Cities brace for large crowds at anti-Trump ‘No Kings' protests across the US
PHILADELPHIA — Cities large and small were preparing for major demonstrations Saturday across the U.S. against President Donald Trump, as officials urge calm, National Guard troops mobilize and Trump attends a military parade in Washington to mark the Army's 250th anniversary.
A flagship 'No Kings' march and rally are planned in Philadelphia, but no events are scheduled to take place in Washington, D.C., where the military parade will take place on Trump's birthday.
The demonstrations come on the heels of protests flaring up around the country over federal immigration enforcement raids that began last week and Trump ordering National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles where protesters blocked a freeway and set cars on fire.
Police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades while officials enforced curfews in Los Angeles and Democratic governors called Trump's Guard deployment 'an alarming abuse of power' that 'shows the Trump administration does not trust local law enforcement.'
Tens of thousands expected to march in Chicago's 'No Kings' rally in defiance of Donald TrumpGovernors and city officials vowed to protect the right to protest and to show no tolerance for violence.
Republican governors in Virginia, Texas, Nebraska and Missouri are mobilizing National Guard troops to help law enforcement manage demonstrations.
There will be 'zero tolerance' for violence, destruction or disrupting traffic, and 'if you violate the law, you're going to be arrested,' Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin told reporters Friday.
In Missouri, Gov. Mike Kehoe issued a similar message, vowing to take a proactive approach and not to 'wait for chaos to ensue.'
Nebraska's governor on Friday also signed an emergency proclamation for activating his state's National Guard, a step his office called 'a precautionary measure in reaction to recent instances of civil unrest across the country.'
Organizers say that one march will go to the gates of Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, where Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis warned demonstrators that the 'line is very clear' and not to cross it.
Governors also urged calm.
On social media, Washington state Gov. Bob Ferguson, a Democrat, called for peaceful protests over the weekend, to ensure Trump doesn't send military to the state.
'Donald Trump wants to be able to say that we cannot handle our own public safety in Washington state,' Ferguson said.
In a statement Friday, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs, a Democrat, urged 'protestors to remain peaceful and calm as they exercise their First Amendment right to make their voices heard.'
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, said his administration and state police are working with police in Philadelphia ahead of what organizers estimate could be a crowd approaching 100,000 people.
Philadelphia's top prosecutor, District Attorney Larry Krasner, warned that anyone coming to Philadelphia to break the law or immigration agents exceeding their authority will face arrest. He invoked civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. as a guide for demonstrators.
'If you are doing what Martin Luther King would have done, you're going to be fine,' Krasner told a news conference.
Some law enforcement agencies announced they were ramping up efforts for the weekend. In California, state troopers will be on 'tactical alert,' which means all days off are canceled for all officers.
The 'No Kings' theme was orchestrated by the 50501 Movement, to support democracy and against what they call the authoritarian actions of the Trump administration. The name 50501 stands for 50 states, 50 protests, one movement.
Protests earlier this year have denounced Trump and billionaire adviser Elon Musk. Protesters have called for Trump to be 'dethroned' as they compare his actions to that of a king and not a democratically elected president.
The No Kings Day of Defiance has been organized to reject authoritarianism, billionaire-first politics and the militarization of the country's democracy, according to a statement by organizers.
Organizers intend for the protests to counter the Army's 250th anniversary celebration — which Trump has ratcheted up to include a military parade, which is estimated to cost $25 million to $45 millionthat the Army expects to attract as many as 200,000 people.
The event will feature hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers. It also happens to be Trump's 79th birthday and Flag Day.
'The flag doesn't belong to President Trump. It belongs to us,' the 'No Kings' website says. 'On June 14th, we're showing up everywhere he isn't — to say no thrones, no crowns, no kings.'
Protests in nearly 2,000 locations are scheduled around the country, from city blocks to small towns, from courthouse steps to community parks, organizers said.
Demonstrations are expected to include speeches and marches, organizers said in a call Wednesday. The group says a core principle behind all 'No Kings' events is a commitment to nonviolent action, and participants are expected to seek to de-escalate any confrontation.
No weapons of any kind should be taken to 'No Kings' events, according to the website.
The No Kings Day of Defiance is expected to be the largest single-day mobilization since Trump returned to office, organizers said. Organizers said they are preparing for millions of people to take to the streets across all 50 states and commonwealths.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
17 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Sen. Padilla's removal from Noem event indicative of Trump's cynical policies
The slam down, handcuffing and forceful removal of Sen. Alex Padilla from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference on Thursday flows from the violence and unrest caused by President Donald Trump's policies to go after the undocumented immigrants where they work, shop and go to school. Immigrants are not criminals but hard-working people (often in jobs others would not consider) who pay taxes and contribute significantly to our economy. They have been allowed to stay in the United States, often for generations, because they are needed Both political parties have failed to pass legislation that would deal with immigration in an efficient and humane way. The most recent attempt, before the presidential election, would have passed but for the opposition of candidate Trump, who cynically sought to exploit the issue. I fear he is now exploiting the unrest he is causing to use it as a means to declare martial law and gain absolute power. Tom Miller, Oakland Deport the worst I am somewhat appalled by the media describing the disruptions in Los Angeles as mostly peaceful demonstrations protected by free speech, accompanied by pictures of burning cars, looting and attacks on police. If these people want to peacefully join our society, why are some of them waving Mexican and, in a few cases, BLM flags? If they intend to intimidate me, they should return to their own country, self-identified by the flag they are waving. Most of our forebears came here legally and peacefully, including, in my case, some from Mexico. I would be happy with a system that screens potential citizens, and excludes those who want to commit crimes or intimidate those around them. I approve of President Donald Trump's stated goal of deporting the worst first. We need to get rid of those who commit crimes. I would be happy to see new citizens, but not the thugs who intimidate us through their demonstrations. Peter Behr, San Anselmo Newsom is right Regarding 'Trump vs. Newsom an ugly skirmish that benefits both politicians' (Politics, June 10): The story suggests that President Donald Trump's search for dictatorial powers through intimidation, fear and escalating violence, and Gov Gavin Newsom calling this out is simply a tit-for-tat play for the attention of an uninformed public. It is becoming more obvious that Trump is trying to tear down the guardrails of civil society, trash the Constitution and eliminate all opposition. If Gov. Newsom did not express his strong, powerful and articulate opposition to this despicable behavior, he would not be doing his job. The Chronicle must not be afraid to illuminate the fact that Trump is a mortal danger to our democratic way of life. Kanda Alahan, Concord
Buzz Feed
19 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
18 People Reacted To Trump Possibly Pardoning Diddy
As you probably know by now, Sean 'Diddy' Combs was indicted in 2024 on federal charges including sex trafficking and racketeering. Recently, HuffPost and BuzzFeed wrote about how Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked the president if he would consider pardoning Diddy. Trump told Doocy, "I haven't spoken to him in years. He used to really like me a lot, but I think when I ran for politics, that relationship busted up, from what I read." "I don't know, he didn't tell me that. But I'd read some … nasty statements in the paper all of a sudden." Trump, who once ran in the same wealthy social circles as Diddy, continued, "You know, it's different. You become a much different person when you run for politics, and you do what's right. I could do other things, and I'm sure he'd like me, and I'm sure other people would like me, but it wouldn't be as good for our country." In other words, Trump didn't give a definitive answer on whether he would pardon Diddy. People in the comments had a lot to say on the topic. Here are some of the best replies: "If Diddy is found guilty, he should not be pardoned. Stop pardoning people who were found or plead guilty." —cole Melton "When considering whether to pardon someone, Trump couldn't care less about whether a person is guilty. As long as the person has some kind words for Trump and/or helped Trump get even richer, the person has a good chance of getting a pardon." "Ask Trump voters if they voted for this corruption of the pardon system."—Carl Hayman "The fact that Trump commented on pardoning Diddy during an active, ongoing trial…I am just speechless. It completely undermines the entire justice system." "Always follow the money. Trump is using the power to pardon as an ATM. He only cares about the next money making opportunity, not law and order, justice, the Constitution, or keeping the guilty in jail. And most assuredly not you and me." —d icard "Even MAGA people on Fox and Breitbart are exploding over this. They hate this idea. Democrats need to keep the topic of Trump possibly pardoning Diddy front and center. Talk about it whenever they can. Keep it in the headlines." —TACO Trump "He says, 'I would certainly look at the facts.' And then what? Ignore them like he did with the results of the 2020 election? It used to be that if you wanted to win a high political office, you had to have character. Now all it takes (at least if you're a Republican) is to be a character." —Carl Olson "'You are the company you keep' has never been more true than as it relates to these two." "There is no justice system if anyone can simply prove love to their president and get a pardon." —Cory Crete"Pardons are now for sale."—James Gettings "Well, being liked is obviously the most important factor in any pardon." —Les Vogt "This isn't just grotesque; it's the rot made visible. Trump floating a pardon for a man indicted for sex trafficking, while reminiscing about party invitations and wounded egos, is less a statement of justice than a confession of moral bankruptcy. It's not about innocence or guilt — it's about whether someone 'used to really like' him." "In Trump's world, the law isn't sacred; it's a velvet rope outside a nightclub, waved aside with the casual shrug of a man picking names from a guest list."—Miles West "If our Republic is still standing in a few years, a different Congress must amend the Constitution to limit presidential pardons." "No more presidential pardons. I would let them commute death sentences, but nothing more. Enough of this abuse. These people had their day in court and have had chances to appeal. I don't trust anyone with that power anymore. Get rid of it." —Charles James "It's so weird (but so typical) that Trump has to tell everyone that Diddy 'used to like me a lot,' as if that's the most relevant thing about the issue. What a terrible thing it must be to live a life actually believing inside that you're incapable of being loved. That's the overriding reality that has made Trump who he is — an immensely insecure, flawed man." —David Hardy "'When you're president you do what's right.' I can't believe he said that because he certainly doesn't abide by that whatsoever." —Jenny Tayla "Whenever he talks about anyone — and I mean anyone — he always comments on if that person likes him or not. Narcissistic dictator." "I pray that Trump does not pardon Diddy. He's just as bad as Jeffrey Epstein and R. Kelly." —smileyzombie492 "Trump is sans empathy. He is a woman-hating dumpster fire." —jamesnylan And finally, "At least he didn't say he would. I was relieved to not read even that. The bar is low. 😭" The article people commented on originally appeared on HuffPost.
Politico
32 minutes ago
- Politico
Florida plans for peak hurricane season amid storm of FEMA reforms
TALLAHASSEE, Florida — The Trump administration's talk about drastically altering FEMA's role in disaster recovery has generated heavy uncertainty. But hurricane season is now in full-swing, and with more experience in storm recovery than any other state, Florida's local emergency management officials are trying to stay focused on staying prepared. Florida's storm season began June 1. With the most active, historically volatile stretch a couple months away, county emergency managers have no time to plan for changes that FEMA, the White House and conservative allies have been discussing for some time. Instead, the state's disaster recovery network has decided to rely on itself — even if they may need federal assistance down the road. Jonathan Lord, president of the Florida Emergency Preparedness Association, said most county managers determined the risk of a powerful storm is greater than six months of talk about ways to cut federal disaster funding. 'Emergency managers can't let that noise blur what they need to do for their community,' Lord said. 'Whatever our federal government decides to do, we at the local level will just morph or evolve our programs to adjust to that new reality.' Florida has the history to back up their prep work: The devastation from Category 5 Hurricane Andrew in 1992 prompted officials to create a statewide emergency network that became a model for other states to follow. This safety net is fine-tuned after every hurricane season, from evacuation and sheltering plans managed by counties, to new training and education requirements for county emergency managers recently finalized by the state Legislature. But despite Florida's experience and expertise, the state historically has also relied on tens of billions of recovery dollars provided by FEMA. In most cases, the agency will agree to reimburse 75 percent of recovery costs incurred by the state, counties and municipalities impacted by a hurricane. But in many cases, FEMA has also agreed to cover 100 percent of the costs if the loss was deemed catastrophic, or if the community had no other means to cover repair bills. In 2022, Category 4 Hurricane Ian left Lee County with the largest cleanup bill in state history. A FEMA database of the $2.2 billion in funding requests awarded to Ian-impacted communities shows the agency agreed to cover 100 percent of Lee County's bills from the first several weeks after landfall. The days of 100 percent coverage from FEMA are expected to be far less frequent as the White House continues to review wasteful government spending. Florida Division of Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie told a joint-legislative budget committee meeting in June a similar message. 'Instead of us getting 100 percent disaster declarations for a period of time, those days are probably over,' Guthrie said as he defended his request for $850 million to cover costs from the hurricanes, flooding and tornadoes that hit the state last year. FEMA's case-by-case decision to award 100 percent funding has been a lifesaver for Florida's rural counties. After Category 5 Hurricane Michael tore through the Panhandle in 2018, FEMA had initially only agreed to cover 75 percent of the recovery costs incurred by counties impacted by the storm. Calhoun County was faced with millions in critical cleanup costs, but the county only had about $3 million on hand to front the millions more in cleanup costs that FEMA had agreed to pay. Those terms changed after Gov. Ron DeSantis took office three months after Michael made landfall and negotiated with the then-Trump White House to cover 100 percent of the costs that came up in the first several weeks after landfall. Guthrie's prediction on future federal disaster funding mirrors an April memo drafted by then-acting FEMA Administrator Cameron Hamilton. The memo, which Hamilton sent to the White House Office of Management and Budget, summarizes options to cut federal disaster spending, including increasing the share of the costs left to states and localities, and no longer agreeing to cover more than 75 percent. 'This is an action the President has already taken and can continue to take to reduce disaster costs,' Hamilton wrote in the memo, later adding, 'The President would retain authority to grant cost share exceptions.' President Donald Trump announced plans to eliminate FEMA shortly after he began his second White House term in January. Hamilton was fired by Trump in May after he told a House committee that FEMA should not be eliminated. He was replaced by now-acting FEMA Administrator David Richardson, who pushed forward with a reorganizational plan that sought to end FEMA's oversight of recovery projects meant to help shield communities from devastation left by future storms. Richardson walked back his plans ahead of the start of this year's hurricane season on June 1, and Trump has since said plans to wind down FEMA will not take place until the season ends at the end of November. Without any concrete decisions from Washington, Florida's county emergency managers have pressed ahead preparing for this year's hurricane season. Eric Poole, director for the Institute of County Government at the Florida Association of Counties, said most county managers are confident the terms of a disaster declaration, which dictate the amount of money FEMA is willing to pay for storm recovery costs, will still be left to the discretion of the president. 'There's always going to be the discretion of the president through FEMA to increase the cost of a disaster,' Poole said. 'It's all going to depend on the severity of the event and the community and its fiscal capacity, and someone in the executive saying we've got to help these guys out.' Plans to slash federal disaster funding are not new to the Trump administration. FEMA's initial offer to only reimburse 75 percent of the devastation left by Hurricane Michael left Bay County, where the storm made landfall, to take out a $50 million loan to cover critical costs such as removing debris from roads. Other impacted counties, which are deemed as 'fiscally constrained' by the state based on low property tax revenue, saw recovery efforts stall for several months. The limited cash assistance from FEMA was part of an effort led in coordination with then-Gov. Rick Scott to make counties and cities pay a larger share of the recovery costs. This tough love approach to cash assistance was reversed by DeSantis, who convinced Trump to cover a significant chunk of recovery costs in the first weeks after he became governor. 'There's definitely trepidation for not knowing what might happen, or concern for something that might have been reimbursable at some level but may not be available come year's end,' Lord, who is also the Flagler County director of emergency management, said. 'That impacts budgets and cash reserves, which there is concern about, but at this point we just don't know.' One chronic problem with FEMA's Public Assistance grant program: The agency sometimes takes months to approve recovery funding requests. To help mitigate the delay, the Legislature in 2022 created a new trust fund that allows the state Division of Emergency Management to front cash for critical cleanup projects on behalf of counties and cities, allowing the recovery work to continue as the state negotiates reimbursements with FEMA. 'That $1 billion allows us to actually respond without having to worry about the federal government,' Guthrie told lawmakers as he explained his recent request for $850 million to cover last year's storms. 'We go out the door, we're ready to do what we need to do without dependency on the federal government.' The state Division of Emergency Management is an offshoot of the governor's office. The new trust fund allows DeSantis' office to draw money to support all executive orders, which includes efforts to combat illegal immigration. But despite concerns from lawmakers, Guthrie said only $9 million of the $850 million he requested was to cover outstanding bills tied to immigration. The rest of the money, which the joint-legislative panel approved, will go toward unpaid bills from last year's flooding, tornadoes and hurricanes. 'We do have flooding and we do have tornadoes and then there's severe hurricanes,' Guthrie said, adding the unpaid immigration enforcement bills, 'came to a very small amount.' State lawmakers will soon present their budget to DeSantis for the next fiscal year, which begins July 1, and talks between the House and Senate included plans by Trump to eliminate FEMA. State Senate budget chair Ed Hooper (R-Palm Harbor) said the prospects of losing the federal agency scared him when considering how to control state spending. One option already under consideration for future state budgets, should FEMA reduce federal recovery spending, was to add more cash to the state budget stabilization fund. 'We just have to take into account how we're going to get things done,' Hooper said. Guthrie was once considered a candidate to become FEMA administrator, but he was instead appointed by Trump to the FEMA Review Council, which will advise the White House as it makes changes to the agency. State House Appropriations Chair Lawrence McClure said Guthrie's role could play to Florida's advantage, especially with freeing up chronic issues with the agency approving recovery funding requests made by the state. 'Although we look further to maybe a reconstruction or recalibration of FEMA, we also have the federal government — I mean this is the United States, right?' McClure said. 'We take care of each other.'
