Prince Andrew has no public future - and lack of royal status 'annoys him', author claims
Andrew Lownie has spent four years working on Entitled: The Rise And Fall Of The House Of York - a book unauthorised by Prince Andrew - and submitted hundreds of Freedom of Information requests to government departments.
However, he has revealed to Sky News that all of his applications for information about Prince Andrew and his official work were knocked back.
The royal household and the royal archive are already exempt from FOI requests.
Image: Andrew Lownie
Speaking ahead of the book's publication, which has already attracted considerable attention because of more lurid claims about the duke, Mr Lownie told Sky News: "Clearly there are details that people have picked up on and run with. And you know, that's inevitable in these sort of books."
But he added: "If they're to earn our trust and support, they have to show that they are not hiding things - that they are behaving well."
Mr Lownie said he was given a catalogue of reasons by the likes of the Foreign Office and the Department for Business and Trade as to why they couldn't help with information about Prince Andrew's public work as a trade envoy in the 2000s.
Sky News was shown a selection of those response letters.
"They blame everything from security reasons, to cost and man hours, to data protection, to my questions being too broad," the author said.
But Mr Lownie believes it's in the interest of the Windsors to be more open if they want to guarantee long-term backing from the public, and he hopes his book may trigger more calls for greater transparency.
Read more UK news:
Met Police make 'most arrests in a decade' at protest
Major incident as crews battle wildfire near Bournemouth
Image: All of his applications for information were knocked back
It comes as a new YouGov report found that Prince Andrew remains the most unpopular royal in the country, with 87% of people having a negative view of him. According to the survey, just 5% of people have a favourable view of the Duke of York.
The poll also found the royals are less popular with a younger audience.
Only 36% of 18 to 24-years-olds believe the monarchy is good for the country, compared with about 60% of Britons overall.
The generational difference is underlined given 81% of over-65s think Britain should continue to have a monarchy, but this falls with each age group to just 41% of 18 to 24s.
Stories about Prince Andrew continue to attract a huge amount of attention and regularly still make him a difficult distraction for the Royal Family.
Mr Lownie says he got no sense of any appetite to reintroduce him into public life while doing his research.
"I don't think he has any public future. I would say his private future is pretty limited too. I mean, he lives in Royal Lodge [on the Windsor Estate], he plays golf, watches TV, and presumably sees his grandchildren ... he's living the life of a retired man."
Image: Lownie speaking to Sky's Rhiannon Mills
But according to one member of staff, the removal of his royal and military titles has stung more than Prince Andrew has publicly shown.
"What most annoys him is his lack of a royal status," Mr Lownie added. "That's what really sort of gave him his whole sense of identity. And that's, you know, it's not being able to put on his uniforms and strut around and being self-important."
Buckingham Palace has not made any comments on the book as the Duke of York is no longer a working royal.
Sky News approached the Duke of York's office but received no response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
13 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Celebration of Lockerbie bomber's release was 'grotesque', says Sturgeon
The Lockerbie bomber's arrival in Libya to a Saltire-waving crowd was 'grotesque' following the decision to release him from a Scottish jail, according to Nicola Sturgeon. The former First Minister opened up on her personal concerns about the release of Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, the only person convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, and said the Cabinet was not consulted. She heavily criticised the way the decision was made by Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill without consultation from other ministers. He was freed from Greenock prison eight years into a life sentence in 2009 on compassionate grounds because of his terminal prostate cancer, and lived in Libya until his death in 2012. Ms Sturgeon said the decision 'sent shockwaves' across Scotland, the UK and much of the world and that 'had the political dynamic in Scotland been different, I have no doubt it would have brought us down'. She said: 'Had I been asked to take a decision based on my personal views, I would have decided against Megrahi's release or transfer.' While Mr MacAskill was responsible for the decision, Ms Sturgeon said it was 'inconceivable' to her that the Cabinet would not be consulted given the magnitude of what was being decided. She said Mr MacAskill's decision to visit Megrahi in jail 'astounded me' and said she first became aware of an imminent decision through a BBC news story. She said she had called Alex Salmond about the story and he implied he was 'surprised' and not in the loop because Mr MacAskill was the decision-maker - but she said she 'didn't believe him'. On Mr MacAskill's statement to parliament confirming the decision, Ms Sturgeon said: 'Kenny's intonation in making the statement made it sound like he was reading a bedtime story.' Ms Sturgeon then goes on to recount the scenes as Megrahi touched down in Tripoli, where he appeared at the door of the plane with his arm held aloft by one of Gadaffi's sons. She described how Megrahi was treated 'like a conquering war hero returning from battle', as the convicted mass murderer was greeted by a large crowd, many waving saltires as they expressed their gratutude for the decision made in Scotland. She added: 'It was grotesque.' She went on to state she could have resigned given her misgivings 'and did consider it' but opted to accept collective responsibility and rowed in behind Mr MacAskill. However, Mr MacAskill has repeatedly rubihsed the autobiography since details from it emerged, stating Ms turgeon 'is seeking to rewrite history and distorting the truth'. In 2009 Ms Sturgeon commented on the release of Megrahi, stating Mr MacAskill had 'made a brave and difficult decision'. Her comments were made after a poll showed 69 per cent of Scots believed the country's reputation was diminished in the eyes of the world because of the decision to release the bomber.
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Revealed: How much Sadiq Khan's congestion charge plans will cost Londoners
Sir Sadiq Khan's plans to increase the congestion charge will cost London's electric car drivers an extra £75m per year. The Mayor of London is poised to increase the capital-wide tax by a fifth – from £15 to £18 – as well as applying it to electric cars and delivery vans. The planned increases, set to kick in from Christmas Day, will cost drivers of electric cars £75m per year as the Labour mayor brings electric cars into the taxation scheme for the first time. The increases could total as much as £455m over the next five years, Auto Express magazine reported. Although Transport for London (TfL) suggested it could add a 25 per cent discount for EVs, that would only apply to those owners who trust the capital's transport authority enough to sign up for its Auto Pay system, the car magazine added. Figures obtained by the magazine suggested that TfL's internal financial projections showed that raising the congestion charge to £18 and extending it to electric vehicles – commercial delivery vans as well as cars – could rake in an extra £75m a year. Under current rules, any driver on the roads inside the M25 motorway at the wheel of an older, more polluting diesel or petrol car must pay £15 a day. Electric car drivers have been exempt until now – but a public consultation that closed on Monday included options for Khan to include those vehicles in the charging scheme for the first time. Richard Holden MP, the Conservative shadow transport secretary, said: 'Sadiq Khan's answer to every problem is to reach deeper into Londoners' pockets. As Transport for London's mismanaged £13bn debt continues to spiral, it is little surprise Sadiq Khan is jacking up the congestion charge on top of the new tunnel tolls, Ulez, and annual Tube fare hikes. 'It can already cost over £35 just to get to work in London before you've even paid the recent road tax hikes, rocketing insurance costs, and rising fuel prices. It's daylight robbery. 'Meanwhile, more than 2,200 TfL staff are on six-figure salaries. Londoners are being bled dry while Labour's Mayor rewards his top brass and piles the bill on working people.' The impact of the Congestion Charge, as well as the mayor's hated Ulez emissions reduction scheme, has had a catastrophic impact on ordinary Londoners and the businesses serving them. David Tucker, 59, who runs a waste and recycling company in South East London with 55 trucks and more than 100 employees said: 'At the moment, Ulez and congestion is costing me £300,000, give or take, per annum, and it's going to get worse. 'We would have to pass the cost onto customers. We built this business over more than 10 years, and employ more than 100 people. We have always played by the rules, but we cannot reinvest now if TfL takes all the profit. 'The margins are really small. We already had to buy new trucks at massive, massive costs. It's no picnic, this business. It's very unfair. TfL, they are absolutely destroying London.' A TfL spokesperson said: 'The congestion charge has been in place since its introduction in 2003 to manage traffic and congestion in the central one per cent of London during the busiest times of day. 'Without the changes proposed in our consultation, the charge would become less effective, with an estimated additional 2,200 vehicles in the zone on an average weekday. 'Under these proposals, we are also proposing a new cleaner vehicle discount for those who do need to drive in the zone so they would still be able to benefit from a discount if they drive an electric vehicle, with a greater reduction for journeys that are harder to switch to walking, cycling and public transport, such as those made by vans for commercial purposes. 'Central London is one of the best-connected places in the world with high quality sustainable transport options.' Ginny Buckley, chief executive of electric car sales website said: 'Mayor Sadiq Khan's plan to make electric car drivers pay the congestion charge flies in the face of the Labour Government's push to accelerate EV adoption and hit our net zero targets. 'It's a backwards step for London's air quality that punishes those making cleaner, greener transport choices – and risks stalling the shift to zero-emission vehicles at the very moment we need it to accelerate.'
The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trans teachers can now ask pupils to call them Mx instead of Mr or Mrs, says Bridget Phillipson
TRANS teachers can ask their pupils to call them Mx instead of Mr or Mrs, the Education Secretary has said. Bridget Phillipson said they have the right to 'make that request' of them. She told LBC: 'But of course, what we'll be looking at is making sure that people are able to exercise their views on this topic too. "This has been the subject of various legal cases as well about people's rights in terms of how they approach questions of gender identity.' The prefix Mx is used by some trans people as a gender-neutral way of saying Mr or Mrs. Ms Phillipson has also been criticised for failing to publish long-awaited trans guidance for schools after more than a year in power. She inherited draft guidance from the Tories that said that teachers should adopt a 'cautious approach' to children wanting to socially transition by living like the opposite sex. Ms Phillipson said she wanted to take time to review the policies — but has still not produced them 13 months into the job. Yesterday she could not say when the guidance would finally be released, despite concerned parents asking for it. Tory Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott said last night: 'The guidance for schools on gender-questioning children is ready to go. 'It will give schools the clarity they need, end the confusion and help safeguard children. 'No more excuses from the Education Secretary, she just needs to get on with it.' 1
