Nvidia to expand their US operations as political wins, although these companies have invested in broadening their US presence before his second term. CNN's Phil Mattingly and Clare Duffy contributed to this report. This story has been updated with additional information and developments. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Is in the S&P 500: 4 Things That Means for Investors in 2025
Tesla (TSLA) stock has had its up and downs of late, but it's certainly been up over time. Tesla is part of the S&P 500; the index most analysts use to measure the overall market. Explore More: Consider This: What does Tesla's presence on the S&P 500 mean for investors in 2025? Here's what you need to know. Tesla Is Number 9 on the S&P 500 As the name implies, there are 500 stocks on the S&P 500. Tesla is number nine on this list, which means it carries more weight on the index than 98% of the companies on the list, per Slickcharts. Find Out: Tesla Makes Up Nearly 2% of the Index The S&P 500 is a weighted index, with the larger companies higher on the list and comprising a larger percentage of the overall metric. In the case of Tesla, its stock makes up 1.82% of the total S&P 500 index. Tech Stocks Dominate The top 10 stocks in the S&P 500, which make up 38% of the index, are nearly all tech or tech-adjacent stocks. They are Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Broadcom, Alphabet (Class A), Alphabet (Class C), Tesla and Berkshire Hathaway. This Can All Add Up to Volatility The S&P 500 is a bellwether for the general market, so it is expected to have some volatility. But the heavy concentration of tech stocks could mean extra volatility, especially as tariffs take effect and companies are incented to move manufacturing to the U.S. Tesla, for example, is up 68% in the past year but down 20% year to date, as of Aug. 7, 2025, according to Yahoo! Finance. Its 52-week range is $192.04 to $488.54 — a very wide spread, particularly for a company of its size. What Is the S&P 500? The S&P500 consists of 500 of the largest U.S. stocks, weighted by market capitalization. This means that the largest companies are represented by a larger percentage than smaller companies. Nvidia is the largest company in the S&P 500 and represents 7.72% of the total index. The S&P 500 is broadly used as an indicator for the stock market overall, and, by extension, the health of the U.S. economy. While the Dow Jones Industrial Average (commonly referred to as 'the Dow' or even 'the market') is often what news outlets report on, that index consists of just 30 stocks. The S&P 500 represents more companies and therefore may be a better barometer for the health of the market. The S&P 500 isn't always the same 500 companies. Companies can be added and removed, based on decisions by the experts at the S&P Dow Jones Indices. These decisions are made four times a year. To be included in the S&P 500, a company must have a market capitalization of at least $22.7 billion in the most recent quarter, according to Charles Schwab. It must have been profitable for at least the last four quarters. It must be based in the United States, and its stock must be traded on an approved U.S. stock exchange. When it was announced that Tesla would be added to the S&P 500 in 2020, its shares gained 60% from the time the announcement was made until it was actually included the following month. A company's shares will often spike when it is added to the index, if for no other reason than that such stocks are included in many index funds that seek to mirror the performance of the S&P 500 itself. Tesla remains profitable despite its recent sales declines. At its July earnings call, the company reported that profits declined for the third quarter in a row, The New York Times reported. If the company were to report a quarterly loss, it would risk being removed from the S&P 500. The inclusion of Tesla on the S&P 500 is certainly justified, given the company's success. Whether it remains there will depend on the company's ability to continue to record profitable results. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on Tesla Is in the S&P 500: 4 Things That Means for Investors in 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio
