logo
Man with 65 previous convictions jumped on his partner and tried to strangle her

Man with 65 previous convictions jumped on his partner and tried to strangle her

Sunday World4 days ago
The defendant then jumped on top of her, put his hands on her throat.
A Donegal man who attempted to strangle his partner during an assault has had his case adjourned for sentencing.
The man who cannot be named due to legal reasons and to protect the identity of the victim appeared at Letterkenny Circuit Court before Judge Roderick Maguire.
The man, who has 65 previous convictions, previously pleaded guilty to one count of assault causing harm.
The charge is contrary to Section three of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997.
Sergeant Maurice Doyle and State Prosecutor Fiona Crawford, BL, outlined the details of the incident to the court.
On October 26, 2024, the injured party had been out along with her partner and her father.
Later, the man shouted at the injured party and called her names.
He then grabbed the back of her head, threw her on the bed and as she fell, she pulled on the curtains which fell on top of her.
The defendant then jumped on top of her, put his hands on her throat.
He then put the curtain over her face and the injured party told gardaí that she could not breathe.
The defendant then began to punch her face and as she moved towards a window, he kicked her in the back and stood on her legs.
The injured party said she tried to run out, but he trailed her back by her hair and would not let her leave.
He then proceeded to punch her in the stomach and ribs.
The injured party explained that later, the defendant went into the kitchen and she attempted to run out of the house but he trailed her across the garden by her hair and was shouting abuse at her.
Gardaí were called and the injured party was taken to the Emergency Department at Letterkenny University Hospital.
The court heard the woman refused to stay in hospital and a physical examination was not carried out.
The court heard the man, who is in his 30s, has been in custody for most of the time since he was arrested for the incident and the injured party had not supplied a victim impact statement.
The injured party was not in court for the hearing and Sergeant Maurice Doyle said 'it was difficult to get in contact with her.'
The court heard the man has 65 previous convictions.
Sergeant Doyle said the accused man was complainant with gardaí.
Defence barrister, Damien Crawford BL, said the defendant had been drinking with the complainant and her father at the time of the incident.
The court heard the man had previously been granted bail but it was revoked after he was spotted close to where the injured party resided.
The court heard the pair have reconciled since the incident and the defendant was anxious to make amends.
Mr Crawford said the results of the incident have been 'catastrophic' for his client.
Mr Crawford said prior to the incident, the defendant had been in employment, taught himself to write and had experienced a difficult life from a young age.
Mr Crawford said his client has little or no memory of the night in question and he remains puzzled as to why he was as intoxicated as he was.
The court heard the defendant is hugely remorseful and he is anxious to make amends.
Mr Crawford said the defendant pleaded guilty at the first opportunity and is eager to turn his life around and return to work.
The man submitted a letter to the court, while he also took to the witness box and said he was very sorry for all that happened.
Mr Crawford said his client is suitable for community service and has spent a solid eight months in custody arising from these matters.
Mr Crawford said he is keen to get his life back together.
Judge Roderick Maguire said he would not finalise the matter at the hearing and the case adjourned for sentencing until Wednesday, July 23.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jury to begin deliberations in trial of garda accused of assaulting teen in Temple Bar
Jury to begin deliberations in trial of garda accused of assaulting teen in Temple Bar

Sunday World

time9 hours ago

  • Sunday World

Jury to begin deliberations in trial of garda accused of assaulting teen in Temple Bar

Lorcan Murphy (32) of Pearse Street Garda Station has pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault causing harm The jury in the trial of a garda accused of assaulting a teenager in Temple Bar over four years ago is due to begin its deliberations tomorrow. Lorcan Murphy (32) of Pearse Street Garda Station has pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault causing harm under section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997. The assaults on the then 17-year-old are alleged to have taken place on Essex Street, Dublin 2 and Pearse Street Garda Station on June 1, 2021. The jury is expected to begin its deliberations tomorrow after hearing closing speeches today and the directions of Judge Pauline Codd. Earlier, Justin McQuade BL, defending, told the jury in his closing speech that his client had to have an honest belief in the necessity to use force, even if it is mistaken, for the defence of justifiable use of force to be available. He noted that there is no suggestion that the initial use of force during the arrest of the complainant, when he was put in handcuffs, was excessive. Mr McQuade suggested the jury may wish to put 'significant weight' on this, then ask how 'did we get from honest belief to absence of honest belief in a short period of time'. 'I don't think we can,' counsel continued, suggesting it was a 'contrivance by the prosecution' which was not grounded in the real world. He told jurors that the law requires them 'to stand in the shoes of Garda Murphy and view the situation that unfolded through the circumstances he believed them to be'. Mr McQuade asked the jury to consider the role played by uniformed services, such as An Garda Siochana, suggesting that society 'may have lost some sight on what people in uniform do for us'. He noted that frontline policing can be messy but 'is done on behalf of everyone in this room'. 'People in uniform are expected, not invited, to take a step forward,' he said, telling the jury that an issue in this trial is 'honest belief even if it is mistaken in the heat of the moment'. He asked the jury to look at the surrounding circumstances of that day as his client believed them to be and pointed out that members of An Garda Siochana are required to make split-second decisions without an 'action replay'. He said the force used was a leg sweep and it was an 'unfortunate secondary impact' when the complainant hit his head on the ground, adding that his client 'did not have the luxury of picking a softer landing point'. Mr McQuade said it is regrettable that the complainant sustained injuries, which thankfully were not life-altering. He said the fact that the complainant suffered injuries does not mean that his client used excessive force. Mr McQuade suggested that if gardai are going to be criminalised for using force, they may be slower to use it in the future and that benefits no one. 'Force is necessary in society to protect citizens from those with criminal intent,' he suggested. He noted that his client and the complainant had never met and asked jurors to consider Mr Murphy's instincts about the complainant. He added that the complainant's convictions were outlined 'not to blacken' his character but to allow for an assessment of his client's instincts. Defence counsel suggested jurors consider the credibility of the complainant when deciding if his screams at the garda station were genuine, noting the defence say these were a 'contrivance'. He said his client used techniques he was trained in both on Essex Street and in Pearse Street Garda Sation. Prosecuting counsel, John Gallagher BL, told the jury in his closing speech that it is accepted that the complainant was 'deserving of garda attention' that day and no issue is taken with his initial arrest. He said the prosecution's case is that the leg sweep of the complainant while he was in handcuffs and the subsequent impact of his head on the ground amounts to an assault causing harm. Mr Gallagher suggested that the complainant was subjected to 'disproportionate and excessive force', which resulted in a fractured skull and a bleed to the brain Mr Gallagher noted that the complainant's convictions are not to his credit, but 'could not have had any impact on the accused man's decision-making' on the day since they were strangers to each other. He said the prosecution also say that pulling the complainant's head backwards using his hair in Pearse Street Garda Station then applying force to his chest or his sternum is also an assault, which caused harm in the form of immediate pain. He said the complainant was a minor who was handcuffed and awaiting medical attention at this time. Mr Gallagher told jurors an issue in this case is whether the level of force used was reasonable. He said the prosecution say the level of force used to bring the complainant to the ground after his initial arrest was not reasonable, inherently dangerous and likely to cause injury to the complainant. He told jurors they must consider Mr Murphy's statements, and if he held an honest belief that the complainant was about to abscond or had concerns about the crowd when he brought him to the ground after his initial arrest. Counsel suggested the jury must consider Mr Murphy's statement about the alleged assault at the garda station that he was providing medical attention to the complainant or if the intention was to get his attention to ask a question. He submitted that Mr Murphy's 'insistence' that the complainant did not lose consciousness suggests his account was 'self-serving' and 'sought to minimise the effects of his conduct'. The jury also heard that an enhanced image of the leg sweep was not available to GSOC until October 2024. The trial continues. Stock image News in 90 Seconds - July 22nd

Widow, 50, of millionaire, 75, who died a DAY after wedding ‘broken' by claims she ‘engineered' death to inherit fortune
Widow, 50, of millionaire, 75, who died a DAY after wedding ‘broken' by claims she ‘engineered' death to inherit fortune

The Irish Sun

timea day ago

  • The Irish Sun

Widow, 50, of millionaire, 75, who died a DAY after wedding ‘broken' by claims she ‘engineered' death to inherit fortune

THE widow of a millionaire who died a day after their wedding is "broken" by claims she "engineered" his death for money. Mum-of-three 4 Millionaire farmer Joseph Grogan died a day after secretly marrying his carer 4 Widow of Joe Grogan, Lisa Flaherty, pictured leaving the Tullamore Coroner's Court Credit: 4 Lisa now stands to inherit his 220 acre farm in Screggan, Tullamore Credit: He knew he didn't have long to live after a long fight with blood cancer and had no children. So he married his partner and gave her the right to inherit his estate - but shockingly he died just 24 hours later. Lisa now stands to inherit his 220 acre farm in Screggan, Tullamore, Co Offaly, which is valued at €5.5 million (£4.77 million). The timing prompted a slew of claims about Lisa being a gold digger who married him for his money. More insidious claims suggested she had known the millionaire farmer was dying and saw an opportunity to get her hands on the estate. She moved in with him in January 2023 to become his carer when he was diagnosed with stage four non-Hodgkin lymphoma. He died three months later. But they previously dated in 1991 - when she was just 16 and he was 41. Lisa went on to marry another man and had three kids who are now in their 20s. Most read in The Sun But her friends told the They said she is "broken" after lawyers for the Grogan family questioned her credibility. Joe Keys, a friend of Mr Grogan, said: "The world can think what it wants but how Lisa has been portrayed is not right. "They were both wonderful people who were very well respected in this community. Lisa didn't care for Joe because she wanted his money, that's total rubbish." A close friend of Ms Flaherty said: "It does sound a bit strange, but this is rural Ireland, strange things happen." The friends and locals claimed Mr Grogan and Lisa remained very involved in one another's lives. However his family insist he was a bachelor, and claimed they were excluded from being involved in his life as his health went downhill. They didn't know Lisa and Mr Grogan had got married and only found out he had passed away after being told by a friend. The coroner said Mr Grogan's death was likely due to a "probability of infection" with his But he was A SECRET MARRIAGE During a three-day inquest, Peter Jones, the solicitor representing Mr Grogan's 90-year-old aunt said "an awful lot of unanswered questions" remain. He also pointed to the "undue haste" with which he said the farmer's remains were taken to be embalmed. Barrister Damien Tansey, representing Mr Grogan's cousins, pushed for the Gardai to conduct a forensic investigation before the coroner came to a decision. Coroner Mahon, however, dismissed the suggestion. According to Mr Tansey Mr Grogan's death, which he called "sudden and unexpected" had caused a stir in the community. He went on to claim that the concerns raised by residents of the local area and the medical community had not been addressed by the inquest. A pathologist had confirmed that cancer had not been the cause of death, and neither was organ failure. Pathologist Charles d'Adhemar had warned that if the three medications Mr Grogan had been prescribed were not administered correctly, it could depress his respiratory and nervous systems. Mr Tansey claimed that the speedy embalming procedure meant the pathologist could not test for drugs in the deceased's system. Lisa had repeatedly claimed that her husband had inoperable, stage four cancer and was at the end of life stage - something his family disputed. He added that the secrecy of the marriage was concerning. The coroner said he would not rule on the validity of the marriage. And Stephen Byrne, representing Lisa, said that Mr Tansey had all but accused her of causing Mr Grogan's death. He went on to say that he had been concerned the inquest into Mr Grogan's death would be used to attack her good name. Mr Byrne continued, saying that the person who stepped up and cared for Mr Grogan - Lisa - had been "dragged over the coals." Mr Byrne said: "He knew his own body, and he knew he was not going to beat this [cancer]." Read more on the Irish Sun The inquest ultimately ruled that Mr Grogan died of natural causes linked to cancer and his treatment. He added that there were "valid concerns" about Mr Grogan's care but said it must be remembered that the deceased was very reluctant to see a doctor. 4 Coroner Raymond Mahon pictured leaving Tullamore Coroner's Court Credit:

Garda (32) on trial for assault ‘spear tackled' teen to the ground, witness claims
Garda (32) on trial for assault ‘spear tackled' teen to the ground, witness claims

Sunday World

time4 days ago

  • Sunday World

Garda (32) on trial for assault ‘spear tackled' teen to the ground, witness claims

STATEMENT DETAILS | Lorcan Murphy of Pearse Street Garda Station has pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault causing harm Garda Station. Photo: Getty Lorcan Murphy (32) of Pearse Street Garda Station has pleaded not guilty to two counts of assault causing harm under section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act, 1997. The assaults on the then 17-year-old are alleged to have taken place on Essex Street, Dublin 2 and Pearse Street Garda Station on June 1, 2021. A witness in the case, Darragh Fitzpatrick, told the trial yesterday that on the evening in question, he had just finished hurling training when he received a call from his friends who were in the Essex Street area. He cycled to the area and met with his friends. Mr Fitzpatrick told the jury that he was not drinking and was just chatting and socialising with his friends. Mr Fitzpatrick described seeing a group of young people drinking down a lane and, upon seeing them, he turned away and left the lane, telling the court, 'it wasn't my scene'. He also described seeing gardai in the area. John Gallagher BL, prosecuting, asked Mr Fitzpatrick if he had seen any interaction between the gardai and the complainant in this case, to which he replied: 'He seemed out of it, he didn't seem to know what was going on.' Mr Fitzpatrick also told the jury that he saw 'a bit of grabbing and handcuffs being placed on him [the complainant] and hearing something about a knife'. Mr Fitzpatrick told the jury that when he heard the word 'knife', he took a step back. He then told Mr Gallagher, prosecuting, that he saw one of the members of the gardai, identified as Mr Murphy, 'spear tackle' the complainant. Read more He described the complainant as going 'limp and lifeless'. He said: 'At the time, I was frozen. I was stuck to the spot, taking it all in. I was initially very shocked.' Under cross-examination from Justin McQuaid BL, defending, Mr Fitzpatrick confirmed there were a lot of people drinking in public and that pubs were closed due to COVID-19. The witness agreed that he saw a large group of young people, and that was so off-putting to him that he turned around. He further agreed that he was wary to the extent that he turned around. Mr McQuaid put it to Mr Fitzpatrick that when he heard the word 'knife', he had the benefit of retreating, to which the witness replied: 'I think I stood my ground.' Counsel responded: 'You said, I took a step back, I wrote that down', to which Mr Fitzpatrick said, 'I may have'. Another witness, Aileen Fitzmaurice, also gave evidence today/yesterday (FRI) that she had been in the area with Mr Fitzpatrick at the time of the alleged incident. Garda Station. Photo: Getty Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 19th She recalled there were quite a few teenagers in the area, and they were approached by two members of the gardai. She told the jury that she could not hear what was said between the gardai and the complainant but thought there was an 'aggressive demeanour'. Ms Fitzmaurice described that everything then happened quite quickly, and the complainant ended up face down on the ground. He was restrained by the gardai, and she then heard shouting 'where is the knife?' She said a garda van then arrived and additional gardai. Describing the gardaí taking the complainant off the ground, Ms Fitzmaurice said: 'It was like they flipped him in a sudden manner and bashed his head off the ground.' She described a loud sound, which was startling. Mr McQuaid asked Ms Fitzmaurice to confirm that she heard 'where is the knife' being repeatedly said, which she did. He put it to her that her friend Mr Fitzpatrick heard the word 'knife' being said before the complainant was arrested. Ms Fitzmaurice said that was not her recollection but she said it was four years ago and she 'cannot remember exactly the sequence of how it happened'. Eoghan Hickey also gave evidence that he was socialising with his friends Mr Fitzpatrick and Ms Fitzmaurice. Mr Hickey said he heard one of the gardai saying 'drop the knife' repeatedly. He also described the complainant as being 'limp' when he was brought to the garda van. Mr McQuaid told Mr Hickey that in his official statement, he said the complainant was 'pushed against the wall and gardai shouted where is the knife and then slammed him to the ground,' which Mr Hickey confirmed. Counsel said, 'It is perfectly clear that when they shouted, where is the knife the complainant was upright when you heard that', to which he replied, 'Yes'. Donal Grant, an investigator with Fiosrú, previously known as GSOC, gave evidence that this matter came to his attention after it was reported that the complainant in this case suffered a head injury as a result of his arrest. He said an investigation began, CCTV footage and witness statements were taken, and Mr Murphy was interviewed on two occasions. Mr Grant then created a report, which was sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions, and they directed a prosecution. Two statements from Mr Murphy were read to the jury in which he outlined the events of June 1, 2021. Mr Murphy said that he went to assist his colleague, who was dealing with the complainant. Mr Murphy instructed the complainant to remove his hands from his pockets. He noted that the young male tensed up and was again asked to take his hands out of his pockets, to which he did not comply. Mr Murphy's statement said the complainant produced a glass bottle, and he did so in such a way that Mr Murphy believed he was at risk of being struck with the bottle. The bottle was then pushed out of the complainant's hand, and he was informed that he was being placed under arrest. The complainant was placed on the ground, and a fellow garda placed one handcuff on him. His second hand was under him, and he was resisting arrest, the court heard. Mr Murphy said he managed to take hold of his second hand, and he was handcuffed. The statement said that the complainant was spitting towards Mr Murphy and prisoner transport was requested. Mr Murphy stood up and took the complainant to his feet as well. He told the crowd that had gathered to 'get back,' but they did not do so. Mr Murphy said he felt unsafe both for his own personal safety and the safety of the arrested male. He said he had his hand on the complainant's back and he felt him shift his weight, and Mr Murphy successfully performed a 'leg sweep'. The side of the complainant's body and head made contact with the ground. Mr Murphy checked him visually and said that at no stage was he unconscious. He again requested prisoner transport and that a doctor be called to Pearse Street Garda Station. The trial continues before Judge Pauline Codd.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store