How Business Insider investigated the true cost of data centers
Tech companies are spending hundreds of billions of dollars building data centers, racing to power an AI revolution they say will bring broad benefits and enormous profits.
The actual price, though, has never been fully measured. So a team of Business Insider reporters and editors set out to find the true cost of the US data center boom — in water, power, pollution, and tax incentives.
We pulled obscure state records, scoured corporate disclosures, and sought analysis and guidance from government researchers in Virginia and elsewhere. We spoke to engineering specialists who study data centers, including Shaolei Ren at the University of California, Riverside, and Vijay Gadepally of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. We also spoke to researchers who study incentive packages, such as Kasia Tarczynska of Good Jobs First, a research group that advocates for transparency and equality in public subsidies. And we sought input from companies and industry groups.
The result is the most complete accounting yet of data centers' impact on our environment, economy, and lives.
Here's how we did it.
Data centers can never be without power. Developers build backup generators to provide emergency electricity. Since these generators emit air pollution, they are regulated by state environmental agencies and need permits.
We requested these air permits and applications from 50 states and Washington, DC, asking agencies to search permits using federal industry codes associated with data centers. To confirm state searches were complete, Business Insider cross-referenced permits against company disclosures, news articles, and data from datacentermap.com, Baxtel, and other trade websites.
Some of the permits we obtained were actually for other types of facilities. If public or corporate records confirmed the facility was not a data center, we removed it from our analysis.
We compiled permits for 1,240 existing or planned data centers across the country, the most definitive tally to date. Tracking the year each permit was first issued reveals a construction boom. Until 2010, companies had filed permits for 311 data centers. By 2024, that number had nearly quadrupled.
Often the permit holders are subsidiaries of Big Tech companies, with unfamiliar names like Nova Mango Farms. Business Insider determined the owners using emails, addresses, and other information on permit applications, secretary-of-state disclosures, county databases, and SEC filings.
Business Insider mapped location information from the permits onto the Aqueduct Water Risk Atlas built by the World Resources Institute, a Washington, DC, group that advocates sustainability. The atlas measures a location's relative water stress — the ratio between demand and available, renewable supplies. Business Insider found that 40% of data centers were sited in areas of high or extremely high water stress.
Data centers can use staggering amounts of water. Business Insider requested metered water use records and water supply agreements from dozens of public utility agencies for every data center in areas with extremely high water stress.
Data center water use is a closely guarded secret. Many agencies denied our requests for facility-specific water use or released the records only in aggregate for all data centers in a water utility's service area. In Denver and Colorado Springs, Colorado, utility agencies sued Business Insider to prevent the release of metered water use records. Business Insider prevailed in both lawsuits.
Business Insider found that some of the largest data center facilities were permitted to use more water a day than you might expect nearly 49,000 Americans to use.
Companies also disclose little information on how much power their US data centers consume. Data center power use varies based on factors including the types and frequency of use of servers, cooling systems, and other infrastructure. To account for this, Business Insider calculated a range of estimated annual data center electricity use.
To calculate this range, Business Insider used air permit data to identify the total power-generation capacity of every backup generator at each facility. Companies rarely install generator capacity that is more than twice what a data center consumes — and often they install significantly less than that. So Business Insider, in consultation with experts, conservatively estimated that a data center's maximum electricity use is between half and 80% of its generators' capacity.
A 2024 federal report estimates that across the industry, data centers operate at just 50% of that maximum electricity use level, to avoid straining their equipment. So Business Insider multiplied the low and high ends of its initial range by 50%.
Business Insider's data includes permits for data centers that are not yet built and fully online, and therefore estimates expected electricity use in the near future. If all permitted data centers go online, we estimate, they will use between 149.6 terawatt-hours and 239.3 terawatt-hours a year. Business Insider's low-end estimate is roughly equivalent to the state of Ohio's electricity needs in 2023, and on the high end, is nearly as much power as the entire state of Florida used that same year.
Our estimates are conservative. The low end of our estimate is below the federal report's estimate for data center power use in 2023. The federal report estimates data center power use could reach the upper end of our estimate by 2026.
Business Insider used the range average to identify the 322 largest facilities in our dataset that, according to our estimate, consume 40 megawatt-hours of electricity or more an hour.
An Amazon spokesperson said the methodology "oversimplifies complex data center operations and is based on assumptions that do not account for important differences in how companies build and operate data centers."
Google and Meta did not respond to Business Insider's queries about data center power use estimates, and QTS declined to comment. A Microsoft spokesperson acknowledged that its data centers "do not always run at 100% of their installed capacity."
Nineteen permits across 10 states — including 12 held by Google — have their generator capacity information fully or partially redacted under public disclosure exemptions for trade secrets. Business Insider was unable to estimate the electricity use of these facilities, so our estimate likely undercounts the true total.
The US uses highly polluting fossil-fuel-fired sources for at least 60% of its electricity. Data centers draw power from a wide regional grid, so Business Insider needed to estimate the public health impact attributable to data centers' use of electricity generated from far-away power plants.
The US electricity grid is complex and does not map closely to state boundaries. To model the complexity of the US electricity grid, Business Insider used an Environmental Protection Agency tool called AVERT that splits the contiguous 48 states into 14 independent electricity regions that approximate grid regions.
Using our estimate for data center power consumption, along with US Energy Information Administration data and the AVERT tool, Business Insider calculated the likely share of total power use attributable to data centers in each of these 14 regions. Then, using another EPA tool with the acronym COBRA, Business Insider estimated the public health cost engendered by that share of total electricity-generation-related pollution in each region. Even a careful calculation like this is inherently imperfect, but in the absence of industry transparency about such emissions it provides a rare and well-founded estimate of the health costs of the data center boom.
Business Insider estimated that annual public health costs from electricity generation for data centers could reach between $5.7 billion and $9.2 billion.
Power plants are not the only source of data center air pollution.
The diesel backup generators installed at data centers emit volatile organic compounds, nitrous oxides, sulfur dioxides, and particulate matter — all regulated air pollutants the EPA labels as hazardous to human health. Air permits issued to these facilities set total annual pollutant emission limits that determine how frequently their generators can be used.
Data centers generally run their generators infrequently so emit only a fraction of the pollutants their permits allow. A 2024 report to the state legislature in Virginia — which is home to nearly a third of US data centers with permits — calculated that data center backup generators on average emit 7% of their permitted pollution limits each year. Business Insider used that percentage to estimate each county's air pollutant emissions from data center backup generators.
Business Insider then input these county-by-county totals into COBRA, which models how air pollution emitted in a county affects public health nationwide. The tool assigns a dollar figure to what it would cost to avoid negative health outcomes like premature deaths, asthma attacks, heart attacks, and missed school or work days.
The COBRA tool estimated that air pollutants emitted by data centers across the country could trigger nearly 20,000 asthma symptom cases a year and create a $385 million annual burden on public health.
Generator pollution is more harmful to communities already overburdened by environmental pollutants. A community that already has high levels of air pollution will experience greater negative health impacts from additional pollutants, for example, than a community that isn't already saturated with harmful pollutants.
To better understand their impact on these communities, Business Insider mapped all 1,240 data center locations onto a third EPA tool called EJ Screen that combines census and pollutant data within a mile radius of a specified location. We found that more than 230 data center locations were in communities highly overburdened by environmental pollutants.
Business Insider requested and obtained the most detailed data-center-related economic development deals and annual tax incentive disclosures for facilities in and around Columbus, Ohio. Some of the oldest data center deals in the state are in Franklin and Licking counties, and companies are required to disclose how much they've saved from these tax exemption agreements each year, which made the state a useful case study for judging data centers' actual economic impact. Business Insider tallied these numbers, then used company-reported property investment totals to calculate total state and local sales and use tax savings (7.5% for Franklin County and 5.75% for Licking County).
We did not include personal property tax in our calculations, as Ohio eliminated that tax. Because of fluctuations in the number of jobs employed at data centers, Business Insider also did not include state or local job creation tax credits in the analysis.
We nevertheless found that these tax incentive packages given to tech companies were highly lucrative, amounting to as much as $2 million in tax savings per full time job at a data center.
Reporting: Hannah Beckler, Dakin Campbell, Daniel Geiger, Rosemarie Ho, Narimes Parakul, Adam Rogers, Ellen Thomas
Editing: Jeffrey Cane, Rosalie Chan, Jason Dean, Esther Kaplan, Jake Swearingen
Research: Darren Ankrom, Schuyler Mitchell, Trey Strange, Yuheng Zhan
Design and visuals: Dan DeLorenzo, Isabel Fernandez-Pujol, Jinpeng Li, Kim Nguyen, Randy Yeip, Rebecca Zisser
Photography: Kendrick Brinson, John David-Richardson, Greg Kahn, Brian Palmer, Jesse Rieser
Video: Robert Leslie, Gary Moon, Marco Secci
Copy editing: Mark Abadi, Kevin Kaplan
Read the original article on Business Insider
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla plans to shut down Model Y and Cybertuck production over the week of July 4
Tesla told staff it plans to pause Cybertruck and Model Y production during the July 4 week. The pause would enable the automaker to perform maintenance on production lines, Tesla told staff. All eyes are on the company's planned Robotaxi launch this month in Austin. Tesla plans to pause production on Cybertruck and Model Y lines for a week at its Austin factory, Business Insider has learned. It would be at least the third such shutdown in a year. In a meeting earlier this month with workers, the company said the shutdown would begin the week of June 30, and production would resume the following week, according to a person familiar with the matter. During the pause, employees can use paid time off or come in for voluntary training and cleaning. The pause would enable the automaker to perform maintenance on production lines, the company told workers. Tesla told staff the improvements would help ramp up production, according to the person. It did not specify which lines could see increased output. In the lead up to the planned shutdown, the carmaker has also been preparing for a Robotaxi launch in Austin. CEO Elon Musk has said that the first rides will be offered in a Model Y. The company plans to launch with between 10 to 20 of the vehicles, he said. Tesla did not respond to a request for comment about the planned shutdown. Tesla has paused production at the Austin facility at least twice over the past 12 months. During a production pause on Cybertruck and Model Y lines in late May, the company held voluntary training that included seminars on improving the work culture at the factory. Tesla also paused production of the Cybertruck for three days in December. At the time, workers said they were told it was due to a battery supply issue. In April, the automaker reduced production of the electric pickup truck and moved some workers off the line. It's common for some automakers to shut production lines down for weeks on end, especially during holiday periods or summer months, when auto sales typically slow down. The production pauses allow companies to conduct routine maintenance and update lines; they can also give companies time to address inventory surpluses or parts shortages. In the fall of 2024, Ford suspended production of its F-150 Lightning for seven weeks. During the semiconductor shortages in 2021, both Ford and GM paused production at some of their plants. Until recently, these kinds of production pauses had been rare at Musk's automaker, four workers told Business Insider. Tesla is expected to release its second-quarter delivery numbers in July. During its first quarter, Tesla reported a 13% drop year-over-year. As of March 20, Tesla has delivered fewer than 50,000 Cybertrucks, according to a voluntary recall notice. Tesla released a refreshed version of its Model Y, the company's best-selling model, in January. For now, all eyes are on the company's upcoming Robotaxi launch. Musk said on June 10 that the company "tentatively" planned to begin offering the self-driving service on June 22 in Austin. "We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift," Musk said in a post on X. By June 28, the vehicles would be able to drive themselves from the factory to a customer house, he added. Do you work for Tesla or have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at gkay@ or Signal at 248-894-6012. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
10 Cities Where It's Easiest for Renters To Take the Leap to Homeownership
According to the latest available U.S. Census Bureau data, 66% of Americans own their homes, which means roughly one-third of Americans are currently renting or have other living arrangements. For renters who aspire to be homeowners, clearing the financial hurdles can be tough, but they have a better chance of achieving this goal in certain U.S. cities compared to others. Find Out: Also See: To find the cities where it's easiest for renters to become homeowners, Rocket Moving analyzed a number of factors including average home price, personal income, down payment size and mortgage approval rates. Based on this analysis, these are the cities where it's easiest for renters to achieve homeownership. Average home price: $226,800 Median down payment: $26,500 15-year mortgage rate: 4.84% Mortgage approval rate: 68.7% Learn More: Read More: Average home price: $346,700 Median down payment: $38,500 15-year mortgage rate: 5.00% Mortgage approval rate: 65.8% Discover More: Average home price: $245,500 Median down payment: $17,500 15-year mortgage rate: 4.94% Mortgage approval rate: 60.9% Average home price: $168,200 Median down payment: $6,600 15-year mortgage rate: 5.00% Mortgage approval rate: 54% Average home price: $301,800 Median down payment: $24,400 15-year mortgage rate: 4.99% Mortgage approval rate: 53.4% Find More: Average home price: $268,600 Median down payment: $24,500 15-year mortgage rate: 4.96% Mortgage approval rate: 68.8% Average home price: $228,300 Median down payment: $8,800 15-year mortgage rate: 4.91% Mortgage approval rate: 53.5% Average home price: $271,900 Median down payment: $25,400 15-year mortgage rate: 4.86% Mortgage approval rate: 61.4% Explore More: Average home price: $249,900 Median down payment: $23,200 15-year mortgage rate: 4.86% Mortgage approval rate: 61.3% Average home price: $252,400 Median down payment: $17,800 15-year mortgage rate: 4.90% Mortgage approval rate: 60% Editor's note: Data was sourced from Rocket Moving and is accurate as of May 21, 2025. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy This article originally appeared on 10 Cities Where It's Easiest for Renters To Take the Leap to Homeownership Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Could Investing $50,000 in the S&P 500 Today Put You on Track to Have a $1 Million Portfolio by the Time You Retire?
The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF is one of the more popular ways for investors to track the index. By doing so, you can earn a solid return over the long run without taking on unnecessary risk. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard S&P 500 ETF › If you're an investor who just wants to put money into the stock market today and forget about it, the S&P 500 index can help you generate some terrific returns. The broad index tracks the leading stocks on U.S. exchanges and can give you broad, comprehensive exposure to the overall market without investing in small or risky companies. You have probably heard that investing in the market and perhaps the index has historically been a good move. But how good could its future gains be, and could investing $50,000 into an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that tracks the S&P 500 create a portfolio worth at least $1 million by the time you retire? Let's take a look. Historically, the S&P 500 has generated annual returns of around 10%. That may not seem like much if your goal is to generate significant growth. But this is where patience can pay off richly. Let's assume you invest in the market and your average annual return is 10% over 10 years. By then, your investment will have more than doubled and be worth around 2.6 times its original value. And let's say you hold on for even longer -- 25 years. If you still end up averaging a 10% annual return, your portfolio will have grown to 10.8 times its original value. This is why over the long term, anyone can conceivably amass significant returns, regardless of their investing abilities. There's no secret to it: Investing in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) like the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO), which tracks the broad index, can be a great long-term strategy that yields impressive results. Rather than trying to guess what rate the S&P 500 will grow at in the future, I've created a table showing you a range of possibilities, with annual returns between 8% and 12%, using a $50,000 investment in the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF or similar ETF over at least 25 years. This can allow you to see both a worst-case scenario (the investment underperforms the S&P's historical average) and a best-case scenario (it does far better than usual). Years 8% Growth 9% Growth 10% Growth 11% Growth 12% Growth 25 $342,424 $431,154 $541,735 $679,273 $850,003 30 $503,133 $663,384 $872,470 $1,144,615 $1,497,996 35 $739,267 $1,020,698 $1,405,122 $1,928,743 $2,639,981 40 $1,086,226 $1,570,471 $2,262,963 $3,250,043 $4,652,549 Calculations and table by author. While it is possible to get to $1 million from investing $50,000 into an S&P 500 ETF today, if the market underperforms, it could take 35 years or more to reach that milestone. The biggest unknown and most difficult variable to account for is the growth rate, which has a massive impact on your gains, as you can see from the table above. By investing in the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (or a similar fund), you will have a solid pillar upon which to build your portfolio. You can make smaller investments into other stocks, but if you have the bulk of your money in an investment with exposure to the S&P 500 index, that can give you a lot of long-term stability. And even if you're not confident about how the market will do in the long run, odds are you'll still be better off sticking with an ETF like this. Many fund managers struggle to outperform the index. And as confident as you may be about your stock-picking abilities, when deploying a buy-and-hold strategy for retirement that may span decades, it can be a lot easier and less risky to simply put that money into an ETF that tracks the S&P 500. Before you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,821!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $886,880!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 791% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 David Jagielski has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could Investing $50,000 in the S&P 500 Today Put You on Track to Have a $1 Million Portfolio by the Time You Retire? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data