For Women Scotland launches legal action against Scottish Government on gender
A campaign group which won a legal victory on the definition of gender is taking action against the Scottish Government over policies it says are 'inconsistent' with the ruling.
For Women Scotland's legal battle with Scottish ministers on the definition of a woman ended in the UK Supreme Court, which ruled in April that the words 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex.
But the group said that it now has 'little choice' but to take further legal action as some policies regarding transgender pupils in schools and transgender people in custody remain in place – which the group said is 'in clear breach of the law'.
The schools guidance for single-sex toilets says it is important that young people 'where possible, are able to use the facilities they feel most comfortable with'.
The prison guidance allows for a transgender woman to be admitted into the women's estate if the person does not meet the violence against women and girls criteria, and there is no other basis to suppose that she poses an unacceptable risk of harm to those housed in the women's estate.
For Women Scotland has now applied to the Court of Session seeking to quash the policies, which it says are 'inconsistent with the UK Supreme Court judgment of April 16 2025'.
It has raised an ordinary action for reduction (quashing) of the policies relating to schools and prisons.
In a statement, the group said: 'Nothing has persuaded the government to take action and both policies remain stubbornly in place, to the detriment of vulnerable women and girls, leaving us little choice but to initiate further legal action.
'The Scottish ministers have 21 days to respond to the summons. If the policies have not been withdrawn by then we will lodge the summons for calling, and the government will have to defend its policies in court.
'We are asking the court to issue a declarator that the school guidance and the prison guidance are unlawful and that they be reduced in whole.
'We are also asking that both policies are suspended in the meantime.'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment on live court proceedings.'
For Women Scotland previously brought a series of challenges over the definition of 'woman' in Scottish legislation mandating 50% female representation on public boards.
The last step of these ended in the Supreme Court ruling, which the campaign group's supporters hailed as a 'watershed for women'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
UK's first trans judge to challenge Supreme Court's landmark gender ruling using European human rights laws
Britain's first transgender judge has lodged an appeal with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman. Victoria McCloud is seeking a rehearing of the case as she claims the UK's highest court undermined her Article 6 rights to a fair trial when it declined to hear evidence from her. In April the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that 'woman' and 'man' refer to biological women and men in the context of the Equality act and that 'the concept of sex is binary'. Ms McCloud - who left her role as a judge last year - is seeking a review as she claims the Supreme Court refused permission for her to provide evidence on how its clarification of the law would affect trans people. But women's rights campaigners have dismissed the case as a 'fantasy' and say Ms McCloud should exhaust 'all domestic legal remedies' before appealing to the court in Strasbourg. The former judge will be represented by Oscar Davies, the UK's first openly non-binary barrister, and Olivia Campbell-Cavendish, the founder of the Trans Legal Clinic and the UK's first black trans lawyer. 'There is no space for decision-making about us, without us,' Ms McCloud said in a statement yesterday. 'I intend to ensure that there will be no peace for the gender-critical ideological movement, the Labour Government appeasing it, or space in our schools, homes and workplaces for an ideology which causes harm, misery and oppression of a small and law-abiding minority in our formerly tolerant country.' A spokesman for the Trans Legal Clinic said: 'For the trans community, it embodies a simple truth: there must be no more conversations about us, without us. 'At its heart lies the principle in Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; the right to a fair and impartial hearing by an independent tribunal. 'This cornerstone of democratic societies exists to guarantee that those whose rights are affected can take part in proceedings that determine their future.' However Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said Ms McCloud's appeal is legally 'incomprehensible' and a 'fantasy'. She said: 'What we are being told about this proposed case is incomprehensible. The ECHR only hears cases that have exhausted all domestic legal remedies, and since McCloud wasn't a party to For Women Scotland in the Supreme Court, that's not the case here. 'It's a fantasy that someone can go straight to Strasbourg to complain that the Supreme Court in their own country didn't listen to them.' Ms Forstater added: 'This looks more like a deceptive and expensive PR campaign than a serious legal strategy.' The Supreme Court can consider outside arguments from 'interveners' at its discretion but rarely allows individuals to intervene and often rejects them if it will hear the same arguments from others. In the biological sex case, the UK's highest court did consider arguments on trans issues from the human rights campaign group Amnesty International. Susan Smith - from For Women Scotland, which brought the Supreme Court case - said that it is the Supreme Court's 'prerogative whether to accept interventions or not' and that it 'rarely takes interventions from individuals' 'We will watch with interest whether McCloud's application is accepted by the ECHR or even if it comes within the deadline to proceed,' she added. Ms McCloud transitioned in the 1990s and became the first transgender barrister and judge in the UK. She stood down last year, saying she could not continue her work amid the increasingly fraught public debate. In her resignation letter, Ms McCloud likened herself to civil rights activist Rosa Parks. It comes as Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy was criticised for wearing a trans rights T-shirt with the slogan 'protect the dolls' while attending a Pride march in her Wigan constituency. Critics have said a government minister should not be promoting the slogan and described it as a 'middle finger from the Labour Government'. The term 'doll' is a slang term from the 1980s for biological men who 'pass' as women but has seen a revival after celebrities including Pedro Pascal, Madonna and Tilda Swinton were photographed in a £75 T-shirt emblazoned with the slogan. James Esses, a gender critical campaigner and therapist, said it was a 'middle finger from the Labour Government to everyone who believes in biological reality'. Fiona McAnena, from Sex Matters, said: 'No elected representative of the public - let alone a government minister - should be promoting the slogan of campaigners who are calling for men to be able to identify into any space for women'. The Culture Secretary was contacted for comment.
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government working ‘at pace' to bring Gazan children to UK for medical care
Sir Keir Starmer's official spokesperson said a cross-government task force is 'up and running', but warned that it is a 'sensitive and complex process'. His comments come after the BBC reported that the first group of critically ill and injured Gazan children, said to be between 30 and 50 patients, will be arriving 'in the coming weeks'. It is understood that the children will come from hospital with family members via a third country, where biometric data will be collected, and that some may enter the asylum system after completing treatment. The Number 10 spokesperson said: 'We're not going to get into a running commentary on numbers or the exact process. 'Exact numbers are going to depend on clinical need and various factors.' He added: 'We continue to take all those plans to evacuate more children from Gaza, who require urgent medical care in the UK and specialist treatment. 'Obviously, it's sensitive and it's a complex process, and the wellbeing of patients and their families is our top priority. 'There's a cross-government task force working together to deliver this new scheme and we'll obviously provide an update as and when we've got them.' The spokesperson continued: 'There's a task force up and running to deliver this (as soon) as possible. 'Patients will obviously be assessed on a case-by-case basis, some will be brought to the UK if that's the best option for their care. 'We obviously continue to provide significant support in the region as well, for evacuations within the region, to support people desperately in need of care. 'And that is on top of the significant aid that we're providing to the region to address the ongoing humanitarian crisis.' He said the Government will give updates on the plans 'as and when we can', but said: 'We are working at pace to deliver it.' More than 50,000 children are estimated to have been killed or injured in Gaza since October 2023, according to Unicef. A small number of children have so far been brought to the UK for specialist medical care via an initiative by Project Pure Hope, and they are being treated privately. The Government's plans, coordinated the Foreign Office, Home Office and Department of Health, is set to see children treated by the NHS. Last month, a cross-party group of 96 MPs wrote a letter to the government urging them to bring sick and injured children from Gaza to the UK, warning that they are at risk of imminent death due to the 'decimation' of the healthcare system. Labour MP Rachael Maskell, who signed that letter, has insisted that there must be 'no delay'. She told the PA news agency: 'There should be no delay in getting children from Gaza the healthcare they need. 'I have met regularly with clinicians on their return from Gaza, who have shared the most distressing stories of the challenges of providing services to children without the equipment and medication that is needed, and in inadequate facilities where they are daily having to make life and death decisions, when in the UK, they know that they would be able to treat and save so many more lives. 'It is vital that we do everything to provide healthcare at scale and more so, do everything to stop the killing in Gaza.'
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Sturgeon making Salmond claims because he cannot defend himself, niece says
Christina Hendry said if the former first minister and Alba Party leader was alive today he would have defended himself 'with every fibre of his being'. Ms Sturgeon made several claims about her predecessor in her memoir Frankly, which was published last week. She accused Mr Salmond of creating conspiracy theories over sexual harassment allegations and said he did not read the independence white paper before the referendum in 2014. Ms Sturgeon also said Mr Salmond 'wanted to destroy me' and would have rather seen the SNP fail than succeed without him. Appearing on the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme, Ms Hendry criticised Ms Sturgeon. She said: 'The way I see it is if my uncle was here today, these things would not be being said. 'I believe they are being said because he's not here to defend himself, as he would have done with every fibre of his being.' Asked what she thought had motivated Ms Sturgeon to make the claims now, Ms Hendry said: 'I'm unsure. I think there's been a few people questioning that. 'But I think the timing of these things being said – there's been a number of years where they've not been said, that these things could have been said, and the timing of it now, where she's released the book and is looking to publicise that. 'I think many people have thought that could be the case.' In her book, Ms Sturgeon said Mr Salmond had never produced a 'shred of evidence' that he was a victim of a conspiracy, adding that he admitted to her the substance of one of the complaints against him. A judicial review into the Scottish Government's handling of complaints against Mr Salmond found the investigation was tainted by apparent bias while a court cleared him of all charges. Ms Hendry said: 'The bottom line is he was cleared in the highest court in Scotland and I think I'm unsure as to why it's being brought up. 'I do think there were people conspiring against him, and I think there's the truth will still come out. 'There are things to still come out in the public, and I think there are many people who should be thinking about their actions.' Ms Hendry added that her family was united in pursuing legal action against the Scottish Government over its botched harassment probe. In December, she announced she would run to be an MSP in one of Mr Salmond's former seats. Ms Hendry said she would contest the Banffshire and Buchan Coast seat for Alba that her uncle had planned to campaign in before his death in North Macedonia in October.
