NYT Strands today: Clues, answers, Spangram for June 01, 2025
The New York Times published its inaugural crossword puzzle on February 15, 1942, in the Sunday Magazine. Created by Charles Erlenkotter and edited by Margaret Farrar, it was the first major newspaper to feature a crossword puzzle. Over the years, the NYT has introduced several beloved games, including the Mini Crossword in 2014, followed by Spelling Bee, Letter Boxed, and Tiles. In 2022, the NYT launched the wildly popular Wordle, followed by additional games like Connections and Strands.
NYT Strands
is the latest addition to its puzzle offerings. This engaging daily game presents players with new themes each day, challenging them to uncover all the words on the grid. One of the game's highlights is the special Spangram, which stretches across two sides of the board. With its innovative approach to word puzzles, Strands quickly became a fan favorite, adding to the diverse and exciting puzzle lineup of the New York Times.
NYT Strands June 01 2025 – Hints, answers, Spangram
Having trouble solving today's NYT Strands puzzle? We're here to help with some easy hints to fuel your curiosity even more. Plus, we've got today's answer waiting for you – just keep reading.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
Today's NYT Strands puzzle theme
The theme for today's Strands is 'All rise'
Hints for today's Strands
Below, we've shared the hints, answers, and Spangram for today's NYT Strands puzzle. The hints may give away part or all of the Strands, so proceed with caution. Scroll down to continue:
Hints
Hint #1: an enclosed space where trials or other legal cases are held.
Hint #2: a claim or piece of evidence shared by a criminal suspect that they were in a different place when the offence was committed.
NYT Strands June 01, 2025 – Hints, answers, Spangram
Spangram for today
YourHonor
is the Spangram for today's NYT Strands puzzle.
Today's Strands' answers:
LAWYER
BAIL
ALIBI
MOTION
COURTROOM
OBJECTION
What are NYT Strands and how to play the game?
Strands is a puzzle game that blends elements of Connections, Spelling Bee, and classic crossword puzzles. Players are given 48 letters arranged on a 6 x 8-inch grid, along with a daily theme. The goal is to solve the Spangram and uncover all the theme-related words.
To play, connect letters on the grid to form words by dragging your mouse or fingers (on a touchscreen) in horizontal, vertical, or diagonal directions.
Start by identifying the central theme word or Spangram, which will help you understand the puzzle's theme.
In addition to the Spangram, you must also find other words related to the theme hidden in the grid. Once you've uncovered them all, the puzzle is complete.
Tips for solving NYT Strands puzzle
Identify the theme words: Fill in the grid with the theme words. Once found, they will be highlighted in blue and won't overlap with each other.
Find the Spangram: Identify the Spangram, a key part of the puzzle that connects two opposite sides of the grid. It encapsulates the theme and may consist of two words. The Spangram will be highlighted in yellow once you've located it.
Take advantage of hints: Pay attention to off-topic words for clues. For every three non-theme words you uncover, letters will be highlighted to give you a hint toward finding a theme word, without directly revealing it.
Also Read |
NYT Wordle
|
Roblox Da Hood Codes
|
Roblox Haze Piece codes
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gang rivalry leads to twin murders in Kovilpatti, nine arrested
Tuticorin: Two murders, believed to be retaliatory in nature, took place within a span of 30 minutes on Sunday night in a shocking escalation of violence at Kovilpatti in Tuticorin district. The murders sent shockwaves in the region. According to police sources, A Pragadheeswaran, 20, of Valluvar Nagar, was hacked to death near a Tasmac shop on Kadalaiyur Road. He had reportedly engaged in a heated argument with a group of men before being brutally attacked. The assailants, believed to be from a rival faction, fled the scene immediately after the murder. Less than half an hour later, a gang believed to be aligned with Pragadheeswaran retaliated by storming the residence of B Kasthuri, 50, at Shenbaga Nagar in Pudhugramam, and hacked her to death. Kasthuri, who died on the spot, was the mother of B Sathish, 22—one of the alleged attackers involved in the earlier incident. Her brother, S Shenbagaraj, who attempted to intervene, sustained injuries in the attack and was admitted to Kovilpatti govt hospital. The Kovilpatti East police rushed to both crime scenes, recovered the bodies, and sent them for postmortem. As a precautionary measure, Pragadheeswaran's body was sent to Virudhunagar Government Medical College Hospital, while Kasthuri's was taken to Tirunelveli Government Medical College Hospital. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Preliminary investigations suggest that long-standing enmity between the two families led to the murders. Police revealed that Pragadheeswaran had a prior conflict with Sathish over damage to a wedding banner. On Sunday night, Sathish and his friends allegedly carried out the attack on Pragadheeswaran. In retaliation, Kasthuri was murdered at her home. Tuticorin superintendent of police, Albert John, confirmed that nine suspects have been taken into custody in connection with the double murder. "A force of 90 police under additional SP oversaw vulnerable areas. DSP Kovilpatti and team secured four accused within minutes of the incidents. This prevented murders from escalating into a law and order concern," he added. Further investigation is underway.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cases beyond media glare remain stuck for years
It took 162 days for the lone suspect in the case to be convicted. The incident happened on Dec 23 and was reported the next day. In Feb a special investigation team formed by Madras HC laid the chargesheet, and on Monday, Gnanasekaran got life term. While appreciating the swift conviction in the case, jurists and activists point out that several thousands of other victims — especially in so-called non-sensational cases — are left waiting indefinitely for justice. More than 46,000 criminal cases in Chennai remained unresolved as of 2023, and many involved serious offences such as murder, cheating, and robbery. Of these, 6,000 cases were idling for more than a decade, with no chargesheet filed. A chargesheet marks end of police probe and beginning of trial in court. "Only high-profile cases with media glare move fast. What about those in rural or under-reported areas without that visibility," asked social activist R Viswanath. He said justice should be uniformly accessible for all. Key reasons for the backlog include the absence of a unit dedicated to monitoring investigation progress, delays in forensic and postmortem reports, and frequent transfers of investigating officers. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Encontre voos low-cost Voos | Anúncios de Pesquisa Saiba Mais Undo Without timely chargesheets, courts cannot initiate hearings. The delays also risk suspects walking free. Under Section 167 of the CrPC, those in custody must be released on bail if chargesheets aren't filed within 60 or 90 days, depending on the offence. "This loophole lets accused misuse bail to tamper with evidence," said advocate R Chandar. Senior police officials admit that investigating officers—usually from law-and-order units — are overburdened and lack time for proper probe and documentation. Though zones such as North and West Chennai introduced colour-coded alerts to track deadlines and fixed tenures for officers, these are piecemeal solutions. A comprehensive, state-wide policy is needed to streamline case tracking, officer accountability, and forensic coordination—ensuring the justice system works for all, not just the headline cases, say experts.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Punjab and Haryana high court declines to direct Punjab to appoint spy's son as Sub-Inspector, cites lack of policy
Chandigarh: The Punjab and Haryana high court has declined to direct Punjab to appoint a man as a sub-inspector (S-I) in the state police despite his father serving as an undercover agent and enduring a decade in a Pakistan prison following his capture for espionage. The court noted that in the absence of an established policy providing such appointments, it was not in a position to compel the state to act. Justice Jagmohan Bansal has passed the orders while dismissing a plea filed by Neeraj Sharma seeking directions to set aside the order dated Feb 7, 2024, and other orders of different dates whereby the Punjab govt rejected his representations for appointment as S-I in the state police. The petitioner claimed that his father, a spy with the Intelligence Bureau (IB), was apprehended by the Pakistan Army in Dec 1968. He was tried by a military court and awarded a sentence of 10 years. He was released in Dec 1974 and returned to India via the Wagah-Attari border, Amritsar. Through an application dated Aug 6, 2008, he requested then chief minister to help him like Kashmir Singh, a Hoshiarpur resident who was jailed for nearly 35 years in Pakistan on charges of spying and released in March 2008. Ferozepur deputy commissioner (DC), in a letter dated Nov 27, 2013, intimated that the monthly income of the family was around Rs 6,000 and they had only one house measuring 3 Marla. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Soluções de energia de confiança para Data Centers de IA Siemens Energy Learn More Undo On Dec 24, 2014, the CM sanctioned financial assistance of Rs 50,000. The petitioner submitted an application dated July 7, 2018, to the CM to give him a job like similarly situated persons. His father died on Oct 22, 2018. A communication took place between different authorities and ultimately, the petitioner, despite possessing qualifications of DPharmacy and BSc (medical), was offered the post of constable, which he took up. However, his pleas for appointment to the higher post of S-I were rejected. In his plea before the HC, his counsel submitted that the petitioner is a highly qualified person, and the state has offered Class-B posts to similarly situated persons. On the grounds of parity, the petitioner should be given the post of at least assistant sub-inspector instead of constable. Responding to the plea, the Punjab govt submitted that there is no policy of the state to make appointments as claimed by the petitioner. After hearing all the parties, the bench observed that the court, in the absence of an express or implied policy of the state govt, cannot direct authorities to consider the petitioner for a higher rank, especially when he has already been offered and appointed as a constable without complying with the terms and conditions applicable to the post. MSID:: 121570821 413 |
