logo
Fired Los Angeles fire chief loses appeal but strikes PR blow against Karen Bass

Fired Los Angeles fire chief loses appeal but strikes PR blow against Karen Bass

Yahoo04-03-2025

LOS ANGELES — The good news for Mayor Karen Bass: Her decision to sack the city's fire chief in the wake of devastating wildfires was broadly upheld Tuesday by the City Council.
The bad news? That affirmation followed a messy spectacle that put the mayor and many council members crosswise with the politically potent firefighters — a spat with implications that could persist long after the council vote.
'You all tell us how much you support firefighters, how much you love labor,' Freddy Escobar, president of United Firefighters of Los Angeles City, the union representing the rank-and-file, pointedly told the council. 'Well, labor is with Chief Crowley on this.'
The showdown centered on ex-Chief Kristin Crowley's appeal of her termination, which Bass announced nearly two weeks ago. Crowley would have needed the support of two-thirds of the council — or 10 members — to reverse the decision.
In the end, Crowley only got two members — Traci Park, who represents the district torched by the Palisades Fire, and Monica Rodriguez. The 13 votes affirming the mayor's decision was a forceful show of muscle by Bass and council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, her close ally.
Though the math was not on Crowley's side, her appeal offered a consolation prize: the chance to inflict new PR pain on a mayor who's been on rocky footing ever since the fires broke out in early January.
The high drama was heightened by an audience stacked with union firefighters — unmissable in Los Angeles Fire T-shirts — while Bass had her own contingent of backers, including civil rights groups and the Stentorians, an organization of Black firefighters. A line of spectators waited outside City Hall well after the proceedings began, while inside the chambers, there was a row of local television cameras capturing live coverage.
Crowley, in her first extended public comments after her firing, offered a point-by-point refutation on Bass' stated reasons for the firing.
She said Bass' primary justifications — that Crowley sent home 1,000 firefighters on the morning the Palisades Fire began and that she refused to participate in an after-action report — were 'false accusations.'
She also refuted Bass' assertion that she failed to warn her of the dangerous conditions before the fires, which the mayor said would have informed her decision to take a diplomatic trip to Ghana — a fateful choice that left her across the globe when the fires began.
More pointedly, Crowley laced into the city's continued underfunding of the fire department, suggesting that Los Angeles' safety is compromised because of the budgetary decisions of its leaders.
'I have seen our fire departments struggle from year to year with limited funding, staffing and resources,' she told the council. 'We are past the point of sustaining our services without compromising public safety and the safety of our firefighters.'
Those budget battles were at the root of the fracture between Bass and Crowley, who gave media interviews while the fires were still burning asserting that the strained resources had hobbled the department's response. Though the two women later insisted they were working together to control the crisis, the public rift had irrevocably poisoned their relationship.
Rodriguez, a frequent critic of the mayor, said that Crowley's firing will have a chilling effect on government workers who could fear the 'political ramifications' of publicly voicing concerns.
'It's sending the wrong message to every city employee and general manager that it is safer to stay silent than to call out what's wrong,' Rodriguez said.
Park, the other member to support Crowley's appeal, said the quest for accountability might ultimately merit firing 'everyone who has culpability across multiple departments.'
'But I wouldn't do it without a well-informed record and actual evidence to support that decision, and I don't have it today,' she said.
Other members made clear the painful position they were in, torn between the mayor and the firefighters, who are often a coveted political backer, especially in the wake of disaster.
Some, like Imelda Padilla, tried to split the difference, taking pains to separate the vote on Crowley from support for the department writ large.
'We cannot allow this conversation to overshadow the extraordinary bravery and dedication of our first responses and firefighters who battled this disastrous fire,' she said. 'Because honestly, it's starting to feel that way, and I'm over it.'
Padilla voted against Crowley's appeal, as did Tim McOsker, whose brother is a former UFLAC president who spoke in favor of Crowley. McOsker said the city would not be well-served by having a mayor and public safety chief who were at odds. But he was blunt about the blowback he may face for his vote.
'With a very, very, very heavy heart, I will say that I'm going to put the goal of public safety and a functional city above what might be more politically expedient for me,' he said. 'Sometimes we need to risk our jobs to do our jobs.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Do Not Knock' ordinance may come to Hazel Park as city council decides
'Do Not Knock' ordinance may come to Hazel Park as city council decides

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

'Do Not Knock' ordinance may come to Hazel Park as city council decides

The Brief The annoyance of solicitors may come to an end for some in Hazel Park. Residents could one day sign a "Do Not Knock Registry", making their home off limits to peddlers. HAZEL PARK, Mich. (FOX 2) - It is a common annoyance that everyone can relate to; solicitors knocking on the door trying to sell you something, but in one community, that could soon be a thing of the past. Hazel Park is inching closer to letting residents sign a "Do Not Knock Registry", making their home off limits to peddlers. What they're saying Though it is only an idea as of Tuesday, it has alot of support from the Hazel Park City Council, and it was modeled after a similar ordinance in Troy where many residents there have told solicitors to get lost. Maddy Reem likes the idea that is working its way through the city council, allowing residents to ban solicitors from knocking on their doors to make a sales pitch or ask for something. "When we first moved here, we had a ton of people knocking," she said. "I don't like answering the door too by myself, so it would be nice. Make me feel safer I would say." Luke Londo is the council member behind the legislation. "A Do Not Knock registry essentially allows homeowners to decline to have solicitors, peddlers come to their door," he said. "Anecdotally, it's something we hear about on occasion. I was particularly alarmed by a recent incident of a gentleman - his 84-year-old mother who's well but not necessarily in control of all her faculties, had somebody visit her home and were trying to sell an alternative energy program. Thankfully, she didn't take them up on their offer, but the son essentially asked if there was something that could be done." Big picture view If approved, peddlers would be required to have a license. Anyone knocking on their behalf would have to carry the license too. Those who get the license will also get a list of homes to stay away from. Specific hours would be set for legal soliciting and existing "No Soliciting" signs would carry a lot more weight. Violators would face tickets and fines and could lose that license all together. FOX 2 did some good old-fashioned door knocking of our own to get more public opinion on the matter. Scott Kearns says he's all good with friendly visitors, but it all depends on their purpose for stopping by. "If they are out here selling things then that is one thing," he said. "I'm not really for that but if you are coming by, and you are coming through the neighborhood to let me know what's going on in the community, eh come on in. I'm a friendly guy." Dig deeper The ordinance would have some exceptions. "Some of the exceptions are people like me that might be canvassing for office or on behalf of other politicians," said Londo. "I personally will abide by the Do Not Knock Registry, but also religious groups that enjoy First Amendment protections that are able to go door to door as a First Amendment right." Anyone who wants to be on the registry would be able to sign up on the City of Hazel Park's website, or they could visit City Hall.

Saco voters approve $80.4 million municipal and school budget
Saco voters approve $80.4 million municipal and school budget

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Saco voters approve $80.4 million municipal and school budget

Jun. 10—Saco voters approved the proposed $80.4 million combined municipal and school budget during the June 10 municipal election. The vote was 708 in favor and 209 opposed. The Saco City Council adopted the municipal and school budget during a meeting on May 12. The budget represents an increase of $6.8 million, or 9.2%, over the current budget. The tax rate is expected to increase to $14.20 per $1,000 of property value, a 15-cent or 1.1% jump. This means that the annual tax increase for a median single-family residential home valued at $420,000 is $63. The 15-cent increase is below the rate of inflation and 55 cents lower than the $14.75 property tax rate set in the 2024 fiscal year, according to a release from the city of Saco. "We are required to adopt a balanced budget," City Administrator John Bohenko said at a meeting. The primary cost driver of the new budget is costs associated with salaries and benefits to employees, accounting for 72% of the budget. These increases include adjustments to bring union wages in line with market value, cost of living adjustments for non-union jobs, four new positions, and anticipated increases in benefits costs, such as health insurance premiums. Increases also include funding for a seacoast resilience project, a Ferry Road culvert replacement, and funding for the Dyer Library and Saco Museum. Copy the Story Link

San Diego City Council approves 2026 fiscal year budget
San Diego City Council approves 2026 fiscal year budget

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

San Diego City Council approves 2026 fiscal year budget

SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — The highly scrutinized San Diego city budget for the 2026 fiscal year has finally been passed. After facing more than a quarter of a billion-dollar shortfall, city council voted to approve an amended budget, all while saving some of the key programs and services Mayor Todd Gloria chose to cut. There has been passion and heated opinions from the public for months, including on decision day Tuesday when city council was set to approve an amended budget. 'Investing in them tell San Diegans they matter. Mayor Gloria's budget tells San Diegans that only some of them matter. It cuts funding for libraries, parks and rec centers, youth programs, the arts, equity offices and climate justice initiatives,' said Noah Yee Yick, researcher and policy advocate at the Center on Policy Initiatives. Councilmembers presented amendments to Gloria's final budget, saving several items on the chopping block that drew heavy criticism from the community. Fire pits have been saved due to county funding. Monday hours will be available at more than a dozen libraries and all rec centers hours will be restored. In addition, the Office of Race and Equity and $450,000 in funding for arts, culture and community festivals nonprofits grants will be restored. Access will not be lost to Lake Murray and Lake Miramar and public restrooms near the beaches and Balboa Park will remain open. After Gloria largely blamed the public for not passing the most recent proposed tax increase, the money for these restorations had to come from somewhere. That includes cutting administrative positions totaling $3 million, plans to start charging for parking at Balboa Park and a newly approved monthly trash fee, which is expected to generate $80 million annually. 'With that behind us and those revenues that we can count on for the next year, it is allowing us to do the extraordinary changes that our residents, our constituents, our neighborhoods, need and demand and deserve,' said Council President Joe LaCava. Even with the budget passing with a majority 7 to 2 vote, the city's independent budget analyst acknowledges how narrow the margin is for any error. 'If we do hit an economic downturn, even if all of these good things, these new revenues come to fruition, we will be faced with the need for immediate cuts,' Charles Modica said. The budget goes into effect on July 1. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store