
Home Depots across L.A. become battleground in new phase of ICE raids
Construction workers are still hauling lumber and nails, and DIY homeowners pushing carts of paint and soil. But all of a sudden, federal immigration agents may appear.
On Thursday, they moved on a Home Depot parking lot in Monrovia, sending laborers running, including a man who jumped a wall and onto the 210 Freeway, where he was fatally struck. A day prior, fear of a possible raid at a Ladera Ranch location sparked warnings across social media.
Since a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting federal agents from targeting people solely based on their race, language, vocation, or location, the number of arrests in Southern California declined in July.
But over the last two weeks, some higher-profile raids have returned, often taking place at Home Depot locations, where migrant laborers often congregate looking for work.
The number of arrests in these incidents was not immediately known, but the fear that pervades the sweeps underscores how Home Depot has emerged this summer as a key battleground in the fight over immigration enforcement in Los Angeles and Southern California.
'Home Depot, whether they like it or not, they are the epicenter of raids,' said Pablo Alvarado, the co-executive director of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, a group that represents the tens of thousands of day laborers working in L.A.
The renewed burst of raids outside neighborhood Home Depots began Aug. 6, when a man drove a Penske moving truck to a Home Depot in Westlake and began soliciting day laborers when, all of a sudden, Border Patrol agents jumped out of the back of the vehicle and began to chase people down. Sixteen people were arrested.
The raid — branded 'Operation Trojan House' by the Trump administration — was showcased by government officials with footage from an embedded Fox News TV crew. 'For those who thought Immigration enforcement had stopped in Southern California, think again,' acting U.S. Atty. Bill Essayli posted on X.
The next day, federal agents raided a Home Depot in San Bernardino. Then, on Aug. 8, they conducted two raids outside a Home Depot in Van Nuys in what DHS described as a 'targeted immigration raid' that resulted in the arrest of seven undocumented immigrants from Guatemala, Honduras and Mexico.
Over the weekend, activists say, a Home Depot was targeted in Cypress Park and word spread that federal agents were at a Home Depot in Marina del Rey. On Monday, day laborers were nabbed outside a Home Depot in North Hollywood, and on Tuesday more were arrested at a Home Depot in Inglewood.
'And it's not just day laborers they are taking,' Alvarado added, noting that when federal agents descend on the hardware store's parking lots, they question anyone who looks Latino or appears to be an immigrant and ask them about their papers. 'They also get customers of Home Depot who look like day laborers, who speak Spanish.'
The national hardware chain — whose parking lots have for decades been an unofficial gathering point for undocumented laborers hoping to get hired for a day of home repair or construction work — was one of the first sites of the L.A. raids in June that kicked off the Trump administration's intense immigration enforcement across Southern California.
Nearly 3,000 people across seven counties in L.A. were arrested in June as masked federal agents conducted roving patrols, conducting a chaotic series of sweeps of street corners, bus stops, warehouses, farms, car washes and Home Depots. But the number of raids and arrests plummeted dramatically across L.A. in mid-July after the court order blocked federal agents across the region from targeting people unless they had reasonable suspicion they entered the country illegally.
On Aug. 1, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the Trump administration's request to lift the restraining order prohibiting roving raids. But within just a few days, federal agents were back, raiding the Westlake Home Depot.
'Even though we've had two successful court decisions, the administration continues with their unconstitutional behavior coming and going to Home Depot stores,' L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said at a news conference Thursday. 'They are violating the' temporary restraining order.
Advocates for undocumented immigrants question the legality of federal agents' practices. In many cases, they say, agents are failing to show judicial warrants. They argue that the way agents are targeting day laborers and other brown-skinned people is illegal.
'It's clear racial profiling,' said Alvarado.
The Department of Homeland Security did not answer questions from The Times about how many people have been arrested over the last week at Home Depots across L.A. or explain what why the agency has resumed raids outside hardware stores.
After last Friday's raids on Van Nuys, Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said four of the seven individuals arrested had criminal records, including driving under the influence of alcohol, disorderly conduct and failing to adhere to previous removal orders. She dismissed activists' claims that the Trump administration were violating the temporary restraining order.
'What makes someone a target for immigration enforcement is if they are illegally in the U.S. — not their skin color, race, or ethnicity,' McLaughlin said. 'America's brave men and women are removing murderers, MS-13 gang members, pedophiles, rapists — truly the worst of the worst from Golden State communities.'
Activists say that federal agents are targeting Home Depots because they are hubs for a constant flow of day laborers — mostly Latino and a great deal of whom are undocumented.
'They know that at the Home Depot there will always be people who are day laborers, many of them undocumented,' said Ron Gochez, a member of the Unión del Barrio, a group that patrols neighborhoods to alert residents of immigration sweeps. 'And so they figured it would be a much easier, faster and more effective way for them to kidnap people just to go to the Home Depot.'
Another reason the hardware store parking lots had become a focal point, Gochez said, is that they present a wide, open space to hunt people down.
'There's nowhere to run, nowhere to hide,' Gochez said. 'And when some of the day laborers started running inside of the Home Depot stores, the agents literally have chased them down the aisles of the store.'
In Los Angeles, pressure is mounting on Home Depot to speak out against the targeting of people outside their stores.
'They haven't spoken out; their customers are being taken away and they are not saying anything,' Alvarado said. 'They haven't issued a public condemnation of the fact that their customers have been abducted in their premises.'
This is not the first time Home Depot has found itself in the center of a political firestorm.
In 2019, the Atlanta-based company faced boycott campaigns after its co-founder Bernie Marcus, a Republican megadonor, announced his support for Trump's reelection campaign. Back then, the chain tried to distance itself from its founder, noting that Marcus retired from the company in 2002 and did not speak on its behalf.
But in a global city like L.A., where civic and political leaders are rallying against the raids and public schools have developed policies blocking federal agents from entering their premises, there are growing calls for the national hardware chain to develop consistent policies on raids, such as demanding federal agents have judicial warrants before descending on their lots.
On Tuesday, a coalition of advocacy groups led a protest in MacArthur Park and urged Angelenos to support a 24-hour boycott of Home Depot and other businesses that they say have not stopped federal immigration agents from conducting raids in their parking lots or chasing people down in their stores.
'We call them an accomplice to these raids, because there is no other location that's been hit as much as they have,' Gochez said. 'We think that Home Depot is being complicit. They're actually, we think, in some way collaborating, whether directly or not.'
Home Depot denies that it is working with federal agents or has advance notice of federal immigration enforcement activities.
'That's not true,' George Lane, manager of corporate communications for Home Depot, said in an email to The Times. 'We aren't notified that these activities are going to happen, and we aren't involved in the operations. We're required to follow all federal and local rules and regulations in every market where we operate.'
Lane said Home Depot asked associates to report any suspected immigration enforcement operations immediately and not to engage for their own safety.
'If associates feel uncomfortable after witnessing ICE activity,' he added, 'we offer them the flexibility they need to take care of themselves and their families.'
The targeting of day laborers outside L.A. Home Depots is particularly contentious because day laborers, primarily Latino men, have for decades represented an integral part of the Los Angeles labor force.
Since the 1960s, day laborers have formed an informal labor market that has boosted this sprawling city, helping it expand, and in recent months they have played a pivotal role in rebuilding L.A. after the January firestorms tore through Pacific Palisades and Altadena destroying thousands of homes.
'It appears they're targeting and taking the very people rebuilding our cities,' Alvarado said. 'Without migrant labor, both documented and undocumented, it's impossible to try to rebuild Los Angeles.'
In many L.A. neighborhoods, day laborers are such a constant, ingrained presence at Home Depots that the city's Economic and Workforce Development Department sets up its resource centers for day laborers next to the stores.
Day laborers are also a reason many customers come to Home Depot.
'Day laborers are a part of their business model,' Alvarado said. 'You come in, you get your materials, and then you get your helper.'
Alvaro M. Huerta, the Director of Litigation and Advocacy of the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, part of a coalition of groups suing Homeland Security over immigration raids in L.A., said the pick up of raids at Home Depot parking lots was 'deeply troubling' and raised serious concerns that the federal government was continuing to violate the July temporary restraining order.
'This looks a lot like it did before a temporary restraining order was in place,' Huerta said.'My sense is they feel they can justify raids at Home Depots more than roving raids.'
Lawyers, Huerta said, were investigating the raids and asking some of the people taken into custody a series of questions: Did agents ever present a warrant? What kinds of questions did they ask? Did you feel like you were able to leave?
'One of the things we've been arguing is that some of these situations are coercive,' Huerta said. 'The government is saying, 'No, we're allowed to ask questions, and people can volunteer answers.' But we've argued that in many of these cases, people don't feel like they cannot speak.'
Attorneys will likely present information about the arrests to court at a preliminary injunction hearing in September, Huerta said, as they press Trump administration attorneys for evidence that the arrests are targeted.
Huerta said some of the people caught up in recent Home Depot raids were not even looking for work at the parking lot.
One man, a 22-year-old who was getting gas across the street from a Home Dept last Thursday, Huerta said, was detained even though he had special immigrant juvenile status as he was brought to the U.S. as a teen. The man had an asylum application pending, work authorization and no criminal history — and yet a week after he was arrested he was confined in Adelanto Detention Center.
Times staff writer Julia Wick contributed to this article.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Samples before space suits: America must be smart about its mission to Mars
On day one of this administration, the president included his ambitions for Mars in his inaugural address, and again several weeks later to a joint session of Congress: 'We are going to conquer the vast frontiers of science, and we are going to lead humanity into space and plant the American flag on the planet Mars, and even far beyond.' President Trump's vision for Mars is correct, and now there is a plan for the next steps in how he achieves it. The U.S. has led the world in the exploration of Mars since Vikings I and II landed in 1976. We now stand on the precipice of two ultimate achievements: the return of samples from Mars to Earth, and sending the first humans — Americans — to the Martian surface. The fiscal 2026 presidential budget request proposed 'to terminate the Mars Sample Return Program given that current architecture options remain unaffordable.' But, it adds: 'It is anticipated that future missions to Mars will return samples for study on Earth.' We need those samples robotically returned for study on Earth. Delaying Mars Sample Return or waiting for astronauts to pick them up will make the human exploration of Mars significantly more expensive and dangerous — and for the first time ever, almost certainly cede decades of U.S. space exploration leadership to China. A lower-cost robotic Mars Sample Return would more than pay for itself from savings realized by simplified human missions. Martian soil has substances known to be toxic, as well as uncharacterized biological potential. Without Mars Sample Return, human mission designs must account for the full range of possibilities and the most demanding scenarios. Laboratory tests are needed to make direct measurements of the Mars samples to determine concentrations and forms of toxic materials to understand threats and develop solutions. This will be needed to design spacesuits and protect astronauts from the fine martian dust. It allows risk mitigation to shift from large and expensive requirements to quantifiable ones with reduced uncertainties. While no martian life has been detected yet, our exploration has shown that much of Mars would previously have been habitable, and parts of Mars may currently still be habitable. In advance of humans to Mars, we need to robotically return samples in a highly controlled manner to satisfy planetary protection back-contamination requirements to ensure that Mars does not have organisms that might impact human health or have adverse effects on Earth's biosphere. Mars Sample Return will accelerate U.S. leadership in space. Mars is several hundred times farther from Earth than the Moon. Using current propulsion technologies, a Mars round trip will take up to three years, with minimal abort opportunities, as compared to Apollo's round trip of days. Even then, there were three uncrewed and four crewed missions before Apollo 11, the first Moon landing. Completing Mars Sample Return supports technology demos needed for human missions, such as advancing from the current precision landing (7-10 km) to pinpoint landing (~100 m) to put astronauts in proximity to safe sites and pre-positioned supplies. Mars Sample Return also achieves a profound international first: the first samples — with potential for evidence of life — returned from Mars. These samples might once and for all answer the fundamental question of 'Are we alone in the universe,' and that is a question we most certainly want the United States to answer first. Lockheed Martin, my former employer, has been studying Mars Sample Return missions for more than 50 years, and is confident it can deliver an end-to-end architecture for under $3 billion — less than half of previous estimates — by leveraging heritage components, reducing design complexity, and streamlining the program structure. They have built and flown four highly successful Mars landers and four highly successful Mars orbiters, as well as pioneered all three of NASA's previous sample return missions (returning material from a comet, the solar wind and an asteroid), and have established credibility and mission success across a wide variety of additional deep space missions, from Venus to Saturn. NASA's Mars 2020 rover, Perseverance or 'Percy,' at Jezero Crater has been caching an unparalleled set of samples that will shed more light on the history of Mars than all previous Mars missions combined. China has announced it plans to launch a sample return mission to Mars in 2028, with an Earth return likely in 2031. If we forgo the timely return of Percy's superior set of samples, it will be China that leaps ahead. Mars soil and dust are uniquely different, and potentially dangerous — returning samples should precede astronauts going to Mars, while also maintaining our nation's pre-eminence in Mars exploration as NASA lays the groundwork for the next giant leap. Ben Clark has been a member of the science teams of every NASA mission to explore the surface of Mars, and designed the instrument on Viking that made the first analysis of martian soil. He was chief scientist for deep space exploration at Lockheed Martin. Currently, he helps analyze chemical compositions of the diverse samples the Perseverance rover has been acquiring during its multi-year trek on Mars.


Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
European leaders to join Ukraine's Zelensky for White House meeting with Trump
Advertisement 'It's a power struggle and a position of strength that might work with Trump,' he said in a phone interview. The European leaders' presence at Zelenskyy's side, demonstrating Europe's support for Ukraine, could potentially help ease concerns in Kyiv and in other European capitals that Ukraine risks being railroaded into a peace deal that Trump says he wants to broker with Russia. It wasn't immediately clear whether all or just some of them would be taking part in the actual meeting with Trump. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced on X that she will take part in the talks, 'at the request of President Zelenskyy.' The secretary-general of the NATO military alliance, Mark Rutte, will also take part in the meeting, his press service said. Advertisement The office of President Emmanuel Macron announced that the French leader will travel on Monday to Washington 'at the side of President Zelenskyy' although it didn't immediately specify that he'll be in the meeting. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will also be part of the European group, but the statement from his office likewise didn't specify that he will be in the talks with Trump. The grouped trip underscored European leaders' determination to ensure that Europe has a voice in Trump's attempted peace-making, after the U.S. president's summit on Friday with Putin — to which Zelenskyy wasn't invited.


American Military News
27 minutes ago
- American Military News
No Ukraine Cease-Fire For Trump, And A Red-Carpet Welcome For Putin
Vladimir Putin wanted a world stage. Donald Trump wanted a peace deal. The Russian leader got his. The US president did not. At least not yet. The August 15 face-to-face summit between Trump and Putin was shaping up to be one of the most consequential in years: for US-Russian relations, for international security, for the largest land war in Europe since World War II. Confident in his deal-making prowess, Trump wanted to halt Russia's 42-month-old war on Ukraine, which has killed or wounded well over 1 million Russian and Ukrainian soldiers, and thousands of civilians, mainly Ukrainian. Confident of his military's ability to grind down Ukraine, Putin wanted to appear before global TV cameras, on US soil, shaking Trump's hand, free of international isolation, and negotiating as a peer. In the end, there was no deal to halt Russia's bloodletting in Ukraine. There was no deal announced for a new arms control agreement, as Putin had suggested ahead of time, nor new business investments, as Trump had suggested. 'Nothing Good Happened, But Nothing Bad Happened Either' It's possible there are deals in the works, not yet announced. In interviews and remarks afterward, Trump signaled some agreement could be forthcoming in the near future. 'Had there been even a small item to announce, you can bet Trump would have done so,' said Luke Coffey, a Russian analyst and senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, a Washington think tank. 'So the fact that there was nothing even minor [announced]… tells me that the talks truly got nowhere.' 'To look in a positive light, Trump didn't give anything away, at least from what we can know publicly,' Coffey said. 'He admitted from the podium that he's going to be taking time to consult with and update European leaders, including Zelenskyy, and he said that there's no deal until there's a deal.' Early on August 16, hours after the summit, Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy spoke by phone for an hour, along with European leaders. There were 'positive signals' regarding possible US participation in security guarantees for Ukraine, Zelenskyy said. He also said he would travel to Washington on August 18. 'The Kremlin is touting this as a major reset in relations with the United States, given the red-carpet treatment Putin received and the possibility of another summit in Moscow,' said Stephen Flanagan, who twice served on the White House National Security Council. 'Putin's comment that to achieve a 'settlement, lasting and long-term, we need to eliminate all of the primary causes of the conflict,' suggests that Russia retains its hardline position on Ukraine,' he said. 'Putin would like to see a more compliant government in Kyiv and recognition of its territorial conquests.' Going into the summit, Trump had mentioned 'land swaps' as a possibility: recognizing Russia's claim to occupied Ukrainian territory in exchange for a cease-fire or other conditions. Zelenskyy professed that was a red line. Some in Europe, whose role in the Ukraine conflict has frequently been downplayed by the Trump administration, feared another 'Munich' – shorthand for when Western allies acquiesced to Hitler in 1938. Or another 'Yalta,' when Soviet leader Josef Stalin, US President Franklin Roosevelt, and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill divided up post-WWII Europe. No land swaps were announced. Neither were any new punitive US sanctions on Russia announced, something Trump had threatened. 'Nothing good happened, but nothing bad happened either,' William Taylor, a former US ambassador to Ukraine, told the BBC. 'There was no Munich, and there was no Yalta, where Ukraine would have been sold.' 'The Welcome, The Red Carpet, The Handshakes' 'For Kyiv, it could obviously be worse,' said Stefan Meister, director of the Center for Order and Governance in Eastern Europe, Russia and Central Asia, at the German Council on Foreign Relations. 'Maybe they agreed on something. But if they had, it would have been announced,' he said. 'Trump is not ready to be the bad guy and force a terrible deal down the Ukrainians' throats,' said Eric Ciaramella, a former White House National Security Council adviser, now a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'Nor is Putin willing to make any major compromises merely to give Trump a win.' Since launching the all-out invasion in February 2022, Putin has been deemed a pariah in the West, and in other places around the world, isolated, under US sanctions and under threat of an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court. Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, refused to meet with him. The 'optics' of the summit – on US soil, red-carpet welcome, personal greeting by the US president – were a victory in itself for the Kremlin. 'Putin certainly got what he wanted out of this meeting,' said Mikhail Alexseev, a political scientist at San Diego State University and expert on Ukraine's governance. 'He got the welcome, the red carpet. He got the handshakes. He even got applause from Trump when he walked from the airplane. In essence, it normalizes his position as [a] world leader.' Senior International Correspondent Mike Eckel reported from Prague; North American correspondent Todd Prince reported from Washington.