The Liquidation Cartel: How MTI's R450 Million Vanishing Act Previews Banxso's Fate
Image: IOL / Ron AI
The stage is set for another potential South African liquidation tragedy. As creditors wait for Judge Le Grange to deliver judgment in a case that could seal the fate of thousands of Banxso clients the anxiety amongst clients is growing.
The precedent is terrifying: Mirror Trading International creditors have waited four years for a single cent while liquidators Bester and Van Rooyen have pocketed millions each, and law firm Mostert & Bosman extracted nearly R25 million in fees.
Now the same players are circling Banxso, having already rejected a R57 million settlement that would have guaranteed 100% creditor payouts to the liquidation applicants. The message is clear: why settle for full creditor recovery when prolonged liquidation proceedings generate far more lucrative professional fees?
How R1.1 Billion Became R627 Million
The Mirror Trading International collapse exposes the brutal mathematics of South Africa's liquidation industry. When liquidators recovered 1,280 Bitcoin worth approximately R1.1 billion in 2021, creditors held hope for meaningful recovery. Four years later, the estate has mysteriously shrunk to R627 million, leaving R450 million spent and not a single creditor payment made.
The June 2023 liquidation and distribution account reveals the shocking scale of professional extraction. From an estate balance of R803 million at the time of the report being published there was already an amount of around R297,000,000 spent over two and a half years, eight liquidators claimed R138.5 million in fees while creditors received nothing. Masters' fees consumed R275,000, with the South African Revenue Service claiming a staggering R283 million. The remainder has vanished into legal fees and administrative costs, yet not one cent has reached the victims whose investments funded this professional feast.
The mathematics of destruction become even more damning when considering lost investment returns. The R1.1 billion recovered in 2021 should have generated substantial interest over four years of liquidation proceedings. Conservative investment returns of 8% annually would have added over R400 million to the estate. Instead, the current R627 million balance suggests this potential growth has also vanished into the professional fee vortex, representing another layer of value destruction that creditors will never recover.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The disappearing funds tell a damning story. Administrative costs have consumed the estate like acid through metal, devouring not only the principal amount but the investment returns that could have significantly improved creditor recoveries. Professional fees flow freely while creditors subsist on empty promises. The Western Cape High Court declared MTI an unlawful Ponzi scheme in 2023, yet the only people profiting from this designation are the very professionals appointed to serve victim interests.
Most cruelly, liquidators promised creditors a second liquidation and distribution account in 2024 that would finally deliver payments. Industry whispers suggested a special dividend of 10 cents per rand of claimed amounts. That promise evaporated with silence taking its place as many creditors now bemoan the lack of transparency and non-existent communications on the matter from the liquidators, leaving creditors with nothing but the bitter taste of false hope while professional fees continued accumulating.
A senior insolvency practitioner, speaking anonymously for fear of industry retaliation, revealed the ugly truth: "This has become the perfect legal heist. You seize control of massive estates, generate astronomical fees through manufactured complexity, drag proceedings across years, and by the time creditors realise the con, their money has been professionally laundered into legal accounts."
Banxso, The Sequel Nobody Wanted
History repeats with mechanical precision in the Banxso liquidation. When stakeholders offered R57 million in security to guarantee full creditor payouts for the liquidation applicants, Mostert & Bosman rejected the proposal without hesitation. The law firm allegedly withheld news of this settlement from clients, who discovered the offer through media reports rather than their supposed legal representatives.
Judge Le Grange himself highlighted the matter during the application hearing remarking that it made no sense for a creditor to turn down a 100% offer in favour of long, drawn out and expensive legal proceedings that would surely end up with the same alleged creditor receiving 10 – 15 cents on the Rand in a best-case scenario.
A forensic accountant with two decades of corporate insolvency experience explained the perverse dynamics: "These liquidations have transformed into wealth destruction machines. Not only do they consume principal through manufactured legal complexity, but they obliterate the investment returns that should compound over time. The R1.1 billion recovered in 2021 could have grown to R1.5 billion through conservative investments. Instead, it has shrunk to R627 million while generating massive professional fees. This represents systematic value destruction disguised as estate administration."
Judge Le Grange raised pointed questions during May hearings about a website promoting Bester and Van Rooyen as preferred liquidators before the application had even been heard by the courts, asking directly and not receiving any substantial answer as to why this would not constitute touting in its worst form. The coordination suggests an orchestrated campaign that may violate professional conduct standards.
A Verdict That Could Doom Thousands
Judge Le Grange faces a critical decision that will determine whether Banxso clients receive their funds or feed the liquidation machine. The contrast could not be starker. Approving forced liquidation consigns clients to the MTI fate: years of waiting while professionals extract maximum fees from dwindling assets.
The human cost of this decision extends far beyond financial statements. Banxso clients represent ordinary South Africans whose savings, retirement funds, and family security hang in the balance. One investor, who invested R150,000 captured the desperation: "If Banxso wins its case, I can access my money immediately. These liquidators see only the profits they can make from forcing this liquidation through, regardless of what happens to us."
An MTI victim whose pension fund vanished into legal fees painted the horrific reality: "Four years of watching lawyers grow rich while I struggle with rent payments. They stole our money twice, first the original scammers, then the professionals meant to protect us. The system is designed to destroy creditors."
David Versus the Legal Goliath
Unlike MTI's passive collapse, Banxso stakeholders have mounted unprecedented resistance against regulatory and legal pressure. While most companies capitulate when faced with FSCA action, Banxso directors are challenging the regulator at every turn, including now preparing to take the authority to tribunal to overturn the final removal of their Financial Services Provider licence.
This defiance represents more than corporate stubbornness. Banxso management recognises that surrendering to the liquidation cartel means abandoning their clients to systematic wealth extraction by professional services. Their R57 million settlement offer, which excluded the large sums held under court order in their bank accounts, demonstrates genuine commitment to creditor protection rather than capitulation to legal machinery designed to enrich lawyers and liquidators.
A retired commercial lawyer with 40 years' experience described Banxso's resistance as extraordinary: "Most companies fold immediately when liquidation proceedings begin because fighting the system is expensive and usually futile. Banxso's willingness to challenge both the FSCA and liquidation applicants shows they understand what their clients face if this process continues."
The company's tribunal challenge against the FSCA represents a broader fight against regulatory overreach that enables liquidation abuse. By freezing Banxso funds while failing to enforce court orders for their release, the FSCA created the perfect environment for professional fee accumulation at creditor expense.
The Professionals Always Win
Industry insiders describe a deliberate methodology perfected through countless liquidations. Early settlement offers that benefit creditors face immediate rejection. Proceedings stretch across years through manufactured legal complexity. Friendly professional services receive appointments to maximise fee extraction. Estate assets disappear through administrative costs while creditors receive blame for poor market conditions affecting recovery rates.
The pattern extends beyond individual cases into systemic dysfunction. South Africa's liquidation framework has evolved into a sophisticated mechanism where liquidators receive guaranteed payment regardless of creditor outcomes, law firms bill unlimited hours with minimal oversight, administrative costs consistently exceed creditor recoveries, and settlement offers threatening fee income face automatic rejection.
The R450 Million Question
As judgment approaches, the MTI precedent looms like a financial death sentence. The R450 million that vanished from MTI's estate represents more than accounting irregularities or market volatility. It demonstrates how professional fees can consume entire estates while creditors wait indefinitely for justice that never arrives.
A bankruptcy specialist summarised the brutal reality: "This is not incompetence or unfortunate circumstances. It represents a refined business model where creditor suffering generates professional prosperity. The longer estates remain in liquidation, the more fees accumulate. Quick resolutions are bad for business."
Justice or Professional Jackpot?
Judge Le Grange holds extraordinary power. His decision will either deliver justice to Banxso clients through immediate settlement acceptance or condemn them to the liquidation lottery that has already claimed MTI creditors. The choice represents far more than legal procedure. It determines whether South Africa's courts serve creditor interests or enable professional wealth extraction.
The evidence is overwhelming. Banxso stakeholders have fought regulatory pressure, challenged FSCA overreach, and offered complete creditor protection through guaranteed settlement funds. They have demonstrated unprecedented commitment to client welfare in a system designed to sacrifice creditor interests for professional profit.
Mostert & Bosman and their preferred liquidators offer the MTI template: years of proceedings, millions in fees, and zero creditor recovery.
The Final Reckoning
Judge Le Grange's judgment will echo far beyond Banxso. It will signal whether South African courts recognise the liquidation cartel's systematic abuse of creditor rights or enable continued professional profiteering disguised as legal process. Judge Le Grange faces a choice between creditor protection and professional enrichment.
The question haunting thousands of Banxso clients is simple: will Judge Le Grange deliver justice or feed the liquidation machine that transforms creditor suffering into professional prosperity? The answer will determine whether South Africa's liquidation system serves justice or perpetuates the most profitable legal scam in the country's history.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
22 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Provinces surrender R923m in unspent funds
Gauteng's R465.4 million surrender dwarfed other provinces, representing nearly half of all surrendered funds. South African provinces surrendered R923 million in unspent conditional grant funds during the 2023-24 financial year, according to Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana. The surrendered amount represents funds that provinces were unable to utilise within the allocated timeframe across critical sectors, including health, education, and human settlements. Gauteng province recorded the highest surrender at R465.4 million, while KwaZulu-Natal was the only province that did not surrender any funds. Provincial breakdown reveals disparities The provincial breakdown, revealed in a parliamentary response to DA MP Wendy Alexander, shows stark differences in spending capacity across South Africa's nine provinces. Gauteng's R465.4 million surrender dwarfed other provinces, representing nearly half of all surrendered funds. The Western Cape surrendered R224.4 million, making it the second-highest contributor to unspent funds. Limpopo followed with R68.6 million, while the North West province surrendered R66.6 million. The Eastern Cape surrendered R62.7 million, while the Free State's unspent amount totalled R19.3 million. Mpumalanga surrendered R10.5 million, and the Northern Cape recorded the smallest surrender at R5.6 million. ALSO READ: Here's how much National Treasury has spent on consultants in two years Human settlements sector records highest underspending According to information provided by Godongwana, analysis by sector revealed that human settlements experienced the most significant underspending, surrendering R409.1 million of allocated funds. This represented nearly 45% of all surrendered provincial grant money. Health sector underspending reached R193.3 million, while roads and transport surrendered R155.9 million. The education sector returned R92.3 million in unspent funds. Sports, arts and culture surrendered R32.7 million, while agriculture returned R24.4 million. The public works sector recorded the smallest surrender at R15.5 million. ALSO READ: Godongwana hits back at Reserve Bank's 3% inflation target Systemic challenges behind underspending Godongwana outlined specific challenges that prevented provinces from utilising allocated funds across different sectors. Human settlements faced particularly severe constraints that hindered project delivery. 'Unfilled vacancies, such as planners, engineers and project managers, led to projects not being delivered on time, resulting in the under expenditure, and subsequent surrender of funds,' Godongwana explained regarding human settlements underspending. Meanwhile, the health sector encountered procurement delays that significantly impacted spending capacity. 'Delays in procurement on the National Tertiary Services grant. A large part of health technology is imported,' the minister noted. ALSO READ: 'Barrelling towards collapse': Concerns mount as Godongwana gives Morero deadline to fix Joburg's finances Education and infrastructure sectors face implementation delays The education sector underspending stemmed from procurement and staffing challenges that delayed programme implementation. 'Delays in the procurement of laptops for officials and the non-appointment of personnel under the School Nutrition Programme' contributed to the R92.3 million surrender, according to Godongwana. Public works struggled with employment programme timelines that affected the utilisation of funds. 'Contracts of EPWP workers not finalised on time, hence unspent funds were surrendered and not rolled over,' the minister stated. Transport sector challenges included legal obstacles and contractor performance issues. 'Delays in project completion due to legal action that halted implementation, and poor contractor performance, which resulted in the project not being completed,' Godongwana explained. ALSO READ: Macpherson suspends all EPWP funds to municipality Agriculture sector hampered by community unrest The agriculture sector's R24.4 million surrender resulted from external disruptions. 'Projects not completed due to community unrest, and planned training of farmers not completed on time' prevented full fund utilisation, the minister revealed. Bus subsidy allocations within the transport sector also contributed to underspending due to contracting delays. 'Regarding bus subsidies, some contracts were only finalised in the 2nd quarter, resulting in the funds being unspent,' Godongwana noted. National Treasury response and oversight measures According to Godongwana, the National Treasury has implemented regular engagement mechanisms to address provincial underspending challenges. These interventions aim to improve grant performance across all sectors and provinces. 'The National Treasury regularly engages with departments responsible for administering conditional grants,' Godongwana stated. The treasury's approach includes active participation in sector-specific review processes. 'The National Treasury officials frequently participate in sectoral meetings where grant performance is reviewed,' the minister explained. He said the treasury provides ongoing support to enhance implementation capacity. 'During these engagements, issues of non-performance are raised with both provincial and national departments and the National Treasury provides guidance to support improved implementation,' Godongwana stated. READ NEXT: R279 million budgeted for National Treasury's building rentals and parking spaces

IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
SA Canegrowers calls for urgent government action to save local sugar industry
SA Canegrowers urges the government to prioritise negotiations with the US to finalise a mutually beneficial trade deal, which would include a tariff exemption for sugar, or a return to the previous US quota mechanism. Image: Simphiwe Mbokazi/Independent Newspapers SA Canegrowers has urged Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development, Thoko Didiza, to expedite the finalisation of regulations that could fortify the survival of South Africa's beleaguered sugar industry. The appeal comes amidst increasing turmoil, marked by a 30% tariff on South African sugar exports to the United States and an influx of heavily subsidised foreign sugar into local markets. The organisation's chairman, Higgins Mdluli, highlights the dire state of the industry, noting that delays in industry consultations threaten the livelihoods of growers crucial for sustaining rural economies, particularly in Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal. 'The sugar industry needs the limited exemption from competition regulations in order to have industry-wide discussions without fear of falling foul of the Competition Act,' Mdluli stated, underscoring the urgency with which the sector requires government support. In May, Minister Didiza published draft regulations allowing collective negotiations on the procurement of over 90% local sugar among growers, millers, retailers, and food manufacturers. Initially welcomed by SA Canegrowers, the lack of progress since the public comment period has raised alarms within the industry. The consultation, requested by the Minister herself, has yet to be scheduled months after feedback was gathered, prompting renewed concern among stakeholders. 'We have written to Minister Didiza and urged her to act with urgency," Mdluli said. "The livelihoods of sugarcane growers depend on it.' The challenge posed by cheap foreign sugar imports and the newly imposed US tariffs threatens not only the viability of local sugar but also the jobs and economic stability of entire communities reliant on the sector. According to SA Canegrowers, the current situation reflects a critical need for domestic action to stave off the competitive threat from subsidised imports. 'The South African sugar industry is a national asset. We support local jobs and farming, yet our market is being flooded by cheap, subsidised imports,' Mdluli elaborated. He emphasised that not only are local jobs at stake, but the influx of cheaper sugar does not benefit consumers, but instead allows importers to reap higher profit margins at the expense of the local economy. Compounding these domestic struggles is the impact of the new US tariff, which has rendered South African sugar less competitive in a vital export market. Prior to this development, the US operated under a quota system for sugar, which did not adversely affect South African growers. As the US grapples with its own supply limitations, SA Canegrowers is calling on the South African government to prioritise negotiations for a mutually beneficial trade deal, advocating for a tariff exemption for sugar or a reversion to the previous quota mechanisms. The call for prompt governmental action highlights the precarious balance that needs to be struck to safeguard the viability of local agriculture. Failure to act could jeopardise the livelihoods of countless growers and ultimately threaten the very foundation of the domestic sugar industry. IOL


The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
How Rosebank Mall is paying less for electricity and fighting outages
A new hybrid energy system to power Rosebank mall An innovative sustainable energy management system was unveiled at Rosebank Mall this week, giving South Africans a glimpse of how to cut costs and keep the lights on in a city plagued by power outages. A first of its kind The newly unveiled energy project at Rosebank Mall is the first of its kind in South Africa. Multiple components have been incorporated into a microgrid, which not only allows for the mall to be fully operational during load shedding but also maximises cost savings. It does this by purchasing energy at lower off-peak rates and utilising it during peak times through energy arbitrage. This provides Rosebank Mall with more energy independence than your average commercial space. Just the batteries can power up the whole mall for two hours. When incorporating the generators, the durations expand. The generators used in this system were upgraded to blend natural gas with diesel. This reduces fuel consumption by more than 50% cutting fuel costs as well. Strategic perspective Wally Webber of Utenergy said the project shows that sustainability and energy returns don't have to be opposites. National utilities manager of Hyprop, Jacques Vosloo, excitedly said, 'Today we're not just switching on a power system, we're unveiling a bold new way of managing energy in a retail environment'. He further emphasised how this project is one of the largest of its kind in South Africa. It promises to deliver not only financial returns and savings but also provide their tenants with the certainty that they will be able to trade uninterrupted, regardless of what the grid is doing. The general manager of Rosebank Mall, Muhammad Varachia, said it is a turning point in South African retail infrastructure. 'What we've activated here in Rosebank Mall is what we believe to be the largest hybrid system in the retail sector. It features a 7.2 megawatt power battery, a 4.5 megawatt inverter and a dual fuel generator. All seamlessly managed by smart controls that optimise everything in real time.' Varachia indicated that it's not just about the hardware but what it delivers. Amongst others, resilience and relief were the qualities he attached to the system. ALSO READ: Eskom adds more power to electricity grid as G20 summit approaches From blueprint to breakthrough One of the leading contractors, Energenic, described how this project was about doing something that had never been done before on the continent. Director Robert Eustace further explained that 'it was about proving a new way of thinking about energy. 'It's not just another generator installation, a standard solar battery fit-out, it was a custom-built techno-economic energy project.' This power plant is set to be a huge change-maker for the operation of the mall. 'Yes, it's green. Yes, it's resilient. But most importantly, it makes financial sense. This system actively reduces operating costs,' he said. Anthony English, chief director of lithium battery manufacturer Freedom Won, was also in attendance. He explained that the only challenge they faced was the timeline. 'From when they placed the order to when we had to deliver was only about eight weeks. To prepare the whole pipeline and all the components, get them into the production line, quality control, testing and then deliver them and install. It was a challenging project but ultimately very successful.' Energy utility Darius Booyens of Egoli Gas described the launch as a milestone for what's happening in the energy market. 'It is not just about supplying gas; there's a bigger picture that supports a greener future. 'The gas power allows us to reduce the carbon emissions significantly, and it is a solution that enables energy to be generated on demand. It also reduces carbon emissions and contributes to both resilience and energy support.' The system also uses AI-enabled technology to monitor and detect anomalies such as leaks and interference by third parties.