
Harnessing Agniveer Power: Lessons From Operation Sindoor
Operation Sindoor marks a landmark success in India's military history post-Independence and is proving to be a game-changer in many ways, especially the close synergy between the three arms of the military, the bold resolve of political leadership, and the effectiveness of indigenous military platforms. It was also the first instance since the India-Pakistan War of 1971 that the Indian armed forces penetrated deep inside Pakistani territory and inflicted unprecedented damage and misery on Pakistan, both militarily and politically.
In just over three days of precise and extremely effective strikes, India struck at the heart of the terror network of Pakistan, hitting nine major terror bases, and followed up by hitting 11 military airbases and downing 5-6 fighter aircraft, bringing Pakistan to its knees in a matter of 96 hours.
Celebrating the 79th Independence Day on 15 August 2025, India honoured its war heroes of Operation Sindoor with several gallantry awards. Among the awardees, it was heartening to see that two Agniveers, too, were awarded the Sena Medal (Gallantry) for their exceptional contribution during the conflict. It is estimated that around 3,000 Agniveers across the three services were part of Operation Sindoor. And, from all accounts, they have acquitted themselves extremely well, proving the critics wrong, who have been seeking the abolition of the Agnipath Scheme of recruitment into the Armed Forces.
The scheme was launched in June 2022, promoted as a transformational reform in the armed forces, aimed at bringing down the mean age in the armed forces and contributing to its youthful profile. It offers employment opportunities for the youth (17.5 years to 21 years old) to serve the nation with an annual intake of around 45,000 to 50,000 Agniveers recruited every year. The numbers could be progressively increased, as required. Those recruited would be trained in respective training centres and serve for a period of 4 years.
At the end of it, 25 per cent meritorious Agniveers would be retained, while others would be let go with an exit package called Seva Nidhi of around Rs 12 lakh and skill certificates to help them in their second careers. During the service of four years, if an Agniveer dies on duty, an insurance package of Rs 48 lakh and an ex gratia payment of Rs 44 lakh have been earmarked.
The government had also announced that it would help the 75 per cent who exit in their second careers through vacancies in Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) as well as in the state governments. A number of state governments have already announced quotas for Agniveers in state services. In a gazette notification issued on 16 June 2025 by the Cabinet Secretariat, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has been made the nodal ministry to coordinate the career progression of individuals who have completed their service under the Agnipath scheme, working with other central government departments and state/UT governments to facilitate this progression.
Accordingly, the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961, were amended, and a new entry was made to Para 19 in the Second Schedule, under the heading 'Ministry of Home Affairs," to state 'Coordinating activities for further progression of Ex-Agniveers".
However, these steps are more towards 'facilitating" rather than 'assuring" jobs for ex-Agniveers after exiting the armed forces. This has been causing a lot of angst against the scheme in political circles as well as among the traditional geographies from which the bulk of the soldiers are generally recruited. In addition, there are a number of other issues that require a serious review if the scheme has to realise its full potential.
Issues in Agnipath Scheme
The first issue and perhaps the biggest concern is the percentage of retention. 25 per cent, which has been currently set in the scheme, is grossly inadequate by any measurement. With only 1 out of 4 set to be retained, it is bound to cause anxiety and uncertainty in the minds of Agniveers and their families. Even the battalions where they are posted would be unsure if their Agniveers, despite proving themselves well, would make the cut.
It also undercuts the lengthy and deliberate recruitment process where, after all the hard work, 75 per cent of selected candidates are to be rejected. Also, for every soldier to progress further into the service, four have to be initially recruited, implying a 400 per cent recruitment against existing vacancies, which is quite difficult.
According to the data presented by the Ministry of Defence to the Parliamentary Standing Committee in April 2025 (just before the Pahalgam terror attack), the total strength of the Indian Army is 12.48 lakh, while the sanctioned strength is higher by more than one lakh. Specifically, the Army is short of 92,410 Junior Commissioned Officers (JCOs) and Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs), representing a 7.72 per cent shortfall. As of October 1, 2024, the troop strength was 11,05,110 against the sanctioned strength of 11,97,520.
Thus, against a deficiency of more than 92,000 soldiers, 46,000 Agniveers are being recruited. Given that only 25 per cent are to be retained, the effective recruitment (or addition) every year is only 11,500. Adding to these figures is the fact that almost 60,000 soldiers retire every year, implying that the overall number of soldiers in the Army will only decrease every year instead of making up for the deficiencies. With India expected to fight a multipronged war in the future, this could be a serious factor affecting the combat potential of the army.
The next issue is the term of Agniveers before being absorbed or exiting, which is currently four years. The initial six months are spent in an intensive training capsule designed at the Training Centres, which is just adequate enough for basic combat training. However, to ensure that the soldier is battle-ready in a technical and specialist wing of the army like Signals, Engineers, Artillery, Armoured Corps, Missile Units, etc, further on-the-job training is essential in the battalions before an Agniveer can be employed in small battle groups within the battalions.
This additional training can again stretch up to six more months. Effectively, this leaves three years for the Agniveer to showcase his skills and get hands-on experience. Even within this period, the profile of the battalion being located in a Field or a Peace location would make a huge difference in how the Agniveer could perform and be judged to ultimately make the cut into the best 25 per cent to be retained.
There is another associated issue with the four-year term. As per the government norms, any employee becomes eligible for payout of gratuity only after 5 years of continuous service. In the present system, an Agniveer would lose out on it too. Despite being assured of a Seva Nidhi payout on exit, the loss of gratuity could be a significant loss. Also, given the high instances of injuries, both while training and in battle (including counterterror operations), the exiting Agniveer would find it difficult to pick up threads of life, despite handsome assured exit packages.
However, the most important issue in this scheme is with regard to assurance of a job and ra egular salary after exit. As mentioned earlier, the Ministry of Home Affairs has now been mandated to 'coordinate" the future employment of Agniveers. It has asked Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF), like the BSF, CISF, CRPF, Assam Rifles, ITBP, SSB, etc, to earmark vacancies to recruit ex-Agniveers, but, as has been seen in the past with reserved vacancies for ex-soldiers, vacancies do not necessarily lead to job offers. The Agniveers would be expected to apply and then undergo selection processes again for recruitment.
What Needs to be Done?
Operation Sindoor, as well as earlier feedback, has indicated one thing very clearly—Agniveers are proving to be a valuable asset in the battalions. The scheme and the process of recruitment are thus validated. What is required now is to iron out a few issues of concern and improve this scheme so that it actually becomes the game-changer it was envisaged to be.
To begin with, the most important thing is to improve the ratio of retention. Reversing it by retaining 70-75 per cent and letting 25-30 per cent go would be ideal, although an initial retention of even 60 per cent, gradually increasing it over a period, could also work. This would not only ensure retention of well-trained personnel but also help in reducing deficiencies in the army faster and improve morale too. Yes, in any recruitment process across industries, all those recruited do not always live up to the potential, and therefore, those few percentages of 'non-performers" can be let go.
Increasing the term to five years would give the battalions one more year of using the skills of trained soldiers, while the ex-Agniveer would get the benefit of a gratuity payout.
Assured jobs for ex-Agniveers would definitely seal the deal and remove any misgivings in the minds of Agniveers. For this, apart from the declared quotas or vacancies, there needs to be a clearly defined process and an agency to ensure, rather than just facilitate. Accordingly, based on clearly defined criteria within each CAPF or the state governments, a central agency within the army, like the DG Resettlement, could be tasked to ensure interface and facilitate issuance of job offer letters to each ex-Agniveer as per the requirements of the accepting organisation. Thus, instead of the ex-Agniveer running around filling forms and applying after exiting, he/she would get the job offer and joining date before the exit date from the armed forces.
Looking Ahead
top videos
View all
Agnipath is a game-changer scheme in its overall concept. All it requires is a few modifications to enable utilising its full potential. Finding the right formula that serves the armed forces best while looking after the interests of Agniveers is the key and could end up as a win-win situation for all. Armed forces will continue to attract the best talent, the overall profile in the armed forces will become more youthful, CAPF will get fully trained personnel to augment their cadre, and most importantly, the career aspirations of youth will be met.
The writer is a West Asia expert and a Senior Research Consultant at Chintan Research Foundation, New Delhi. His X Handle is @rajeev1421. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google.
tags :
agniveer armed forces army Operation Sindoor
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 20, 2025, 19:26 IST
News opinion Opinion | Harnessing Agniveer Power: Lessons From Operation Sindoor
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Loading comments...
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
States raise revenue loss concerns: GoM backs Centre's plan for GST rate rationalisation
The Group of Ministers on Rate Rationalisation gave its in-principle support Thursday to the Centre's proposal to overhaul the Goods and Services Tax (GST) design, even as member states raised concerns about potential revenue loss on account of the rate rationalisation. Six days ago, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, in his Independence Day address, announced the next big phase of reforms under the GST regime by Diwali, a gift for the common man, small entrepreneurs and MSMEs, in terms of reduced tax burden. The Centre has suggested replacing multiple slabs – 5 per cent, 12 per cent, 18 per cent and 28 per cent – with a broad two-slab structure – 5 per cent and 18 per cent – in addition to a 40 per cent special rate for sin and demerit goods. States said they do not oppose the 'pro-people' proposal, but it may result in revenue losses that will ultimately leave them with less resources to spend on common people in their regions. While Bihar's Deputy Chief Minister and GoM convenor Samrat Choudhary spelt out the panel's support for the GST overhaul proposal, he said observations made by states will be referred to the GST Council. Detailed discussions on items will be taken up in the Council, he said. 'We have deliberated upon the Centre's proposal to remove the two GST slabs, we have given our support and recommendations. Now, the GST Council will decide. All states gave their views, there were some observations by some states. Those will be referred to the GST Council,' Choudhary said. The differing views and observations of states on revenue loss and concerns over profiteering by manufacturers and companies will be part of the note that the GoM will send to the Council along with the Centre's proposal. Some states were also of the view that the work done by the GoM over the last few years will now essentially be wasted as they would be simply handing over the Centre's proposal to the GST Council. 'We have neither approved nor rejected it. Centre cannot give its proposal directly to the Council, so we will be just handing over the Centre's proposal to the Council,' a top state government official told The Indian Express. States are learnt to have sent their suggestions for the GoM's note on a mechanism to compensate states that will address their revenue loss concerns. States are anticipating annual revenue loss of Rs 6,000-10,000 crore, the official said. West Bengal's Finance Minister Chandrima Bhattacharya echoed a similar view and said they are 'okay with the pro-people proposal' but it is not an agreement. The Centre's proposal has not outlined the figure for revenue loss on account of the GST rate rationalisation and the proposal should not move ahead without detailing a mechanism for compensating states for revenue loss. 'It's not an agreement in that way. If it's there, it is okay. If it is pro-people, then it's okay. But it has to be discussed in the Council's meeting also. There is no benefit in discussing it item-by-item in the GoM meeting. It will be discussed item-by-item in the (GST) Council meeting. While presenting a report to the GST Council, they will give a note of what we have said,' she said. Bhattacharya said no state had any issue in accepting the pro-people GST overhaul proposal. 'All states are pro-people. There is no doubt about it. It's nothing to talk about in politics. They are pro-people, let us take it for granted. But when the states lose their revenue, that also ultimately goes back to common people. That has to be looked into. That is what we have said,' she said. 'Because to give relief to common people should not mean that there isn't much left to spend on them after that, we have to think about that. That's why we have said that while you give the presentation, you must quantify it (revenue loss),' she said. She also said that ministers from BJP-ruled states have concurred with the suggestions. 'But we have said we are there, if it benefits people, we are okay. On the one hand it reaches people and on the other hand see what is the loss we (states) are facing. Ultimately if a state suffers any loss, that ultimately boils down to the suffering of the common man,' she said. Uttar Pradesh's Finance Minister Suresh Kumar Khanna said the Centre's proposal was welcomed by all member states saying it is in the interest of the common man. 'States were asking that they should be compensated for revenue loss. The revenue loss will be calculated. Ultra luxury goods and sin goods will attract 40 per cent,' he said. Revenue loss concerns of states stem from the plan to prune the list of items in the 12 per cent slab and shift them to 5 per cent. There is also a concern that most items the existing 28 per cent slab. The Centre plans to introduce a special rate of 40 per cent, which will apply only to 5-7 sin, demerit and luxury items. States revenue loss concerns stem from the plan to prune the list of items in the 12 per cent slab and shift them to 5 per cent. There is also a concern that most items in the existing 28 per cent slab will shift to 18 per cent slab except sin and demerit goods. The Centre plans to introduce a special rate of 40 per cent, which will apply only to 5-7 sin, demerit and luxury items. Some states have suggested amending the GST laws to allow for an additional levy going beyond the current cap of 40 per cent (20 per cent Central GST plus 20 per cent State GST). Some of the items right now attract GST of 60-70 per cent, Bhattacharya said, adding that the law should be amended to ensure that the current tax incidence, especially on sin goods, remains at the current level.


The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Kashmir issue will be non-existent had Sardar Patel enjoyed free hand, says Puducherry L-G
Had Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, the architect of modern India who used persuasion and steely resolve to unify a fragmented land of princely states, been given a free hand, the Kashmir problem would not have existed in India today, Lieutenant Governor K. Kailashnathan said on Thursday (August 21, 2025). Addressing a seminar on 'The Idea of Indian National Integration Through the Vision of The Iron Man of India' hosted by the School of Social Sciences and International Studies, Pondicherry University, Mr. Kailashnathan pointed out that at the time of Independence in 1947, the British left behind not a united country, but a fragmented land with more than 560 princely states, each with its own ruler, its own army, and in some cases, its own aspirations to remain independent. Had these states not been integrated into the Indian Union, the map of India would have looked like a patchwork quilt, vulnerable to foreign interference and internal chaos, the Lt. Governor said. It was Sardar Patel, with his firmness, foresight and unshakeable commitment, who persuaded, negotiated and where necessary, acted decisively to ensure that all these states became part of one India. The Iron Man, with the support of V.P. Menon, who drafted the Instrument of Accession, had brought together a scattered subcontinent into a united nation in less than two years, Mr. Kailashnathan said. Sardar Patel had thwarted the disastrous designs of Pakistan to carve out more pockets of that country in new India. 'If a free hand would have been given to Sardar Patel, I don't think the Kashmir problem would have existed in India today', the Lt. Governor, who is also the Chief Rector of the University said. According to the Lt. Governor, in spite of his towering contributions towards the country, its unification, development and progress, Patel's role was never appreciated after 1950. Pointing out that this was why Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the then Chief Minister of Gujarat, built the 182-metre-tall Statue of Unity on the banks of the Narmada river, Mr. Kailashnathan, who was closely associated with the project for five years, said the construction of the statue reflected the real spirit of rural India. The Wall of Unity on the premises was built by forging agricultural implements with the soil collected from 1.35 lakh villages across India, he further added. However, the true tribute to Sardar Patel was not in statues alone but in embodying his ideals and realising the idea of national integration he envisioned. 'This required holding respect for diversity and regarding linguistic, cultural, and regional differences not as obstacles but as ornaments of our nation. True integration would come only when every region feels it has an equal share in national growth,' he said. The Lt. Governor further said, 'while we live in a free India, united politically, the challenge of emotional unity – the unity of hearts and minds – is ongoing. Regionalism, linguistic divisions, casteism and communalism are dangers that can fragment our national spirit if we are not vigilant. Rights are essential, but duties to preserve unity are equally vital.' Mr. Kailashnathan urged the youth to imbibe the ideals of Sadar Patel who embodied integrity, courage and unity and transformed political independence into national unity. 'In an age where globalisation, technology and social media expose us to both opportunities and divisions, we must be careful that our words and actions do not create fissures but build bridges'. The Lt. Governor felt that national integration must be part of the curriculum and campus culture. Pondicherry University Vice-Chancellor P. Prakash Babu, Rajneesh Bhutani, Registrar, Nanda Kishor M. S. Ritesh Rai, G. Chandrika and Sanjay Sharma, faculty members of Pondicherry University, participated. The two-day event is held in collaboration with the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), New Delhi.


India Today
32 minutes ago
- India Today
Karnataka refers crowd control bill to house committee amid Opposition concerns
The Karnataka government has moved to refer the Crowd Control (Managing Crowd at Events and Place of Gathering) Bill, 2025 to a house committee after facing strong opposition from rival parties over concerns it could restrict protests and affect cultural and religious Bill, tabled in the Assembly by Home Minister G Parameshwara, was introduced in the wake of the June 4 stampede outside Bengaluru's Chinnaswamy Stadium, which claimed 11 lives. Parameshwara described the tragedy as a 'wake-up call' and said the legislation aims to ensure crowd safety and hold event organisers accountable. advertisementThe Bill requires organisers of events expecting 7,000 or more people to obtain police permission in advance, with those expecting over 50,000 attendees additionally required to provide an indemnity bond of Rs 1 crore. Applications for permission must initially be submitted ten days before the event, though Parameshwara later agreed to reduce this period to five days following opposition concerns. The legislation specifies that unpermitted events could attract penalties including imprisonment of up to seven years and fines of Rs 1 crore. Events resulting in injury or fatalities would carry up to seven years' imprisonment for injuries and up to life for or breaches of peace during events could result in three years' imprisonment and fines of Rs 50,000. The Bill exempts family functions and private events, including those in leased or hired venues, while religious events, mass marriages, and government functions are to be BJP legislator Suresh Kumar criticised the Bill as an 'afterthought' following the High Court's questions on Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for crowd management, describing it as a 'postmortem Bill.'Leader of the Opposition R Ashoka expressed concerns that the Bill could become a tool for police misuse, asking, 'All political parties hold programmes or events. If something goes wrong, then what'll be the fate of that party? This must be thought about. This should not become a weapon for police. Think and frame rules.'Other legislators, including Bijapur City MLA Basanagouda Patil Yatnal and BJP MLA Sunil Kumar, echoed these concerns, warning that powers granted under the Bill could be misused to target protests or certain communities, and questioned its applicability to spontaneous protests, religious festivals, or government events. Yatnal alleged the Bill seemed intended 'to target events of one religion and curtail protests' and warned it was 'more dangerous than what was done by the British.'Responding to the opposition, Parameshwara agreed to amend certain clauses, reducing the advance notice period to five days and exempting religious events, mass marriages, and government functions. Despite these assurances, opposition members maintained that the Bill required careful scrutiny before enactment and called for its referral to a house committee. The Speaker, UT Khader, subsequently confirmed that the Assembly's House Committee would review the legislation for detailed consideration.- EndsIN THIS STORY#Karnataka