Full Speed Ahead For Fast-Track Projects
The Fast-track Approvals Act contains a list of 149 projects which, from 7 February, have been able to apply to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for consideration by an expert panel.
Minister for Infrastructure
Minister for RMA Reform
Hon Shane Jones
Minister for Regional Development
Today marks four months since the Fast-track Approvals Act opened for project applications.
The projects which have applied for Fast-track approvals could contribute 12,208 new homes and 1,136 new retirement units, if approved.
On Friday, 6 June, associate panel convener Helen Atkins appointed the fourth expert panel to oversee the Milldale project.
It's been four months since the Fast-track Approvals system opened for business and the statistics show strong progress toward making it quicker and easier to build the projects New Zealand needs for economic growth, RMA Reform and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop and Regional Development Minister Shane Jones say.
'The Fast-track Approvals Act, part of the coalition agreement between National and NZ First, was signed into law just before Christmas and opened for project applications on 7 February this year. The Act helps cut through the tangle of red and green tape and the jumble of approvals processes that has, until now, held New Zealand back from much-needed economic growth,' Mr Bishop says.
'The Fast-track Approvals Act contains a list of 149 projects which, from 7 February, have been able to apply to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) for consideration by an expert panel. The expert panels consider each application, decide whether or not each project receives approval, and attach any necessary conditions to those approvals.
'In the four months since the Fast-track one-stop shop approvals regime officially opened for project applications, we've seen good progress on a range of applications for projects that, if approved, will grow New Zealand's economy and sort out our infrastructure deficit, housing crisis, and energy shortage, instead of tying essential projects up in knots for years at a time.
'As of this week, 15 substantive applications for listed projects have been lodged and found complete and within scope by the EPA. Of these, twelve applications have no competing applications or existing resource consents; two applications are undergoing checks for competing applications or existing resource consents; and one application was found to have an existing resource consent and can therefore not proceed any further through Fast-track.
'Eight of the 12 complete applications that are complete, within scope and with no competing applications or existing resource consents are being considered by the panel convenor who will soon establish expert panels for each project.
'Three are currently before expert panels for consideration, with a fourth expert panel being appointed on 6 June. These four projects are Delmore (residential subdivision and roading interchange in Orewa), (Maitahi Village (residential development including commercial centre and a retirement village in Nelson), Bledisloe North Wharf and Fergusson North Berth Extension (new and extended wharf facilities at Port of Auckland), Milldale (earthworks and site work for approximately 1,100 residential allotments).
'The first expert panels' final decisions are expected in mid-September this year.
'Projects not listed in the Act can also apply for referral to an expert panel through the same Fast-track website. Their applications go first to me as Infrastructure Minister for consideration, which includes inviting written comments from the Minister for the Environment and any other Ministers with relevant portfolios, before the deciding whether to refer the project for Fast-track.
'To date I have referred three projects to the Fast-track process, meaning they can now submit substantive applications to the EPA. These three projects are the Ayrburn Screen Hub (a film and television production facility) in Otago; Ashbourne (a development of 530 homes and 250 retirement units) in Waikato; and the Grampians Solar Project (a solar farm expected to generate 300 megawatts) in Canterbury.'
'As well as delivering a strong pipeline of projects into the future, Fast-track is well on track to deliver a much boost to the economy now, with up to 17 projects whose applications are underway expected to commence this year, if approved. This will be welcome news for the construction sector,' Mr Jones says.
'The projects that have applied for Fast-track approvals to date would contribute an additional 12,208 new homes across the Auckland, Nelson and Otago regions, and an additional 1,136 new retirement units in Auckland and Nelson.'
Notes:
In Fast-track's first four months there have been:
Referral Applications
· 3 projects referred by the Minister for Infrastructure – (can now apply for a substantive application):
Ashbourne
Ayrburn Screen Hub
Grampians Solar Project
Substantive Applications
15 substantive applications found to be complete, of those:
1 application found to have an existing resource consent – can no longer proceed
2 applications currently undergoing checks for competing applications / existing resource consents
12 projects found to be complete without competing applications or existing resource consents (all those that have gone to the Panel Convener prior to expert panel)
With EPA for completeness, competing applications or existing resource consent checks:
Kings Quarry
Rangitoopuni
12 applications have gone to the Panel Convener, of those:
8 are with the panel convener to establish an expert panel
4 projects currently before expert panels, or have an expert panel appointed (have gone from the panel convener to the expert panel)
With Panel Convener:
Taranaki VTM
Ryans Road
Stella Passage
Tekapo Power Scheme
Waihi North
Drury
Sunfield
Drury Quarry
Expert Panels appointed for:
Delmore
Maitahi
Bledisloe
Milldale
Content Sourced from scoop.co.nz
Original url
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
2 hours ago
- Newsroom
Why planned voting changes could be a civic rights breach
Opinion: You might recall that in the 2023 election, National and Act 'lost' two seats once the special votes were counted post-election day. In other words, the special votes weighed against them. This meant that they could not form a government without NZ First. Fast-forward to July 2025. National, Act and NZ First have just passed the first reading on the Electoral Amendment Bill, a bill that will almost certainly reduce the number of special votes. Is this bill an apolitical, justified limitation on the holy grail of democratic rights – the right to vote? Or is it a power-abusing, rights-breaching, Trump-esque attempt to rig voting in their favour? Let's look at this a bit more closely. One proposed amendment is that people must enrol to vote 13 days prior to election day. If they don't, they cannot cast a valid vote. Under current law, people can enrol up to and on election day. Votes from people enrolled after 'writ day' – approximately two months before the election in 2023 – and election day are so-called special votes (together with, for example, votes cast overseas). In other words, votes from people who enrol in the 12-day period leading up to the election are special votes. In 2023, 110,000 voters registered on election day and, of the 600,000 special votes cast, 97,000 people enrolled for the first time during the voting period. These votes would be discarded under the proposed law change. Unsurprisingly, then, the Attorney-General – the Government's highest legal officer, and senior National Party member, Judith Collins – found in her report that there was a real possibility a large number of people would be caught by this new rule and, as a result, their votes wouldn't be tallied. She also noted that the highest courts of the land – here and overseas, especially Australia – have stressed 'the fundamentality of the right to vote as lying at the heart of the democratic system'. The coalition argues we need to restrict who gets to vote to avoid delays in post-election count and the formation of a new government. There just isn't the evidence to prove that this amendment is necessary to expedite a verified election result. And as Collins writes, 'While acknowledging the public importance of promoting timeliness in the counting of votes … there may be alternative measures for addressing delays in the processing of votes, which are less restrictive of the right to vote, and could therefore possibly be justified.' It is not even clear that restriction would remedy delays in counting. Those not enrolled before the cut-off can still apply for and cast a special vote. These special votes must still be processed after the election but won't be included in the ultimate vote count. Anyway, any detriment associated with any delay is – to me at least – relatively small because we have a longstanding plan b in place, in the form of caretaker governments to ensure the country keeps running while votes are tallied, checked and verified. Collins also recognises that the restriction on voting registration will effectively discriminate against Māori, Pasifika, Asian and youth voters, who are currently more likely to enrol in the 12 days ahead of the election. 'The Electoral Commission has data that indicates that special votes are more likely to come from areas with larger Māori, Asian and Pasifika communities, and that younger people are more likely to cast special votes. This may indicate that these communities will be more affected by the proposed registration deadline.' The Government had Collins' report before it passed the bill in Parliament but chose to ignore the Attorney-General's recommendations. Let's now consider the bill in the light of the current political context. At least one political poll has the National Party heading towards one term in power and it's likely that the next election will be tight. Just like in 2023, every vote could tip the balance one way or the other. Now balance the long-standing trend that special votes favour the left. As leading election law professor Andrew Geddis notes, 'Restricting same-day enrolment and voting can … be predicted to reduce the number of votes cast by groups that support left-of-centre parties.' This Government has enacted some of the most regressive laws breaching the rights of Indigenous peoples we have seen in decades. In a constitution such as ours, there are few legal barriers to it doing so. This bill is likely to disproportionately affect Māori and their right to vote, thereby making it more difficult to defend their rights. The Act Party has promoted its role as the defender of democracy and the right of one person, one vote. Leader David Seymour said in 2023 that, 'Yes, it's pretty frustrating that it's taken so long to count the votes, but let's not lose sight of the real goal here which is free and fair elections that are above any kind of suspicion. That's absolutely key no matter what the result is.' Given there is no convincing justification for the bill, as assessed by Collins, the reasoning behind it looks suspicious. It has the whiff of a calculated move by National, Act and NZ First to weigh the next election in their favour, in a way that is reminiscent of Donald Trump's advocacy for redistricting of congressional boundaries in Texas to favour the Republican Party. If that is the case, and you be the judge, then this could be a substantial breach of one of the most important of our civic rights and democratic process.
Scoop
20 hours ago
- Scoop
Hipkins Needs Ideas That Don't Make Kiwis Poorer
ACT Leader David Seymour is urging Chris Hipkins to bring serious ideas to today's Labour retreat – because so far, Labour's only policies would make New Zealanders worse off. 'Chris Hipkins, the recidivist country-destroyer, has retreated to his lair, presumably to stockpile fresh petrol for the economic fire he was stoking just 18 months ago,' says Seymour. 'He moans about the people leaving New Zealand, even while proposing to tax the ones who stay harder – and ban the industries that could bring Kiwis back – just as the economy is turning the corner. 'Yesterday, Treasury confirmed what ACT said at the time: Labour ignored clear advice not to 'stimulate' the post-COVID economy with reckless spending. Grant Robertson did it anyway, ramping up the spending machine, flooding the economy with cheap money that pushed up debt, then inflation, then interest rates, and now unemployment. 'It was economic vandalism on an historic scale. Now, as we hose down the smouldering ashes of Labour's inferno, Hipkins cries 'austerity' – like an arsonist returning to the scene of the crime, asking for the matches back. 'Labour is a party out of ideas – and the vacuum will be filled by the Greens and Te Pāti Māori. That circus would plunge us into third world conditions: higher debt, crippling taxes, more division, and fewer reasons to build a life in New Zealand.'
The Spinoff
2 days ago
- The Spinoff
Cheaper petrol on its way under new system – but will drivers end up paying more?
While Chris Bishop calls it the biggest change to road funding in 50 years, details on how the new system will work remain scarce for now, writes Catherine McGregor in today's extract from The Bulletin. Major shift from fuel tax to pay-per-km The government has announced it will scrap fuel excise duty and move all vehicles to a system of road user charges (RUCs), in what transport minister Chris Bishop called 'the biggest change to how we fund our roading network in 50 years'. He said the surge in fuel-efficient, hybrid and full electric vehicles had eroded the longstanding connection between petrol consumption and kilometres driven. Under the new system, charges would be based on distance travelled, vehicle type, time and location. The timeline is still vague: Bishop expects legislation to pass in 2026, with the system 'open for business' by 2027. But a full transition date for light vehicles remains deliberately unannounced, with Bishop explaining the government is 'focused on getting the system right rather than rushing its rollout', reports the Herald's Jamie Ensor. Privatised and digitised Alongside the policy shift comes a sweeping modernisation of the road charging system. Gone will be the paper labels stuck to windscreens, replaced by a fully digital e-RUC system. The NZTA's dual role as both regulator and RUC retailer will be split, with private firms taking over the collection and administration of charges. The idea is that this will drive innovation and reduce compliance costs by allowing the market to offer high-tech solutions, such as integrations with in-car computers. 'Instead of expanding a clunky government system, we will reform the rules to allow the market to deliver innovative, user-friendly services for drivers,' Bishop said. Flexible payment options like monthly billing and post-pay models are being considered, and RUCs could be bundled with tolls and congestion charges in a single bill. As Luke Malpass writes this morning in The Post (paywalled), the new system is being designed with one eye firmly on a future where our most expensive roads are funded with tolls, and ease of payment will be key to getting people to use them. 'Roads have to be paid for somehow,' he notes. A pattern of reform The transport minister's announcement came as a surprise to many, but the move had been clearly signalled for years. National ran on eliminating fuel taxes and the policy was part of the National-Act coalition agreement. Last year the government scrapped the Auckland regional fuel tax and oversaw the imposition of RUCs on electric vehicles, ending a long-standing exemption. These earlier moves laid the groundwork for yesterday's grand shift. As the number of petrol hybrids on the roads climbs – from 12,000 in 2015 to 350,000 today – there's a growing mismatch between fuel tax contributions and actual road usage, Bishop said, adding that lower-income drivers of older cars are effectively subsidising wealthier owners of hybrids and EVs. The missing details While the move has been widely framed as a step toward fairness and future-proofing, many of the key details remain unresolved, writes Stuff's Michael Daly. One key question: how much drivers will pay. Bishop gave no indication as to how much the government is planning to charge different vehicle types under the new system. Currently, light diesel vehicles pay $76 per 1000km, but that figure may not translate directly to petrol vehicles. Owners of small, fuel-efficient cars could be forgiven for worrying they'll end up paying more under a RUC system, regardless of the weight class tiers. There are also concerns about the cost of privatising tax collection. 'The only people who will see any benefit from this scheme are the corporates who take their cut to gather the tax,' said Fleur Fitzsimons of the Public Service Association, whose members include NZTA employees. As the legislation progresses and the 2027 rollout approaches, the government will need to spell out what motorists are actually signing up for – and how much they'll be paying.
