
US agriculture supply chain to be protected from Chinese Communist Party in Hinson, Ricketts bipartisan bill
FIRST ON FOX: Rep. Ashley Hinson and Sen. Pete Ricketts are rolling out a bicameral bill with bipartisan support that would secure agriculture supply chains in the United States from vulnerabilities and potential Chinese Communist Party exploitation, Fox News Digital has learned.
Hinson, R-Iowa, will introduce the Securing American Agriculture Act in the House of Representatives, while Ricketts, R-Neb., will introduce the measure in the Senate.
The Securing American Agriculture Act would require the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to conduct an annual assessment to identify supply chain vulnerabilities, domestic production gaps and potential CCP exploitation.
It also would direct the secretary of Agriculture to recommend ways to strengthen U.S. reliance and reduce China's influence in the industry to mitigate potential threats.
The bill would ensure that the USDA accurately accounts for U.S. dependence on China for critical agricultural inputs and guarantee access for American producers.
"China has intentionally captured a significant market share of America's agricultural inputs — which is vital to our food supply chain — ceding leverage to our top adversary," Hinson told Fox News Digital Tuesday. "Iowa farmers have told me firsthand that if China decides to shut off U.S. access to these critical inputs, our food production would be in jeopardy. I'm proud to reintroduce this bipartisan bill that exposes and counters China's grip on agricultural inputs to strengthen domestic manufacturing and food security."
Hinson added: "Plain and simple: We should bring our agriculture supply chain home."
And Ricketts told Fox News Digital Tuesday that "Communist China's strategic control over crucial sectors of our food and agricultural supply chains poses a serious national security threat."
"Losing access to key inputs could reduce productivity, increase food prices and undermine food security," Ricketts told Fox News Digital. "My bill will bolster and protect these supply chains and reduce our reliance on foreign adversaries."
The bill is also supported by House China Committee Ranking Member Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., who said the bipartisan bill is "a critical step forward in protecting our nation's food supply and farmers from foreign adversaries, including the Chinese Communist Party, who threaten our agricultural security."
"America's farmers are the backbone of our economy, and we must ensure they have the resources and safeguards needed to compete on a level playing field while securing our nation's agricultural supply chains," Krishnamoorthi told Fox News Digital.
The bill is also supported by House China Committee Chairman John Moolenaar, R-Mich.; Rep, Jill Tokuda, D-Hawaii; Rep. Sharice Davids, D-Kansas; and Rep. Scott Franklin, R-Fla., among others.
In the Senate, Democrat Sen. Elissa Slotkin; Republican Sens. James Risch, R-Idaho; Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.V.; Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.; Mike Crapo, R-Idaho; Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo.; Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb.; and Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., also support the bill.
Slotkin told Fox News Digital that "food security is national security."
"We need to treat threats to our food supply chain just like any other security risk," Slotkin said. "This legislation requires us to assess those risks so we can protect our food supply. Bottom line: We need to make sure America's agriculture supply chain is secure and stays right here at home."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
27 minutes ago
- USA Today
Minnesota shootings victims John, Yvette Hoffman say they are 'lucky to be alive'
Minnesota shootings victims John, Yvette Hoffman say they are 'lucky to be alive' Show Caption Hide Caption Authorities arrest suspected Minnesota lawmakers shooter Police caught Vance Luther Boelter, the man accused of killing Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband and wounding a state senator and his wife. Days after a gunman shot two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses in what Gov. Tim Walz called "politically motivated" attacks, the surviving victims have shared an update on their recovery. Authorities arrested Vance Luther Boelter, 57, on June 15 for allegedly killing State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, and wounding State Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette. Both lawmakers and their spouses were shot at their respective homes in separate incidents on June 14, authorities said. Boelter posed as a law enforcement officer to gain access to the victims' homes, police said. Boelter was apprehended in Sibley County, about 50 miles away from Minneapolis, after a two-day manhunt authorities called the largest in the state's history. He was charged with two counts of second-degree murder and two counts of second-degree attempted murder, according to a criminal complaint filed in Hennepin County reviewed by USA TODAY. Here's what we know about the victims in the shootings. Live updates Minnesota assassination suspect charged in attack on lawmakers Sen. John Hoffman and his wife are recovering from multiple gunshot wounds: 'Lucky to be alive' In a social media post around 7 p.m. EST on June 15, United States Sen. Amy Klobuchar, of Minnesota, shared an update from Yvette Hoffman on her and her husband's recovery. Yvette Hoffman said in the statement that she was shot eight times, while her husband suffered nine gunshot wounds. "We are both incredibly lucky to be alive," Yvette Hoffman said. Yvette Hoffman added that the family is "humbled by the love and outpouring" they have received, but added that they are "gutted and devastated" by the deaths of Melissa and Mark Hortman. "We have no words," she said. "There is never a place for this kind of political hate." She added that John Hoffman was "enduring many surgeries" and is "closer every hour to being out of the woods." During a press conference hours later, Walz said Sen. Hoffman "came out of his final surgery and is moving towards recovery." After Boelter's arrest, Yvette Hoffman said in a statement to The Minnesota Star Tribune that she and her husband 'hold a deep and profound gratitude" for the efforts of law enforcement officials. Who is Sen. John Hoffman? Minnesota Sen. John Hoffman is serving his fourth term in the state's House of Representatives. He was first elected in 2012 and won reelection bids in 2016, 2020 and 2022. The 60-year-old Democrat is originally from Casper, Wyoming. He earned a bachelor's degree in sociology from Saint Mary's University of Minnesota in 1988, according to his LinkedIn. Before his political career, Hoffman worked in business and education, according to his campaign website. He was first elected to office in 2005 as vice chair of the Anoka Hennepin School Board, the largest school district in Minnesota. Hoffman and his wife Yvette share a daughter, Hope. Who was Rep. Melissa Hortman? Minnesota Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were fatally shot on June 14 by Boelter, authorities said. Before her death, Hortman was serving her 11th term in the state's House of Representatives. The 55-year-old Democrat was also an attorney, having earned her juris doctorate degree from the University of Minnesota. She also earned a bachelor's degree in political science and philosophy from Boston University and a master's degree in public administration from Harvard University, according to her House bio. She and her husband had two children together. Contributing: Christopher Cann, USA TODAY Melina Khan is a national trending reporter for USA TODAY. She can be reached at


Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Greg Abbott To Sign Texas Property Tax Bill: What To Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Texas Governor Greg Abbott is expected to sign new legislation offering property tax relief to homeowners in the state struggling with rising bills, on Monday. If endorsed by voters in November, the measures pushed forward by the GOP-led Texas legislature would significantly lower the cost of homeownership for millions of Lone Star State residents, including seniors and disabled owners, at a cost of over $3 billion. It would also dramatically slash revenues for local governments funding crucial public services, which the state would have to make up for. Why Do Texas Lawmakers And Abbott Want To Cut Property Taxes? While the Lone Star State is known for its relatively low tax environment, homeowners actually pay some of the highest property taxes in the country. These are levied by local governments and used for funding schools, streets, roads, police and fire protection. The governing body of each of these local governments sets its own tax rate based on a property's appraised value. But property taxes all across the U.S. have surged in step with home values since the pandemic, when historically low mortgage rates sparked a homebuying frenzy which had its epicenter in some of the country's most affordable states, including Texas. Between 2019 and 2023 alone, median property taxes in the Lone Star State rose by 26 percent, according to data by Cotality, formerly CoreLogic. Gov. Greg Abbott speaks during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025, in Austin, Texas. Gov. Greg Abbott speaks during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025, in Austin, of 2025, Texas homeowners are paying the seventh-highest property taxes in the nation, according to SmartAsset, at an effective rate of 1.63 percent. That is a lot higher than the national average, which stands at 0.90 percent, with the typical Texas homeowner paying $3,872 annually in property taxes. Abbott has long been trying to lower the property tax burden on Texas homeowners, signing in 2023 what was then the largest property tax cut in the state's history at $18 billion. But that intervention barely helped the many homeowners struggling with rising bills, and the Republican governor called for lowering property taxes as a priority during this year's legislative session. What Is In The New Package Of Property Tax Cuts? The package of property tax cuts that Abbott is expected to sign on Monday at the Robson Ranch clubhouse in Denton includes two bills recently passed by the Texas House and Senate that would back two constitutional amendments. One bill, SB 4, would raise the existing homestead exemption from $100,000 to $140,000 for all homeowners, while the other, SB 23, would raise it to $200,000 for those with disabilities or those aged 65 and above. "You've always heard that mantra, 'I don't want to rent my home—after it's paid for — from my school district,' " Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said after the two bills passed the Texas legislature. "Well, seniors, to the average senior out there, you're never going to have to do that again." SB includes a provision guaranteeing school districts would not lose funding due to the lower property taxes, trying to answer criticism that the cuts would harm public services. It would be up to the state to raise the difference—which is estimated at $3.5 billion. What Happens After Abbott Signs The Legislation? In order to implement the constitutional amendments approved by the legislation, voters would have to back the homestead exemption hikes in November. Texas Senator Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, who introduced the legislation, will be attending the signing ceremony on Monday. He said that he hopes there will be a "record turnout by the public" to get these tax cuts "enshrined" in the Texas constitution. Newsweek contacted Abbott's office and Bettencourt's office for comment by email on Monday morning.


Hamilton Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Wisconsin dairy farmer sues Trump administration claiming discrimination against white farmers
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin dairy farmer alleged in a federal lawsuit filed Monday that the Trump administration is illegally denying financial assistance to white farmers by continuing programs that favor minorities. The conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture in federal court in Wisconsin on behalf of a white dairy farmer, Adam Faust. Faust was among several farmers who successfully sued the Biden administration in 2021 for race discrimination in the USDA's Farmer Loan Forgiveness Plan. The new lawsuit alleges the government has continued to implement diversity, equity and inclusion programs that were instituted under former President Joe Biden. The Wisconsin Institute wrote to the USDA in April warning of legal action, and six Republican Wisconsin congressmen called on the USDA to investigate and end the programs. 'The USDA should honor the President's promise to the American people to end racial discrimination in the federal government,' Faust said in a written statement. 'After being ignored by a federal agency that's meant to support agriculture, I hope my lawsuit brings answers, accountability, and results from USDA.' Trump administration spokesperson Anna Kelly did not immediately respond to an email Monday seeking comment. The lawsuit contends that Faust is one of 2 million white male American farmers who are subject to discriminatory race-based policies at the USDA. The lawsuit names three USDA programs and policies it says put white men at a disadvantage and violate the Constitution's guarantee of equal treatment by discriminating based on race and sex. Faust participates in one program designed to offset the gap between milk prices and the cost of feed, but the lawsuit alleges he is charged a $100 administrative fee that minority and female farmers do not have to pay. Faust also participates in a USDA program that guarantees 90% of the value of loans to white farmers, but 95% to women and racial minorities. That puts Faust at a disadvantage, the lawsuit alleges. Faust has also begun work on a new manure storage system that could qualify for reimbursement under a USDA environmental conservation program, but 75% of his costs are eligible while 90% of the costs of minority farmers qualify, the lawsuit contends. A federal court judge ruled in a similar 2021 case that granting loan forgiveness only to 'socially disadvantaged farmers' amounts to unconstitutional race discrimination. The Biden administration suspended the program and Congress repealed it in 2022. The Wisconsin Institute has filed dozens of such lawsuits in 25 states attacking DEI programs in government. In its April letter to the USDA, the law firm that has a long history of representing Republicans said it didn't want to sue 'but there is no excuse for this continued discrimination.' Trump has been aggressive in trying to end the government's DEI efforts to fulfill a campaign promise and bring about a profound cultural shift across the U.S. from promoting diversity to an exclusive focus on merit. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .