logo
Unholy row as church raises concerns over rental plan

Unholy row as church raises concerns over rental plan

Perth Now02-07-2025
City of Vincent residents and a church have raised concerns about a proposed policy for unhosted short-term accommodation.
Under the draft policy, unhosted accommodations, such as an Airbnb, will be able to be used for only 90 days over a 12-month period.
Anyone who wants to operate for more than 90 days will need to seek development approval from the council.
A public consultation period for the policy closed on June 23.
Multiple residents and a church leader raised their concerns with it at the city's June 17 council meeting.
Greek Orthodox Church of WA president Gabriel Kafetzis said the policy would have devasting effects on the church.
Representing a long-standing not-for-profit institution located in West Perth, he argued the proposed restrictions would hinder the church's ability to achieve financial stability. Short-term rental policy changes have sparked concerns from residents and a church. Credit: church / Greek Orthodox Church
With declining donations and volunteerism, the church wanted to convert six unit dwellings into short-term rentals to generate income for maintenance and community services.
Mr Kafetzis said the church was independent from government or religious funding and was committed to supporting local heritage and the broader community.
'We are not funded by the Patriarch, we are not funded by any government bodies — we've been self-funded this whole time,' he said.
'We can no longer rely on traditional fundraising methods such as donations and sausage sizzles — the cost is simply too high.
'We feel that (our units) would be ideal to convert into short-term accommodation. It would move us into a more sustainable model for the long term.'
Vera Saragih, of North Perth, said the proposed policy would restrict property owners and negatively impact the local economy.
Ms Saragih said the policy's 90-day cap on short-term rentals was unworkable and would significantly limit the flexibility homeowners currently have.
Taking away the right for me to have short-term accommodation would be devastating to me personally.
'Nobody wants to come to an unhosted short-term accommodation place where the owner's clothes are still in the cupboards and wilted lettuce in the fridge,' she said.
She said the policy could exclude economically vulnerable workers who relied on short-term rental support roles, such as cleaners and delivery drivers.
'These groups are highly represented in the short-term accommodation industry – property cleaners, linen providers, delivery drivers and other trades.' she said.
Ms Saragih also asked if the draft policy aligned with the city's Access and Inclusion Plan 2022-2027.
She said having the option to use her property as a short-term unhosted enabled her to not be 'bound by the ever-restrictive requirements of the Residential Tenancy Act'.
Delma Davies told the council its proposed policy would severely impact her financial stability.
Ms Davies said she rented out a second property above her own home to help pay her mortgages and relied on this income as she did not have superannuation.
'Taking away the right for me to have short-term accommodation would be devastating to me personally,' she said.
She questioned the lack of accessible data on both the number of short-term rentals in the area and complaints.
'We've had responses from councillors that there are apparently hundreds of complaints … I'd like to have access to those,' she said.
Ms Davies expressed frustration over the inability to secure a consultation with mayor Alison Xamon and urged the council to hold a roundtable discussion.
Ms Xamon said the proposed 90-night limit for unhosted short-term rental accommodation aligned with State Government planning reforms.
'Which allows unhosted short-term accommodation to operate without development approval for up to 90 nights in a 12-month period,' she said.
Ms Xamon said the city also understood and acknowledged concerns raised by residents about a potential increase of unhosted short-term accommodation.
'The aim of the policy is to achieve a balance between encouraging visitors and tourists to stay around our vibrant town centres and ensure that people living in quiet residential neighbourhoods do not experience increased noise and other disruptions,' she said.
Ms Xamon said it did not aim to reduce employment opportunities for people with a disability and the outcomes of the Access and Inclusion Plan were considered. Financial gain was also not a relevant planning considerations for the draft policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Class war': outsiders moving to Puerto Rico trigger displacement
'Class war': outsiders moving to Puerto Rico trigger displacement

News.com.au

time21-07-2025

  • News.com.au

'Class war': outsiders moving to Puerto Rico trigger displacement

Gloria Cuevas thought she would live forever in her pink, century-old house on Puerto Rico's west coast -- but then her landlord decided to transform the home into an Airbnb. Cuevas left her home -- now purple and split in two -- and her beloved city for another further south, forced out by the rising cost of living and an explosion of short-term rentals on the US Caribbean island territory. Puerto Rico -- long a draw for sun-worshipping tourists -- is also a hotspot for foreign investment and offers tax incentives to attract outsiders. "At first, I couldn't come back here," Cuevas, 68, told AFP, gazing at the home she once made her own. "It made me feel sad and angry at the same time." Cuevas's experience is becoming an all too familiar tale across the island, where signs promote mansions for sale, and the Airbnb logo is plastered on homes where locals once lived. Intensifying Puerto Rico's gentrification are laws that encourage primarily wealthy mainland Americans to move there in exchange for preferential tax treatment. The program originally enacted in 2012 was meant to spur economic growth and attract investment on the island, an unincorporated territory under US control since 1898. Those relocating must acquire residency and buy property to keep the significant incentives -- but many Puerto Ricans as well as some US lawmakers say this is driving up housing prices and encouraging tax evasion. "Colonialism kills us, it suffocates us," Cuevas said. "It's a global theme. It's a class war." - 'Unfair' - Ricki Rebeiro, 30, moved to San Juan more than a year ago, bringing his packaging and marketing business that services cannabis companies with him. He told AFP that basing his work in Puerto Rico saves his company millions of dollars annually, and that he pays zero personal income tax -- what amounts to the equivalent of "a whole second income" that he says he tries to reinvest locally. "I believe that the locals are probably upset that they're not reaping the same benefits of somebody like me," said the entrepreneur, whose family is based in Pennsylvania and Oklahoma. The system is "unfair," Rebeiro said, "but I also don't believe that I should be the one to blame for that. I didn't structure the program." Puerto Ricans in recent years have slammed their government for what they say is a hyperfocus on outsiders at the expense of locals, as the rich -- including people like the famous content creator-turned-boxer Jake Paul -- move in. - 'This is ours' - In Cabo Rojo, a seaside city about an hour's drive south of Rincon on the island's western coast, some residents are taking the matter into their own hands. During a recent canvassing effort, a group of activists urged their neighbors to protest a massive development project called Esencia, which would transform more than 2,000 acres (810 hectares) of recreational land and more than three miles of beaches into a $2 billion luxury resort and residential development. Dafne Javier's family goes back generations in this area -- her great-grandfather was the last mayor in the municipality under Spanish occupation, and the first under US rule. The 77-year-old said the Esencia project would "totally change the landscape," creating a gated town within a town. Protesters say it would destroy the natural habitat of some endangered species, while exacerbating problems with potable water, electricity supply and trash pick-up. Project investors have called Puerto Rico "one of the most promising growth markets in the world" and vowed Esencia would create "thousands of jobs." But those jobs will be minimum wage, Javier predicted, and the wealthy newcomers "won't mix with us." Christopher Powers is married to a Puerto Rican with whom he has children, and has lived in Cabo Rojo for 20 years. "They have no idea what they're destroying, and if they do have an idea what they're destroying, then they should be ashamed," he told AFP of the developers. "Not only is it ecologically destructive, not only will it be an economic disaster for those of us who live here, but it's also against the sort of spirit or values of the Caborojinos." Cuevas is hopeful her story and others like it will crystallize for her fellow Puerto Ricans what they stand to lose. "We have to keep fighting. We have to educate our youth. Have you heard of Bad Bunny?" she said, referring to the Puerto Rican global superstar whose music and current residency in San Juan has amplified discussion of gentrification and cultural dilution, on the island and beyond. "This is ours," Cuevas said. "We're not going to leave."

Airbnb owner forced to tear down ‘monstrous prison camp watchtower'
Airbnb owner forced to tear down ‘monstrous prison camp watchtower'

Daily Telegraph

time07-07-2025

  • Daily Telegraph

Airbnb owner forced to tear down ‘monstrous prison camp watchtower'

An Airbnb owner has been ordered to tear down a massive 40ft (12.2 metres-high 'prison-camp watchtower' after furious neighbours complained. The 'monstrous' structure was built at the £5,000 ($A10,300)-a-week holiday let in Rhos-on-Sea, North Wales, without planning permission, The Sun reports. Locals nearby say the eyesore addition is disturbing their day-to-day lives in a seaside town. Planning permission for the towering 'garden room' was turned down last year. Neighbours are celebrating after another bid has now also been rejected by officials who say the tower must be removed. Neighbour Nick Whitmore, 35, who lives with his partner and three young children said their 'dream home' had been marred by the platform and cabin. 'It's advertised on Airbnb year-round, bringing noise, light pollution, and worse,' Mr Whitmore said. 'The impact on my partner, our three children, and our neighbours is horrendous. 'The structure dominates our house and garden, as well as our neighbours'. It looks into my daughter's bedroom. MORE: Fresh blow for Perry amid split 'Let go': Common item Mariah refuses to own 'Never coming back': Depp reveals sad demise Mr Whitmore added: 'We are a local, hardworking family with three children under the age of 10. 'My partner and I worked very, very hard to buy our dream home, just up the road from the children's school, various public parks, with a bedroom for each of our children, and a nice garden for them to enjoy. 'This has now been taken away from us as we back onto a busy Airbnb and, since Jan 2024, a building site.' The holiday let was purchased by a Sheffield-based property owner in December 2023. Neighbours reported the structure to the council and JAM Domestic Properties Ltd submitted a planning application – which was refused. The owners had described the 'breathtaking' £700,000 ($A1.4 million) four-bedroom property as 'the epitome of luxury'. 'We alerted Conwy council who asked the company to stop work,' Mr Whitmore. 'They did, and submitted a retrospective planning application, which was refused in June 2024 after numerous neighbour objections. 'With no appeal by the 16 December 2024 deadline, we thought the council would follow through and move to enforce their own refusal. 'We assumed relief was near. Instead, two weeks ago, earlier in March 2025, the owner submitted a near-identical planning application. 'We've now endured over 15 months of this situation, with Conwy sitting on their hands while local families and residents suffer daily.' Families living next-door are furious at the 13 metre high 'concrete plateau' giving clear views into their properties and blighting their lives. Work on the tower – which would provide panoramic views of the village and neighbouring Penrhyn Bay – began last year, only to be paused when a planning application was turned down. The holiday rental – called Gardd y Llys – is a contemporary property in one of the most up-market residential areas of Rhos-on-Sea. 'OVERBEARING' Neighbours Stephen and Hazel Walburn also wrote a letter of objection to the council. 'The cabin is 13m above our main living area and certainly feels to us to be out of character and overbearing,' they wrote. 'Its scale and appearance are unlike other garden buildings in the area. It fails to enhance the local environment, commanding attention not unlike a prison camp watchtower.' They added: 'It dominates the roofscape and is alien and incongruous.' Conwy council said: 'An enforcement notice has been served which requires the removal of the structure.' The notice was served on 17 June and the developer has been given 10 weeks from that date to launch an appeal. The application by JAM Domestic Properties read: 'Views from the raised platform into neighbouring properties were recognised as being available from the initial planning consent. 'The proposed development is not considered to lead to an acceptable increase to this and is not considered to have a detrimental impact on privacy or residential amenity to neighbouring properties, and therefore would be acceptable on this basis.' A Conwy Council spokeswoman previously said: 'Planning permission was granted in 2016 for a smaller garden structure on this site. 'In February 2024, it was brought to our attention that a larger outbuilding was being constructed. 'Following an investigation by the planning enforcement officer, the owners agreed to cease work and to submit a planning application to regularise the work. Parts of this story first appeared in The Sun and was republished with permission. MORE: 'Lonely': Who gets what in Holly, ex split 'Big allure': Secret MJ homes reveal sad life Wild reason Charles can't kick Andrew out

Airbnb owner forced to tear down ‘monstrous prison camp watchtower'
Airbnb owner forced to tear down ‘monstrous prison camp watchtower'

News.com.au

time06-07-2025

  • News.com.au

Airbnb owner forced to tear down ‘monstrous prison camp watchtower'

An Airbnb owner has been ordered to tear down a massive 40ft (12.2 metres-high 'prison-camp watchtower' after furious neighbours complained. The 'monstrous' structure was built at the £5,000 ($A10,300)-a-week holiday let in Rhos-on-Sea, North Wales, without planning permission, The Sun reports. Locals nearby say the eyesore addition is disturbing their day-to-day lives in a seaside town. Planning permission for the towering 'garden room' was turned down last year. Neighbours are celebrating after another bid has now also been rejected by officials who say the tower must be removed. Neighbour Nick Whitmore, 35, who lives with his partner and three young children said their 'dream home' had been marred by the platform and cabin. 'It's advertised on Airbnb year-round, bringing noise, light pollution, and worse,' Mr Whitmore said. 'The impact on my partner, our three children, and our neighbours is horrendous. 'The structure dominates our house and garden, as well as our neighbours'. It looks into my daughter's bedroom. Mr Whitmore added: 'We are a local, hardworking family with three children under the age of 10. 'My partner and I worked very, very hard to buy our dream home, just up the road from the children's school, various public parks, with a bedroom for each of our children, and a nice garden for them to enjoy. 'This has now been taken away from us as we back onto a busy Airbnb and, since Jan 2024, a building site.' The holiday let was purchased by a Sheffield-based property owner in December 2023. Neighbours reported the structure to the council and JAM Domestic Properties Ltd submitted a planning application – which was refused. The owners had described the 'breathtaking' £700,000 ($A1.4 million) four-bedroom property as 'the epitome of luxury'. 'We alerted Conwy council who asked the company to stop work,' Mr Whitmore. 'They did, and submitted a retrospective planning application, which was refused in June 2024 after numerous neighbour objections. 'With no appeal by the 16 December 2024 deadline, we thought the council would follow through and move to enforce their own refusal. 'We assumed relief was near. Instead, two weeks ago, earlier in March 2025, the owner submitted a near-identical planning application. 'We've now endured over 15 months of this situation, with Conwy sitting on their hands while local families and residents suffer daily.' Families living next-door are furious at the 13 metre high 'concrete plateau' giving clear views into their properties and blighting their lives. Work on the tower – which would provide panoramic views of the village and neighbouring Penrhyn Bay – began last year, only to be paused when a planning application was turned down. The holiday rental – called Gardd y Llys – is a contemporary property in one of the most up-market residential areas of Rhos-on-Sea. 'OVERBEARING' Neighbours Stephen and Hazel Walburn also wrote a letter of objection to the council. 'The cabin is 13m above our main living area and certainly feels to us to be out of character and overbearing,' they wrote. 'Its scale and appearance are unlike other garden buildings in the area. It fails to enhance the local environment, commanding attention not unlike a prison camp watchtower.' They added: 'It dominates the roofscape and is alien and incongruous.' Conwy council said: 'An enforcement notice has been served which requires the removal of the structure.' The notice was served on 17 June and the developer has been given 10 weeks from that date to launch an appeal. The application by JAM Domestic Properties read: 'Views from the raised platform into neighbouring properties were recognised as being available from the initial planning consent. 'The proposed development is not considered to lead to an acceptable increase to this and is not considered to have a detrimental impact on privacy or residential amenity to neighbouring properties, and therefore would be acceptable on this basis.' A Conwy Council spokeswoman previously said: 'Planning permission was granted in 2016 for a smaller garden structure on this site. 'In February 2024, it was brought to our attention that a larger outbuilding was being constructed. 'Following an investigation by the planning enforcement officer, the owners agreed to cease work and to submit a planning application to regularise the work.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store