MIC risks political marginalisation if it leaves BN, say experts
Political experts believe that the Indian-based party's survival hinges on either remaining within BN, given how closely its identity is tied to the coalition, or undertaking major reforms to remain relevant in the country's political arena.
This follows a statement by party president Tan Sri S.A. Vigneswaran, who said MIC is prepared to engage in discussions with any political party to ensure its survival and better serve the Indian community.
He added that the decision was made in the party's best interest and not due to pressure from any external party.
International Islamic University Malaysia political analyst Associate Professor Dr Syaza Shukri said MIC could face greater political marginalisation if it exits BN, as it would struggle to compete with multiracial parties already gaining support among Indian voters.
Speaking to the New Straits Times, Syaza said the party has long depended on BN's framework to maintain its relevance as the Indian community's representative.
She added that MIC would also find it difficult to go head-to-head with more established multiracial parties such as PKR and DAP, which have broadened their appeal among Indian Malaysians.
"It will be challenging for them to leave BN, as the party has long positioned itself as a representative of the Indian community within BN's larger framework.
"This allows them to access resources that would not be available outside BN.
"If they leave the coalition, it is unclear how they would compete with parties like PKR and DAP, who also attract Indian support," she said.
Syaza added that MIC could only stand a chance outside BN if it goes through significant internal reform, brings in younger leaders and shifts its focus from race-based to issue-based politics.
This, she said, could help it shed the perception of being a 'minor' party.
However, even with reform, she believes MIC would still face stiff competition.
"All in all, I think it is best for MIC to remain in BN but perhaps reinvent itself, much like what Umno is trying to do which is by reaching out to younger voters without losing its core base," she said.
Echoing this view, Universiti Malaya political analyst Associate Professor Dr Awang Azman Awang Pawi said MIC is unlikely to survive outside BN due to its long-standing reliance on the coalition's political structure and the increasingly fragmented support among Indian voters.
He said MIC's traditional strength was built within BN's consociational framework, alongside Umno, representing the Malays, and MCA, representing the Chinese, which provided it access to ministerial posts, patronage networks, and grassroots machinery.
"Outside this framework, MIC risks being reduced to a symbolic actor without institutional backing," he said.
Awang Azman also pointed out that the Indian vote is now heavily fragmented across Pakatan Harapan (PH), Perikatan Nasional (PN) and various groups, making it difficult for MIC to establish legitimacy without the support of a major coalition.
He said the most strategic path forward for MIC is to remain within the coalition, led by Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.
"Umno under Zahid has shown adaptability by cooperating with PH, demonstrating political pragmatism over rigidity.
"This stable and inclusive environment allows MIC space to rehabilitate its image and reconnect with the community through service delivery, policy advocacy, and youth outreach, without the existential risk of venturing into the unknown.
"MIC's political survival is not viable outside BN unless it secures a guaranteed platform within a ruling coalition.
"Its safest and most strategic path is to work alongside a rejuvenated Umno under Zahid and leverage the machinery of the unity government for the upliftment of the Indian community," he said.
Political analyst Assistant Professor Dr Lau Zhe Wei said remaining in BN still offers MIC a viable support structure.
He added that while the party may be open to cooperating with other coalitions, such overtures are unlikely to significantly improve its political standing.
"For parties like MIC and MCA, there are only two options, whether to stay in BN or form an independent party and stand on their own.
"It sounds promising to say they are open to working with other parties, but in reality, Pakatan Harapan does not need them and if they join PN, their fate could be even worse than in BN.
"It is a gamble, they could either win independently or suffer even greater losses," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Hybrid rice project launched at Nepal's sci-tech park
KATHMANDU, Aug. 11 (Xinhua) -- Experimental seedlings of hybrid rice varieties were transplanted into Nepal South Agricultural Science and Technology Park on Monday, as part of efforts to help the South Asian country achieve food self-sufficiency. The first batch of 37 high-yield varieties will land at the hybrid rice demonstration zone of the park, which is located in the town of Rampur in Bharatpur city in south-central Nepal. Speaking at the inauguration ceremony, Chinese Ambassador to Nepal Chen Song described the project as the result of hard work for more than two years, calling it another progress in agricultural cooperation between the two countries on the 70th anniversary of diplomatic ties. Chen noted that improving agricultural productivity and enhancing food self-sufficiency has become a global focus, and the promotion of China's hybrid rice technology is a key area in global agricultural technology cooperation and a key component of China's current global governance approach. "China hopes to help more developing countries, including Nepal, achieve food self-sufficiency through international cooperation and technological exchange, thereby promoting the shared development of global agriculture," added Chen. Agriculture is the backbone of Nepal's economy and provides a livelihood to a large portion of the population. "I believe that by using improved varieties of seeds, farmers will be able to increase their production, contribute to poverty alleviation, and achieve the goal of sustainable development by becoming self-reliant in rice," Mayor of Bharatpur Renu Dahal said at the inauguration ceremony. "These seeds will provide the potential for self-reliant agriculture, prosperous farmers and food security in the future," she added, expecting the program to reach farms in the local district as well as across the country. The park was developed with the support of China-South Asian Countries Poverty Alleviation and Cooperative Development Center and implemented by Nepal's Agriculture and Forestry University based in Bharatpur and Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Trump's India threats are hollow for crude market
THE crude oil market's rather sanguine reaction to the US threats to India over its continued purchases of Russian oil is effectively a bet that very little will actually happen. President Donald Trump cited India's imports of Russian crude when imposing an additional 25% tariff on imports from India on Aug 6, which is due to take effect on Aug 28. If the new tariff rate does come into place, it will take the rate for some Indian goods to as much as 50%, a level high enough to effectively end US imports from India, which totalled nearly US$87bil in 2024. As with everything related to Trump, it pays to be cautious given his track record of backflips and pivots. It's also not exactly clear what Trump is ultimately seeking, although it does seem that in the short term he wants to increase his leverage with Russian President Vladimir Putin ahead of their planned meeting in Alaska this week, and he's using India to achieve this. Whether Trump follows through on his additional tariffs on India remains uncertain, although the chances of a peace deal in Ukraine seem remote, which means the best path for India to avoid the tariffs would be to acquiesce and stop buying Russian oil. But this is an outcome that simply isn't being reflected in current crude oil prices. Global benchmark Brent futures have weakened since Trump's announcement of higher tariffs on India, dropping as low as US$65.81 a barrel in early Asian trade yesterday, the lowest level in two months. This is a price that entirely discounts any threat to global supplies, and assumes that India will either continue buying Russian crude at current volumes, or be able to easily source suitable replacements without tightening the global market. Are these reasonable assumptions? The track record of the crude oil market is somewhat remarkable in that it quickly adapts to new geopolitical realities and any price spikes tend to be shortlived. The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 sent crude prices hurtling toward US$150 a barrel as European and other Western countries pulled back from buying Russian crude. But within four months the price was back below where it was before Moscow's attack on its neighbour as the market simply re-routed the now discounted Russian oil to China and India. In other words, the flow of oil around the globe was shifted, but the volumes available for importers remained much the same. Different this time? But what Trump is proposing now is somewhat different. It appears he wants to cut Russian barrels out of the market in order to put financial pressure on Moscow to cut a deal over Ukraine. There are effectively only two major buyers for Russian crude, India and China. China, the world's biggest crude importer, has more leverage with Trump given US and Western reliance on its refined critical and other minerals, and therefore is less able to be coerced into ending its imports of Russian oil. India is in a less strong position, especially private refiners like Reliance Industries, which will want to keep business relationships and access to Western economies. India imported about 1.8 million barrels per day of Russian crude in the first half of the year, or about 37% of its total, according to data compiled by commodity analysts Kpler. About 90% of its Russian imports came from Russia's European ports and was mainly Urals grade. This is a medium sour crude and it would raise challenges for Indian refiners if they sought to replace all their Urals imports with similar grades from other suppliers. There are some Middle Eastern grades of similar quality, such as Saudi Arabia's Arab Light and Iraq's Basrah Light, but it would likely boost prices if India were to seek more of these crudes. If Chinese refiners were able to take the bulk of Russian crude given up by India, it may allow for a reshuffling of flows, but that would not appear to be what Trump wants. Trump and his advisers may believe there is enough spare crude production capacity in the United States and elsewhere to handle the loss of up to two million bpd of Russian supplies. But testing that theory may well lead to higher prices, especially for certain types of medium crudes which would be in short supply. It's simplistic to say that higher US output can supply India's refiners, as this would mean those refiners would have to be willing to accept a different mix of refined products, including producing less diesel, as US light crudes tend to make more products such as petrol. For now the crude oil market is assuming that the Trump/India/Russia situation will end as another Taco, the acronym for Trump always chickens out. But the reality is likely to be slightly more messy, as some Indian refiners pull back from importing from Russia, some Chinese refiners may buy more and once again the oil market goes on a geopolitical merry-go-round. — Reuters Clyde Russell is an Asia commodities and energy columnist at Reuters. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Nvidia, AMD to pay US 15% of China AI chip sales
(FILES) People attend a Nvidia production preview exhibition in Taipei on May 21, 2025. Chinese authorities summoned US technology giant Nvidia on July 31, 2025 to discuss "serious security issues" discovered involving its chips, the country's top internet regulator said. (Photo by I-HWA CHENG / AFP) New York: Nvidia Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD) have agreed to pay 15% of their revenues from Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) chip sales to the US government in a deal to secure export licences, an unusual arrangement that may unnerve both US companies and Beijing. Nvidia plans to share 15% of the revenue from sales of its H20 AI accelerator in China, according to a person familiar with the matter. AMD will deliver the same share from MI308 revenues, the person added, asking for anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. The arrangement reflects US President Donald Trump's consistent effort to engineer a financial payout for America in return for concessions on trade. His administration has shown a willingness to relax trade conditions like tariffs in return for giant investments in the United States – as with Apple Inc's pledge to spend US$600bil on domestic manufacturing. But such a narrow, select export tax has little precedent in modern corporate history. Beijing, which has grown increasingly hostile to the idea of Chinese firms deploying the H20, is unlikely to warm to the idea of a chip tax. Yuyuantantian, a social media account affiliated with state-run China Central Television that regularly signals Beijing's thinking about trade, on Sunday slammed the chip's supposed security vulnerabilities and inefficiency. 'This seeming quid pro quo is unprecedented from an export control perspective. The arrangement risks invalidating the national security rationale for US export controls,' said Jacob Feldgoise, a researcher at the Washington-based Centre for Security and Emerging Technology. It 'will likely undermine the US' position when negotiating with allies to implement complementary controls,' he added. 'Allies may not believe US policymakers if they are willing to trade away those same national security concerns for economic concessions – either from US companies or foreign governments.' A Nvidia spokesperson said the company follows US export rules, adding that while it hasn't shipped H20 chips to China for months, it hopes the rules will allow US companies to compete in China. AMD didn't respond to a request for comment. The Financial Times earlier reported the development. It followed a separate report from the same outlet that the Commerce Department had begun issuing H20 licences last week, days after Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang met with Trump. Huang has lobbied long and hard for the lifting of restrictions, arguing that walling China off will only slow the spread of American technology and encourage local rivals such as Huawei Technologies Co. 'It's a strategic bargaining chip' that tightens Washington's grip on a critical tech sphere during trade negotiations with China, said Hebe Chen, an analyst with Vantage Markets in Melbourne. 'Over time, this hurdle for chips entering China will likely deter Nvidia and AMD from deeper expansion in the world's largest chip-importing market, while giving local Chinese producers a clear edge to capture market share and accelerate domestic semiconductor innovation,' Chen said If Washington goes ahead with the tax, it should funnel some capital to the United States – but not an enormous amount in relative terms. Both Nvidia and AMD have said it'll take time to ramp back up production of their China-specific products – even if orders return to previous levels, which is uncertain. Nvidia raked in US$4.6bil of revenue from the H20 in its quarter ended April 27 – days after new restrictions on shipping the AI accelerator to China were imposed. It said it had been unable to ship US$2.5bil of H20 China revenue in that period because of the new rules. That implies it would have gotten more than US$7bil in H20 sales to China during the period. If it can return to that level, the US government will stand to get about US$1bil a quarter from its deal. AMD could generate US$3bil to US$5bil of revenue this year if restrictions were lifted, Morgan Stanley estimates. Chinese alternatives such as Huawei's Ascend chips now account for 20% to 30% of domestic demand, it reckoned. 'The US government clearly needs the money given its deficits and eagerness to collect tariffs,' said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee in Singapore. 'But the complication is China's accusations about H20 chips containing backdoors, which could be a negotiation tactic to highlight that the country is not that 'hard up' for US chips,' Ling added. — Bloomberg
