US Marines carry out first known detention of civilian in Los Angeles, video shows
The incident took place at the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles where Marines took charge of the mission to protect the building earlier on Friday, in a rare domestic use of US troops after days of protests over immigration raids.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump knocks California on its heels: ‘He's pulling the trigger on everything all at once.'
California Democrats have long battled Donald Trump. But they've never faced such a ferocious offensive as they did this week. Between the deployment of federal agents to Los Angeles, the gutting of climate standards and the manhandling of the state's senior U.S. senator, the state absorbed one show of force after another from the president. And in the balance of power between the Trump administration and the nation's most populous state, California was on the losing end. 'We're at DEFCON 1 in the conflict between California and the Trump administration,' said Democratic strategist Katie Merrill. 'It's orders of magnitude more than what we've seen, ever.' Democrats in this deep-blue state have spent years working to shield California from a hostile White House, dating back to his first term. But for them, the week's events registered a new low — a multifront assault that not only threatened the state's liberal values, but exposed the limits of California's ability to control its destiny when the federal government has other ideas. 'The moment we've feared,' Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a Tuesday night address, 'has arrived.' Trump's focus on California is predictable. The state was a perennial first-term target term that Republicans and conservative media allies have relentlessly portrayed as dysfunctional and lawless. It has produced national Democratic figures, like Newsom and former Vice President Kamala Harris, who have eagerly hoisted the anti-Trump banner. Elected officials spent months preparing for a second Trump administration. They studied Project 2025 and set aside money to contest Trump's agenda in court. But the scale and aggressiveness of the onslaught has still stunned them. The harrowing stretch for California Democrats began with immigration raids across the Los Angeles area. Then, when protests sprang up, Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops to the region over Newsom's objections. He then moved to eliminate California's vehicle emissions standards as his administration contemplated withholding education dollars over California's policies on transgender athletes. By Thursday, Democrats were watching with outrage a video clip of Padilla being forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security news conference, pulled to the ground and handcuffed. And that night, just hours after a federal judge ordered the president to end his unilateral deployment of the state's National Guard, an appeals court preserved his ability to do so, at least temporarily. It marked a major escalation of the Democratic state's long-running feud with the president to a new, existential echelon of antagonism. 'Federalizing the National Guard was in the 2025 plan, but we hoped he wouldn't do something so drastic and dramatic,' said Dana Williamson, who was Newsom's chief of staff until earlier this year. 'He's pulling the trigger on everything all at once.' Trump's decision to enlist the National Guard and Marines in his immigration agenda — and in Los Angeles, a bastion of Latino political power — has made California a globally watched test case for the limits of federal power. Hours before Judge Charles Breyer issued his decision ordering Trump to end his deployment of the Guard, Padilla strode into a press conference to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and was forcibly restrained. Images of a supine Padilla surrounded by federal agents ignited universal Democratic condemnation and came to symbolize the stakes of California's fight with the federal government. Many Democrats argued the White House had pushed California to the precipice of authoritarianism. Federal pressure on California's political luminaries extended beyond Padilla's confrontation with Noem: Officials detained prominent union leader David Huerta; Sen. Josh Hawley launched an investigation into a Los Angeles-based immigrant advocacy group; and Border czar Tom Homan threatened to arrest anyone, including Newsom, who interfered with federal enforcement. 'This is about an abuse of power. This is about a desire to cross red lines time and time again,' said California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks. 'We see that in other parts of the world,' Hicks added about Padilla. 'We don't see that here. If there weren't enough wakeup calls over the last week, that sure is one.' Padilla's treatment drew wall-to-wall coverage. But it was only one squall in the storm engulfing California. While the immigration raids plunged California into a political maelstrom, Newsom and other officials were also bracing against the threat of the Trump administration slashing funding as the president and education Secretary Linda McMahon assailed the state's policies on trans students. Then there was Trump's move to override some of California's signature climate change policies. 'They're looking to make California the punching bag,' said California Environmental Voters Executive Director Mike Young. 'We're flabbergasted and really disgusted by what's happening.' As a pillar of Democratic politics and the world's fourth-largest economy, California has long sought to mold a broader economic and political agenda. During Trump's first term, California passed a 'sanctuary' law shielding immigrants and struck an auto emissions deal that Newsom proclaimed as 'checkmate' over Trump. But it turned out to be just one move in a larger chess match. And Trump is demonstrating that he holds the most powerful pieces: a compliant Republican Congress, a conservative Supreme Court, and above all, federal supremacy over even large, wealthy states. 'The idea that the federal government can bigfoot the state government is coming to the fore,' said Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson. 'We are experiencing that, if you have a power struggle between the federal government and the states, chances are pretty high that the federal government wins.' While Newsom notched a victory on Thursday when a judge ordered Trump to relinquish control of the National Guard, it proved short-lived when an appeals court blocked the order for at least a few days, setting a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. The governor has walked back his threat to retaliate against withheld funding by blocking the flow of tax dollars from California to Washington. Republicans say the Constitution is squarely on their side, arguing they are rescuing California's citizens from ruinous immigration and climate policies. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement that Trump 'rightfully stepped in to protect federal law enforcement officers' when Newsom would not. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said Trump acted to squelch California's 'costly, unrealistic, and tyrannical' climate policies. 'The goal is to help California,' said GOP Rep. Kevin Kiley, who spearheaded the push to reverse Newsom's gas car phaseout, 'and unfortunately helping California means all too often fighting against or counteracting the politicians who hold power in our state.' Democrats say Trump is pushing limits of the law and regularly violating it. 'The lying has become more brazen. The overreach has become more evident,' said Xavier Becerra, the former state attorney general and former health secretary under President Joe Biden. 'They've dialed up the severity, the volatility of their actions, they've dialed up the intensity of their misrepresentations, but it's still at the end of the day the same unlawful actions the courts rejected the first time Donald Trump was president." He said, 'This president won't take no for an answer. He'll continue to try to do it his way even if it runs counter to the Constitution.' California's current attorney general, Rob Bonta — whose office on Thursday sued to block the environmental rollback and then squared off with Department of Justice attorneys over the National Guard deployment — told reporters he was on pace to bring twice as many legal actions as during the first Trump administration. That reaction is of a newly urgent necessity, he suggested. 'The speed and the volume in Trump 2.0 is materially different,' Bonta said. 'The shamelessness and brazenness of the violations — they seem more severe.'
Chicago Tribune
39 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Cities brace for large crowds at anti-Trump ‘No Kings' protests across the US
PHILADELPHIA — Cities large and small were preparing for major demonstrations Saturday across the U.S. against President Donald Trump, as officials urge calm, National Guard troops mobilize and Trump attends a military parade in Washington to mark the Army's 250th anniversary. A flagship 'No Kings' march and rally are planned in Philadelphia, but no events are scheduled to take place in Washington, D.C., where the military parade will take place on Trump's birthday. The demonstrations come on the heels of protests flaring up around the country over federal immigration enforcement raids that began last week and Trump ordering National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles where protesters blocked a freeway and set cars on fire. Police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades while officials enforced curfews in Los Angeles and Democratic governors called Trump's Guard deployment 'an alarming abuse of power' that 'shows the Trump administration does not trust local law enforcement.' Tens of thousands expected to march in Chicago's 'No Kings' rally in defiance of Donald TrumpGovernors and city officials vowed to protect the right to protest and to show no tolerance for violence. Republican governors in Virginia, Texas, Nebraska and Missouri are mobilizing National Guard troops to help law enforcement manage demonstrations. There will be 'zero tolerance' for violence, destruction or disrupting traffic, and 'if you violate the law, you're going to be arrested,' Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin told reporters Friday. In Missouri, Gov. Mike Kehoe issued a similar message, vowing to take a proactive approach and not to 'wait for chaos to ensue.' Nebraska's governor on Friday also signed an emergency proclamation for activating his state's National Guard, a step his office called 'a precautionary measure in reaction to recent instances of civil unrest across the country.' Organizers say that one march will go to the gates of Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, where Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis warned demonstrators that the 'line is very clear' and not to cross it. Governors also urged calm. On social media, Washington state Gov. Bob Ferguson, a Democrat, called for peaceful protests over the weekend, to ensure Trump doesn't send military to the state. 'Donald Trump wants to be able to say that we cannot handle our own public safety in Washington state,' Ferguson said. In a statement Friday, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, urged 'protestors to remain peaceful and calm as they exercise their First Amendment right to make their voices heard.' Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, said his administration and state police are working with police in Philadelphia ahead of what organizers estimate could be a crowd approaching 100,000 people. Philadelphia's top prosecutor, District Attorney Larry Krasner, warned that anyone coming to Philadelphia to break the law or immigration agents exceeding their authority will face arrest. He invoked civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. as a guide for demonstrators. 'If you are doing what Martin Luther King would have done, you're going to be fine,' Krasner told a news conference. Some law enforcement agencies announced they were ramping up efforts for the weekend. In California, state troopers will be on 'tactical alert,' which means all days off are canceled for all officers. The 'No Kings' theme was orchestrated by the 50501 Movement, to support democracy and against what they call the authoritarian actions of the Trump administration. The name 50501 stands for 50 states, 50 protests, one movement. Protests earlier this year have denounced Trump and billionaire adviser Elon Musk. Protesters have called for Trump to be 'dethroned' as they compare his actions to that of a king and not a democratically elected president. The No Kings Day of Defiance has been organized to reject authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics and the militarization of the country's democracy, according to a statement by organizers. Organizers intend for the protests to counter the Army's 250th anniversary celebration — which Trump has ratcheted up to include a military parade, which is estimated to cost $25 million to $45 millionthat the Army expects to attract as many as 200,000 people. The event will feature hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers. It also happens to be Trump's 79th birthday and Flag Day. 'The flag doesn't belong to President Trump. It belongs to us,' the 'No Kings' website says. 'On June 14th, we're showing up everywhere he isn't — to say no thrones, no crowns, no kings.' Protests in nearly 2,000 locations are scheduled around the country, from city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, organizers said. Demonstrations are expected to include speeches and marches, organizers said in a call Wednesday. The group says a core principle behind all 'No Kings' events is a commitment to nonviolent action, and participants are expected to seek to de-escalate any confrontation. No weapons of any kind should be taken to 'No Kings' events, according to the website. The No Kings Day of Defiance is expected to be the largest single-day mobilization since Trump returned to office, organizers said. Organizers said they are preparing for millions of people to take to the streets across all 50 states and commonwealths.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
The week Trump rocked California: ‘He's pulling the trigger on everything all at once.'
California Democrats have long battled Donald Trump. But they've never faced such a ferocious offensive as they did this week. Between the deployment of federal agents to Los Angeles, the gutting of climate standards and the manhandling of the state's senior U.S. senator, the state absorbed one show of force after another from the president. And in the balance of power between the Trump administration and the nation's most populous state, California was on the losing end. 'We're at DEFCON 1 in the conflict between California and the Trump administration,' said Democratic strategist Katie Merrill. 'It's orders of magnitude more than what we've seen, ever.' Democrats in this deep-blue state have spent years working to shield California from a hostile White House, dating back to his first term. But for them, the week's events registered a new low — a multifront assault that not only threatened the state's liberal values, but exposed the limits of California's ability to control its destiny when the federal government has other ideas. 'The moment we've feared,' Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a Tuesday night address, 'has arrived.' Trump's focus on California is predictable. The state was a perennial first-term target term that Republicans and conservative media allies have relentlessly portrayed as dysfunctional and lawless. It has produced national Democratic figures, like Newsom and former Vice President Kamala Harris, who have eagerly hoisted the anti-Trump banner. Elected officials spent months preparing for a second Trump administration. They studied Project 2025 and set aside money to contest Trump's agenda in court. But the scale and aggressiveness of the onslaught has still stunned them. The harrowing stretch for California Democrats began with immigration raids across the Los Angeles area. Then, when protests sprang up, Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops to the region over Newsom's objections. He then moved to eliminate California's vehicle emissions standards as his administration contemplated withholding education dollars over California's policies on transgender athletes. By Thursday, Democrats were watching with outrage a video clip of Padilla being forcibly removed from a Department of Homeland Security news conference, pulled to the ground and handcuffed. And that night, just hours after a federal judge ordered the president to end his unilateral deployment of the state's National Guard, an appeals court preserved his ability to do so, at least temporarily. It marked a major escalation of the Democratic state's long-running feud with the president to a new, existential echelon of antagonism. 'Federalizing the National Guard was in the 2025 plan, but we hoped he wouldn't do something so drastic and dramatic,' said Dana Williamson, who was Newsom's chief of staff until earlier this year. 'He's pulling the trigger on everything all at once.' Trump's decision to enlist the National Guard and Marines in his immigration agenda — and in Los Angeles, a bastion of Latino political power — has made California a globally watched test case for the limits of federal power. Hours before Judge Charles Breyer issued his decision ordering Trump to end his deployment of the Guard, Padilla strode into a press conference to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and was forcibly restrained. Images of a supine Padilla surrounded by federal agents ignited universal Democratic condemnation and came to symbolize the stakes of California's fight with the federal government. Many Democrats argued the White House had pushed California to the precipice of authoritarianism. Federal pressure on California's political luminaries extended beyond Padilla's confrontation with Noem: Officials detained prominent union leader David Huerta; Sen. Josh Hawley launched an investigation into a Los Angeles-based immigrant advocacy group; and Border czar Tom Homan threatened to arrest anyone, including Newsom, who interfered with federal enforcement. 'This is about an abuse of power. This is about a desire to cross red lines time and time again,' said California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks. 'We see that in other parts of the world,' Hicks added about Padilla. 'We don't see that here. If there weren't enough wakeup calls over the last week, that sure is one.' Padilla's treatment drew wall-to-wall coverage. But it was only one squall in the storm engulfing California. While the immigration raids plunged California into a political maelstrom, Newsom and other officials were also bracing against the threat of the Trump administration slashing funding as the president and education Secretary Linda McMahon assailed the state's policies on trans students. Then there was Trump's move to override some of California's signature climate change policies. 'They're looking to make California the punching bag,' said California Environmental Voters Executive Director Mike Young. 'We're flabbergasted and really disgusted by what's happening.' As a pillar of Democratic politics and the world's fourth-largest economy, California has long sought to mold a broader economic and political agenda. During Trump's first term, California passed a 'sanctuary' law shielding immigrants and struck an auto emissions deal that Newsom proclaimed as 'checkmate' over Trump. But it turned out to be just one move in a larger chess match. And Trump is demonstrating that he holds the most powerful pieces: a compliant Republican Congress, a conservative Supreme Court, and above all, federal supremacy over even large, wealthy states. 'The idea that the federal government can bigfoot the state government is coming to the fore,' said Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson. 'We are experiencing that, if you have a power struggle between the federal government and the states, chances are pretty high that the federal government wins.' While Newsom notched a victory on Thursday when a judge ordered Trump to relinquish control of the National Guard, it proved short-lived when an appeals court blocked the order for at least a few days, setting a hearing on the matter for Tuesday. The governor has walked back his threat to retaliate against withheld funding by blocking the flow of tax dollars from California to Washington. Republicans say the Constitution is squarely on their side, arguing they are rescuing California's citizens from ruinous immigration and climate policies. White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement that Trump 'rightfully stepped in to protect federal law enforcement officers' when Newsom would not. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said Trump acted to squelch California's 'costly, unrealistic, and tyrannical' climate policies. 'The goal is to help California,' said GOP Rep. Kevin Kiley, who spearheaded the push to reverse Newsom's gas car phaseout, 'and unfortunately helping California means all too often fighting against or counteracting the politicians who hold power in our state.' Democrats say Trump is pushing limits of the law and regularly violating it. 'The lying has become more brazen. The overreach has become more evident,' said Xavier Becerra, the former state attorney general and former health secretary under President Joe Biden. 'They've dialed up the severity, the volatility of their actions, they've dialed up the intensity of their misrepresentations, but it's still at the end of the day the same unlawful actions the courts rejected the first time Donald Trump was president.' He said, 'This president won't take no for an answer. He'll continue to try to do it his way even if it runs counter to the Constitution.' California's current attorney general, Rob Bonta — whose office on Thursday sued to block the environmental rollback and then squared off with Department of Justice attorneys over the National Guard deployment — told reporters he was on pace to bring twice as many legal actions as during the first Trump administration. That reaction is of a newly urgent necessity, he suggested. 'The speed and the volume in Trump 2.0 is materially different,' Bonta said. 'The shamelessness and brazenness of the violations — they seem more severe.'
