logo
What the federal parties can learn from Doug Ford's election win

What the federal parties can learn from Doug Ford's election win

CBC26-03-2025

After a provincial election campaign fought in the shadow of U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs and annexation, federal parties could draw some lessons from the way Doug Ford and his Ontario PC Party romped to victory.
Ford pitched himself as the best leader to protect the province against those threats and even made "Protect Ontario" his campaign slogan.
His campaign focused almost exclusively on that one issue and he was rewarded with a third straight majority government, something no leader has accomplished in Ontario since 1959.
It's a formula that strategists of all political stripes say the federal leaders should emulate if they hope to win the general election on April 28.
Kory Teneycke, who managed all three of Ford's provincial campaigns and advised Stephen Harper during his time as prime minister, says the federal parties must acknowledge what matters to voters right now.
"The number one issue driving voter intent in the Ontario provincial campaign was clearly Trump and tariffs," said Teneycke in an interview. "There's a lot of national polling data that would indicate that the same is true now in the federal election campaign, only even more so."
WATCH | What Doug Ford's election win can teach the federal leaders:
It's almost impossible to win federally in Canada without winning Ontario.
Over the past 50 years, the party that took the most seats in Ontario won 14 of the last 15 elections. The only exception: when Stephen Harper's Conservatives won their first minority, in 2006.
'The only issue in this election'
It's rare to have a federal election follow so closely on the heels of an Ontario election; rarer still to have the same political theme resonate so profoundly in both contests.
"The only issue in this election is protecting Canada and Trump and tariffs," said Marion Nader, co-founder of consulting firm Nexus Strategy Group and a veteran adviser to New Democrat politicians in Ontario and Alberta.
"If any party tries to make the ballot question anything other than Trump, then they're going to get drowned out and they're going to be irrelevant," Nader said in an interview.
Nader says a key to the election will be how each federal leader frames their message on the Trump and tariffs issue.
"I think what what Canadians want is someone who's going to unify, talk about solutions, be the adult in the room," she said.
Teneycke believes the Trump presidency and his repeated threat of tariffs poses a particular challenge for Poilievre, but not an insurmountable one.
Poilievre's Conservative team did "an incredible job" in laying the groundwork over the past two-plus years to fight an election against Justin Trudeau on the carbon tax, affordability and housing, says Teneycke.
Many Ontario voters strongly against Trump
"The situation has changed," he said. "You've got to fight the campaign that's ahead of you, not the one that you wanted to fight necessarily."
Teneycke says the Ontario PC campaign's research found large numbers of voters vehemently opposed to Trump and everything about him. He says the only time he saw the party's polling numbers dip during the campaign was after a camera caught Ford saying he was "100 per cent" happy that Trump had won the presidential election last November.
The lesson for Poilievre, according to Teneycke: avoid sounding anything like Trump, whether in words or tone.
"Talking about your big, beautiful, bring-it-home tax cut, talking about sneaky Carney, talking about fake news, these are all lines pulled from the lexicon of of Trump," he said. "Probably the worst of them is saying Canada First, which sounds, I think to a lot of voters, like America First."
WATCH | Compare the income tax cut promises from the Liberals and Conservatives:
How do Carney and Poilievre's income tax cuts compare? | About That
12 hours ago
Duration 8:30
The federal election campaign is officially underway and among the first promises of the leading parties is an income tax cut. Andrew Chang breaks down the math behind the two plans to explain how much you would save, and why experts are skeptical about how either would pay for it.
CBC News asked the Conservative Party to respond to Teneycke's comments. "Pierre Poilievre has been talking about his plan to put Canada First and make Canada stronger in order to stand up to Trump, and will continue to do so," said a party spokesperson in an email.
While the CBC Poll Tracker suggests the Conservative Party has lost more than seven percentage points nationally since Trump's inauguration on Jan. 20, Teneycke thinks it's not impossible for Poilievre to win back those voters.
'Hard to change a ballot question'
Ashley Csanady, who worked as an adviser on the Ontario Liberal campaign, saw firsthand how difficult it is to fight an election on any issue other than tariffs at this time in Canada.
"It's pretty hard to change a ballot question when you have something that's as big and as looming as the shadow of Donald Trump and our largest trading relationship," said Csanady, a vice-president at McMillan Vantage, a public affairs firm.
In the past Ontario election, Bonnie Crombie's Liberals campaigned largely on fixing the health care system, and although they attracted nearly 30 per cent of the vote provincewide, that only translated into 14 of a total 124 seats.
"The overall take away is that when voters are are looking at Trump and tariffs and they're scared about what's going on, they're voting based on who they think is the best option to take on that threat," Csanady said.
In the federal election, Csanady believes this gives the advantage to Liberal Leader Mark Carney.
"The fact that he sort of presents as this kind of boring dad, technocrat, smart guy economist is actually a superpower right now, she said. "I think with all the bombast coming out of the States, that calm presentation is the sort of thing that Canadians are looking for."
Nader, the NDP strategist, says a key lesson for the federal party from the Ontario election is the value of targeting key ridings with extra campaign support. The Ontario New Democrats won 27 seats — nearly double the Liberal total — with less than 19 per cent of the vote share province-wide.
She also says NDP leader Jagmeet Singh can win over voters by pitching his campaign message in a way that speaks to people's concerns.
"It is about Trump and who's going to be best to stand up to Trump, but reframe it," said Nader. "Who is going to be prioritized in that battle? Who's going to stand up for families and workers?"
There's a long-held notion in politics that incumbency is an advantage when contesting an election in times of crisis. The Progressive Conservative victory in Ontario — in which only two of the party's incumbents seeking re-election lost their seats — would appear to bolster that notion.
The federal Liberals, who took 78 of Ontario's 121 seats in the last federal election, will be hoping that pattern from the provincial election in late February repeats itself come voting day in late April.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in the alliance's air and missile defense
NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in the alliance's air and missile defense

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

NATO chief Rutte calls for 400% increase in the alliance's air and missile defense

LONDON (AP) — NATO members need to increase their air and missile defenses by 400% to counter the threat from Russia, the head of the military alliance plans to say on Monday. Secretary-General Mark Rutte will say during a visit to London that NATO must take a 'quantum leap in our collective defense' to face growing instability and threats, according to extracts released by NATO before Rutte's speech. Rutte is due to meet U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer at 10 Downing St. ahead of a NATO summit in the Netherlands where the 32-nation alliance is likely to commit to a big hike in military spending. Like other NATO members, the U.K. has been reassessing its defense spending since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Starmer has pledged to increase British defense spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product by 2027 and to 3% by 2034. Rutte has proposed a target of 3.5% of economic output on military spending and another 1.5% on 'defense-related expenditure' such as roads, bridges, airfields and sea ports. He said last week he is confident the alliance will agree to the target at its summit in The Hague on June 24-25. At the moment, 22 of the 32 member countries meet or exceed NATO's current 2% target. The new target would meet a demand by President Donald Trump that member states spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense. Trump has long questioned the value of NATO and complained that the U.S. provides security to European countries that don't contribute enough. Rutte plans to say in a speech at the Chatham House think tank in London that NATO needs thousands more armored vehicles and millions more artillery shells, as well as a 400% increase in air and missile defense. 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies,' he plans to say. 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' European NATO members, led by the U.K. and France, have scrambled to coordinate their defense posture as Trump transforms American foreign policy, seemingly sidelining Europe as he looks to end the war in Ukraine. Last week the U.K. government said it would build new nuclear-powered attack submarines, prepare its army to fight a war in Europe and become 'a battle-ready, armor-clad nation.' The plans represent the most sweeping changes to British defenses since the collapse of the Soviet Union more than three decades ago.

There is no such thing as "decarbonized oil"
There is no such thing as "decarbonized oil"

National Observer

timean hour ago

  • National Observer

There is no such thing as "decarbonized oil"

It takes a lot to make Simon Donner lose his cool. The co-chair of the feds' advisory group on climate policy has a daily practice of swimming in the Pacific and braves the frigid water all winter long. But he couldn't bear the blather about 'decarbonized oil' spilling from the first ministers' meeting this week. The prime minister and premiers emerged from their meeting in Saskatoon last Monday and jointly declared they would 'work urgently to get Canadian natural resources and commodities to domestic and international markets, such as critical minerals and decarbonized Canadian oil and gas by pipelines, supported by the private sector….' Donner took to social media to denounce the whole notion of 'decarbonized oil' as 'Orwellian.' It was strong language from the co-chair of the federal Net-Zero Advisory Body (NZAB). Donner is a climate scientist at UBC studying oceans and the intersection of climate science and policy. In that role, he gets to call the fouls as he sees them. But when people accept official government advisory roles, their criticisms usually devolve into gracious gibberish. So, it was refreshing to hear Donner push back on the statement by Carney et al. The whole idea is just plain 'silly,' he said. There is no such thing as 'decarbonized oil' — 'Oil contains carbon and emits CO2 when combusted.' Oil is, after all, a hydrocarbon. Along with methane gas and coal, the combustion of these fossil fuels is the primary driver of climate change. You already knew that, I'm sure. But the reason it's important to spell it out is that you're in the minority. Everyone knows there's a conflict between Big Oil and the greenies. But after decades of climate denial, online disinformation and general gaslighting, there is still widespread confusion about the most basic facts — just under half of Canadians pick out 'burning fossil fuels' even when given a list of possible sources most responsible for climate change. The marketing spin about 'decarbonized oil,' isn't new. The oil and gas industry and various agencies were talking about carbon capture on oil production last century. More recently, Natural Resources Canada published a Roadmap for the Decarbonization of Canada's Oil and Gas Sector in the Trudeau years. The nonsensical term is a close cousin to the attempts at marketing deep offshore drilling in the Atlantic as 'net-zero.' And adjacent to the most brazen branding effort to date — so-called 'ethical oil.' Decarbonized oil doublespeak may not be new but it was jarring coming from the mouth of Prime Minister Mark Carney, who has an undeniable grasp of the impacts of hydrocarbons. @ writes for @ The decarbonized doublespeak may not be new but it was jarring coming from the mouth of our new PM, who has an undeniable grasp of the impacts of hydrocarbons but nevertheless talked about 'decarbonized barrels' at the press conference following the first ministers' meeting. And it was particularly painful considering the venue — a province under a state of emergency where more than 15,000 people have fled wildfires. Extended families are crammed into single hotel rooms and sleeping in parking lots. While the first ministers discussed their nation-building plans in Saskatoon, a group of evacuees held a protest in the city demanding more resources for firefighting and evacuation support. It is still only Spring, but over 33,000 Canadians have already been forced to evacuate. John Vaillant, the author of Fire Weather relayed a startling conversation this week: the CEO of Red Cross Canada told him that when he started with the organization 17 years ago, 'eighty per cent of our work was outside Canada. Now, eighty per cent of our work is inside the country.' The early-season heatwave and fire conditions on the Prairies are 'at least five times more likely than they would be in a world without climate change,' according to attribution scientists. 'These conditions, which set the stage for dangerous wildfires, will only become more frequent and more severe if we continue burning fossil fuels,' said Dr. Kristina Dahl, VP of Science at Climate Central. The contrast was too much for another member of NZAB. ''Decarbonized oil and gas' does not exist,' wrote Catherine Abreu. '[It is] a complete contradiction in terms, and a dangerous lie that Canadian government after Canadian government has tried to spin under the spell of industry lobbying.' It may be too early to tell who's doing the spinning and what kind of spell they're casting. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith sounded positively enthusiastic about an emerging 'grand bargain' to satisfy the demands of the oil and gas industry. But some political watchers suspect Mark Carney is spinning a political web of his own. CNO's Max Fawcett argues that Carney is effectively calling Smith's bluff — a kind of judo move that avoids direct confrontation and puts the pressure back on her: 'He will, as Smith demanded, create the conditions for a more rapid assessment of infrastructure projects. But it's clear that one of those conditions will be the net-zero targets that Smith and Alberta's oil and gas industry have repeatedly committed themselves to.' Politics is the art of the possible, as they say. And perhaps there's a method behind the oxymorons and doublespeak. But it's hard to shake the sense that we're kidding ourselves and avoiding the basic reckoning. Still muttering about decarbonizing hydrocarbons even as the flames close in.

As new U.S. travel ban arrives, some Canadian dual nationals are worried
As new U.S. travel ban arrives, some Canadian dual nationals are worried

CBC

time2 hours ago

  • CBC

As new U.S. travel ban arrives, some Canadian dual nationals are worried

Christian Kodia is accustomed to visiting the United States on a weekly basis, but with a new travel ban coming into effect on Monday, he's not sure if that will continue. Kodia is a dual national with citizenship from both Canada and the Republic of Congo, one of 12 states whose citizens U.S. President Donald Trump has now banned from entering that country. "I travel to the United States of America, I would say, every weekend. I go to visit my family, I go for business, I go for friends," said Kodia, president of the Congolese-Brazzaville Community of Ottawa-Gatineau. Even though Kodia has a Canadian passport, he's unsure of what kind of welcome to expect from U.S. customs. "It's going to be difficult," he told Radio-Canada, predicting that the ban would have a "huge, negative impact" for many people. Citing national security, Trump said Thursday his administration would block entry for citizens of Afghanistan, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. Trump also announced restrictions to limit the entry of nationals of seven other countries: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. In the case of the Republic of Congo, Trump cited high rates of overstaying among citizens visiting the United States: 29.6 per cent of those on temporary business or tourism visas, and 35 per cent of students and exchange visitors. For other countries he cited links to terrorism, failure to accept deportees or a lack of central authority as justification for barring their citizens. "If we had a government, a strong one, one that we elected, they [would] be able to deal with [Trump]," said Darlène Lozis, a Haitian community organizer in Gatineau, Que. Lozis said with much of her home country controlled by armed gangs, she doesn't think Haiti's government will be able to advocate for the rights of its citizens. "Whatever we do won't change anything. That man is a fool," she said, referring to Trump. "He will continue doing and saying whatever he wants." Entering 'the lion's den' Dual nationals like Kodia are now trying to establish whether they can still legally enter with their Canadian passports. But Ottawa immigration lawyer Betsy Kane suggests that given the potential risks,"it's not even about what's legal." Kane said she's asking her business clients whether it's worth risking the well-being of their staff by sending them to the United States, especially if they are dual nationals from one of the banned countries. "It's about putting yourself in the lion's den," said Kane, stressing that she's not a U.S. immigration specialist. U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents have wide discretion whether to admit travellers to the United States — even if they have a valid visa. They also have the power to detain people for questioning and to search their electronic devices. In April, Global Affairs Canada updated its travel advisory for the United States, warning Canadians to "expect scrutiny," which could include those devices. It also warned that Canadians denied entry could be detained while awaiting deportation. In an interview with the Canadian Press on Friday, U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra said if a Canadian faced device searches, or detainment at the border, it was "an isolated event" and "not a pattern."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store