logo
Government will ban YouTube for under 16 year olds

Government will ban YouTube for under 16 year olds

SBS Australia2 days ago
Three parents of teenagers lost to the harms of social media have taken their stories of loss, right to the office of the Prime Minister. Among the group was Mia Bannister, who lost her son Ollie last year, when he was 14. 'This restriction, while specific to account creation is a good starting point. We won't stop pushing for real, meaningful reform. Together we made change happen, and together we will keep going. Thank you.' The Federal Government this week banned children under 16 from creating a YouTube account. That's after the platform was initially spared from a broader social media ban. Communications Minister Anika Wells says she made the decision after receiving advice from e-Safety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant. 'The evidence cannot be ignored that four out of ten Australian kids report that their most recent harm was on YouTube. As parents we are really trying our best when it comes to the internet, but it is like trying to teach your kids how to swim in the open ocean with the rips and the sharks compared to at the local council pool. We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks.' She says under-16s can still access YouTube Kids. 'There is a place for social media. There is no place for predatory algorithms, and that's what we're cracking down on. There is no cure, but this is a treatment plan, and this is too important for us not to have a good crack at it.' While these parents hailed the move, others see it differently, like Leo Puglisi, who started 6 News while he was in primary school. 'Broadly it does restrict the access of teenagers from getting news and information. And that's not just from 6 news, that's from other outlets who post their information online. They're getting that from traditional outlets often from one way or another. They might not be watching TV, they might not be listening to the radio, but they're seeing it online. This ban just cuts that off or at least it seems to be attempting to do that.' Youtuber Grace Mulgrew says the ban could impact the number of viewers she'll reach. 'Potentially my videos won't get recommended as much, because people who are using their parents' account, I'm sure they're going to be getting content that their parents are watching as well. So maybe it could impact the way that our videos are recommended, especially if you're an up-and-coming Youtuber too, it's going to be really hard to try and establish an audience if you're trying to target a younger audience.' The ban also facing criticism inside Parliament House, including from Deputy Opposition Leader, Ted O'Brien. 'There's no doubt that the safety of children has to come first. What's curious is the government did not make it clear to the Australian people its intent before the election. Now its changed its mind.' The Greens Communications spokeswoman is Sarah Hanson-Young.
'It's delulu to think that Google will just do the right thing. They need to be forced to do it, and that means a legislated enforceable duty of care and to be licenced.'
YouTube's parent company Google was this week scheduled to host a major event in Parliament's Great Hall, but it was postponed out of respect to the grieving parents. Earlier this week, Google had threatened legal action against the government. A spokesperson for YouTube says the site is a video-sharing platform, not social media, and will consider its next steps. Digital Rights Watch Founder Lizzie O'Shea, says the government's announcement today was a missed opportunity. 'I absolutely think there's a role for government here to regulate large technology companies from a safety perspective. The question is what form should that take? An outright ban has these technical problems which I think can be distracting from other reforms. The key reform I think the govt should progress at this stage is bold privacy reform. That attacks the underlying business model that gives rise to a lot of these negative design features.'
The ban will come into effect from December 10.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Claiming 'vindication' after escaping higher tariff rates, Australia vows to export more into the US
Claiming 'vindication' after escaping higher tariff rates, Australia vows to export more into the US

ABC News

time31 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Claiming 'vindication' after escaping higher tariff rates, Australia vows to export more into the US

Australia will seek to exploit its comparatively low tariff rate enacted by US President Donald Trump by exporting more products into the United States. The order signed by Mr Trump has imposed new tariffs on some nations, but Australia has — for now — held onto its minimum 10 per cent "baseline" tariff rate, escaping a threat to lift that to 15 or 20 per cent suggested by the president. Trade Minister Don Farrell said Australian wine, beef, lamb, wheat and other products were now "cheaper" in a relative sense, and the government would seek to capitalise on that. "As a government, we will assist all of our exporters in ensuring we take advantage of this situation and increase the volume of exports, not just to the US, but all of those other countries that we have diversified with," Senator Farrell said. "I think this is a vindication for the Albanese government and particularly the prime minister in the cool and calm way we have conducted diplomacy with the United States," Senator Farrell said. "I am hopeful this is the end of the matter now and the American government maintains that 10 per cent [tariff], and our producers, our wine makers, can get back to normal relations with the United States." The Trump administration has taken umbrage against countries that were in a trade surplus with the US, or where it perceived countries had unfair trade barriers restricting US trade, in some cases imposing harsher tariffs as a retaliatory measure. Mr Trump has also used the tariffs to encourage companies to move their operations to the US. Senator Farrell noted the US still exported more than double the value of goods into Australia than was sold by Australia to the US. A report by Meat and Livestock Australia released in June found the threat of tariffs on beef had not hurt trade, which had risen 32 per cent year-to-date. While the government has claimed victory for its tactics in the face of fierce criticism from the Coalition for still not securing a face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump, the president is still weighing further tariffs that could have a more significant impact on Australia. Mr Trump is mulling a 200 per cent tariff on pharmaceuticals, one of Australia's largest export products to the US, which are currently exempt from the administration's tariff schedule. The president said earlier this month he had held off from committing to that tariff to give manufacturers time to move their operations to the US to avoid the tax. Last year, Australia exported $2.2 billion in pharmaceutical products to the US, about 40 per cent of Australia's pharmaceutical exports, according to the UN's Comtrade database. Overnight, Mr Trump wrote to several pharmaceutical giants demanding they price US drugs no more expensive than prices negotiated overseas, asserting they would have to take a tougher negotiating position with foreign nations to do so. Senator Farrell said he did not expect that to affect Australian drug prices, repeating that the government would never put Australia's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme "at risk" in trade talks with the US. The minister repeated the government's view that the Trump administration's tariffs were an act of economic self-harm by the states, and it did not support them.

VNI West transmission network costs double as Victorian farmer protests
VNI West transmission network costs double as Victorian farmer protests

ABC News

time31 minutes ago

  • ABC News

VNI West transmission network costs double as Victorian farmer protests

The cost of building a contentious overhead transmission line project in Victoria is expected to nearly double, triggering calls to cancel it. VNI West will run 475 kilometres from New South Wales to Victoria, connecting the Energy Connect transmission line that is under construction in NSW to the yet-to-be-built Western Renewables Link in Victoria. Previously estimated to cost $3.9 billion, yesterday the Australian Energy Market Operator increased its cost estimate to $7.6 billion, and potentially as much as $11.4 billion. When complete, it will transmit renewable energy between the two states, and the Victorian government argues it is necessary to "keep the lights on" and push down power prices. Victorian Farmers Federation (VFF) president Brett Hosking said the cost blowout came as no surprise. "I think it's what farmers said right from the start, that it felt like the numbers were underdone," Mr Hosking said. Mr Hosking accused project developer Transmission Company Victoria of failing to engage properly with affected landowners. "Unfortunately, the poor engagement and the poor management of the project has resulted in delays, and will continue to result in delays until we see a massive turnaround in the attitudes of the proponents," he said. There have been numerous farmer-led protests against VNI West, including in regional towns and on the steps of parliament. Transmission Company Victoria was not available for an interview, but in a statement, spokesperson Claire Cass said the cost blowout was due to "inflationary pressures that are affecting major infrastructure projects across Australia and the globe". Victorian Energy Minister Lily D'Ambrosio said, despite the inflated price tag, the benefit of VNI West would outweigh the cost, rejecting any suggestion the future of the project was uncertain. "It is a fact that without building transmission projects … that deliver that cheap, reliable electricity, bills would actually go up and our energy supply would be in danger," Ms D'Ambrosio said. Ms D'Ambrosio said the government would closely monitor the cost of transmission projects. "I will always hold proponents of projects to account on costs," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store