
RFK Jr. Attacks Pediatricians for Daring to Recommend Covid-19 Vaccines for Kids
In an X post Tuesday afternoon, the health secretary and longtime anti-vaxxer accused the AAP of bowing to corporate pressure in making the recommendations. He also claimed that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recent decision to oppose pediatric covid-19 shots represented a return to 'gold-standard science.' The AAP, by contrast, has maintained that covid-19 remains a serious health threat to children, particularly younger kids.
In May, RFK Jr. announced that the CDC would remove its recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women to receive the covid-19 vaccine, including annual booster shots. Though Kennedy was flanked by NIH director Jay Bhattacharya and FDA chief Marty Makary, the announcement featured no actual CDC staff. Several days later, the CDC officially updated its language to state that these groups may get these vaccines in consultation with their doctors (the previous guidance said they should).
RFK Jr.'s Baseless Purge of CDC Vaccine Panel Alarms Public Health Experts
Some countries have started to ease off their covid-19 vaccine recommendations for children. And the CDC's vaccine advisory panel (outside experts who guide vaccine policy in the U.S.) was set to discuss their recommendations for the fall vaccination schedule in June, which would have included the covid-19 shots. Kennedy rushed ahead of the panel, however, and he provided no evidence at the time to justify the change. The next month, he unilaterally removed all members of the advisory panel and replaced them with members more supportive of his anti-vaccination views.
On Tuesday morning, the AAP issued its own vaccine guidance, which, for the first time in 30 years, differs significantly from the CDC's stance.
The AAP strongly recommends that all children ages 6 through 23 months old receive at least one covid-19 shot, citing their generally higher risk of having a severe infection. Older children are also recommended to get vaccinated if they fall into certain groups, including children at higher risk of severe covid-19 (such as those with weaker immune systems), children who have never been vaccinated at all, and children living with other people at high risk of severe covid-19.
The AAP also took another swipe at HHS for its recent decision to recommend against vaccines containing thimerosal, a preservative that anti-vaxxers have long alleged causes autism despite many studies finding otherwise. It continued to endorse the small minority of vaccines made with the ingredient and recommended against delaying this year's flu shots to remove these products from the market.
'We extensively reviewed the most recently available data about covid-19 risks in kids, as well as safety and effectiveness of available COVID-19 vaccines. It's clear they are very safe for all populations,' said Sean O'Leary, chair of the AAP's Committee on Infectious Diseases, in a statement from the AAP. 'Among the reasons we decided to move to a risk-based recommendation for healthy older children is the fact that the hospitalization rate for young children and children with underlying medical conditions remains high, in line with rates for many of the other vaccine-preventable diseases for which we vaccinate.'
Kennedy, however, alleged in his X post that the AAP's decision was possibly a part of a 'pay-to-play scheme to promote commercial ambitions of AAP's Big Pharma benefactors.' And he called for the AAP to disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
For starters, the AAP does disclose its funders, some of which do include vaccine manufacturers like Pfizer. These funders don't change the reality that while covid-19 is generally less dangerous to children than older adults, it isn't harmless. Covid-19 has sickened children, sometimes severely, and in rare cases, has even been fatal. Meanwhile, reams of scientific data have consistently shown that covid-19 vaccines greatly reduce the risk of severe illness.
RFK Jr. Made a Million Dollars From His Anti-Vax Work He Previously Claimed Was 'Unpaid'
Kennedy is also hardly one to talk about financial conflicts of interest, given that he has greatly profited from crusading against vaccine makers. And in fact, many of RFK's ideological allies and anti-vaccination proponents promote their own, often unregulated, health products and alternative treatments.
In the battle between the AAP and the revamped HHS under RFK. Jr, I'd much rather back the side that doesn't demonize vaccines every chance it gets.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
a minute ago
- Newsweek
Green Card Applicants Face New Vetting Procedures: What to Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On Tuesday the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a major update on assessment of immigrant benefit applications, including those for Green Cards, which will now encompass "anti-Americanism" expressed on social media. Newsweek contacted the USCIS, part of the Department of Homeland Security, for comment on Thursday via email outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Since coming to power, the Trump administration has tightened restrictions on travel to the United States, including requiring prospective international students to provide details about their social media accounts which will be checked for "any indication of hostility" toward American "citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles." As of April 14, data from Inside Higher Ed showed more than1,000 international students had their visas revoked due to alleged involvement in political activism, including relating to the ongoing war in Gaza. The Trump administration accused some of these students of holding antisemitic or "pro-terrorist" views, which they have widely denied. What To Know The USCIS updated its Policy Manual on Tuesday, with immediate effect, instructing its employees to take account of any "anti-American activity" when deciding whether to approve immigration applications including for permanent resident cards, commonly known as green cards. According to a press release any "anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis" of applications. It is unclear exactly what would constitute "anti-American activity," though CBS News reports it will be based around an existing immigration law blocking citizenship from advocates of communism, totalitarianism or the overthrow of the American government. The updated USCIS Policy Manual says its officers should factor in "whether the alien has endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused anti-American views or the views of a terrorist organization or group" when making decisions on benefits such as green cards. This process has been expanded to include vetting of social media accounts. A U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) sign is displayed at the Border Field State Park with the US-Mexico border wall in the background on August 17, 2025 in Imperial Beach, California. A U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) sign is displayed at the Border Field State Park with the US-Mexico border wall in the background on August 17, 2025 in Imperial Beach, California. Kevin Carter/GETTY The policy change impacts those immigration benefits classed as discretionary, which includes work permits and student visas as well as green cards. When considering discretionary immigration benefits the USCIS already had compliance with immigration law as a factor, and this will continue. Earlier this month the USCIS said it would expand vetting for migrants seeking American citizenship to focus on assuring they have a "good moral character." Previously this had largely been dependent on the absence of criminal offenses or immigration law violations, but this will now include the applicants "adherence to societal norms" and "positive contributions" to wider society. What People Are Saying USCIS spokesman Matthew Tragesser said: "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible. "Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right." What Happens Next? The changes outlined by the USCIS went into effect immediately and apply to "requests pending or filed on or after the publication date."


Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Senate contest emerges as Democrats' pick-up target
Republican National Committee Chair Michael Whatley on the Texas House passing a controversial new congressional map and his U.S. Senate race Democrats are eyeing as a pick-up opportunity.


CNN
a minute ago
- CNN
Target's in a brand identity crisis. It's not alone.
Target is in trouble. And while it's easy to get lost in the company's recent (poor) handling of American culture war narratives that cast it as too 'woke' or too willing to cave to online fascists, the root of Target's problems runs deep. Don't get me wrong – the massive consumer boycotts from Black organizers have done damage. And there are probably folks on the far right who think even Target's toned-down, overwhelmingly beige Pride merch this year was still too loud. But its stock is in the gutter, and sales have been falling for two years because of good ol' business fundamentals. It overstocked. It lost the pulse of its customers. It went up against Amazon Prime with… actually, does anyone know what Target's Amazon Prime competitor is called? Plus the boycotts. Plus the joy-less Pride garb. Now, investors have another wrinkle to consider. On Wednesday, Target replaced its CEO of 11 years, Brian Cornell — a shakeup that was widely expected and likely overdue. Taking his place to steer the brand out of its malaise is … Cornell's right-hand man. The brand we petite bourgeoisie once playfully referred to as Tar-zhay has lost its spark. The company reported a decline in sales for a third straight quarter, part of a broader trend of falling or flat sales for two years. Employees have lost confidence in the company's direction. And 2025 has been a particularly rough financially, as Black shoppers organized a boycott over Target's decision to cave to right-wing pressure on diverse hiring goals. Shares fell 10% in early trading. It's not to say the new guy, Michael Fiddelke, is unqualified. He's been at Target since he started as an intern more than 20 years ago, after all. But Wall Street is clearly concerned that Target's leadership is underestimating the severity of the need for a significant change— just as President Trump's tariffs on imported goods threaten the entire retail industry. Appointing a company lifer 'does not necessarily remedy the problems of entrenched groupthink and the inward-looking mindset that have plagued Target for years,' Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData Retail, said in a note to clients Wednesday. In its 2010s heyday, Target became a go-to for consumers who liked a bargain but didn't necessarily like bargain-hunting. The shelves felt well-curated. You'd go to Target because it had one thing you needed and 12 things you didn't know you needed. It was stocked with Millennial cringe long before Gen Z gave us the term Millennial cringe. Target's sales held strong through the pandemic as remote workers set up home offices and stocked up on essentials. Months of lockdown also benefited the store as people began refreshing their spaces because they didn't really have much else to do and they were staring at the same walls all the time. But things began to falter in 2022. Target over-ordered and wound up with a glut of unsold inventory, just as generationally high inflation was making things more expensive. As Covid subsided, consumer spending shifted to experiences. Taylor Swift was on tour and everyone wanted to take a vacation or make up for the bachelorette weekends we'd missed during lockdown. Meanwhile, Target and other retailers began locking up products behind Plexiglass, claiming a scourge of shoplifting was to blame for disappointing profits — a cry that didn't always hold up to scrutiny. Locking up necessities has backfired in almost every way, annoying customers and burdening employees, yet Cornell stood by the decision and claimed on an earnings call that customers were actually grateful for the inconvenience. Cornell's misplaced optimism about locking up shampoo was an early indication Target's management might have lost touch with its customers' lived experience. Perhaps the biggest strategic misstep by Target came in January, when it joined a crush of American companies in dropping its diversity, equity and inclusion goals — a move that landed like a slap in the face to Target's more-progressive and racially diverse customer base. 'When Black people understood that we spend $12 million a day at Target … people begin to have the light bulb go off and say, I can't spend my dollars where I'm not getting dignity,' the Rev. Jamal Bryant, who led a boycott against Target, told CNN on Wednesday. 'We felt like it was a stark betrayal.' The boycott worked. Target's sales and foot traffic have suffered even as rivals like Walmart, Amazon and Costco have thrived. It's not just Target — other companies that have attempted to change the very idea of who they are have suffered the consequences. McDonald's and Pizza Hut are both trying to win customers back as they balk at $18 combo meals (in McD's case) and seek out better deals from rivals (in the Hut's case). Southwest Airlines is practically unrecognizable today as it ditches all the things — like open seating and zero baggage or change fees — that made it distinct from rivals. Another brand in crisis is MSNBC. The news channel said this week it is rebranding itself as MS NOW, or My Source News Opinion World, for reasons beyond grammatical understanding. Target doesn't seem to know whether it can revive its Tar-zhay magic or whether it morphs into something else. 'It's unclear what they represent,' wrote Jamie Meyers, senior analyst at Laffer Tengler Investments, in a note Wednesday. 'They're not an office retailer, a low-budget chain, a dollar store or a direct competitor to Walmart or Amazon.'