Trump on Negotiations with Iran: We Don't Want the Military Option - Jordan News
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday, 'It would be great if we could reach an agreement with Iran without dropping bombs all over the Middle East.' اضافة اعلان Speaking at a press conference at the White House, Trump added: 'Iran must not be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon—it's as simple as that,' emphasizing that while Iran wants a deal, 'the United States does not want the military option.' This statement coincided with remarks reported by Iran's Fars News Agency, quoting an Iranian official who said that 'the U.S. president's threat to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities is a clear red line and will have serious consequences.' The official added, 'If the United States is truly seeking a diplomatic solution, it must abandon the language of threats and sanctions,' calling such threats 'a blatant act of hostility against Iran's national interests.'
Meanwhile, Vahid Ahmadi, a member of the Iranian Parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, suggested that Tehran may reach a 'temporary and limited agreement' with the United States as part of ongoing indirect talks between the two sides.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Jordan News
7 hours ago
- Jordan News
Oil Prices Rise Amid Supply Concerns Linked to Iran, Russia, and Canada - Jordan News
Oil prices rose in early Asian trading on Tuesday due to growing supply concerns, as Iran appeared poised to reject a proposed U.S. nuclear deal that would be key to easing sanctions on one of the world's largest oil producers, while wildfires disrupted production in Canada. اضافة اعلان Brent crude futures climbed 55 cents, or 0.85%, to $65.18 a barrel by 12:00 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude rose 59 cents, or 0.94%, to $63.11 a barrel, after gaining nearly 1% earlier in the session. Both benchmarks had risen about 3% in the previous session after OPEC+ agreed to maintain its planned production increase of 411,000 barrels per day, a figure lower than some in the market had feared and consistent with the past two months' increases. Geopolitical tensions further supported prices on Tuesday. An Iranian diplomat said on Monday that Iran was on the verge of rejecting a U.S. proposal to resolve the decades-long nuclear dispute, stating that the deal fails to serve Tehran's interests or soften Washington's stance on uranium enrichment. If the U.S.-Iran nuclear talks collapse, sanctions on Iranian oil would remain in place, restricting supply and supporting higher oil prices. Meanwhile, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine continues to fuel supply worries and raise geopolitical risk premiums. Adding to supply fears, a wildfire in Alberta, Canada, has led to the temporary shutdown of some oil and gas production, potentially curbing output. According to Reuters calculations, the wildfires have impacted over 344,000 barrels per day of oil sands production—around 7% of Canada's total crude oil output.
Ammon
8 hours ago
- Ammon
The thin line between explosion and détente in Gaza
The Witkoff Plan is one of the most prominent international initiatives proposed to halt the devastating war on the Gaza Strip, which has entered its final months amid profound political, military, and humanitarian complications. While the plan came in response to mounting international pressure, particularly from the Trump administration, the positions of both Israel and Hamas have ranged from conditional acceptance to cautious rejection. This makes the future of this plan contingent on a set of complex internal, regional, and international equations, and makes studying possible scenarios a matter of strategic importance. The Witkoff Plan, proposed under US sponsorship and led by President Donald Trump and his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, aims for a temporary ceasefire in Gaza for 60 days, with US guarantees, as a prelude to reaching a permanent agreement. It stipulates the release of 10 living Israeli hostages and 18 bodies from a list of hostages, in exchange for the release of 125 Palestinian prisoners serving life sentences and 1,111 detainees from Gaza, in addition to the handover of 180 Palestinian bodies. The plan includes a cessation of Israeli military operations, a restriction of military air traffic, and the redeployment of Israeli forces northward and then southward, according to agreed-upon maps. It also stipulates the entry of humanitarian aid under the supervision of the United Nations and the Red Crescent. Negotiations on a permanent ceasefire will begin on the first day of the truce, and will address the exchange of the remaining hostages, redeployment, security arrangements, and the "day after" for Gaza. If an agreement is not reached within the deadline, the truce can be extended under agreed-upon terms. The plan includes mediation and guarantees from the United States, Qatar, and Egypt, with direct oversight from President Trump, who will officially announce the agreement. The Israeli scene is suffering from a sharp internal division between a security faction that favors accepting the plan as a political solution that saves Israel's face, and a hard-line right-wing faction that rejects any truce before the complete elimination of the "military threat from Hamas." Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu finds himself between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, he fears that accepting the plan will lead to the collapse of his government under pressure from the extreme right, which threatens to withdraw. On the other hand, he faces increasing American pressure, in addition to internal demonstrations by the families of the hostages, who accuse his government of stalling and sacrificing their sons for narrow political calculations. Israel, in its strategic depth, fears that accepting the plan will be perceived as a political and military defeat against a beleaguered resistance movement, and that the scenario following the 2006 Lebanon War will be repeated, when Hezbollah emerged with increasing political and popular influence despite human and material losses. In contrast, Hamas, despite the severe blows it has suffered, retains a negotiating position based on its remaining Israeli hostages and its ability to withstand the war machine. Hamas expressed initial acceptance of the plan, but stipulated that it include a permanent ceasefire, a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip, the release of all Palestinian prisoners, and a rejection of any Israeli military or security presence inside the Strip. It also stipulated the need for Gaza's reconstruction under Arab and international supervision. These demands reflect the movement's desire to transform the results of the war into political gains that will enable it to maintain its role in the Palestinian arena, especially in light of talk of future arrangements that may include the return of the Palestinian Authority to Gaza or the formation of a new administration for the Strip with regional participation. In light of these facts, three main scenarios for the future of the Witkoff plan can be envisioned. The first scenario involves conditional mutual acceptance of the plan, whereby some of its provisions are modified to bring the positions closer together, and a gradual implementation phase begins under international supervision, with American and regional guarantees. This scenario is possible, but it requires internal consensus within Israel and effective pressure from Washington on the Netanyahu government. It also requires Hamas's tacit acceptance of the phased solution without compromising its basic conditions. The second scenario is that Israel refuses to implement the second phase of the plan after the release of some hostages, leading to the collapse of the agreement and the resumption of fighting. This scenario reflects the nature of the divisions within the Israeli government and could lead to a domestic political crisis and increased public pressure. However, it could also serve Netanyahu in gaining more time and avoiding the collapse of his coalition. The third, and most bleak, scenario is the complete failure of the plan, either due to the refusal of one party or the collapse of international understandings, leading to the continuation of the war and its transformation into a protracted war of attrition. In this scenario, the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza would worsen, and Arab and international popular anger against Israel would expand. Other regional parties might also become more involved, threatening to escalate the situation on other fronts, such as southern Lebanon or the West Bank. In this scenario, the United States would find itself in an extremely difficult position before the world. The Witkoff Plan, despite its political ambition and humanitarian dimensions, collides with an extremely complex reality, rendering its chances of success limited without comprehensive agreements and painful concessions from both sides. This seems unlikely given each side's adherence to its own narrative and objectives. At the same time, however, the plan could constitute a preliminary framework upon which to build to reduce the intensity of the conflict and open a window for negotiations, should genuine international support and political will transcend narrow calculations be available. Between rejection and acceptance, Gaza's future remains suspended on a thin line between explosion and détente.
Jordan News
20 hours ago
- Jordan News
Beijing Rejects U.S. Accusations of Violating Tariff Reduction Agreement - Jordan News
China on Monday rejected U.S. accusations that it had violated a tariff reduction agreement reached between the world's two largest economies. Last month, Beijing and Washington agreed to a temporary and mutual reduction of tariffs burdening both sides for a period of 90 days, following high-level talks held in Geneva. اضافة اعلان However, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Fox News Sunday that Beijing was "delaying the implementation of the agreement." In response on Monday, Beijing stated that Washington had "made false accusations and unreasonably blamed China for violating the agreement, which seriously contradicts the facts." In a statement, China's Ministry of Commerce said it "strongly rejects these groundless accusations." Last week, U.S. President Donald Trump also accused China of having "completely violated the agreement," though he did not provide specific details. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce maintained that it is "firm in protecting its rights and interests and sincere in implementing the agreement." It further noted that Washington has "repeatedly imposed discriminatory and restrictive measures against China," citing export controls on AI chips and the revocation of visas for Chinese students in the U.S. China urged the U.S. "to meet it halfway, immediately correct its wrongful actions, and jointly uphold the consensus reached during the Geneva trade talks." Failing that, "China will continue to take firm and strong measures to defend its legitimate rights and interests." — AFP
