Enthusiasm ‘sky high' as Sonoma-Marin rail service expands northward
After 67 years, a train rolled out of the city of Windsor on Saturday, with 80 souls aboard.
It was the Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District's latest expansion of a transit route that snakes from Larkspur in Marin County to Healdsburg and Cloverdale in Sonoma County.
The train system sits on refurbished tracks of the Northwestern Pacific Railroad, which last carried passengers in 1958. State lawmakers created the SMART district in 2002, but the rail service did not start carrying passengers along a 43-mile section of rail until 2017 — but that didn't include the route's three northernmost stations in Windsor, Healdsburg and Cloverdale.
In the years since, the district has been working to extend service north, SMART spokesperson Julia Gonzalez said.
'It's taken years to secure funding to complete this northern section,' Gonzalez said. 'That's what made today particularly meaningful — the opening of the first stations of the northern extension.'
While many transit systems around the U.S. have struggled to regain ridership that fell off during the COVID pandemic, Gonzalez said SMART rail use has grown significantly — and this month reached more than 1 million rides over the past fiscal year.
The SMART dIstrict's rail service involved refurbishing the old tracks once used by the Northwestern Pacific Railway's freight trains and replacing wood ties with concrete ones, which allowed trains to run up to 80 mph. SMART also had to rebuild and renovate former station buildings in Petaluma, Healdsburg and Windsor, replace a century-old bridge with a newer one, and obtain federal authorization to run trains on the moribund tracks.
Residents voted to fund the railway's construction in 2008. The district completed a 43-mile route between Northern Santa Rosa and downtown San Rafael in mid-2017 and extended service to Larkspur in late 2019.
District officials say they hope to open Healdsburg's station in 2028 and later extend service to Cloverdale, a small town near the Sonoma-Mendocino counties' border. The agency has no estimated timeline for a Cloverdale station to open.
On average, 3,500 to 4,000 riders per day travel SMART, said Gonzalez, adding that Windsor could see as many as 500 passengers a day. The agency has yet to meet its projected ridership of 5,100 daily riders, the Marin Independent Journal reported, with the pandemic setting back early progress.
On Saturday, the first train departed from Windsor at 7:12 a.m., Gonzalez said, with the last arriving at the station at 9:07 p.m.
Saturday's start of service to Windsor corresponded with the SMART district's opening of the multiuse pathway that runs adjacent to the railroad tracks, part of a 307-mile protected path for runners and cyclists that will ultimately connect San Francisco Bay and Humboldt Bay.
Gonzalez and other SMART officials are hoping that ridership will include visitors to Sonoma County's vineyards and wineries, as well as students traveling to school and commuters heading to jobs in Petaluma, Larkspur or as far as San Francisco by way of the rail service's connection to the ferry terminal in Larkspur.
Foot traffic into the Windsor Chamber of Commerce & Visitors Center was about three times higher than normal Saturday, said Denyce Carrillo, the center's visitor coordinator.
'Enthusiasm is just sky high,' she said.
Carrillo said she spent much of Saturday morning and early afternoon greeting visitors who'd arrived in town on the train, many asking about tasting rooms and restaurants.
'It's encouraging and delightful to see this much enthusiasm and excitement,' she said. 'Particularly because it's not just from locals but from visitors as far away as Larkspur and Marin.'
SMART plans a grand opening for the station and service extension on June 13.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
40 minutes ago
- CNBC
People are cooking at home at the highest levels since the start of the pandemic, according to Campbell's
Campbell's has seen customers prepare their own meals at the highest rate in about half a decade, offering the latest sign of everyday people tightening their wallets amid economic concerns. "Consumers are cooking at home at the highest levels since early 2020," Campbell's CEO Mick Beekhuizen said Monday, adding that consumption has increased among all income brackets in the meals and beverages category. Beekhuizen drew parallels between today and the time when Americans were facing the early stages of what would become a global pandemic. It was a period of broad economic uncertainty as the Covid virus affected every aspect of everyday life and caused massive shakeups in spending and employments trends. The trends seen by the Pepperidge Farm and V-8 maker comes as Wall Street and economists wonder what's next for the U.S. economy after President Donald Trump's tariff policy raised recession fears and battered consumer sentiment. More meals at home could mean people are eating out less, showing Americans tightening their belts. That can spell bad news for gross domestic product, two thirds of which relies on consumer spending. A recession is commonly defined as two straight quarters of the GDP shrinking. It can also underscore the souring outlook of everyday Americans on the national economy. The University of Michigan's consumer sentiment index last month fell to one of its lowest levels on record. Campbell's remarks came after the soup maker beat Wall Street expectations in its fiscal third quarter. The Goldfish and Rao's parent earned 73 cents per share, excluding one-time items, on $2.48 billion in revenue, while analysts polled by FactSet anticipated 65 cents and $2.43 billion, respectively. Shares added 0.8% before the bell on Monday. The stock has tumbled more than 18% in 2025.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Moderna's New COVID Vaccine Secures FDA-Clearance For Seniors, At-Risk Individuals
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Saturday approved Moderna, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MRNA) mNexspike (mRNA-1283), a new vaccine against COVID-19, for all adults 65 and older and individuals aged 12-64 years with at least one or more underlying risk factor as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 'The FDA approval of our third product, mNEXSPIKE...,' said Stéphane Bancel, Chief Executive Officer of Moderna. The FDA's approval of mNEXSPIKE is based on results from a randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled Phase 3 trial, which enrolled approximately 11,400 participants aged 12 years and primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate the non-inferior vaccine efficacy against COVID-19 starting 14 days after mNexspike compared to that after the comparator vaccine, mRNA-1273 (Spikevax), Moderna's original COVID-19 vaccine. Participants received either a 10 μg dose of mRNA-1283 or a 50 μg dose of mRNA-1273. mRNA-1283 showed a 9.3% higher relative vaccine efficacy (rVE) compared to mRNA-1273 in individuals aged 12 years and older, and in a descriptive sub-group analysis, a 13.5% higher rVE in adults aged 65 and older. In the Phase 3 trial, mRNA-1283 was found to have a similar safety profile to mRNA-1273, with fewer local reactions and comparable systemic reactions. The most commonly solicited side effects were injection site pain, fatigue, headache and myalgia. Moderna expects to have mNexspike available for eligible populations in the U.S. for the 2025-2026 respiratory virus season, alongside Spikevax and mRESVIA, the company's approved respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine. William Blair writes, 'Approval of mRNA-1283 is an incremental win for Moderna, especially considering HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s negative public opinion on mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, and we continue to see autonomy and data-driven decisions at the FDA.' 'We do not see approval of mRNA-1283 as a massive boost to Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine sales, which we believe are primarily driven by sentiment surrounding the vaccination market in general, but this is a critical step in the regulatory path for the combo flu/COVID vaccine product, mRNA-1083, which uses mRNA-1283 as the COVID-19 component of its formulation,' analyst Myles Minter writes. Analyst Minter says Moderna is still facing challenges from new government policies, including losing about $700 million in funding from the Department of Health and Human Services for its bird flu vaccine project. In addition, William Blair writes that the company's goal to break even by 2028 is overly optimistic since it would need to more than double its revenue—based on cash costs—to reach that target. In May, the FDA approved Novavax, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:NVAX) Nuvaxovid for active immunization to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in adults 65 years and older and individuals 12 through 64 years who have at least one underlying condition that puts them at high risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19 (e.g. asthma, cancer, diabetes, obesity, smoking). Achievement of the U.S. license approval has triggered a $175 million milestone payment from Sanofi SA (NASDAQ:SNY). Price Action: MRNA stock is up 4.82% at $27.84 during the premarket session at the last check on Monday. Read Next:Photo by Wolfilser via Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? MODERNA (MRNA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Moderna's New COVID Vaccine Secures FDA-Clearance For Seniors, At-Risk Individuals originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
How product companies can smartly navigate tariffs, supply chain pressure
The next wave of physical product innovation needs to go beyond new features and aesthetics. Technical products are large investments and must be designed for resilience in an unpredictable global trade environment. With the current political administration's sweeping global tariffs, officially announced on April 2, many manufacturers are revisiting design decisions made years ago. Factors like sourcing and factory location, previously largely unseen, can now determine which products will remain profitable, which will become liabilities, and which must be redesigned to maintain viability. The prior USMCA/CUSMA free trade agreements remain in place for North American product companies, meaning low or no tariffs on compliant products. However, products beyond the scope of the CUSMA will face tariffs of 25%, which includes hundreds of product types. Companies are already adjusting. According to the World Economic Forum, 40% of businesses are increasing US sourcing, and a third are cutting costs to offset tariffs. Based on recent sales calls, we see tariff concerns firsthand, and leads frequently ask how to mitigate tariff impacts. My company has guided hundreds of manufacturers through new product development challenges, and we are seeing a fundamental shift in how smart companies approach product design. If you or your clients are making products that cross the US border, it's time to get strategic. By following the principles and road map outlined below, you can make design resilience a competitive advantage. THE VULNERABILITY OF INFLEXIBLE DESIGN When trade policies shift, the greatest vulnerability isn't in your supply chain; it's in your product design. Who has design control? And what are your options when it comes to sourcing component parts? These questions are critical. A medical device manufacturer with high sales numbers in North America recently discovered this when 45% tariffs on Chinese electronics transformed their profitable monitoring system into a loss leader overnight. The culprit wasn't just sourcing strategy but design decisions that locked them into specific components from newly expensive locations. Due to the unprecedented nature of current US tariffs, manufacturers face design constraints they never anticipated. Products developed without consideration for manufacturing flexibility have little room to maneuver when tariffs suddenly alter the economics. That makes you and your profit margins vulnerable. Companies that can quickly adapt their designs for alternative sourcing will have a significant competitive advantage. Not only can companies protect their bottom line through flexibility, but tariff resilience is also becoming a procurement criterion. Major retailers and business-to-business (B2B) customers now evaluate suppliers on design flexibility and adaptability to changing trade conditions. From COVID-era supply chain disruptions to the US tariffs in 2025, product manufacturers have learned they can't take anything for granted. That's why forward-thinking companies are implementing new design requirements that build in resilience from the start: Keep your (sourcing) options open: Some electronics manufacturers now classify components based on availability across different tariff zones, with critical components requiring multiple sourcing options from different regions. I have spoken to several electronics manufacturers and component suppliers deploying this strategy, mainly in an ad hoc method, as tariff uncertainty continues. Choose materials wisely: Even subtle material choices on product components can dramatically affect tariff treatment. Certain plastics qualify for preferential treatment under trade agreements while nearly identical alternatives don't—a difference that can represent broad tariff swing percentages. Take care that your materials choices do not affect the entire tariff assessment for your product. Go modular—with care: Many products are increasingly made up of several modules, enabling companies to quickly shift production location of specific sub-assemblies if tariff conditions change. Care must be taken with margin-sensitive products, however, as I've found that modularity always increases product cost. In my experience, modular products require higher up-front investments in tooling and manufacturing setup. These can be offset if production volumes remain high, but when margins are tight, it increases risk for new products early on—so a shift to modularity to mitigate tariff and supply chain uncertainty will likely not pay off in the short term. Beyond principles, companies need practical tools for trade-resilient design. Three key approaches leading companies use: Simulators: Forward-thinking development teams can create simulations showing how trade disruptions might impact product designs. • Create two versions of your bill of materials (BOM) with different build locations, part costs and part suppliers. • Add additional info to track in-transit supply costs and calculate how tariff changes and factory location may affect total product cost in either scenario. Metrics: Traditional design metrics focus on acceptable product performance at the lowest cost. But the best companies now track additional metrics: • Geopolitical exposure index: What percentage of supply components come from politically sensitive regions? • Redeployment time and cost: How quickly can you shift production to a different region? Moving a physical product design involves setting up new suppliers, ensuring their quality, and transferring design files and custom tooling. Moving locations becomes cumbersome and expensive if your manufacturer controls design and the manufacturing process changes. Unless your yearly production volume is very high, this cost can far exceed simply paying a tariff. Cross-functional integration: Studies suggest companies with highly integrated design and supply chain teams experience fewer disruptions during volatile periods (like a trade war). Breaking down walls between design and supply teams to strategize on trade compliance is an essential tactic. DESIGN A RESILIENCE ROAD MAP For companies looking to enhance their design resilience, I recommend a phased approach: Assess: Evaluate your current products for tariff sensitivity and design inflexibility. Identify components and assemblies that could prevent manufacturing relocation. Prioritize: Focus initially on high-volume and high-impact products with significant tariff exposure before expanding to other product lines. Build cross-functional teams: Ensure design, supply chain, and trade compliance teams collaborate from the earliest concept stages, and ensure the product owner maintains design control of all product builds, engineering changes, and unique manufacturing processes. Measure: Create specific measurements for design flexibility and resilience, and incorporate them into product development gates. FROM DOWNSTREAM TO PRIMARY CONCERNS Integrating tariff and supply chain changes into product design represents a fundamental shift in development strategy. What was once considered a hidden downstream concern is now a critical design parameter that must be addressed from the earliest stages of conception. This new climate presents challenges, but it can also be a golden opportunity. Those who quickly adapt their design processes will gain significant cost stability, market responsiveness, and long-term competitiveness advantages. The new competitive edge is not just having the best product. It's designing the one that is most resilient to supply.
