Trump's Clash with Harvard Sparks Debate — This Week in Your Words
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
We're back with a fresh roundup of your highlighted comments of the week — and this time, one topic has taken center stage. President Donald Trump's ongoing clash with Harvard has ignited passionate discussions across the board. From sharp insights to thoughtful critiques, your comments have brought fresh perspectives that deepen the debate. Whether you agreed, challenged, or expanded the narrative, your voices once again brought this story to life in unexpected ways.
Here are some of your highlighted comments from the past week.
U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to...
U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to Trump and led the Department of Government Efficiency, announced he would leave the Trump administration to refocus on his businesses. (Photo by) More
Getty Images
On the Latest on Donald Trump's Clash with Harvard
Original Article: Donald Trump Says Harvard is 'Getting Their A** Kicked'
Background: Trump and his administration have cracked down on Ivy League institutions, such as Harvard and Columbia University, since taking office in January.
Original Comment: "I'm not sure what Trump is trying to prove here. It's silly to think he is just hurting Harvard, he is permanently damaging the International reputation of the US and damaging its reputation for those that want to study in the US. And for what? A couple protests and some DEI policies. Trump decided that's worth tanking 10 Billion dollars in research from arguably the best university in the US. And he's proud of it." - KevinBer702
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter cuts straight to the heart of the broader consequences behind Trump's actions. Rather than focusing solely on the political optics, they highlight the potential damage to America's global reputation and its standing in higher education.
On Plans for Trump's Administration to Revoke Visas for Chinese Students
Original Article: Marco Rubio Announces New Plan to Revoke Chinese Student Visas
Background: Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a new plan on Wednesday to "aggressively revoke" student visas issued to international students from China.
Original Comment: "Another court challenge that will end up as another loss for Trump. Can't single out students based on their race or national origin for blanket visa revocation, and any decision must be rooted in credible and sufficient evidence of some tangible threat to national security concerning the specific student. Nearly all Chinese students at Harvard are the very cream of the crop, and actually add significant value to US university education. National security threats are managed by our security clearance system and controlling access to secret and top secret information, not by the visa system." - Metteyya
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter challenges the policy with a clear, informed perspective, arguing that targeting students undermines both legal standards and the strength of U.S. academia.
On Calls for Universities to Align with the Trump Administration
Original Article: Linda McMahon Says Colleges Must Be 'In Sync' with Trump Administration
Background: Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in an interview that U.S. colleges and universities should be "in sync" with the Trump administration.
Original Comment: "Only in a totalitarian nation-state would any university be REQUIRED to be "in-sync" with the presidential administration. Universities by definition are autonomous regarding academic rigor and freedom; they are apolitical." - countryman_1776
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter argues for the principle of academic independence, warning against political interference in universities. They highlight concerns that requiring alignment with the administration could undermine the core values of academic freedom and institutional autonomy.
Further Reflections on Universities Aligning with the Trump Administration
Original Comment: "The American university system has been the envy of the world for decades. That's due in large part to the deeply rooted tradition of academic freedom. The expectation that a university be in sync with the administration is antithetical to the idea of academic freedom." - vasant073
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: This reader emphasizes the global reputation of the American university system, attributing its success to long-standing traditions of academic freedom. They challenge the notion that universities should conform to political agendas, reinforcing why such expectations conflict with academic ideals.
On Asian Colleges Trying to Woo Harvard Students – and The Possible Fallout
Original Article: Asian Colleges Aim to Woo Harvard International Students
Background: As Harvard University faces looming restrictions on enrolling international students, colleges across Asia are positioning themselves to attract some of the world's brightest minds.
Original Comment: "So the US has an advantage in research, medicine and AI but if you are telling potential students to go somewhere else, the money that foreign tuitions that could be used for us citizens scholarships would also disappear. This is unironically the biggest mistake you can make." - andrew.lansangan
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter points out the potential economic and academic fallout of pushing international students away. They highlight a less discussed consequence: that lost tuition could also impact scholarship support for domestic students.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and keeping the conversation alive. Your insights help us see these stories from new angles and remind us why open dialogue is so important. Keep the comments coming—we look forward to hearing more from you next week.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures slip with all eyes on trade talks after OECD warning
US stock futures slipped on Tuesday as an OECD warning of economic damage from President Trump's tariffs put investors on watch for progress in US trade talks. Futures on the S&P 500 (ES=F) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) fell about 0.2%. Contracts on the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) were little changed on the heels of an upbeat start to the week for the major gauges. The OECD has slashed its outlook for global economic growth, citing the impact of Trump's trade policy on investment and confidence. The US economy will slow particularly sharply, the OECD forecast, going from 2.8% growth last year to only 1.6% this year and 1.5% in 2026. In another sign of trade war taking a toll, China's manufacturers suffered their worst slump since 2022 in May. Tariff hikes had an impact on smaller exporters despite the US-China trade truce. Caixin found. Countries need to act fast to seal deals to lower trade barriers, the OECD urged. Trump is reportedly pushing trade partners for their "best offers" by Wednesday, as deadlines for the implementation of "reciprocal" tariffs loom. But progress in trade talks with key nations seems to have stalled as US-China tensions simmer amid hopes for a call between Trump and President Xi as soon as this week. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs A JOLTS update on job openings in April, due later, will provide insight into how the labor market has fared since the tariff hikes began. It will also set the stage for the all-important May jobs report, which is set for release on Friday. Meanwhile, with nearly all of the S&P 500 companies having finished reporting their results, earnings season is coming to an end. On Tuesday, CrowdStrike (CRWD), Asana (ASAN), and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) will issue their reports. Constellation Energy (CEG) stock surged more than 12% in premarket trading following news that it struck a 20-year power purchase agreement (PPA) with Meta (META). Meta stock was roughly unchanged. Starting in June 2027, Meta will buy 1,121 megawatts of energy from Constellation's Clinton nuclear facility in Illinois, powering its AI ambitions while supporting its clean energy goals, a release stated. The Clinton Clean Energy Center was nearly retired in 2017 after financial losses, but a state clean energy program kept the facility operational until mid-2027. Meta's PPA now ensures that the plant will continue to run once that program ends, essentially replacing that financial support. Though Constellation and Meta did not announce a price tag for the deal, they noted it "backs billions in plant investments," marking one of the largest nuclear energy agreements so far. Meta has signed a number of power purchase agreements in recent months — along with the other hyperscalers like Google (GOOG), Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT) — as Big Tech races to ensure it can power the artificial intelligence boom. Reuters reports: Read more here. Shares in Dollar General (DG) rose 10% in premarket trading on Tuesday, after the retailer raised its annual sales forecast and beating quarterly sales estimates on robust demand for everyday essentials. Reuters reports: Earnings: Asana (ASAN), CrowdStrike (CRWD), Dollar General (DG), Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), Nio (NIO), Ollie's (OLLI), Signet Jewelers (SIG) Economic data: JOLTS Job Openings (April); Factory and Durable goods orders (April); Capital goods orders (April final); Capital goods shipments (April final) Here are some of the biggest stories you may have missed overnight and early this morning: Boeing is the US government's favorite trade talk tool Why the 'Magnificent 7' are outperforming other stocks again Trump tariffs: A Supreme Court test may make or break their fate OECD warns of tariff hit to growth as US pushes for deals Google stock could fall 25% on 'black swan event': Barclays Nvidia's $1 trillion rally has traders primed to ramp back up Wall Street games out how to profit from Trump tariff flip-flops Yahoo Finance's Josh Schafer reports: Read more here. President Trump's trade war has dragged the global economy into a downturn, with the US among those hardest hit, the OECD has warned. Trade barriers and uncertainty are stifling investment and undermining confidence, the organization said on Tuesday as it slashed its forecasts for leading economies for the second time this year. Trump's policy shift is also adding to inflationary pressures, it said. The Financial Times reported: Read more here Oil prices rose Monday evening as major producers Iran and Canada were struck with issues. Iran has an ongoing deal with the US in jeopardy over a potential pivot to nuclear while Canada is facing wildfires. Reuters reports: Read more here. Constellation Energy (CEG) stock surged more than 12% in premarket trading following news that it struck a 20-year power purchase agreement (PPA) with Meta (META). Meta stock was roughly unchanged. Starting in June 2027, Meta will buy 1,121 megawatts of energy from Constellation's Clinton nuclear facility in Illinois, powering its AI ambitions while supporting its clean energy goals, a release stated. The Clinton Clean Energy Center was nearly retired in 2017 after financial losses, but a state clean energy program kept the facility operational until mid-2027. Meta's PPA now ensures that the plant will continue to run once that program ends, essentially replacing that financial support. Though Constellation and Meta did not announce a price tag for the deal, they noted it "backs billions in plant investments," marking one of the largest nuclear energy agreements so far. Meta has signed a number of power purchase agreements in recent months — along with the other hyperscalers like Google (GOOG), Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT) — as Big Tech races to ensure it can power the artificial intelligence boom. Reuters reports: Read more here. Shares in Dollar General (DG) rose 10% in premarket trading on Tuesday, after the retailer raised its annual sales forecast and beating quarterly sales estimates on robust demand for everyday essentials. Reuters reports: Earnings: Asana (ASAN), CrowdStrike (CRWD), Dollar General (DG), Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE), Nio (NIO), Ollie's (OLLI), Signet Jewelers (SIG) Economic data: JOLTS Job Openings (April); Factory and Durable goods orders (April); Capital goods orders (April final); Capital goods shipments (April final) Here are some of the biggest stories you may have missed overnight and early this morning: Boeing is the US government's favorite trade talk tool Why the 'Magnificent 7' are outperforming other stocks again Trump tariffs: A Supreme Court test may make or break their fate OECD warns of tariff hit to growth as US pushes for deals Google stock could fall 25% on 'black swan event': Barclays Nvidia's $1 trillion rally has traders primed to ramp back up Wall Street games out how to profit from Trump tariff flip-flops Yahoo Finance's Josh Schafer reports: Read more here. President Trump's trade war has dragged the global economy into a downturn, with the US among those hardest hit, the OECD has warned. Trade barriers and uncertainty are stifling investment and undermining confidence, the organization said on Tuesday as it slashed its forecasts for leading economies for the second time this year. Trump's policy shift is also adding to inflationary pressures, it said. The Financial Times reported: Read more here Oil prices rose Monday evening as major producers Iran and Canada were struck with issues. Iran has an ongoing deal with the US in jeopardy over a potential pivot to nuclear while Canada is facing wildfires. Reuters reports: Read more here. Sign in to access your portfolio
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
The GOP's Fiscal Hawk Era Is Officially Over
There is no constituency for debt reduction, which is a fancy way of saying voters don't care that the federal balance sheet is roughly $37 trillion in the red — and growing. This simple fact of American politics goes a long way toward explaining why President Donald Trump, with the help of congressional Republicans, is pushing a sweeping reconciliation package of tax cuts and fresh domestic spending priorities that is projected to add approximately $3.8 trillion to the swelling federal debt. Politics is a service business and Trump and his Capitol Hill allies are aiming to please the customer.
CNBC
27 minutes ago
- CNBC
Firings, pardons and policy changes have gutted DOJ anti-corruption efforts, experts say
For decades, the FBI and the Justice Department have been the main enforcers of laws against political corruption and white-collar fraud in the United States. In four months, the Trump administration has dismantled key parts of that law enforcement infrastructure, creating what experts say is the ripest environment for corruption by public officials and business executives in a generation. Trump aides have forced out most of the lawyers in the Justice Department's main anti-corruption unit, the Public Integrity Section, and disbanded an FBI squad tasked with investigating congressional misconduct. They have issued a series of directives requiring federal law enforcement agencies to prioritize immigration enforcement. And they have ended a 50-year policy of keeping the Justice Department independent of the White House in criminal investigations. All of that came after Trump fired most of the inspectors general — the independent agency watchdogs responsible for fighting corruption and waste — and the Justice Department dropped a corruption case against the mayor of New York in what a judge said was a "breathtaking" political bargain. And it came after the Trump administration Justice Department pulled back on enforcement of foreign bribery and lobbying statutes, as well as cryptocurrency investigations. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has issued a steady stream of pardons to all but one Republican member of Congress convicted of felonies over the last 15 years. "He's dismantling not just the means of prosecuting public corruption, but he's also dismantling all the means of oversight of public corruption," said Paul Rosenzweig, a George Washington University law professor who was a senior homeland security official in the George W. Bush administration. "The law is only for his enemies now." A spokesman for the Justice Department denied the allegations. "This Department of Justice has ended the weaponization of government and will continue to prosecute violent crime, enforce our nation's immigration laws, and make America safe again," he said. The White House declined to comment. The Biden Justice Department also came under criticism from groups that considered it soft on white-collar and corporate crime. A report by the public advocacy group Public Citizen said President Joe Biden's Justice Department successfully prosecuted only 80 corporations last year — a 29% drop from the previous fiscal year and fewer than in any year for the previous three decades. And an analysis published last month by the Transactional Records Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University, which uses Justice Department records to examine enforcement and sentencing trends, found that white-collar prosecutions have been declining since 2011. U.S. attorneys' offices filed 4,332 prosecutions for white-collar crimes in fiscal year 2024, less than half of the 10,269 prosecutions filed three decades earlier in fiscal year 1994, the report found. But TRAC analysts, other experts and Democrats say the Trump policy changes — coupled with a mandate that FBI agents spend significant time on immigration enforcement — mean corporate fraud and public corruption enforcement is expected to plummet faster and further. "President Trump has ushered America into a golden age of public corruption," Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, a senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, told NBC News in a statement. "Trump quickly cleared out the watchdogs responsible for policing corruption cases at home and abroad by gutting the Department of Justice's Public Integrity Section and the anti-kleptocracy teams." Last month, the head of the Justice Department's Criminal Division, Matthew Galeotti, announced in a memo and a speech that the Justice Department was "turning a new page on white-collar and corporate enforcement." While he said that "white-collar crime also poses a significant threat to U.S. interests," he said the Biden administration's approach has "come at too high a cost for businesses and American enterprise." Big law firms interpreted his message as saying the Trump administration will still prosecute corporate misconduct, at least under certain circumstances. But three lawyers who represent large corporations in dealings with the Justice Department told NBC News that over the last several months, corporate compliance investigations of their clients have dropped. They declined to be named or to cite specifics, citing client confidentiality. In his memo, Galeotti said the Justice Department will prioritize corporate violations relating to drug cartels, immigration law, terrorism, trade and tariff fraud, and corporate procurement fraud. "Too often, businesses have been subject to unchecked and long-running investigations that can be costly — both to the department and to the subjects and targets of its investigations," he added in a speech at an anti-money-laundering conference. All presidential administrations set broad policy direction for the Justice Department. But more than a dozen current and former Justice Department officials and legal experts said in interviews that the Trump administration has unleashed a revolution in policies, personnel and culture across the department unlike anything in the last five decades, including Trump's first term. Trump, they say, has fundamentally changed the nature of the post-Watergate Justice Department, in the process driving out hundreds of senior lawyers who helped form its backbone. The shift began even before Attorney General Pam Bondi took office, when Trump's acting U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C., fired several prosecutors who had worked for Jack Smith, the special counsel who filed now-dismissed charges against Trump. Trump aides said the Smith prosecutors were fired because they could not be counted on to carry out Trump's orders, because they had prosecuted him. Never before, experts said, had so many career civil servants been sacked simply because they worked on a case the president disliked. When Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, a former Trump defense lawyer, was acting deputy attorney general, he ordered federal prosecutors in New York to drop corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams, a move that was seen as another signal that the second Trump term would be different. The move triggered several resignations by prosecutors, and a federal judge ultimately ruled that there was no evidence to support the reasons the Justice Department gave for dropping the charges. The judge, ultimately, decided he had no choice but to dismiss the charges. Bondi also paused enforcement of a law prohibiting U.S. corporate executives from bribing foreign officials, an area of U.S. law so well-developed that major law firms had entire sections devoted to advising clients about it. She also disbanded the FBI task force devoted to combating foreign influence and a Justice Department group that sought to confiscate the assets of Russian oligarchs. She also ordered a pullback on enforcing the law requiring foreign agents to register with the government and disclose their activities. Several weeks later, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche ended an effort by the Justice Department to police crypto-related violations of banking secrecy and securities laws. Finally, one of the most impactful moves the Trump administration has made was to slash the size of the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, which has dropped from roughly 35 lawyers to four to five, according to two former members of the unit. Lawyers who work in the Public Integrity Section consult with U.S. attorneys around the country on official corruption matters. Their role is twofold — to assist in cases when needed or when U.S. attorney's offices' prosecutors faced conflicts of interest and to ensure politically appointed U.S. attorneys followed the rules in some of the most politically sensitive cases the government brings. Some of the corruption cases the section was working on are continuing, former officials said. For example, a retired four-star admiral was convicted last month of bribery, but many cases are in limbo, and some have been dropped. And Justice Department officials say a policy that requires the Public Integrity Section to approve corruption charges against members of Congress is under review. They also noted that the policy was not followed when the acting U.S. attorney for New Jersey, Alina Habba, another former Trump attorney, brought assault charges against a New Jersey congresswoman last month. The Public Integrity Section has made its share of mistakes over the years, and some Trump supporters wish it good riddance. "President Trump's justice system is focused on protecting the rule of law and combating crime, which is what the American people elected him to do," Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said in a statement to NBC News. "My public oversight has shown that the DOJ and FBI sections responsible for public integrity inquiries were a hotbed for partisan investigations against President Trump and his allies." But by shrinking the Public Integrity Section, dropping corruption charges against Adams and pardoning political allies convicted of federal crimes, Trump has sent an unmistakable message, current and former Justice Department officials say. "Public corruption investigations are being politicized like we've never seen before," said a former Justice Department official, who declined to be named for fear of retaliation. "What prosecutor or FBI agent is going to want to work on a case they think Donald Trump isn't going to like? To witness the destruction of the institution is just infuriating and disheartening." Rosenzweig, the law professor, said the damage to America's image as a country built on the rule of law is not easily fixable. "Good governance is really a shared myth — it happens only because we all believe in it," he said. "People are good because they share a mythos that expects them to be good. When that myth is destroyed, when you learn that it's just a shared dream that isn't mandatory ... it's really, really hard to rebuild faith." Rosenzweig added, "In 150 days, Donald Trump has casually destroyed a belief in the necessity of incorruptibility built over 250 years."
