$200M Columbia payout a ‘blueprint' for Trump to squeeze Harvard and other Gaza protest schools: report
Columbia agreed to pay the Trump administration a $200 million settlement in exchange for access to federal funding that was cut over claims the Ivy League school failed to combat antisemitism, the university announced Wednesday. The college laid off nearly 180 staffers in May after funds were cut.
It comes as President Donald Trump's White House has for months attempted to bend Harvard and other academic institutions to ideologically driven demands.
The deal with Columbia has paved the way for negotiations with other top schools, including Cornell, Brown, Duke and Northwestern, according to the Wall Street Journal, which cited an unnamed White House official.
In Harvard's case, the school has fought back in a lawsuit arguing that the government has illegally cut $2.6 billion of its federal funding.
The Trump administration hopes to make an example of the country's oldest academic institution.
'The White House hopes to extract hundreds of millions of dollars from Harvard, in a deal that would make Columbia's $200 million payment look like peanuts,' the Journal reports, citing a person familiar with the talks.
The Independent has contacted Harvard, Cornell, Brown, Duke, Northwestern and the White House for comment.
The Trump administration pulled research funding from Columbia over what it described as the university's failure to deal with antisemitism on campus during the Israel-Hamas war that began in October 2023.
Columbia then agreed to a series of demands laid out by the administration, including overhauling the university's student disciplinary process and adopting a new definition of antisemitism.
Wednesday's agreement, which does not include any admission of wrongdoing, codifies those reforms while preserving the university's autonomy, acting University President Claire Shipman said.
But the deal has divided academics and university leaders.
'This cannot be a template for the government's approach to American higher education,' Ted Mitchell, president of the university lobbying group American Council on Education, told the Journal.
Mitchell said it was 'chilling' that Columbia's fine came without typical due process when investigating antisemitism claims.
'We're in a world now where the government can say to all these schools, 'Hey, we're serious, you're going to have to pay the piper to get along with the most powerful organization in the world,'' Michael Roth, president of Connecticut's Wesleyan University told the outlet. 'Which is the federal government.'
Elsewhere, Harvard's former president Lawrence Summers lauded the deal as 'an excellent template' for other universities in a post on X. 'This may be the best day higher education has had in the last year,' he wrote, arguing that the deal 'preserved academic freedom.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Columbia settlement with Trump puts Ivy League universities in ‘survival mode,' Ohio State president claims
Ohio State President Ted Carter said on Sunday that Ivy League schools are in 'survival mode' after Columbia University's settlement with President Donald Trump. In an interview on CBS News's 'Face the Nation,' anchor Margaret Brennan asked Carter if he would have taken a deal like the one Trump secured with Columbia that resolved multiple civil rights investigations. 'I can't speak to those institutions because I'm not leading them,' Carter responded. 'I know both President Shipman and some of the other Ivy League presidents are colleagues, and they're having to do, I think, what I would call- be in survival mode, quite frankly,' he said, referring to current Columbia University President Claire Shipman. 'We're not going through any of that here at Ohio State and nor do I think that we will. I mean, obviously, we have a new state law, we're a public institution, so that means we're going to be transparent and put out everything that we do so that the state of Ohio, the people, the entire country can see it,' Carter added. 6 President Donald Trump speaks with the media during a meeting with Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer. AP 6 Pro-Palestinian protestors at Columbia University holding a Palestinian flag. James Keivom 6 The Columbia settlement includes $200 million over three years for alleged discriminatory practices and $21 million to settle claims of antisemitic employment discrimination against Jewish faculty. James Keivom The Columbia settlement includes $200 million over three years for alleged discriminatory practices and $21 million to settle claims of antisemitic employment discrimination against Jewish faculty after the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks in Israel. The White House called it the largest antisemitism-related settlement in U.S. history. Columbia confirmed the dollar amounts, but characterized the deal differently. The agreement restores billions in federal research funding and imposes oversight through an independent monitor. Columbia has agreed to reform, including enhanced campus protest rules and changing disciplinary authority from faculty to administrators. 6 The White House called it the largest antisemitism-related settlement in U.S. history. Columbia confirmed the dollar amounts, but characterized the deal differently. James Keivom 6 Linda McMahon speaking at the National Governors Association meeting. AP 6 Ohio State President Ted Carter on Face the Nation. CBS Columbia's settlement with the Trump administration is laying the groundwork for a culture of accountability, Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in an interview with Fox News Digital last week. 'This agreement is going to be an excellent template for other universities to be able to use as well,' McMahon said. Trump has suspended federal funding to every Ivy League school, except for Penn and Dartmouth, over investigations into anti-Israel protests that have taken place on their campuses since October 2023.
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Building Our Future: Relational Organizing For Student Voter Turnout
Civic engagement rarely begins in a vague email or at the registrar's office. It really begins in late-night dorm talks, over dining hall meals, and with hushed study sessions in the campus library. That's where I believe real civic engagement lives — in conversations grounded in mutual trust, shared experience, and valued peer-to-peer interaction. Civic habits form through who you hear from, not just what you hear. Before a college student registers to vote, requests a mail-in ballot, or shows up to their polling place, they often need a reason. And sometimes, grand sweeping campaign messaging is not enough. Most often, that reason is a peer who makes their participation feel seen, heard, and valued. Rhea Maniar holding 'I'm A Harvard Voter' sticker at a Harvard Votes Challenge tabling event Relational organizing is different from traditional voter outreach. It actively fosters a communal civic participation culture. By harnessing the power of our networks, every volunteer has a unique and individualized power at their fingertips. It's proactive rather than reactive. Voters aren't receiving automated messages from texting bots — rather, they're being reached out to by someone who knows them, recognizes their humanity, and simply wants to know if they have made a plan to vote. The Columbia Data Science Institute found that a text from a friend increased an individual's likelihood to vote by 8.3% in the 2018 midterm elections, affirming that relational organizing, such as this, is the most effective way for students to turn their peers into voters. The power of relational organizing is especially prime for college campuses. Colleges are one big, relational network. University communities are tight-knit, and influence travels fast. We are all united by our similarities: the team we cheer for at the big game, our academic pursuits, and our shared living spaces. That's why it's so vital for nonpartisan campus voter registration groups to harness fellow students' networks for effective get-out-the-vote efforts. The college experience is built to foster relationships — ones that can, and should, be used for the greater good to encourage civic participation and democratic knowledge. Relational organizing meets students where they are: not just on campus, but emotionally, in moments of doubts, confusion, or increasing apathy towards political processes. It's beneficial for students to know they have a friend who deeply cares about both them and their potential to shape democracy. Building civic confidence requires students to buy into the shared promise of a functioning and participatory democracy, and who better to share that future with them than their fellow peers? Members of the Harvard Votes Challenge tabling on Election Day 2024. As the Organizing Director of the nonpartisan Harvard Votes Challenge, I've seen the impact of relational organizing firsthand. Students don't vote because of a poster on a bulletin board. They vote because someone they trust asked them to. From my friends recognizing my voice yelling at them across the campus green to classmates reaching out about requesting an absentee ballot, being a known voting resource for my peers has been a rewarding experience. At Harvard, we've built campus-wide coalitions that span across cultural organizations, clubs, and athletic teams. Our student Organizing Fellows remind their friends to check registration deadlines, and Harvard Votes Challenge members hold them accountable to vote. We host ballot education workshops and ensure that voting is an intimate, friendly, and social experience because we recognize that when voting becomes a shared experience, it becomes a sustained habit. Even though I have seen the power of my voice and my peers, I know we have a limited reach. We can be more powerful when non-organizers get involved and check in on their friends. So, I ask you: don't leave the work up to us organizers. We all have the power to send a quick text, forward an email with a personalized note, or call a friend with a kind reminder to check their voter registration, notify them about an upcoming election, and ask them if they've requested their absentee ballot yet. Encourage your network to create a plan to vote at Harvard University is one of more than 1000 colleges and universities currently participating in the ALL IN Campus Democracy Challenge. Learn more about ALL IN and support our work here.
The Hill
3 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump may rue the day he sued Murdoch for libel over Epstein's birthday card
President Trump is suing Rupert Murdoch, Dow Jones — the Wall Street Journal's parent company — and two of the paper's reporters for $10 billion over the Journal's story about a lurid birthday card that Trump allegedly sent to the deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. Trump claims that the card, which contains arguably compromising statements, was fabricated by unnamed Democrats. He posted about 'a POWERHOUSE Lawsuit against everyone involved in publishing the false, malicious, defamatory, FAKE NEWS 'article' in the useless 'rag' that is, The Wall Street Journal.' Murdoch and Trump have had an off-again-on-again relationship over the years. Murdoch's media outlets, principally the Journal and Fox News, after largely opposing Trump during the 2016 Republican primary, have been credited with helping propel him to the White House. According to the Journal's story, a letter bearing Trump's name 'contains several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker.' 'Inside the outline of the naked woman was a typewritten note styled as an imaginary conversation between Trump and Epstein, written in the third person,' the paper reported. It reportedly contained a joking reference that 'enigmas never age' and ended with the words, 'A pal is a wonderful thing. Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Trump denied writing the note after the article was published, posting, 'These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures.' The birthday note, if authentic, hints at Trump's contemporaneous awareness of Epstein's criminal behavior — as might Trump's comment to a reporter less than a year earlier that Epstein 'likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' Dow Jones said it would 'vigorously defend' itself against the lawsuit. 'We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting.' And so the issue is joined in court as well as the court of public opinion. Libel suits have historically been gravely dangerous not only for defendants but for plaintiffs as well. Such a suit often serves only to magnify the allegedly defamatory statements. Roy Cohn advised his clients never to sue for libel. He knew that Oscar Wilde and Alger Hiss sued for libel, and the truth, which is always a complete defense in a libel suit, led to criminal prosecution, conviction and jail. Gen. William Westmoreland sued CBS over defamatory statements about his conduct of the Vietnam War. Israeli Gen. Ariel Sharon sued Time Inc. over its reporting about his actions in Lebanon. Both came up essentially empty-handed. Trump will have a steep uphill climb to make out his complaint against Murdoch. The venerable New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) is still good law, despite Justice Clarence Thomas's stated desire to overrule it. A public official suing for libel must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the defamatory statements were published with actual knowledge of their falsity or a reckless disregard for the truth. In this case, we are talking about the Wall Street Journal, not the National Enquirer. It is very unlikely that the Journal knew the birthday card was a fabrication or that they proceeded recklessly, knowing that the source of the document was unreliable. More likely than not, the document came from the files of the Justice Department. Indeed, Trump, apart from lashing back at Murdoch, may have sued mainly to unearth via discovery the source of the leak. Trump claims that he relishes discovery in the case. 'I hope Rupert and his 'friends' are looking forward to the many hours of depositions and testimonies they will have to provide in this case,' the president stated. Trump's lawyers have asked the court to expedite Murdoch's deposition while he is still alive because Murdoch is '94 years old' and 'has suffered from multiple health issues.' But those 'many hours' may prove more harmful than helpful to Trump. Murdoch's lawyers will be able to bring out just where the Journal obtained the birthday card, as well as all the torrid details of the 15-year relationship between Epstein and Trump, including such undisclosed gems as how the friendship began; how close was it; whether it involved under-age women; whether, and, if so, when Trump learned that Epstein was trafficking teenagers; when Trump learned that Epstein was engaged in criminal acts; and when there was a severance of the relationship and why. Reports have suggested Trump and Epstein had a rift in 2004 over competing bids on a Palm Beach mansion, but there may be more to the story. Peggy Noonan reminds us that Trump's mantra is 'fight, fight, fight,' and he will do so even when it hurts him. 'There is no way on earth that [the lawsuit] will be a net positive for him. Which surely he knows,' she writes. 'He fights even when he will hurt himself, because the fight is all.' Trump is essentially libel-proof. What are his damages? His reputation for sexual misconduct is well known. A civil jury in New York found him liably for sexually abusing writer E. Jean Carroll in a department store dressing room. A New York jury convicted him of 34 counts of felony document falsification to cover up a tryst with pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels. It is too early to tell, but Trump may not have the sort of walk in the park he's had in his recent media lawsuits. He settled with ABC shortly after his reelection for $15 million, arising from George Stephanopoulos carelessly saying Trump was convicted of rape instead of sexual assault. Trump's recent settlement with CBS for $16 million, arising out of the claim that '60 Minutes' left unfavorable footage of former Vice President Kamala Harris on the cutting-room floor, seemed influenced more by parent company Paramount's need for FCC approval of its corporate merger than by the merits of the case. The Murdoch libel lawsuit, if pressed, may be full of booby traps and surprises for Trump. It could result in disclosure of many of the documents in the possession of the Justice Department, which the Journal reported subsequently were riddled with references to Trump himself. People in a position to know tell me that Murdoch will never settle. But he did appear to blink a little with a front-page 'exclusive' Journal article Friday under the headline: 'Jeffrey Epstein's Birthday Book Included Letters From Bill Clinton, Leon Black.' The article was singularly uninformative.
