Massena Central School Board discusses facility naming
School board President Paul A. Haggett had questioned the requirements, saying he felt they were too extensive — a minimum of 1,000 signatures and a minimum of 100 letters of support.
"I think we passed it in 2019. I never liked the thresholds that were set. I've always felt that was just too high of a bar, and I would like to request the Policy Committee take another look at that and see if that couldn't be modified," Haggett said in December.
The committee opted to maintain the policy as written, according to board member Zachary J. Monroe.
Monroe said they discussed the number of signatures versus voting population figures before making their decision.
"We had some discussion about how 1,000 signatures represents roughly 1/7th of community voter input currently. So, the recommendation was to keep that policy as written," he said.
Board member Robert M. LeBlanc asked if the policy was on agenda as an action item for approval.
"No, it was just a question," Haggett said. "I requested that the Policy Committee go back and look at that because it's my belief that the number of letters and the number of signatures is too high, and I just made the request. I very much appreciate that you took the time in the meeting to have more discussion on that. I do appreciate that.
According to the policy, there may be "rare circumstances where the honoree's contributions to the District have been at a level of significance that warrants greater recognition" through the naming of a facility or a portion of it.
"Such action will require considerable community support and documented achievement of the honoree to merit this highest level of acknowledgement," the policy reads.
The requirements for consideration include completion of a Recognition Nomination Form, and a petition with a minimum of 1,000 signatures supporting the plan,and a minimum of 100 letters of support that must be original rather than form letters. There is also a 45-day comment period for the presentation of oral and written correspondence.
"The Board of Education will consider the input received from the community and the record of the individual's contributions before making a final decision. Such decision will be made following the 45 day comment period at a meeting of the Board of Education," the policy reads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
McCollam gets most votes among Republican officers to Spokane County prosecutor's office
Aug. 16—The search for Spokane County's top prosecutor is entering the final stretch. More than 120 Republican precinct committee officers gathered in Mead Saturday morning to deliberate and nominate three candidates to lead the Spokane County Prosecutor's Office following Larry Haskell's resignation in July, leaving 1 1/2 left in his term. Nearly 80% of the officers voted for the current Spokane County Acting Prosecutor Preston McCollam in the first round of voting. The party also agreed to back Assistant Washington Attorney General Steve Garvin and attorney Marshall Casey for consideration. Spokane County commissioners will chose among the three to fill the remaining part of Haskell's term. Next year, voters will fill the position. When someone vacates an elected partisan position like county prosecutor, state law dictates that the outgoing official's party names up to three replacements for the county's top legislative body to choose from. If the county commission is unable to make a selection, the decision goes to the governor. Spokane County Republican Party Chairman Rob Linebarger stressed the importance of the constitutional responsibility put before the assembly at the start of the meeting. "We have an 'Article Two, Section 15' duty to nominate three people, three qualified people, to fill the vacancy of the county prosecutor," Linebarger said, referring to the state Constitution. "And the legislative body in the county, which is the county commissioners, also have that same duty to appoint." An hour and 50 minutes after those remarks, the Spokane County GOP voted to end the meeting, list of candidates in hand. Only three candidates were nominated , meaning the list of attorneys the Spokane County Commission will consider was rounded out relatively quickly. Of more interest Saturday morning in the Mead Union Event Center was who among the trio Republican leaders favored most. Garvin and McCollam have hit the campaign trail hard already, securing donations and endorsements, even though voters won't decide between them till the August 2026 primary election at the earliest. McCollam, head of the criminal side of the prosecutor's office since 2023, has raised more than $25,000 for his campaign, according to the Washington Public Disclosure Commission. In an interview last week, Garvin said his campaign total is over $30,000, around $22,000 of which has been reported. Garvin spent nearly 20 years in the prosecutor's office before joining the state's legal team in 2022. Republican precinct leaders voted in a blind-ballot vote on pink slips of paper, the first of three rounds of voting to decide who would fill each slot following speeches from the candidates and the precinct committee officers who nominated them. Nearly 80%, 97 of the 124 counted ballots, carried McCollam's name. In his remarks, McCollam touted his 12 years as a prosecutor in Benton and Spokane counties, the support he's received from regional law enforcement and his two years leading the office's 102 member team taking on criminal prosecution. His time at the helm has included successfully advocating to the county commissioners to bring salaries for prosecutors and public defenders more in line with other Washington counties, to grow the victim and witness advocates team and to introduce a facility dog to assist those advocates in particularly delicate cases. He said his office is growing, working hard and consistently punching above their weight, filing over 3,900 felony cases last year. He said Snohomish County, larger than Spokane County by more than 300,000 residents, filed around 1,500. Pierce County, population 940,000, filed 3,400. "And they have twice the lawyers that I have," McCollam said. If appointed, McCollam said he would be a wise steward of taxpayer dollars, work to bring a new jail and treatment facility to address overcrowding in the jail and partner with regional legislators to make drug possession charges felonies again — which would allow his office to prosecute them in Superior Court rather than most cases landing in Municipal Court where the city of Spokane's prosecutors practice. "As your county prosecutor, I serve the entire community, and I submit to you that I have been fighting for you in this role," McCollam said. "I'm excited about where we're going to take this office." Sheriff John Nowels nominated McCollam in his capacity as a precinct committee officer, saying he has the integrity, character and proven track record to lead the office. Nowels already endorsed McCollam for the 2026 ballot, alongside former Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich, former Spokane police Chief Craig Meidl, and all four unions representing Spokane County deputies, Spokane Police Department officers — and the upper command units for both agencies. "It is no mistake that every law enforcement association in Spokane County has endorsed Preston McCollam to be our prosecuting attorney," Nowels said. "They know he has the leadership necessary, and he knows how to keep our law enforcement and our community safe." The assembly elected to hold a standing vote for the second and third nominees. Casey, a former Court of Appeals judicial candidate currently with Sweetser Law Office, conceded to third in his remarks, and used most of his allotted 10 minute speaking time reflecting on the opportunity the precinct committee officers had before them. He acknowledged he was in the running solely to fill the third spot. Garvin, 55, said he sees an urgent need for change in Spokane, and by extension the prosecutor's office. As examples, he said he's heard from crime victims that feel shut out of their litigation, and pointed to the over 300 people in Spokane County who died of drug overdoses in 2024 and the downtown office vacancy rate of nearly 30%. "If we do not change the direction we are headed, guess what?" Garvin said. "We'll get where we're going." He said the office has a long standing "bad habit" of not filing cases in a timely fashion, and he's worked before to tackle back logs efficiently as a former leader in the office on property crime and juvenile cases. Before joining the prosecutor's office in 2003, he spent six years as a deputy district attorney for San Diego County, California. He's been with the state Attorney General's Office since 2022. Garvin also laid out an ambitious plan to sue the city of Spokane on his first day as prosecutor to address what he described as "lawlessness," "we see in the streets." "It's the same playbook that was run to shut down Camp Hope," Garvin said. "We do not have to be victims of the poor management of the city, and by bringing real time justice and swift and certain justice, we will address these urgent problems in our community." The city of Spokane, under former Mayor Nadine Woodward, entered into litigation against the state of Washington in 2023 over the large homeless encampment on parcels owned by the Washington Department of Transportation in the East Central neighborhood known as Camp Hope. The suit eventually led to a judge-ordered clean up plan agreed upon by both parties. It's not clear whether Garvin in his capacity as county prosecutor would be able to enter into litigation on behalf of the county on his own accord. It would likely take a vote from the Spokane County Commissioners, who hold final say over most all county business. Following the meeting, Linebarger said he was pleased with the selections, and the engagement from party members in what is an important part of democracy, and an important issue for Spokane County residents. "Safety and crime, that is what people are passionate about," he said. Republican party leaders got underway with the search last month, with a 10-member vetting committee meeting with Garvin and McCollam ahead of the vote. The process was fair, thorough and impartial, he said. It all went relatively smoothly, aside from the bevvy of early endorsements before the assembly made their nominees, including from Commissioners Mary Kuney and Al French, who have lent their backing to McCollam. While he acknowledges their right to endorse as citizens, Linebarger said members of the public share a base level distrust in government that spans all political persuasions. He said the early endorsements adds an air of impropriety, of bias, that fuels that sentiment; to endorse ahead of the party's selection meant McCollam all but secured two of the three votes necessary to appoint him. "I wish they hadn't done that," Linebarger said. Saturday marked the second time this year the Spokane County GOP has gone through the process. Congressman Michael Baumgartner left his post as county treasurer in January shortly before his swearing in as a member of Congress, which spurred a search and January meeting in which the party whittled eight candidates to three. State Rep. Mike Volz, who's served as second-in-command in the treasurer's office since 2011, eventually got the nod from the county commission to lead the office in the interim. Solve the daily Crossword
Chicago Tribune
15 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 receiving additional revenue from state's evidence-based funding program
As Gwen Polk prepares the budget she will present to the Waukegan Community Unit School District 60 Board of Education in September, she has learned that she has approximately $6.2 million in additional revenue courtesy of the State of Illinois' evidence-based funding program. Though every school district receives some of the $9.25 billion appropriated by the Illinois General Assembly, Tier 1 districts like Waukegan and North Chicago School District 187 face a harder time adequately funding education, including a smaller property tax base, and receive the most. When the Illinois General Assembly approved the final $350 million in May — $43 million was held for distribution at a later time — Lake County's 13 Tier 1 districts and the Regional Office of Education were awarded 87.5% of the county's total, with District 60 getting 38% — $6.2 million. Polk, District 60's associate superintendent for business and financial services, said the proposed budget currently sits at slightly less than $327 million. With COVID-19 federal relief funds no longer available, the additional money from the state is a big help. 'We're all affected by the fiscal cliff,' Polk said, referring to the federal money schools received nationwide. 'The increase (from the state) is going to help.' Lake County's 47 school districts and the Regional Office of Education collectively received just under $16.3 million in additional evidence-based funding earlier this month from the state, bringing its total to more than $562 million to augment their budgets. For the Waukegan public schools, Polk said evidence-based funding provides for more than half of its total revenue, which also includes property tax income. The approximate district-wide enrollment for the 2025-2026 school year is 14,000. By contrast, Barrington Community Unit School District 220, a Tier 4 district — they receive the smallest amount of evidence-based funding — with approximately 8,100 students, received just over $6.5 million. State Sen. Adriane Johnson, D-Buffalo Grove, said evidence-based funding became law in Illinois in 2017 to help all schools get to a level of funding to adequately educate youngsters. 'Education is the great equalizer,' Johnson said, 'If students' schools are adequately funded they they get the support and resources they need. This helps students in low-income areas get those resources.' Originally proposing $550 million for the final round of evidence-based funding, Johnson said that with a tight state budget, $350 million was the most she and her colleagues could get passed. In Waukegan, like most school districts, the bulk of the budget goes toward salaries and benefits for teachers, staff, and administrators. The current evidence-based funding is 4.1% more than a year ago, but not close to full adequacy. With the largest share of evidence-based funding in Lake County, District 60's adequacy level is 72%, well below the ideal amount. Barrington's adequacy level is 119%. Some of the highest adequacy levels are found where the property values are also high. Leading Lake County in adequacy is Rondout School District 72 at 255% which includes parts of Lake Forest, Lake Bluff, Green Oaks, and Mettawa. Bannockburn School District 106 is at 202% while Lake Forest High School District 115 is at 193% and Township High School District 113 serving Deerfield and Highland Park High Schools is at 190%. District 187 Principal John Price said the adequacy level in North Chicago dropped from 78% to 71%. A year ago, there was a large influx of migrant children that is not the case this year. The district is receiving $1.67 million, the second-highest amount in Lake County. Price said District 187's budget is approximately $80 million, and its evidence-based funding totals just under $40.1 million.
Fox News
4 days ago
- Fox News
Illinois changes benchmarks that proved proficiency in math, English on standardized tests
Print Close By Joshua Nelson Published August 13, 2025 Illinois education officials on Wednesday approved changes to their cut scores — the benchmarks used to determine proficiency — used for state standardized tests. "Prior performance levels mislabeled many students in elementary and high school, often indicating that students were less academically successful and prepared for college than they actually were. The new, unified levels correct long-standing misalignment between Illinois' state assessments and other real college and career readiness expectations," the Illinois State Board of Education announced on Wednesday. The Board maintained that its learning standards and assessments have not changed. The new policy changes the score that proves proficiency in core subjects on each state assessment in order to "align it to college and career readiness expectations." During the school board meeting, Illinois State Superintendent Tony Sanders said the move is not a lowering of standards, but rather an adjustment that appropriately fits with the reality of student outcome patterns. ILLINOIS PARENTS WARY OF SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH SCREENING LAW, POTENTIAL FOR 'OVERREACH' The decision stems from the Board's 18-month-long process of consulting with over 100 educators and other local higher education stakeholders to establish new proficiency benchmarks. The Board said that such benchmarks are based on analysis of "college and university course placement data and student probabilities of passing college coursework" and success data from Illinois colleges and universities. The Illinois Assessment of Readiness decreased its cut scores, while increasing the cut scores for the Illinois Science Assessment. According to ChalkBeat, data shared in a presentation on Tuesday indicates that more students will be labeled as "proficient" than in the previous year. "Under the new cut scores, 53% of students would be considered proficient in English language arts, up from 41% last year; 38% would be proficient in math, up from 28% last year; and 45% would be in science, down from last year," ChalkBeat reported. SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL DISTRICT DITCHES PROPOSED 'GRADING FOR EQUITY' STRATEGY AFTER BACKLASH FROM COMMUNITY "Illinois' students are nationally recognized for their academic achievements, but our proficiency rates have not reflected that reality," Sanders said in a statement released by the board. Sanders added that the state's proficiency benchmarks mislabeled students, inhibiting qualified students from accessing opportunities for accelerations and giving students the impression that they were not ready for college when they actually were. "Illinois' new performance levels bring much-needed alignment between grade levels, subjects, and actual college and career readiness expectations," Sanders said. Representative Mary Beth Canty, D-Arlington Heights, claimed that the new benchmarks will benefit rural students, low-income students and students of color. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "These common-sense adjustments will align state testing benchmarks with college expectations and will particularly benefit rural students, low-income students, and students of color whose true capabilities and academic successes have not been reflected in our state's proficiency rates or in their own test results," Canty said. "I believe better data leads to better outcomes for all students. The Accelerated Placement Act can only achieve its goal of expanding access to advanced coursework and college preparation for all qualified students if we are using accurate measures of student achievement." Print Close URL
