Fei-Fei Li, 'godmother of AI,' points to risks of cuts to US research funds, student visas
Fei-Fei Li, the leading Stanford University researcher nicknamed the 'godmother of AI,' emphasized the risks of cutting research funding and international student visas to the US as it faces an increasingly competitive global tech race.
'The public sector, especially higher education, has been a pivotal, central part of America's innovation ecosystem [and] a critical part of our economic growth,' she said at a Semafor Tech event in San Francisco on Wednesday. 'Almost everything we know as classic knowledge of AI came from academic research, whether its algorithms, data-driven methods, or early research in microprocessors.'
Her comments come as the Trump administration has targeted billions of dollars in grants for universities because of their social policies and revoked thousands of visas for students as part of its crackdown on immigration.
Li, who is co-director of the Stanford Institute Human-Centered AI and the co-founder of the World Labs startup, is revered in the tech sector because of her early breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, and she's been a leading voice on policies to promote innovation.
'Continuing to nourish our higher education, our public sector, for this kind of innovative, blue sky, curiosity-driven research is critical for the health of our ecosystem [and] for training the next generation,' she said. 'I hope [my students] can get work visas and have a path for immigration.'
She added that US visa quotas for individuals from certain countries 'has been a challenge for many talents to stay, and I hope we can continue to address that.'
Speaking at the same event on Wednesday, Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark added that the Trump administration recognizes the importance of AI, but its strategy is still coming together, including its plan around export controls.
'The challenge of AI is it touches everything — electricity generation, export controls, how you do the structuring of science and research,' Clark said. 'This administration has gone through the pattern of coming and saying, 'Oh wow, we've got this cool technology. It's called AI.' And then they discover very quickly that this technology touches every single thing they care about. It will eventually form into — I hope — a larger, more coherent strategy.'
Clark also noted the increasing tension reflected in the Trump administration's recent decision to expand access to advanced chips to the UAE and Saudi Arabia. The region had been limited under the Biden administration, which put caps on its semiconductor purchases from American companies.
On one hand, Clark said, there's a push for the world to use US-led AI platforms and build on US chips. But if the technology becomes as incredibly powerful as predicted, products built on it will have dual uses that could have nefarious purposes.
'All of those computers all around the world are going to become equivalent to factories that can turn out both cars and tanks,' he said. 'And you are going to see which way it goes depending on what the alliance looks like. So we are going to need to think about how we apply really good security to these factories that we've now built all around the world.'
Director of the Center for AI Safety Dan Hendrycks, who is also an advisor at Elon Musk's AI startup, xAI, and for Scale AI, also pointed to export controls as a safety mechanism.
'Chips are sort of the currency of power in AI. It's over 90% of these AI companies' budget is spent on,' Hendrycks said at the event. 'And making sure that that isn't falling in the hands of rogue actors, or pariah states, is a priority.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
AI is disrupting the advertising business in a big way — industry leaders explain how
Artificial intelligence is shaking up the advertising business and "unnerving" investors, one industry leader told CNBC. "I think this AI disruption ... unnerving investors in every industry, and it's totally disrupting our business," Mark Read, the outgoing CEO of British advertising group WPP, told CNBC's Karen Tso on Tuesday. The advertising market is under threat from emerging generative AI tools that can be used to materialize pieces of content at rapid pace. The past couple of years has seen the rise of a number of AI image generators, including OpenAI's DALL-E, Google's Veo and Midjourney. In his first interview since announcing he would step down as WPP boss, Read said that AI is "going to totally revolutionize our business." "AI is going to make all the world's expertise available to everybody at extremely low cost," he said at London Tech Week. "The best lawyer, the best psychologist, the best radiologist, the best accountant, and indeed, the best advertising creatives and marketing people often will be an AI, you know, will be driven by AI." Read said that 50,000 WPP employees now use WPP Open, the company's own AI-powered marketing platform. "That, I think, is my legacy in many ways," he added. Structural pressure on creative parts of the ad business are driving industry consolidation, Read also noted, adding that companies would need to "embrace" the way in which AI would impact everything from creating briefs and media plans to optimizing campaigns. A report from Forrester released in June last year showed that more than 60% of U.S. ad agencies are already making use of generative AI, with a further 31% saying they're exploring use cases for the technology. Read is not alone in this view. Advertising is undergoing a "huge transformation" due to the disruptive effects of AI, French advertising giant Publicis Groupe's CEO Maurice Levy told CNBC at the Viva Tech conference in Paris. He noted that AI image and video generation tools are speeding up content production drastically, while automated messaging systems can now achieve "personalization at scale like never before." However, the Publicis chief stressed that AI should only be considered a tool that people can use to augment their lives. "We should not believe that AI is more than a tool," he added. And while AI is likely to impact some jobs, Levy ultimately thinks it will create more roles than it destroys. "Will AI replace me, and will AI kill some jobs? I think that AI, yes, will destroy some jobs," Levy conceded. However, he added that, "more importantly, AI will transform jobs and will create more jobs. So the net balance will be probably positive." This, he says, would be in keeping with the labor impacts of previous technological inventions like the internet and smartphones. "There will be more autonomous work," Levy added. Still, Nicole Denman Greene, analyst at Gartner, warns brands should be wary of causing a negative reaction from consumers who are skeptical of AI's impact on human creativity. According to a Gartner survey from September, 82% of consumers said firms using generative AI should prioritize preserving human jobs, even if it means lower profits. "Pivot from what AI can do to what it should do in advertising," Greene told CNBC. "What it should do is help create groundbreaking insights, unique execution to reach diverse and niche audiences, push boundaries on what 'marketing' is and deliver more brand differentiated, helpful and relevant personalized experiences, including deliver on the promise of hyper-personalization."


Forbes
39 minutes ago
- Forbes
3 Game-Changing AI Investment Strategies For Big Tech Investors To Save Millions
Game-Changing AI Investment Strategies In recent years, a number of high-profile AI startups—backed by leading AI investors—have faced significant setbacks, with some incurring losses in the hundreds of millions of dollars even after promising early traction and ambitious valuations. These developments serve as a cautionary signal to the global AI investment community: in a landscape defined by rapid innovation and media-fueled excitement, conventional due diligence practices are no longer sufficient. The AI sector, in particular, has become increasingly vulnerable to hype, with some startups overstating their technological capabilities—often relying on hundreds of human inputs behind the scenes while promoting their solutions as fully autonomous AI systems. As the old adage goes, "Anyone can sell snake oil, but not everyone is selling the real deal." Distinguishing genuine innovation from inflated claims is more critical than ever for investors seeking sustainable, long-term value in the AI space. For major AI investors—including big tech, institutional funds, and venture capital firms—this moment represents both a warning and an opportunity. The complexity of AI evaluation demands a strategic shift that marries visionary insight with technical rigor and collaborative diligence. The recent rise and fall of prominent startups underscores the necessity of a more disciplined, forward-looking approach—one that transitions from reactive to proactive investing. Outlined below are three forward-looking strategies designed to help investors engage more effectively with the opportunities and challenges shaping the evolving AI landscape. Strategy #1: Mitigating FOMO with Parallel Investment in Third-Party AI Expertise In a sector where the pace of innovation often outstrips investors' ability to evaluate it, a parallel investing model is becoming increasingly indispensable. This approach involves not only allocating capital to AI startups, but also systematically engaging independent AI experts and auditors to conduct ongoing, objective evaluations of a startup's core technology. While endorsements from marquee investors may signal credibility, they should never substitute for direct, evidence-based due diligence. These assessments should span critical AI disciplines such as natural language processing (NLP), machine learning operations (MLOps), model performance and product-level validation. Avoiding FOMO-Driven Decisions in AI Investing: The fear of missing out (FOMO) often drives investors to chase high-profile deals—particularly when influential names are involved—at the expense of rigorous evaluation. A disciplined, expertise-led parallel investment strategy mitigates this risk by prioritizing independent technical assessments that validate a startup's long-term potential beyond the pitch deck. A comparable model can be found in the approach of Entrepreneur First (EF), a global accelerator that pioneered 'talent investing'—backing exceptional individuals even before a team or business idea exists. By focusing on the raw potential of technical founders and guiding them through co-founder matching and company creation, EF has helped launch more than 600 startups, collectively valued at over $11 billion as of 2025. In the same spirit, the strategy proposed here advocates for investing not only in companies but also in third-party AI expertise—ensuring continued, unbiased due diligence throughout the investment lifecycle. Strategy #2: Establish a Dedicated Syndicate Investor Communication Channel While founder transparency is essential, equally important is structured, collaborative communication among investors—particularly in fast-moving sectors like AI, where innovation can outpace traditional diligence. Establishing dedicated syndicate communication channels—through regular briefings, shared due diligence, and expert panels—helps reduce information asymmetry, enable cross-validation of claims, and improve capital allocation. A coordinated framework also strengthens oversight, facilitates resource sharing, and supports early risk identification, potentially saving millions in misallocated funding. A relevant example of investors' appetite for greater transparency is the rise of Arfur Rock—an anonymous X (formerly Twitter) account dubbed the 'Gossip Girl of Silicon Valley.' The account shares insider updates on startup funding and performance metrics, gaining traction by revealing information typically shielded by NDAs or SEC regulations. Though informal, Arfur Rock underscores a broader need for visibility and information-sharing in venture capital. A private, structured communication network among syndicate investors could go even further—offering vetted, actionable insights that support more aligned, evidence-driven investment decisions. Strategy #3: Prioritize Technical Transparency and Engage Directly with AI Engineers Artificial intelligence is inherently complex and often opaque, making it difficult for non-technical investors to assess. In a hype-driven market, distinguishing genuine innovation from polished narratives requires more than pitch decks—it demands transparency around technical documentation, model performance metrics, and real-world deployment data. To truly evaluate a startup's capabilities and scalability, investors must go beyond the founders and engage directly with engineers, product teams, and early customers. A relevant example is Nvidia's ascent in the AI hardware space. Its market leadership was built on disciplined R&D investment and transparent, iterative product development. Investors who engaged closely with Nvidia's technical teams gained deep insight into its innovation pipeline—demonstrating how technical fluency and direct engagement can lead to more informed, high-conviction investments. Closing Reflections: A Mandate for Strategic Discipline in AI Investing As artificial intelligence rapidly evolves—reshaping industries and redefining competitive advantage—the imperative for disciplined, transparent investing has never been greater. In this high-stakes landscape, where promise and peril coexist, capital alone is insufficient. Big tech investors, institutional funds, family offices, and venture capital firms must meet the challenge with a deeper commitment grounded in technical fluency, collaborative intelligence, and sustained due diligence. Navigating the future of AI will require more than conviction; it demands clarity, rigor, and the discipline to see beyond the hype. Ultimately, the next era of AI will not be defined solely by those who dream the boldest, but by those who invest with discernment. In a market driven by exponential potential and persistent volatility, only disciplined capital—anchored in insight and accountability—will truly endure.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft stays the course in Malaysia amid global pullbacks on data centres
KUALA LUMPUR, June 15 — Tech titan Microsoft has reaffirmed its commitment to invest RM10.5 billion in Malaysia, including the development of hyperscale data centres in the Klang Valley. This comes despite reports that the company has paused or delayed similar projects in several countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Indonesia. 'Microsoft remains committed to our investment in Malaysia to accelerate the nation's AI and cloud adoption,' a representative for Microsoft Malaysia told news portal Free Malaysia Today (FMT). 'As a company, the tariff is something we are watching, but we don't have anything to share right now,' the same unnamed source was quoted as saying, referring to market concerns triggered by US tariffs announced in April. In the same month, Bloomberg reported that Microsoft was scaling back plans for its US data centres in Illinois, North Dakota and Wisconsin, as well as in other countries. The company said these changes reflect the flexibility of its global infrastructure strategy. Last month, Microsoft launched its Malaysia West cloud region in Greater Kuala Lumpur, which includes three availability zones. The facility is expected to offer low-latency connectivity and a resilient digital infrastructure supporting services like Microsoft 365 and Azure. Microsoft is also pushing forward with its AI for Malaysia's Future (AIForMYFuture) initiative to develop local talent. Its managing director Laurence Si previously said the company aims to train 800,000 Malaysians in artificial intelligence by the end of 2025. As of May, more than 400,000 people have already received AI training through the programme, Microsoft Malaysia's legal and government affairs director Adilah Junid told FMT. She encouraged Malaysians to take part via Microsoft's AI Skills Navigator website and the monthly AI Teach sessions at local institutions. 'Microsoft relies heavily on local partners such as Biji-Biji, HRD Corp, Perkeso, Pepper Labs, and the International Women's Federation of Commerce and Industry Malaysia,' Adilah was quoted as saying. 'They are really the ones to have networks within the community and society, enabling us to make this opportunity as widely accessible as possible,' she added. Addressing environmental concerns, Adilah said Microsoft is exploring ways to make its data centre operations more sustainable. 'We were part of the consultations with the digital ministry's guidelines for sustainable data centres. 'We also work with authorities to ensure that our water and energy usage metrics are aligned,' she was quoted as saying.