French court dismisses government Covid response probe
The Court of Justice of the Republic (CJR) closed the probe five years after it began in July 2020 over complaints that the government mismanaged its reaction to the virus's spread, including a lack of protective gear and unclear guidance over mask wearing.
Then premier Philippe, ex-health minister Agnes Buzyn and her successor Olivier Veran were named as assisted witnesses -- a status in the French legal system that falls between that of a witness and a formal suspect.
"The investigating committee of the Court of Justice of the Republic has decided to dismiss the case," prosecutor general Remy Heitz said on Monday, without offering details.
The public prosecutor in May requested the case be dismissed -- a move that effectively ruled out a trial.
The CJR is the only court authorised to prosecute and try former and current government members for alleged crimes and offences committed in exercising their official duties.
Its investigation found the government had taken several measures to combat the pandemic, Heitz said in May.
The prosecutor's request -- seen by AFP -- argued that while the measures taken to combat the spread of Covid-19 were insufficient, neither Philippe nor Veran deliberately refused to respond to the disaster.
"Each, at their own level, fought the epidemic from the moment it emerged in France," the request said.
Buzyn had been sharply criticised for leaving her post at the start of the health crisis to run for mayor of Paris.
But she actually left on February 16, 2020 -- a few days before an official disaster was declared in France with the first death of a Covid-19 patient recorded on February 25, the prosecutor general's office added.
Buzyn had also been under investigation for endangering the lives of others, but France's Court of Cassation dropped that charge in January 2023.
Philippe, a popular premier from 2017 to July 2020, is now mayor of the northern city of Le Havre and leads a right-centre party allied with, but not part of, Macron's centrist faction.
He is the only leading contender to firmly have declared his intention to stand in the 2027 presidential election.
According to France's public health agency, around 168,000 people died from Covid-19 between February 2020 and September 2023, when the World Health Organization declared the global health emergency over.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
EU defends Trump trade deal in face of backlash
STOCKHOLM - The European Union on Monday defended its trade deal with President Donald Trump, with EU capitals and businesses sharply divided on an outcome some branded a "capitulation". "I'm 100-percent sure that this deal is better than a trade war with the United States," top EU trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic told journalists. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched the framework accord with Trump on Sunday after dashing to Scotland as the 1 August deadline loomed for steep levies that threatened to cripple Europe's economy. EU exports are now set to face across-the-board tariffs of 15 percent -- higher than customs duties before Trump returned to the White House, but much lower than his threatened 30 percent. The 27-nation bloc also promised its companies would purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments -- although it was not clear how binding those pledges would be. "This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances," Sefcovic said. Full details of the agreement -- and crucially which sectors could escape the 15-percent levy -- will be known in the coming days, although the EU says it has avoided steeper tariffs on key exports including cars and medicines. - European criticism - The reaction from European capitals -- which gave von der Leyen the mandate to negotiate -- ranged from muted to outright hostile. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said it was a "dark day" for Europe and that the accord was tantamount to "submission". Speaking for Europe's biggest economy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his country would face "substantial damage" from the tariffs but that "we couldn't expect to achieve any more". He argued that the deal's negative effects "will not only be limited to Germany and Europe, but we will see the effects of this trade policy in America as well". Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said he gave his support for the deal "without any enthusiasm". Industry groups in both countries made plain their disappointment, with Germany's main auto sector body saying the 15-percent levy "burdens" carmakers while its VCI chemical trade association said the rates were "too high". Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban attacked the deal in blunt terms, saying: "Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast." European stock markets dipped later on Monday, wiping out early gains and reflecting unease at terms viewed as lopsided. "It looks a bit like a capitulation," said Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). "The EU accepted a fairly unbalanced deal," he added, saying it delivered a "political victory for Trump". - Europe security stakes - Von der Leyen had faced intense pressure from EU states to strike a deal quickly with the bloc's biggest partner and protect a $1.9-trillion trading relationship. Defending Brussels' approach, Sefcovic warned that a no-deal scenario -- meaning a 30-percent tariff and the prospect of further escalation -- would have risked up to five million jobs in Europe. Throughout the months-long talks, Brussels prioritised stability and maintaining good relations with Washington over escalation. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a Trump ally, said the deal had avoided "potentially devastating" consequences. Hanging over the negotiations was the risk to other areas of cooperation -- such as the war in Ukraine -- if the EU descended into a trade war with its closest security partner. "It's not only about the trade -- it's about security, it's about Ukraine," Sefcovic told reporters Monday. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute for International Economics acknowledged it was "clearly an imbalanced deal" if judged purely on trade terms. "But if you're trying to avoid worse national security outcomes, well then maybe the deal is not so bad," he said. - Cautious approach - The EU had sought to ramp up the pressure in the final stretch of talks, fearing a bad deal and higher levies, with countries approving a $109-billion package of counter-tariffs at the last minute. And states led by France were pushing for a more robust response including the option to deploy the trade "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument. But the threat of retaliation was consistently framed by Brussels as a last resort should talks fail, and experts suggested the hardening stance may have come too late to make a real difference. "If the EU had played hardball at the very beginning, it probably could have got a better deal," ECFR's Rizzi told AFP.
Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
EU defends Trump trade deal in face of backlash
BRUSSELS - The European Union on Monday defended its trade deal with President Donald Trump, with EU capitals and businesses sharply divided on an outcome some branded a "capitulation". "I'm 100% sure that this deal is better than a trade war with the United States," top EU trade negotiator Maros Sefcovic told journalists. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen clinched the framework accord with Trump on Sunday after dashing to Scotland as the 1 August deadline loomed for steep levies that threatened to cripple Europe's economy. EU exports are now set to face across-the-board tariffs of 15% - higher than customs duties before Trump returned to the White House, but much lower than his threatened 30%. The 27-nation bloc also promised its companies would purchase energy worth $750 billion from the United States and make $600 billion in additional investments - although it was not clear how binding those pledges would be. "This is clearly the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances," Sefcovic said. Full details of the agreement - and crucially which sectors could escape the 15% levy - will be known in the coming days, although the EU says it has avoided steeper tariffs on key exports including cars and medicines. EUROPEAN CRITICISM The reaction from European capitals - which gave von der Leyen the mandate to negotiate - ranged from muted to outright hostile. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said it was a "dark day" for Europe and that the accord was tantamount to "submission". Speaking for Europe's biggest economy, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said his country would face "substantial damage" from the tariffs but that "we couldn't expect to achieve any more". He argued that the deal's negative effects "will not only be limited to Germany and Europe, but we will see the effects of this trade policy in America as well". Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said he gave his support for the deal "without any enthusiasm". Industry groups in both countries made plain their disappointment, with Germany's main auto sector body saying the 15% levy "burdens" carmakers while its VCI chemical trade association said the rates were "too high". Hungary's Prime Minister Viktor Orban attacked the deal in blunt terms, saying: "Trump ate Ursula von der Leyen for breakfast." European stock markets dipped later on Monday, wiping out early gains and reflecting unease at terms viewed as lopsided. "It looks a bit like a capitulation," said Alberto Rizzi of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). "The EU accepted a fairly unbalanced deal," he added, saying it delivered a "political victory for Trump". EUROPE SECURITY STAKES Von der Leyen had faced intense pressure from EU states to strike a deal quickly with the bloc's biggest partner and protect a $1.9-trillion trading relationship. Defending Brussels' approach, Sefcovic warned that a no-deal scenario - meaning a 30% tariff and the prospect of further escalation - would have risked up to five million jobs in Europe. Throughout the months-long talks, Brussels prioritised stability and maintaining good relations with Washington over escalation. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, a Trump ally, said the deal had avoided "potentially devastating" consequences. Hanging over the negotiations was the risk to other areas of cooperation - such as the war in Ukraine - if the EU descended into a trade war with its closest security partner. "It's not only about the trade - it's about security, it's about Ukraine," Sefcovic told reporters Monday. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard of the Peterson Institute for International Economics acknowledged it was "clearly an imbalanced deal" if judged purely on trade terms. "But if you're trying to avoid worse national security outcomes, well then maybe the deal is not so bad," he said. CAUTIOUS APPROACH The EU had sought to ramp up the pressure in the final stretch of talks, fearing a bad deal and higher levies, with countries approving a $109-billion package of counter-tariffs at the last minute. And states led by France were pushing for a more robust response including the option to deploy the trade "bazooka" known as the anti-coercion instrument. But the threat of retaliation was consistently framed by Brussels as a last resort should talks fail, and experts suggested the hardening stance may have come too late to make a real difference. "If the EU had played hardball at the very beginning, it probably could have got a better deal," ECFR's Rizzi told AFP.
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump addresses Gaza's humanitarian crisis and warns of starvation
Israeli activists held a protest march in Tel Aviv last week denouncing the ongoing food shortage and forced displacement of Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The United Nations in June 2025 condemned what it claimed was Israel's "weaponisation of food" in Gaza and called it a war crime, as aid agencies urge action and warnings about malnutrition multiply. Image: AFP US President Donald Trump warned on Monday that the people of Gaza are facing "real starvation". Speaking in Scotland after meeting Britain's leader, Trump contradicted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had earlier dismissed fears of famine in Gaza as Hamas propaganda. Trump said the US and its partners would help set up food centres to feed the more than two million Palestinians in Gaza facing what UN aid agencies warn is a deadly wave of hunger and malnutrition. 'We're going to be getting some good strong food, we can save a lot of people. I mean, some of those kids -- that's real starvation stuff,' he told reporters at a news conference with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. 'We have to help on a humanitarian basis before we do anything. We have to get the kids fed,' Trump said. Trump's remarks came after Netanyahu, during a reception on Sunday for Trump's spiritual adviser Paula White-Cain in Jerusalem, declared: 'There is no starvation in Gaza, no policy of starvation in Gaza.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The US already backs food centres under the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), but the group's high-security operations have been criticised after repeated incidents in which Israeli troops have reportedly fired on civilians near its distribution points. Trump said the UK and European Union would back the new effort, and that the new food centres would be easier to access -- 'where the people can walk in, and no boundaries'. 'It's crazy what's going on over there,' he added. The war in Gaza has dragged on for almost 22 months, creating a dire humanitarian crisis only exacerbated by an Israeli blockade on supplies imposed from March to late May. The easing of the blockade coincided with the beginning of the GHF's operations, which effectively sidelined Gaza's traditionally UN-led aid distribution system and have been criticised as grossly inadequate. In recent days, the UN and humanitarian agencies have begun delivering more truckloads of food after the Israeli military declared a daily "tactical pause" in the fighting and opened secure aid routes amid mounting international outrage over hunger in the territory. Jamil Safadi said he had been getting up before dawn for two weeks to search for food, and yesterday was his first success. 'For the first time, I received about five kilos of flour, which I shared with my neighbour,' said the 37-year-old, who shelters with his wife, six children and a sick father in a tent in Tel al-Hawa. The Israeli defence ministry's civil affairs agency COGAT said the UN and aid organisations had been able to pick up 120 truckloads of aid on Sunday and distribute it inside Gaza, with more on the way yesterday. Jordan and the United Arab Emirates have begun airdropping aid packages into Gaza, while Egypt has sent trucks through its Rafah border crossing to an Israeli post just inside the territory. The UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, cautiously welcomed Israel's recent moves but warned Gaza needed at least 500 to 600 trucks of basic food, medicine and hygiene supplies daily. Netanyahu has denied Israel was deliberately starving civilians, but yesterday two local rights groups, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights, accused the country of 'genocide' - a first for Israeli NGOs. THE MERCURY
