Greens, Coalition promise to challenge Labor's agenda in the Senate
The Prime Minister commands a massive 94-seat majority in the House of Representatives, but the Senate is another matter.
Labor will need to work with either the Greens or the Coalition to pass legislation through the chamber – a task far easier said than done.
For many of the Albanese government's more progressive items, such as legislating penalty rates, the Greens are more natural partners, but Senator Nick McKim said on Monday his party would hold Mr Albanese 'to account'.
'The results were pretty clear in the Senate and I wasn't that happy with the PM telling the Senate and the Greens to get out of the way shortly after the election,' Senator McKim told Nine's Today.
'We haven't been put into the Australian parliament to get out of the Prime Minister's way.
'We've been put in there to hold him to account.
'And we do expect him to deliver, and we expect him to engage in some of the really meaningful issues, whether it's climate change, whether it's protecting nature, whether it's the housing crisis in Australia.'
He went on to say the Greens needed 'to see solutions that are commensurate with the scale of the challenges facing the country'.
'We're here to work constructively and cooperatively with Labor,' Senator McKim said.
'We hope that they would take the same approach to us.'
Meanwhile, demoted Liberal senator Jane Hume took a similar line.
She was opposition finance spokeswoman under Peter Dutton and championed some of the Coalition's most controversial policies.
Senator Hume was booted from the frontbench after Labor's federal election landslide decimated the Liberal Party.
Acknowledging the Coalition had 'hit a low point in their primary vote', she pledged to 'work every day' to claw back support.
'We're going to work every day to rebuild trust with the Australian people, to make sure that they know that we're listening to their concerns and responding to them, sticking with our values,' Senator Hume told Sky News.
'Of course, those important values of reward for effort, lower taxes, growing the economy, managing the budget responsibly.
'But at the same time, we have to make sure that this three years we are holding this very bad government to account, because the last three years delivered nothing other than a cost of living crisis where people saw their standard of living go backwards and economic growth stagnating.
'The last thing we need is another talk fest – we need an economic plan.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
12 minutes ago
- ABC News
New real estate disclosure laws to come into effect in Queensland - what it means for sellers
Real estate experts are warning new mandatory seller laws that allow a buyer the right to terminate a contract right up to settlement day will push up the cost of selling a property by $1,000 or more. The tough new laws coming into force in Queensland from August 1, will allow buyers to get their entire deposit back, and even claim compensation, if the vendor fails to offer up vital information Here's what every seller must know before they put their house on the market. The sales bundle of documents includes what is known as a "seller disclosure statement — Form 2" and various prescribed certificates. A vendor can't sign a contract of sale until they provide this statement. Some of the things the statement will have to include are: Legal costs to prepare this seven-page document vary from about $600 to $1,500, depending on who you ask, and the money that will have to be paid by the seller up front. However, agents have said the vendor may try to add it into the final sale price. In a state so prone to severe weather events, flooding or other natural hazard history does not have to be disclosed. Nor does structural soundness, pest infestation, limits imposed by planning laws or if there is any asbestos on site. What the laws don't cover The current or historical use of the building (e.g. if it was once a massage parlour or a boarding house) will also not have to be disclosed on the statement. Real Estate Institute of Queensland CEO Antonia Mercorella said this new law would create some consistency and bring Queensland in line with other states. However, buyers still need to remain vigilant and think about other types of due diligence, she said. "Similarly, the seller needs to understand that a property cannot be sold, or a contract entered into until the statement is given," Ms Mercorella said. The regime applies to all contracts entered into on or after August 1, 2025, regardless of when the property was listed for sale. While it is not mandatory for the buyer to sign the statement, REIQ said it was best practice for them to do so to confirm receipt. The Form 2 can be prepared by the seller, the seller's solicitor, or the seller's real estate agent (if authorised). All parties can sign the statement electronically. This new framework was designed to reduce disputes and improve transparency in property transactions. You will find everything you need to know by searching for the Property Law Regulation 2024. Brisbane property manager Brett Andreassen said the new law would create "more confusion" in the industry. He said existing contracts already contained 90 per cent of the information required and believed that the 10 per cent not included could be placed in formal contracts. "For a lot of sellers, this is making it too complicated — they are already asking why do we have to have these costs on top of everything else?" he said. "What is going to happen is their solicitor's work will then be duplicated again by the buyer's solicitors. "So, the buyer is paying again because their lawyer will say we can't trust what has been provided to us". Mr Andreassen also raised a red flag for private sellers who may not be across the changes. "Sellers have been bringing their sales forward to try and miss out on the confusion that is going to happen," he said. Real estate agent Michael Shean said vendors were "in shock" when they were told of the added costs to comply. Lawyers are telling agents the document will take at least five days to prepare, Mr Shean said. He said transactions could be slowed by up to a week, and the process could hinder anyone trying to quickly close an unsolicited cash offer. But at the end of the day, he believed the change would give "buyers some peace of mind". This is where — cost-wise — it gets messy. While lawyers and conveyancers are still nutting out the "true" cost to be passed onto clients, there are fears Queensland's 52,000 body corporates, which manage the sale of units and townhouses, will be out of pocket. According to Strata Community Association general manager Laura Bos, said this was because the government sets a prescribed fee for the data gathering involved in community title schemes. That fee is $84.10, but she said the real cost for a body corporate certificate was more than $200. Ms Bos said the fact some records are still on paper would complicate work some are assuming could be done by "pressing a button". "There is going to be a $3 million headache for Queenslanders in the next twelve months," she said. "We have done time and motion on it; it is not just a figure we have plucked out of the air. "Somebody is going to have to pay the shortfall." She's worried there will be people living in body corporates "who are not parties to a transaction, who are now going to have to foot the bill". "The government has sent a signal to the market that is completely at odds with what the commercial reality of the situation is," she said.
Sydney Morning Herald
42 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Twiggy' Forrest-led business campaign demands Albanese go greener
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is facing one of his first major policy tests after his re-election as big firms, led by Andrew Forrest's Fortescue, demand a 75 per cent cut to Australia's emissions, and the government's hand-picked climate adviser prepares to tell the government what its 2035 target should be. Labor ducked a fight on emissions at the May election by delaying a decision on the interim target required by the Paris Agreement – the legally binding international treaty on climate change – but the government's Climate Change Authority is expected to force its hand when it delivers long-awaited advice within weeks. Sources familiar with the authority's thinking expect it to urge a cut of 65 to 75 per cent by 2035, which could add weight to calls for the prime minister to use his large parliamentary majority to legislate an ambitious target, despite the United States turning away from climate action and withdrawing from the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement signed by almost 200 parties including Australia commits countries to reducing their emissions via five year targets to avoid global average temperature increases of more than 2 degrees, and ideally 1.5. The stoush over Australia's emissions comes amid a global reckoning on climate change agreements as many countries in Europe debate the merits of deep emissions reductions targets after years of sharp rises to the cost of living. Big business is split on climate targets. The Business Council of Australia, which represents more than 100 of the country's largest companies, is divided between telecommunications firms and banks happier with steeper cuts and resources companies worried about a speedier transition. As the council debates options, a new coalition of mostly left-leaning companies, called the Business for 75 campaign that includes mining giant Fortescue, has formed to call for larger cuts. Fortescue, whose founder Forrest accompanied Albanese on his visit to China this month, said it would continue to push the government to have higher ambitions.
The Age
42 minutes ago
- The Age
‘Twiggy' Forrest-led business campaign demands Albanese go greener
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is facing one of his first major policy tests after his re-election as big firms, led by Andrew Forrest's Fortescue, demand a 75 per cent cut to Australia's emissions, and the government's hand-picked climate adviser prepares to tell the government what its 2035 target should be. Labor ducked a fight on emissions at the May election by delaying a decision on the interim target required by the Paris Agreement – the legally binding international treaty on climate change – but the government's Climate Change Authority is expected to force its hand when it delivers long-awaited advice within weeks. Sources familiar with the authority's thinking expect it to urge a cut of 65 to 75 per cent by 2035, which could add weight to calls for the prime minister to use his large parliamentary majority to legislate an ambitious target, despite the United States turning away from climate action and withdrawing from the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement signed by almost 200 parties including Australia commits countries to reducing their emissions via five year targets to avoid global average temperature increases of more than 2 degrees, and ideally 1.5. The stoush over Australia's emissions comes amid a global reckoning on climate change agreements as many countries in Europe debate the merits of deep emissions reductions targets after years of sharp rises to the cost of living. Big business is split on climate targets. The Business Council of Australia, which represents more than 100 of the country's largest companies, is divided between telecommunications firms and banks happier with steeper cuts and resources companies worried about a speedier transition. As the council debates options, a new coalition of mostly left-leaning companies, called the Business for 75 campaign that includes mining giant Fortescue, has formed to call for larger cuts. Fortescue, whose founder Forrest accompanied Albanese on his visit to China this month, said it would continue to push the government to have higher ambitions.
