logo
AI is disrupting the advertising business in a big way — industry leaders explain how

AI is disrupting the advertising business in a big way — industry leaders explain how

CNBC9 hours ago

Artificial intelligence is shaking up the advertising business and "unnerving" investors, one industry leader told CNBC.
"I think this AI disruption ... unnerving investors in every industry, and it's totally disrupting our business," Mark Read, the outgoing CEO of British advertising group WPP, told CNBC's Karen Tso on Tuesday.
The advertising market is under threat from emerging generative AI tools that can be used to materialize pieces of content at rapid pace. The past couple of years has seen the rise of a number of AI image generators, including OpenAI's DALL-E, Google's Veo and Midjourney.
In his first interview since announcing he would step down as WPP boss, Read said that AI is "going to totally revolutionize our business."
"AI is going to make all the world's expertise available to everybody at extremely low cost," he said at London Tech Week. "The best lawyer, the best psychologist, the best radiologist, the best accountant, and indeed, the best advertising creatives and marketing people often will be an AI, you know, will be driven by AI."
Read said that 50,000 WPP employees now use WPP Open, the company's own AI-powered marketing platform.
"That, I think, is my legacy in many ways," he added.
Structural pressure on creative parts of the ad business are driving industry consolidation, Read also noted, adding that companies would need to "embrace" the way in which AI would impact everything from creating briefs and media plans to optimizing campaigns.
A report from Forrester released in June last year showed that more than 60% of U.S. ad agencies are already making use of generative AI, with a further 31% saying they're exploring use cases for the technology.
Read is not alone in this view. Advertising is undergoing a "huge transformation" due to the disruptive effects of AI, French advertising giant Publicis Groupe's CEO Maurice Levy told CNBC at the Viva Tech conference in Paris.
He noted that AI image and video generation tools are speeding up content production drastically, while automated messaging systems can now achieve "personalization at scale like never before."
However, the Publicis chief stressed that AI should only be considered a tool that people can use to augment their lives.
"We should not believe that AI is more than a tool," he added.
And while AI is likely to impact some jobs, Levy ultimately thinks it will create more roles than it destroys.
"Will AI replace me, and will AI kill some jobs? I think that AI, yes, will destroy some jobs," Levy conceded. However, he added that, "more importantly, AI will transform jobs and will create more jobs. So the net balance will be probably positive."
This, he says, would be in keeping with the labor impacts of previous technological inventions like the internet and smartphones.
"There will be more autonomous work," Levy added.
Still, Nicole Denman Greene, analyst at Gartner, warns brands should be wary of causing a negative reaction from consumers who are skeptical of AI's impact on human creativity.
According to a Gartner survey from September, 82% of consumers said firms using generative AI should prioritize preserving human jobs, even if it means lower profits.
"Pivot from what AI can do to what it should do in advertising," Greene told CNBC.
"What it should do is help create groundbreaking insights, unique execution to reach diverse and niche audiences, push boundaries on what 'marketing' is and deliver more brand differentiated, helpful and relevant personalized experiences, including deliver on the promise of hyper-personalization."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Warren Buffett Has $90 Billion Invested in These 9 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks. Here's the Best of the Bunch.
Warren Buffett Has $90 Billion Invested in These 9 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks. Here's the Best of the Bunch.

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Warren Buffett Has $90 Billion Invested in These 9 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks. Here's the Best of the Bunch.

Berkshire Hathaway owns only two AI stocks. However, Buffett's "secret portfolio" owns another seven AI stocks. The best Buffett AI stock should benefit tremendously as organizations build and deploy AI models in the cloud. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Warren Buffett readily admits that he doesn't understand artificial intelligence (AI). He has also said that he won't invest in businesses that he understands. So, does that mean the legendary investor doesn't own any AI stocks? Nope. Actually, Buffett has invested roughly $90 billion in nine companies that are heavily focused on AI. Here they are -- and which one is the best of the bunch. Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) ranks as the largest holding in Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE: BRK.A) (NYSE: BRK.B) portfolio. Berkshire's stake in the iPhone maker is valued at close to $59.3 billion. Although Buffett significantly reduced the conglomerate's position in Apple last year, it still makes up 21% of Berkshire's total portfolio. AI has been at the forefront of Apple's development strategy for years. However, the company was seemingly left behind in the generative AI race until it launched Apple Intelligence in 2024. So far, though, Apple Intelligence doesn't appear to be igniting the super-cycle of iPhone upgrades that some analysts predicted. Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) is another top AI stock in Berkshire's portfolio, albeit a much smaller one. Berkshire owns around $2.1 billion of the e-commerce and cloud service giant's shares. Buffett didn't make the initial decision to buy Amazon; one of Berkshire's other investment managers (either Todd Combs or Ted Weschler) bought the stock. Most AI models run in the cloud. As the largest cloud services provider in the world, Amazon Web Services (AWS) has been a big winner as organizations scrambled to build and deploy AI models in the cloud. Amazon is also using AI extensively internally to increase efficiency and provide more services to customers. Apple and Amazon are the only AI stocks owned directly by Berkshire Hathaway. But I said that Buffett owned nine AI stocks. Where are the other seven? In Buffett's "secret portfolio." General Reinsurance acquired New England Asset Management (NEAM) in 1995. Three years later, Berkshire Hathaway acquired General Re. NEAM continues to manage investments for insurance companies. Its holdings don't show up in Berkshire Hathaway's regulatory filings, but any stock owned by NEAM is also owned by Buffett. Apple is the only AI stock in both Berkshire's and NEAM's portfolios. NEAM owns two other so-called "Magnificent Seven" stocks -- Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT). Like Amazon, both Alphabet and Microsoft are major cloud service providers and are profiting from the strong AI tailwind. NEAM also has stakes in a couple of tech pioneers that are investing heavily in AI. IBM (NYSE: IBM) made headlines in the past with the success of its Watson AI technology. Texas Instruments (NASDAQ: TXN) isn't exactly a shining star in the AI world. However, the company makes edge AI products (AI deployed on local devices) and is working with Nvidia to develop power management and sensing technologies for data centers. The stocks of three AI chipmakers are also in NEAM's portfolio. Broadcom (NASDAQ: AVGO) manufactures AI products, including Ethernet switches designed to accelerate AI workloads and custom AI accelerators. NXP Semiconductors (NASDAQ: NXPI) and Qualcomm (NASDAQ: QCOM) sell products that support edge AI. If you're an income investor, Texas Instruments is probably the best pick among Buffett's nine AI stocks. Its forward dividend yield stands at 2.73%. Alphabet is arguably the most attractively valued AI stock in the group, with growth prospects factored in. The Google parent's price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio is 1.36. I think the best Buffett AI stock all-around, though, is Amazon. The company is poised to profit as more organizations move their apps and data to the cloud. It still has significant growth prospects in e-commerce as well. Amazon is also expanding into new markets, including healthcare, autonomous ride-hailing, and satellite internet services. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $368,190!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $37,294!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $653,702!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keith Speights has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Berkshire Hathaway, International Business Machines, Microsoft, Nvidia, Qualcomm, and Texas Instruments. The Motley Fool recommends Broadcom and NXP Semiconductors and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Warren Buffett Has $90 Billion Invested in These 9 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stocks. Here's the Best of the Bunch. was originally published by The Motley Fool

Trump must stop the AI bloodbath before it's too late
Trump must stop the AI bloodbath before it's too late

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Trump must stop the AI bloodbath before it's too late

A white-collar bloodbath is coming. Not in theory. Not in ten years. It's already begun. Tens of millions of entry-level jobs — gone. Mid-level coders, paralegals, junior analysts, HR coordinators, customer service agents, entire rungs of the labor force about to be vaporized by artificial intelligence — not because it's more ethical or more productive, but because it's cheaper, quieter and doesn't complain. Unless President Trump acts fast, America's economic foundation — work itself — will be hollowed out and handed over to a class of unelected engineers and Silicon Valley kingmakers who believe your relevance should be determined by a model's capabilities. This is not paranoia. It's happening now. And the architects aren't hiding it. The people building this technology — Anthropic, OpenAI, Google — aren't sugarcoating the situation. They've run the simulations, watched the user metrics and tested the capabilities. AI is about to gut entire sectors of the economy from the inside out, beginning with those least able to absorb the blow: young Americans trying to get a foothold in a career, middle-class parents working clerical jobs to keep food on the table, veterans retraining to survive in a digital economy that shifts faster than policy can blink. This is where the president must make a choice that actually matters: Will he defend the American worker, or will he let Silicon Valley redraw the economic order while the middle class is shoved silently off the map? Trump built his MAGA movement on a promise — not just to revive the economy but to restore dignity through work. To bring back jobs. To make labor meaningful again. To tell the forgotten men and women of this country that they matter, because what they do matters. That mission now faces a threat unlike any we've seen. Not foreign competition. Not global offshoring. But extinction-by-algorithm. And as bleak as it looks, it isn't too late. Not yet. The federal government still has tools, and the presidency still has teeth. But it will take nerve. It will take a president willing to do something rare in this moment: to say no. No to unchecked automation, no to the idea that human labor is an inefficiency to be optimized away, no to the lie that faster always means better, and cheaper always means smarter. Trump doesn't need to burn Silicon Valley to the ground. He just needs to remind it who owns the rails. If a company takes money from the federal government through contracts, grants, subsidies or loans, it should not be allowed to quietly fire American workers and replace them with bots. No taxpayer should fund their own obsolescence. If these companies want the benefits of public money, then they answer to the public. And the public has a right to know who's getting replaced, when and why. Every company automating away jobs should be forced to disclose it, openly and in real time. Let the American people see which corporations are killing jobs while posting record profits. If they're proud of their efficiency, let them stand by it. If they're going to replace workers, let them say it with their chest. Enough with the silent rollbacks and euphemisms. Enough with the term 'augmented' when what you mean is 'deleted.' And if they insist on automating, fine. But they can pay for the damage. Every AI transaction, every commercial model use that replaces a real person's job, should be taxed. Not to fund some utopian universal income experiment, but to pay for something real: job retraining, trade schools, small-business grants for human-led enterprises. America isn't a testbed. It's a country. And it deserves policy that defends people, not models. And then there's the future. Not the tech future but the human one. We need a Federal Job Corps that actually builds futures again. Not a holding tank for the unemployed, but a launchpad for Americans ready to work in sectors AI can't touch: critical trades, skilled manufacturing, energy, health care, logistics, infrastructure. Real jobs. Real training. Real ladders. We cannot TikTok our way out of structural collapse. We cannot freelance our way into a middle class. If Trump wants to lead this nation through the next decade, he must be more than a fighter. He must be a builder of new ground. A president who understands that the battle ahead isn't just about borders or budgets, it's about value. What we value. Who we value. And whether the average American has any place left in the economy being written for them behind closed doors. AI is not evil. But the hands controlling it aren't neutral. They're interested in profit, in scale, in optimization. Not patriotism, stability or sovereignty. Trump can put a stop to this. But he has to act now. Because if MAGA doesn't mean standing between the American worker and extinction-by-code, then it doesn't mean anything at all. John Mac Ghlionn is a writer and researcher who explores culture, society and the impact of technology on daily life.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store