Ukraine hopes leaving landmine treaty will level the battlefield
Ukraine has taken the first legal step towards withdrawing from the international treaty banning landmines, arguing that the restrictions create an 'unequal' situation on the battlefield as Russia makes extensive use of them.
President Zelensky signed a decree on Sunday instructing his government to begin withdrawing Ukraine from the 1997 Ottawa convention, also known as the Mine Ban Treaty.
The foreign ministry said that Russian use of anti-personnel mines since 2014, which increased after the full-scale invasion of 2022, has created an unequal situation that limits Ukraine's right to self-defence.
In his nightly video address, Zelensky accused Moscow of 'using anti-personnel mines with utmost cynicism' in Ukrainian territory and of seeking to 'destroy life by all means at their disposal'. He also described anti-personnel mines as 'often the instrument for which nothing can be substituted for defence purposes'.
The decision must be confirmed by parliament before Ukraine can formally withdraw from the treaty.
Poland made the same decision a week ago in response to security fears over the threat from Russia. Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz, the defence minister, said at the time that Warsaw intended to leave the treaty because of 'security conditions on the eastern flank'.
Other countries bordering Russia, including Finland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, have either withdrawn, suspended certain treaty obligations or publicly signalled that they may do so. Russia is not a signatory to the treaty.
On Friday Lithuania said it had notified the United Nations of its withdrawal, and it will cease to be bound by the treaty six months after the notification. Kestutis Budrys, it foreign minister, said on X: 'This decision was not taken lightly.'
The potential withdrawals are a blow to the Ottawa convention, which has 164 signatory states at present and is widely credited with reducing the civilian casualties from landmines globally.
Anti-personnel landmines are small explosive devices, often made of plastic, designed to detonate under a person's weight or with a tripwire. They are attractive to militaries because they can block an enemy advance, channel forces into kill zones and protect defensive positions. They are a serious threat to civilians, often remaining lethal for decades after a conflict has ended.
Two months before he left office in the US, President Biden approved the delivery of anti-personnel mines to Ukraine to help stall Russian gains in the east of the country.
According to a 2023 report by Human Rights Watch, Russian forces have laid landmines in at least 11 of Ukraine's 27 regions since the start of the war in 2014, making Ukraine one of the most heavily mined countries in the world.
A report by the United Nations concluded that landmines had killed 413 civilians and injured another 966 between the invasion of February 2022 and December 2024. The Ukrainian defence ministry says that sapper squads have cleared almost 450,000 mines from de-occupied areas in the past three years.
Human Rights Watch has condemned the use of anti-personnel landmines, warning that they pose long-term dangers to civilians and hamper postwar recovery efforts.
Ukraine ratified the Ottawa convention in 2005 and destroyed millions of Soviet-era stockpiled mines as part of its disarmament obligations.
Roman Kostenko, chairman of the Ukrainian national security, defence and intelligence committee and a decorated special forces colonel said on Facebook that Kyiv 'cannot remain tied down in conditions where the enemy has no restrictions'. He added: 'This is a step that the reality of war has long demanded. Russia is not a party to this convention and is massively using mines against our military and civilians.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Oil edges down on expectations of more OPEC+ supply, tariff fears
July 1 (Reuters) - Oil prices edged down on Tuesday, weighed by expectations of an OPEC+ output hike in August and concerns of an economic slowdown driven by prospects of higher U.S. tariffs. Brent crude futures for September delivery fell 16 cents, or 0.24%, to $66.58 a barrel by 0000 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude declined 20 cents, or 0.31%, to $64.91 a barrel. "The market is now concerned that the OPEC+ alliance will continue with its accelerated rate of output increases," ANZ senior commodity strategist Daniel Hynes said in a note. Four OPEC+ sources told Reuters last week that the group plans to raise output by 411,000 barrels per day in August, following similar hikes in May, June, and July. If approved, this would bring OPEC+'s total supply increase for the year to 1.78 million bpd, equivalent to more than 1.5% of global oil demand. OPEC and its allies including Russia, together known as OPEC+, will meet on July 6. Uncertainty about U.S. tariffs and their impact on global growth also kept a lid on oil prices. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that countries could be notified of sharply higher tariffs, opens new tab despite good-faith negotiations as a July 9 deadline approaches, when tariff rates are scheduled to revert from a temporary 10% level to President Donald Trump's suspended rates of 11% to 50% announced on April 2. Morgan Stanley expects Brent futures to retrace to around $60 by early next year, with the market being well supplied and geopolitical risk abating following the Israel-Iran de-escalation. It expects an oversupply of 1.3 million bpd in 2026. A 12-day war that started with Israel targeting Iran's nuclear facilities on June 13 pushed up Brent prices. They surged above $80 a barrel after the U.S. bombed Iran's nuclear facilities and then slumped to $67 after Trump announced an Iran-Israel ceasefire.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ukraine war briefing: Russia claims to have seized all of Luhansk region and first village in Dnipropetrovsk
Moscow's forces have seized all of Luhansk – one of four regions Russia illegally annexed from Ukraine in September 2022 despite not fully controlling a single one – Leonid Pasechnik, a Russia-appointed official there, said on Monday. If confirmed, that would make Luhansk the first Ukrainian region to be fully occupied by Russia after more than three years of war. There was no immediate comment from Kyiv on Pasechnik's claim. In remarks to Russia's state TV Channel One that aired Monday evening, Pasechnik said he had received a report 'literally two days ago' saying that '100%' of the region was now under the control of Russian forces. Russian forces have captured a village in the Ukrainian region of Dnipropetrovsk for the first time in their three-year offensive, Russian state media and pro-war bloggers have claimed. Dnipropetrovsk, which lies to the west of the Donetsk region, is not among the five Ukrainian regions over which Russia has asserted a formal territorial claim. There was no immediate confirmation from Ukrainian officials or from the Russian defence ministry. North Korea's state media showed on Monday leader Kim Jong-un draping coffins with the national flag in what appeared to be the repatriation of soldiers killed fighting for Russia against Ukraine, as the countries marked a landmark military treaty. In a series of photographs displayed in the backdrop of a gala performance by North Korean and visiting Russian artists in Pyongyang, Kim is seen by rows of a half a dozen coffins, covering them with flags and pausing briefly with both hands resting on them. The European Union said Monday it had agreed a new long-term trade deal with Ukraine, covering imports of food products from the war-torn country that have angered EU farmers. Brussels and Kyiv have been wrangling over the deal after protests from farmers saw the EU slap quotas on tariff-free Ukrainian agricultural imports into the bloc. Brussels added certain restrictions in 2024, when it extended the agreement for one additional year, by introducing a maximum ceiling on certain tariff-free products such as cereals, poultry, eggs, sugar and corn. The European Commission said that under the new deal – which still needs to be finalised – quotas would remain for those sensitive agricultural areas. In return, Kyiv will cut its quotas for pork, poultry and sugar imported from the EU and push to align its food production standards with those of the 27-nation bloc by 2028, Brussels said. The International Monetary Fund said on Monday it has completed its eighth review of Ukraine's $15.5bn four-year support program, paving the way for a disbursement of an additional $500m to the war-torn country. That will bring total disbursements to $10.6bn, the IMF said in a statement, after its board's approval of the review of Ukraine's Extended Fund Facility. It warned of ongoing and 'exceptionally high' risks to the country's outlook. Russian President Vladimir Putin 'wants to subjugate the whole of Ukraine and at the same time spread fear throughout Europe,' German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said on a visit to Kyiv on Monday, adding that Putin's 'alleged willingness to negotiate is just a facade.' Kyiv and its allies have accused Russia of sabotaging diplomatic efforts, which have stalled in recent weeks, despite Washington's desires to reach a quick peace deal. US President Donald Trump's senior envoy for Ukraine and Russia Keith Kellog also said on Monday that Russia cannot continue to stall for time 'while it bombs civilian targets in Ukraine.' 'We urge an immediate ceasefire and a move to trilateral talks to end the war,' Kellogg wrote on X.
Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Europe's tax climbdown for US firms sets a dangerous precedent
There's been a clear delineation in transatlantic power dynamics on display in the past week and the result is two-nil to President Trump versus Europe. It began at last week's Nato summit, where European leaders fell over themselves to sign up to a wildly ambitious 5 per cent of GDP defence spending target to appease the president. The now infamous 'daddy' quip from Mark Rutte, secretary general of Nato, was probably lost in translation but ended up as a neat summation of the continent's firmly supplicant role vis-a-vis the US. Ever since US vice-president JD Vance lambasted Europe's political class at the Munich Security Conference in February, the Continent's leaders have wondered how far they can rally together to stand up to US intimidation. • Call him Daddy … How flattery and fanfare warmed Trump to Nato Europe, it is said, has the economic heft to lead the free-trading world, signing pacts with like-minded countries, and upholding the norms of co-operation and openness as the US sets fire to them. The subsequent humiliation of Ukraine's President Zelensky by Vance two weeks after Munich, followed by Trump's tariff onslaught in April, was even more ballast to the cause of European 'strategic autonomy' in foreign and economic policy. But this initial bullishness about Europe's ability to fight back meaningfully against Trump has vanished. The US, it seems, has most of the cards in the tariff war and the Europeans don't have the stomach for the fight. The Nato 'deal' is just one example of the asymmetries cemented by the most recent skirmishes with Trump. European governments have signed up to massive defence spending targets this decade with no clear route to how they will be achieved. It all has echoes of the hollow promises to buy up American natural gas and soybean imports by the European Commission when Trump threatened tariffs in his first administration. European and G7 leaders have also firmly stood behind the US over its bombing of Iran — a far cry from the transatlantic schism over the Iraq war. Foreign and security policy was always the weakest point of departure for European sovereignty claims. But on economic policy and trade, there has been hope that the bloc will fight for its economic interests and could land meaningful blows against the US, its largest trading partner. This is why the far more significant concession was not at Nato, but one inked over the weekend by the G7, where the EU and the UK agreed to exempt American firms from a global minimum corporate tax of 15 per cent. This is in return for the US abandoning 'revenge taxes' on investors and companies from countries that the president deems to have discriminatory tax regimes targeting US firms. The revenge tax, known as section 899, was part of Trump's 'big beautiful budget' bill that is due to be voted on by US lawmakers this week. • G7 strikes deal with Trump to escape 'revenge' taxes The tax climbdown won't get as much attention as other fronts in Trump's economic warfare but the administration has landed a major blow against Europe's prized regulatory machinery and the world's attempts to stop multinational companies shifting profits around the globe. The 15 per cent minimum rate was agreed by more than 120 countries at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development in 2021. It was the result of a decade of negotiations about how countries should crackdown on corporate profit shifting to tax havens in the years after the financial crisis, when governments bailed out banks and assumed huge debt burdens in the process. Calls for tax justice were redoubled during the pandemic and there was broad agreement that multinationals had to stop gaming the global tax system. It was the US under Joe Biden that forced the Europeans and others to push for two reforms: a 'pillar one' tax would apply to the biggest tech platforms who would be taxed based on where they had customers, and 'pillar two', which would impose a minimum levy of 15 per cent on the largest multinationals with revenues above €750 million. The UK introduced the minimum last year and the EU's 15 per cent was due to kick in from next year, but the US never ratified the agreement after the Democrats lost their majority in the House of Representatives in 2022. This led Trump to claim that the 15 per cent would unfairly target American firms as the US was no longer party to the agreement. The G7 swallowed the argument and in exempting American firms, have hollowed out the only breakthrough in global corporate tax avoidance made this century. The manner in which it was done is equally lamentable. Fiscally constrained governments who had once called for the end of tax havens and demanded big firms pay their fair share, capitulated with ease in the face of a threatened revenge levy which may never have happened. As I've written before, the section 899 clause would have been an act of self-harm from the US and its status as the issuer of the world's reserve currency. In destroying the global minimum tax deal, Trump has given free rein for US tech firms to exploit low tax jurisdictions like Ireland, who he claims are the ones 'ripping off' Americans. Apple and others are far less likely to re-domicile back to America if their cushy tax arrangements get to live another day. The concession is a dangerous precedent for Europe. As Americans will remind their counterparts, what is sovereignty if it is not the ability to decide your own tax affairs? After the OECD scalp, the White House will also demand US tech companies are exempted from Brussels' sweeping digital regulations designed precisely to capture them. Even without a formal deal, a de facto under-enforcement of the EU and UK's digital services laws is on the cards. • Trump threatens retaliation against UK over tax on tech giants Contrast this with how US-China negotiations have evolved. Beijing has emerged with a clear negotiating advantage over Trump, agreeing to keep its precious raw material export licences under a tight leash in return for a tariff rates dropping from 145 per cent to about 50 per cent. Brussels, London, Ottawa and the rest of the G7 have none of the same leverage over Trump.
